Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.mobile.android > #153753

Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ?

Show all headers | View raw

Vanguard,

>> I already mentioned that my country uses #31# for that.  Do you
>> really think that your countries codes will be in any way usefull
>> to me ?
>
> Unidentified telco or cellular provider.

Not relevant in my nick of the woods.  Our telcos' don't get to choose their 
own user-centric phone codes.

> Unidentified country.

Not relevant.  I've provided you with the format my country uses, and an 
eventually existing "temporarily re-enable caller-id" code will be in that 
same format.

> Oh, this information is supposed to somehow get divined
> by your respondents?

:-) For some reason you are rather good at ignoring information that has 
already been provided.  Why is that ?

> I showed what I found for one provider.  In keeping everything
> secret,

:-)  See the above.  None of what you asked for is relevant to my question. 
And no, not even my country.

If you think otherwise than show me some user-centric phone codes in the 
same format as #31#, but with a different meaning for different countries.

> now it's your turn to investigate, or just call them to get the codes.

Well, for me investigating myself *before* posting a question is pretty-much 
a given.  I did not find anything relevant.


And you missed a big part of my initial post (something I specifically named 
in a following post) : I mentioned that I disabled caller-id *using the 
configuration of the phone*.   I have no idea if such phone codes can 
override that setting.

... something you have not even considered.

> No more responses from me

You say that as if its some kind of punishment. :-)


To say it again : you ask for information you don't actually need, while 
ignoring the information you already got.  Thats not a good combination.

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-28 14:39 +0200
  Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-04-28 08:54 -0500
    Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-28 20:22 +0200
    Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-28 21:30 +0200
      Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-04-28 19:09 -0500
        Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-29 09:53 +0200
          Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-04-29 06:14 -0500
            Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-29 14:54 +0200
              Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-29 19:46 +0200
                Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-29 21:39 +0200
  Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? David Oseas <doseas{nospam}@usa.net> - 2026-04-28 09:55 -0700
    Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-04-28 13:21 -0600
    Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-28 21:14 +0200

csiph-web