Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #153734
| From | David Oseas <doseas{nospam}@usa.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? |
| Date | 2026-04-28 09:55 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10sqopb$3a2bk$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <10sq9po$3578e$1@dont-email.me> |
On 4/28/2026 5:39 AM, R.Wieser wrote: > Hello all, > > I've just disabled my phones caller-ID (using instructions found on the > web), but would like to know if its possible to switch it on *for the > current call only*. > > In my country I can /disable/ the caller-ID for the current call only by > prefixing the phone number with #31#, but could not find if it would perhaps > act in the reverse when the caller-ID is already disabled... > > Or better yet, is there a similar-but-different prefix (#30# or alike) which > will re-enable the caller-ID for the current call (so I can prefix the > phone-numbers in my list of contacts with them - and not have to remove them > when I re-enable the caller-ID again.) ? > > Does anyone have some experience with the above and can tell ? > In North America: for current call, *82 enables Caller ID whereas *85 disables (doesn't show) it. Both perform their function regardless of what the default status of your line is. Yes, these two prefixes can be entered into a contact's number so they are dialed every time. See the topic "Vertical service code" on Wikipedia or similar. -David
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-28 14:39 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-04-28 08:54 -0500
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-28 20:22 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-28 21:30 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-04-28 19:09 -0500
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-29 09:53 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-04-29 06:14 -0500
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-29 14:54 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-29 19:46 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-29 21:39 +0200
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? David Oseas <doseas{nospam}@usa.net> - 2026-04-28 09:55 -0700
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-04-28 13:21 -0600
Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-28 21:14 +0200
csiph-web