Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #153735
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? |
| Date | 2026-04-28 20:22 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ofa7cmx6st.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink) |
| References | <10sq9po$3578e$1@dont-email.me> <1jo4zbdol08pg$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> |
On 2026-04-28 15:54, VanguardLH wrote: > "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> wrote: > >> I've just disabled my phones caller-ID (using instructions found on >> the web), but would like to know if its possible to switch it on *for >> the current call only*. >> >> In my country I can /disable/ the caller-ID for the current call only >> by prefixing the phone number with #31#, but could not find if it >> would perhaps act in the reverse when the caller-ID is already >> disabled... >> >> Or better yet, is there a similar-but-different prefix (#30# or >> alike) which will re-enable the caller-ID for the current call (so I >> can prefix the phone-numbers in my list of contacts with them - and >> not have to remove them when I re-enable the caller-ID again.) ? > > <Side issue of being anonymous> > You'll get your anonymous calls often if not usually blocked. When > Caller-ID is disabled (for your outbound calls), you are seen as > Anonymous. If a recipient blocks Anonymous callers, you won't get > through. Anonymous callers can be blocked, or immediately redirected to > voicemail. In either case the recipient's phone will not ring when you > call them. > </Side issue> Absolutely. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-28 14:39 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-04-28 08:54 -0500
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-28 20:22 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-28 21:30 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-04-28 19:09 -0500
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-29 09:53 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-04-29 06:14 -0500
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-29 14:54 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-29 19:46 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-29 21:39 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? David Oseas <doseas{nospam}@usa.net> - 2026-04-28 09:55 -0700
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-04-28 13:21 -0600
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-28 21:14 +0200
csiph-web