Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!border-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-2.netnews.com!peer04.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx17.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Betterbird (Windows) Subject: Re: "SUPREME COURT No. 25A810 ELIZABETH MIRABELLI, ET AL. v. ROB BONTA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INTERLOCUTORY STAY ORDER" Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.drugs.psychedelics,talk.politics.guns,alt.politics.trump,talk.politics.drugs,talk.politics.misc References: <10o5ehh$1lf4v$1@dont-email.me> <10ojal1$evf$3@toxic.dizum.net> <10qk3jv$jjdu$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US From: CrudeSausage In-Reply-To: <10qk3jv$jjdu$1@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 73 Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenet-news.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:11:14 UTC Organization: usenet-news.net Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 20:11:13 -0400 X-Received-Bytes: 4627 X-Original-Bytes: 4576 Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:710581 alt.drugs.psychedelics:33114 talk.politics.guns:1776194 alt.politics.trump:276161 talk.politics.drugs:7451 talk.politics.misc:1216851 On 2026-04-01 5:44 p.m., Bobbie Sellers wrote: > > > On 3/8/26 00:05, Starboard wrote: >> On 02 Mar 2026, "Joel W. Crump" posted some >> news:10o5ehh$1lf4v$1@dont-email.me: >> >>>> https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a810_b97d.pdf >>> >>>> The Ninth Circuit granted defendants’ motion to stay the >>>> injunction pending appeal. >>>> The Ninth Circuit also expressed doubts about the Dis- >>>> trict Court’s decision on the merits. On the free exercise >>>> issue, it relied on a not-precedential Sixth Circuit decision >>>> and brushed aside Mahmoud v. Taylor, 606 U. S. 522 >>>> (2025), as “a narrow decision focused on uniquely coercive >>>> ‘curricular requirements.’ ” App. 10a–11a (citing Doe No. 1 >>>> v. Bethel Local School Dist. Bd. of Educ., 2025 WL 2453836, >>>> *7 (CA6, Aug. 26, 2025)). The Ninth Circuit expressed >>>> skepticism about the parents’ and teachers’ Fourteenth >>>> Amendment due process claim because it viewed those >>>> claims as seeking to expand the protection afforded by es- >>>> tablished precedent. >>> >>>> When the Ninth Circuit stayed the injunction, the par- >>>> ents and teachers filed this application seeking vacatur of >>>> the Ninth Circuit’s stay pending appeal. >>>> II >>> >>>> We grant the application and vacate the stay with respect >>>> to the parents because this aspect of the stay is not “justi- >>>> fied under the governing four-factor test.” Alabama Assn. >>>> of Realtors v. Department of Health and Human Servs., 594 >>>> U. S. 758, 763 (2021) (per curiam) (citing Nken v. Holder, >>>> 556 U. S. 418, 434 (2009)). >>>> Likelihood of success on the merits. We conclude that the >>>> parents who seek religious exemptions are likely to succeed >>>> on the merits of their Free Exercise Clause claim. Califor- >>>> nia’s policies likely trigger strict scrutiny under that >>>> provision because they substantially interfere with the >>>> “right of parents to guide the religious development of their >>>> children.” Mahmoud, 606 U. S., at 559 (citing Wisconsin v. >>>> Yoder, 406 U. S. 205 (1972)). The parents who assert a free >>>> exercise claim have sincere religious beliefs about sex and >>>> gender, and they feel a religious obligation to raise their >>>> children in accordance with those beliefs. California’s poli- >>>> cies violate those beliefs and “impos[e] the kind of burden >>>> on religious exercise that Yoder found unacceptable.” 606 >>>> U. S., at 550. Indeed, the intrusion on parents’ free exercise >>>> rights here—unconsented facilitation of a child’s gender >>>> transition—is greater than the introduction of LGBTQ sto- >>>> rybooks we considered sufficient to trigger strict scrutiny in >>>> Mahmoud. See id., at 563. >>> >>> >>> Few people reading this on Usenet itself will be minors.  But it will >>> be echoed on modern social media.  Trans minors are being told that >>> school is not a safe place for them, period.  This is controlling >>> school staff, controlling children/minors by their phobe parents - >>> this is war, Supreme Court, fuck you to the justices voting for the >>> order. >> >> School staff doesn't have any such authority that supercedes parental >> rights.  There is no such thing as a "trans" it anyway.  It's just a >> social media fad that went out of control. > >     About a third of a percent of the US population are transgender. That's a third of a percent of Americans which will go on to commit suicide. -- CrudeSausage Islam is poison, leftism is retardation.