Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #886961 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-04-27 10:57 -0700 |
| Last post | 2024-09-06 18:05 +0000 |
| Articles | 9 on this page of 469 — 42 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-27 10:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2024-04-27 14:50 -0500
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-04-27 13:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-04-28 09:01 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-28 21:38 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2024-04-29 05:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-29 08:47 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-04-29 09:46 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> - 2024-04-29 12:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2024-04-30 05:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-04-30 07:49 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-04-30 13:26 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2024-04-30 20:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-04-30 18:09 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2024-04-30 22:41 -0500
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-01 13:58 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2024-05-01 17:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-02 16:10 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2024-05-02 05:35 -0500
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-03 09:28 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2024-05-03 00:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-05-03 11:11 +0200
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2024-05-03 15:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-04 12:18 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-05-05 12:51 +0200
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-03 23:07 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-04-30 13:26 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2024-04-30 20:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-30 19:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-01 11:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2024-05-01 18:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-01 21:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2024-05-02 05:40 -0500
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-02 10:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-05-03 11:03 +0200
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-03 09:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2024-05-04 07:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-04 14:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-02 09:55 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Malte Runz <nobodys@busine.ss> - 2024-04-29 19:36 +0200
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-04-30 11:18 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-04-30 11:54 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2024-05-12 06:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Professor Love" <jesus@loves.you> - 2024-05-12 14:14 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2024-06-06 14:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-06-06 12:16 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-06-06 16:17 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 17:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-06-10 15:30 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 14:37 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-06-10 18:29 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2024-06-12 15:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-06-13 08:53 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2024-06-13 15:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-06-13 16:02 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-06-15 23:26 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2024-08-03 07:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-08-03 09:36 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2024-06-12 15:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-06-13 08:53 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2024-06-13 15:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-06-13 16:03 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2024-08-03 07:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-08-03 09:36 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-06-15 23:23 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-06-15 23:28 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 17:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-06-10 15:28 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2024-06-12 15:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-06-06 16:17 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2024-06-10 17:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-06-10 15:29 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2024-06-12 15:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-06-13 08:54 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2024-06-13 15:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-06-13 12:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2024-08-03 07:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-08-03 09:37 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-06-13 16:03 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-06-13 15:16 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-06-15 23:22 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-06-15 23:20 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-12 20:47 +0200
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-12 16:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-13 17:36 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-05-13 11:10 +0200
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-13 19:34 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Andrew" <andrew.321.remov@usa.net> - 2024-05-13 03:20 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-13 06:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Andrew" <andrew.321.remov@usa.net> - 2024-05-13 14:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-13 18:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-15 09:40 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-14 21:20 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-14 21:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-15 06:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2024-05-15 13:15 +0100
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-15 10:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2024-05-15 15:06 +0100
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-15 12:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2024-05-15 18:27 +0100
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-15 19:28 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-05-15 15:08 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-15 19:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-05-15 19:27 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-16 00:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-05-16 13:00 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-16 19:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-16 10:03 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-05-15 15:07 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-16 09:47 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-16 00:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-16 14:21 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-05-17 06:11 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-17 19:19 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-05-17 15:05 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-05-17 06:10 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-17 18:24 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-05-18 07:50 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-17 05:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-05-18 07:51 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Andrew" <andrew.321.remov@usa.net> - 2024-05-18 17:20 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-16 09:14 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-15 14:54 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-15 18:02 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2024-05-15 09:48 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-15 06:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-15 06:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-16 09:12 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-14 11:30 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2024-05-14 01:44 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-13 21:06 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2024-05-13 12:55 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Tim <cyfur12345@gmail.com> - 2024-05-25 09:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Jospeh Lőrincz Ujvári <erz@phoocqhr.hu> - 2024-05-25 15:11 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-04-29 13:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-04-30 11:59 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-04-30 01:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-04-30 18:18 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-04-30 06:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-04-30 21:43 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-04-30 08:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-04-30 22:57 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-04-30 10:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-01 01:01 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-04-30 15:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. cld <clowd@nimbus.net.inv> - 2024-05-01 20:43 +0100
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-01 16:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-02 10:36 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-01 20:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-02 05:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-02 09:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-02 14:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-05 10:55 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-05 18:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Mike Colangelo <air@vatican_.con> - 2024-05-07 23:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-08 05:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Mike Colangelo <air@vatican_.con> - 2024-05-09 08:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-09 13:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-10 11:33 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2024-05-10 04:00 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-05-10 06:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-10 10:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-10 01:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-10 15:44 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-10 05:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2024-05-10 10:26 +0100
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-05-10 06:37 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-10 10:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-02 05:01 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-03 22:37 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-03 09:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-04 12:25 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-04 05:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-04 20:19 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-04 06:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-05-04 21:26 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-04 21:23 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-04 08:41 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-05 09:06 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-05 09:47 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-05 00:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-05 14:30 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-05 20:14 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-04 23:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-05 14:42 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-05 02:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-04 21:47 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-05 02:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-05 18:46 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-05 04:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. cld <clowd@nimbus.net.inv> - 2024-05-02 21:50 +0100
