Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > talk.politics.drugs > #7447

Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER"

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/1/26 05:59, CrudeSausage wrote:
> On 2026-04-01 12:46 a.m., Rey wrote:
>>>> https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a810_b97d.pdf
>>>
>>>> The Ninth Circuit granted defendants’ motion to stay the
>>>> injunction pending appeal.
>>>> The Ninth Circuit also expressed doubts about the Dis-
>>>> trict Court’s decision on the merits. On the free exercise
>>>> issue, it relied on a not-precedential Sixth Circuit decision
>>>> and brushed aside Mahmoud v. Taylor, 606 U. S. 522
>>>> (2025), as “a narrow decision focused on uniquely coercive
>>>> ‘curricular requirements.’ ” App. 10a–11a (citing Doe No. 1
>>>> v. Bethel Local School Dist. Bd. of Educ., 2025 WL 2453836,
>>>> *7 (CA6, Aug. 26, 2025)). The Ninth Circuit expressed
>>>> skepticism about the parents’ and teachers’ Fourteenth
>>>> Amendment due process claim because it viewed those
>>>> claims as seeking to expand the protection afforded by es-
>>>> tablished precedent.
>>>
>>>> When the Ninth Circuit stayed the injunction, the par-
>>>> ents and teachers filed this application seeking vacatur of
>>>> the Ninth Circuit’s stay pending appeal.
>>>> II
>>>
>>>> We grant the application and vacate the stay with respect
>>>> to the parents because this aspect of the stay is not “justi-
>>>> fied under the governing four-factor test.” Alabama Assn.
>>>> of Realtors v. Department of Health and Human Servs., 594
>>>> U. S. 758, 763 (2021) (per curiam) (citing Nken v. Holder,
>>>> 556 U. S. 418, 434 (2009)).
>>>> Likelihood of success on the merits. We conclude that the
>>>> parents who seek religious exemptions are likely to succeed
>>>> on the merits of their Free Exercise Clause claim. Califor-
>>>> nia’s policies likely trigger strict scrutiny under that
>>>> provision because they substantially interfere with the
>>>> “right of parents to guide the religious development of their
>>>> children.” Mahmoud, 606 U. S., at 559 (citing Wisconsin v.
>>>> Yoder, 406 U. S. 205 (1972)). The parents who assert a free
>>>> exercise claim have sincere religious beliefs about sex and
>>>> gender, and they feel a religious obligation to raise their
>>>> children in accordance with those beliefs. California’s poli-
>>>> cies violate those beliefs and “impos[e] the kind of burden
>>>> on religious exercise that Yoder found unacceptable.” 606
>>>> U. S., at 550. Indeed, the intrusion on parents’ free exercise
>>>> rights here—unconsented facilitation of a child’s gender
>>>> transition—is greater than the introduction of LGBTQ sto-
>>>> rybooks we considered sufficient to trigger strict scrutiny in
>>>> Mahmoud. See id., at 563.
>>>
>>>
>>> Few people reading this on Usenet itself will be minors.  But it will
>>> be echoed on modern social media.  Trans minors are being told that
>>> school is not a safe place for them, period.  This is controlling
>>> school staff, controlling children/minors by their phobe parents -
>>> this is war, Supreme Court, fuck you to the justices voting for the
>>> order.
>>
>> School staff doesn't have any such authority that supercedes parental
>> rights.  There is no such thing as a "trans" "it" anyway.  It's just a
>> social media make-believe gay grooming fad that went out of control.
> 
> Except that it is being forced on people for fear of losing their job. 
> Just look at the situation with Jaden Ivey who got waived from the 
> Chicago Bulls for criticizing the Pride Month garbage. Any teacher who 
> doesn't affirm that a student is a boy when they are clearly a girl also 
> faces repercussions. In Canada, our evil government is also passing Bill 
> C-9 which will criminalize any rejection of this ideology as hate 
> speech. These demons are not only decimating what's left of Christianity 
> and the white people who generally follow the faith, they also insist on 
> installing a religion inspired by Satan.
> 


	Ivey is an obcessive narcisstic evangelical whose evangelical behavior
in the locker room where he preached at the coach and all his fellow players
is what got him canned.
<https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2026/4/1/2375895/-Bulls-beat-writer-Jaden-Ivey-was-a-problem-long-before-his-homophobic-tirade>

	bliss who thinks that blaming your problems on the LBGTQ+ folks is stupid
	

Back to talk.politics.drugs | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

"SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-03-02 20:39 -0500
  Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-03-02 20:46 -0500
    Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Starboard <right@side.com> - 2026-03-08 08:05 +0000
      Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-03-08 13:38 -0400
      Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-01 14:44 -0700
        Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-01 20:11 -0400
          Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-01 18:17 -0700
            Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-02 08:50 -0400
              Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-02 08:27 -0700
                Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-02 11:40 -0400
                Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-02 09:31 -0700
                Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-02 13:04 -0400
    [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Rey <invalid@dont-email.me> - 2026-04-01 06:46 +0200
      Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-01 08:59 -0400
        Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-01 14:04 -0700
          Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-04-01 16:56 -0500
            Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-01 20:11 -0400
          Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-01 20:09 -0400
            Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-01 18:09 -0700

csiph-web