Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > talk.politics.drugs > #7451
| Subject | Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.drugs.psychedelics, talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.trump, talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.misc |
| References | <KZqpR.52208$jM1.37269@fx45.iad> <10o5ehh$1lf4v$1@dont-email.me> <10ojal1$evf$3@toxic.dizum.net> <10qk3jv$jjdu$1@dont-email.me> |
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
| Message-ID | <CuizR.1573039$At07.50725@fx17.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | usenet-news.net |
| Date | 2026-04-01 20:11 -0400 |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
On 2026-04-01 5:44 p.m., Bobbie Sellers wrote: > > > On 3/8/26 00:05, Starboard wrote: >> On 02 Mar 2026, "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some >> news:10o5ehh$1lf4v$1@dont-email.me: >> >>>> https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a810_b97d.pdf >>> >>>> The Ninth Circuit granted defendants’ motion to stay the >>>> injunction pending appeal. >>>> The Ninth Circuit also expressed doubts about the Dis- >>>> trict Court’s decision on the merits. On the free exercise >>>> issue, it relied on a not-precedential Sixth Circuit decision >>>> and brushed aside Mahmoud v. Taylor, 606 U. S. 522 >>>> (2025), as “a narrow decision focused on uniquely coercive >>>> ‘curricular requirements.’ ” App. 10a–11a (citing Doe No. 1 >>>> v. Bethel Local School Dist. Bd. of Educ., 2025 WL 2453836, >>>> *7 (CA6, Aug. 26, 2025)). The Ninth Circuit expressed >>>> skepticism about the parents’ and teachers’ Fourteenth >>>> Amendment due process claim because it viewed those >>>> claims as seeking to expand the protection afforded by es- >>>> tablished precedent. >>> >>>> When the Ninth Circuit stayed the injunction, the par- >>>> ents and teachers filed this application seeking vacatur of >>>> the Ninth Circuit’s stay pending appeal. >>>> II >>> >>>> We grant the application and vacate the stay with respect >>>> to the parents because this aspect of the stay is not “justi- >>>> fied under the governing four-factor test.” Alabama Assn. >>>> of Realtors v. Department of Health and Human Servs., 594 >>>> U. S. 758, 763 (2021) (per curiam) (citing Nken v. Holder, >>>> 556 U. S. 418, 434 (2009)). >>>> Likelihood of success on the merits. We conclude that the >>>> parents who seek religious exemptions are likely to succeed >>>> on the merits of their Free Exercise Clause claim. Califor- >>>> nia’s policies likely trigger strict scrutiny under that >>>> provision because they substantially interfere with the >>>> “right of parents to guide the religious development of their >>>> children.” Mahmoud, 606 U. S., at 559 (citing Wisconsin v. >>>> Yoder, 406 U. S. 205 (1972)). The parents who assert a free >>>> exercise claim have sincere religious beliefs about sex and >>>> gender, and they feel a religious obligation to raise their >>>> children in accordance with those beliefs. California’s poli- >>>> cies violate those beliefs and “impos[e] the kind of burden >>>> on religious exercise that Yoder found unacceptable.” 606 >>>> U. S., at 550. Indeed, the intrusion on parents’ free exercise >>>> rights here—unconsented facilitation of a child’s gender >>>> transition—is greater than the introduction of LGBTQ sto- >>>> rybooks we considered sufficient to trigger strict scrutiny in >>>> Mahmoud. See id., at 563. >>> >>> >>> Few people reading this on Usenet itself will be minors. But it will >>> be echoed on modern social media. Trans minors are being told that >>> school is not a safe place for them, period. This is controlling >>> school staff, controlling children/minors by their phobe parents - >>> this is war, Supreme Court, fuck you to the justices voting for the >>> order. >> >> School staff doesn't have any such authority that supercedes parental >> rights. There is no such thing as a "trans" it anyway. It's just a >> social media fad that went out of control. > > About a third of a percent of the US population are transgender. That's a third of a percent of Americans which will go on to commit suicide. -- CrudeSausage Islam is poison, leftism is retardation.
Back to talk.politics.drugs | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
"SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-03-02 20:39 -0500
Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-03-02 20:46 -0500
Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Starboard <right@side.com> - 2026-03-08 08:05 +0000
Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-03-08 13:38 -0400
Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-01 14:44 -0700
Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-01 20:11 -0400
Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-01 18:17 -0700
Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-02 08:50 -0400
Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-02 08:27 -0700
Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-02 11:40 -0400
Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-02 09:31 -0700
Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-02 13:04 -0400
[Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Rey <invalid@dont-email.me> - 2026-04-01 06:46 +0200
Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-01 08:59 -0400
Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-01 14:04 -0700
Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-04-01 16:56 -0500
Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-01 20:11 -0400
Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-01 20:09 -0400
Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-01 18:09 -0700
csiph-web