Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > talk.politics.drugs > #7456

Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER"

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/2/26 05:50, CrudeSausage wrote:
> On 2026-04-01 9:17 p.m., Bobbie Sellers wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/1/26 17:11, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>> On 2026-04-01 5:44 p.m., Bobbie Sellers wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3/8/26 00:05, Starboard wrote:
>>>>> On 02 Mar 2026, "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some
>>>>> news:10o5ehh$1lf4v$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a810_b97d.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Ninth Circuit granted defendants’ motion to stay the
>>>>>>> injunction pending appeal.
>>>>>>> The Ninth Circuit also expressed doubts about the Dis-
>>>>>>> trict Court’s decision on the merits. On the free exercise
>>>>>>> issue, it relied on a not-precedential Sixth Circuit decision
>>>>>>> and brushed aside Mahmoud v. Taylor, 606 U. S. 522
>>>>>>> (2025), as “a narrow decision focused on uniquely coercive
>>>>>>> ‘curricular requirements.’ ” App. 10a–11a (citing Doe No. 1
>>>>>>> v. Bethel Local School Dist. Bd. of Educ., 2025 WL 2453836,
>>>>>>> *7 (CA6, Aug. 26, 2025)). The Ninth Circuit expressed
>>>>>>> skepticism about the parents’ and teachers’ Fourteenth
>>>>>>> Amendment due process claim because it viewed those
>>>>>>> claims as seeking to expand the protection afforded by es-
>>>>>>> tablished precedent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When the Ninth Circuit stayed the injunction, the par-
>>>>>>> ents and teachers filed this application seeking vacatur of
>>>>>>> the Ninth Circuit’s stay pending appeal.
>>>>>>> II
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We grant the application and vacate the stay with respect
>>>>>>> to the parents because this aspect of the stay is not “justi-
>>>>>>> fied under the governing four-factor test.” Alabama Assn.
>>>>>>> of Realtors v. Department of Health and Human Servs., 594
>>>>>>> U. S. 758, 763 (2021) (per curiam) (citing Nken v. Holder,
>>>>>>> 556 U. S. 418, 434 (2009)).
>>>>>>> Likelihood of success on the merits. We conclude that the
>>>>>>> parents who seek religious exemptions are likely to succeed
>>>>>>> on the merits of their Free Exercise Clause claim. Califor-
>>>>>>> nia’s policies likely trigger strict scrutiny under that
>>>>>>> provision because they substantially interfere with the
>>>>>>> “right of parents to guide the religious development of their
>>>>>>> children.” Mahmoud, 606 U. S., at 559 (citing Wisconsin v.
>>>>>>> Yoder, 406 U. S. 205 (1972)). The parents who assert a free
>>>>>>> exercise claim have sincere religious beliefs about sex and
>>>>>>> gender, and they feel a religious obligation to raise their
>>>>>>> children in accordance with those beliefs. California’s poli-
>>>>>>> cies violate those beliefs and “impos[e] the kind of burden
>>>>>>> on religious exercise that Yoder found unacceptable.” 606
>>>>>>> U. S., at 550. Indeed, the intrusion on parents’ free exercise
>>>>>>> rights here—unconsented facilitation of a child’s gender
>>>>>>> transition—is greater than the introduction of LGBTQ sto-
>>>>>>> rybooks we considered sufficient to trigger strict scrutiny in
>>>>>>> Mahmoud. See id., at 563.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Few people reading this on Usenet itself will be minors.  But it will
>>>>>> be echoed on modern social media.  Trans minors are being told that
>>>>>> school is not a safe place for them, period.  This is controlling
>>>>>> school staff, controlling children/minors by their phobe parents -
>>>>>> this is war, Supreme Court, fuck you to the justices voting for the
>>>>>> order.
>>>>>
>>>>> School staff doesn't have any such authority that supercedes parental
>>>>> rights.  There is no such thing as a "trans" it anyway.  It's just a
>>>>> social media fad that went out of control.
>>>>
>>>>      About a third of a percent of the US population are transgender. 
>>>
>>> That's a third of a percent of Americans which will go on to commit 
>>> suicide.
>>>
>>
>>      Why do you think that?
> 
> Because they will never be accepted as the gender they wish to be and 
> will have realized, by the time they want to start a family, that they 
> have sterilized themselves.
> 
>>      Only the depressed children are really suicidal and that could be
>> prevented by allowing them access to medical care approved by the
>> AMA and other bodies of physicians.
> 
> You don't need "medical care" to know that cutting your dick off isn't a 
> good idea; you need a father who is willing to slap you very hard in the 
> back of the head.
> 
>>      Oh right you don't trust science
> 
> Show me the science telling us that cutting your own dick off leads to 
> happiness. Similarly, show me the science that shows that putting a 
> dildo in the excrement-smelling hole created by such an act every day to 
> prevent it from closing on itself will make a person happier.
> 
>> and ignore the word of the
>> bible where it it says that "some make themselves eunuchs for the
>> love of God."
> 
> They make themselves eunuchs so as to not be distracted by lust in their 
> _pursuit_ of God. Are you suggesting that the women who believe they're 
> men and the men who believe they're women go on to spend their entire 
> lives worshiping Christ once they've sterilized themselves? No, they 
> spend their lives hoping people become stupid enough to accept an 
> obvious woman as man and an obvious man as woman. I'm not an expert on 
> the Bible, but I know this part very well. You are purposefully lying to 
> fit your idiotic narrative.
> 
> < snip continued idiocy >

	You assume obvious males and obvious females but the
fact is that  at least some transgender people pass very well in their
chosen roles.  They do get married sometime to men who lost their
wives and have children to be care for.  Sometime they marry and
adopt.

	Sometimes like many other women they do not think marriage
and children to be a desirable life choice prefering to be childless
and happy in their careers.

	ou seem to have a sterotypical view of women and of gender
roles.  You fail to consider the great variety of body types that
human persons enjoy as well as the wide variety of psychological
adaptation to society.

	Maybe crude sausage you should observe the processes
that make a crude sausage like you.  And i do not mean the
physical processes but the indoctrination you have  obviously
undergone which makes you insecure enough in your gender
and your sexuality that you feel you must denigrate other
people, human beings who are different from yourself.

	I am sure you are perfectly happy in yourself and the life
which you are leading so why not relax about the relativeely
harmless variants which have been present through human
history.

	

Back to talk.politics.drugs | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

"SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-03-02 20:39 -0500
  Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-03-02 20:46 -0500
    Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Starboard <right@side.com> - 2026-03-08 08:05 +0000
      Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-03-08 13:38 -0400
      Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-01 14:44 -0700
        Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-01 20:11 -0400
          Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-01 18:17 -0700
            Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-02 08:50 -0400
              Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-02 08:27 -0700
                Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-02 11:40 -0400
                Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-02 09:31 -0700
                Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-02 13:04 -0400
    [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Rey <invalid@dont-email.me> - 2026-04-01 06:46 +0200
      Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-01 08:59 -0400
        Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-01 14:04 -0700
          Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-04-01 16:56 -0500
            Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-01 20:11 -0400
          Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-04-01 20:09 -0400
            Re: [Spam] Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-01 18:09 -0700

csiph-web