Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.mobile.android > #153734

Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ?

From David Oseas <doseas{nospam}@usa.net>
Newsgroups comp.mobile.android
Subject Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ?
Date 2026-04-28 09:55 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <10sqopb$3a2bk$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <10sq9po$3578e$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 4/28/2026 5:39 AM, R.Wieser wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I've just disabled my phones caller-ID (using instructions found on the
> web), but would like to know if its possible to switch it on *for the
> current call only*.
> 
> In my country I can /disable/ the caller-ID for the current call only by
> prefixing the phone number with #31#, but could not find if it would perhaps
> act in the reverse when the caller-ID is already disabled...
> 
> Or better yet, is there a similar-but-different prefix (#30# or alike) which
> will re-enable the caller-ID for the current call (so I can prefix the
> phone-numbers in my list of contacts with them - and not have to remove them
> when I re-enable the caller-ID again.) ?
> 
> Does anyone have some experience with the above and can tell ?
> 

In North America: for current call, *82 enables Caller ID whereas *85 
disables (doesn't show) it.  Both perform their function regardless of 
what the default status of your line is.

Yes, these two prefixes can be entered into a contact's number so they 
are dialed every time.

See the topic "Vertical service code" on Wikipedia or similar.

-David

Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-28 14:39 +0200
  Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-04-28 08:54 -0500
    Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-28 20:22 +0200
    Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-28 21:30 +0200
      Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-04-28 19:09 -0500
        Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-29 09:53 +0200
          Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-04-29 06:14 -0500
            Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-29 14:54 +0200
              Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-29 19:46 +0200
                Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-29 21:39 +0200
  Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? David Oseas <doseas{nospam}@usa.net> - 2026-04-28 09:55 -0700
    Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-04-28 13:21 -0600
    Re: Enabeling caller-ID for the current call only ? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-04-28 21:14 +0200

csiph-web