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-02 17:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-05 11:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-05 18:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-06 10:11 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-06 05:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-05-06 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-08 12:00 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-02 10:34 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-02 05:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-03 22:42 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-03 09:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-03 09:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-03 15:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-06 08:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-06 12:05 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-06 12:41 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-07 00:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-06 22:02 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-07 06:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-07 23:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-08 05:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-08 20:42 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-08 21:12 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-09 06:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-09 23:50 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-09 10:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-10 11:08 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-10 01:05 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-10 15:51 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-10 05:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-10 22:37 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-10 09:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-10 21:38 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-10 22:48 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-11 09:57 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-10 09:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-11 10:01 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-11 11:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-11 14:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-11 21:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-12 00:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-12 20:31 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-05-12 17:17 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-13 04:52 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-05-14 16:29 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-12 16:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-05-14 16:30 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-14 18:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-05-15 06:38 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-15 05:59 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-15 21:39 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-15 10:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-05-15 19:29 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-05-15 15:09 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-05-16 04:25 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-15 19:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-05-16 04:22 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-16 14:25 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-05-16 19:17 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-16 18:58 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-05-18 07:54 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-18 05:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-19 08:33 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2024-05-19 01:01 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-05-28 20:55 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. In the Name of Jesus <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-29 07:15 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-28 22:09 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-16 08:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-16 09:03 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-15 19:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-12 11:30 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-13 04:54 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-12 11:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-12 16:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-12 14:28 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-12 19:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-13 11:56 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-13 06:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-12 20:35 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2024-05-13 09:51 +0100
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-13 06:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-13 10:34 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-13 13:37 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-13 15:17 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. neus <neus@elk.Net.inv> - 2024-05-14 21:45 +0100
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-14 11:28 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-13 20:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-14 13:23 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-13 23:01 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-05-12 03:21 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. spaminator <spami@na.tur> - 2024-05-10 23:06 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-11 19:34 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-11 07:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-11 22:09 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2024-05-11 12:20 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-12 07:33 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-11 09:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-12 07:50 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-11 18:47 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-12 09:01 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-12 09:44 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-12 10:10 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-12 00:52 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Ted" <ted.street@gmail.com> - 2024-05-12 03:30 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-12 00:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-12 14:56 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-12 05:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-12 19:47 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-12 20:04 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-12 06:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-12 20:04 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-12 06:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-12 20:34 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-09 08:29 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-09 13:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-09 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-09 15:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-09 14:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-09 19:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-10 00:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-10 05:53 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-10 10:41 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-10 11:28 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-10 01:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-09 23:20 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-04 12:21 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-04 05:09 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-05-04 12:47 +0200
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-05-02 12:05 +0200
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-02 21:32 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-04-30 11:15 +0200
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-04-30 19:39 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-04-30 06:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-04-30 21:50 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-04-30 08:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-04-30 23:01 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-04-30 10:30 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-02 10:40 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-02 05:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-05-02 13:12 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-02 12:21 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Ref <ref@creon.earth> - 2024-04-30 13:27 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-01 08:29 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-01 08:26 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-04-30 18:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-01 08:51 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-01 22:28 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-04-30 20:52 +0200
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-04-30 15:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-01 22:22 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-05-01 20:43 +0200
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-30 18:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-30 18:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-30 19:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-01 05:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-01 19:38 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-01 21:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-02 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-06 10:46 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-06 05:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-06 20:10 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-06 09:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-07 10:23 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-01 10:57 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-05-01 20:48 +0200
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-05-01 14:39 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-01 14:20 -0700
(belief) Greeting "The Starmaker" (aka TS) on 04/30/24 ... HeartDoc Andrew <disciple@T3WiJ.com> - 2024-04-30 22:18 -0400
(belief) Expertly: How to be perfect (Matt 5:48) as GOD is perfect; Start by greeting (Matt 5:47) others ... HeartDoc Andrew <disciple@T3WiJ.com> - 2024-04-30 22:19 -0400
(belief) fyi: "The Starmaker" (aka TS) is #StatCOVID19Test **positive** on 04/30/24 ... HeartDoc Andrew <disciple@T3WiJ.com> - 2024-04-30 22:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-01 13:55 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-05-01 11:43 +0200
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-01 22:35 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-05-01 20:47 +0200
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-05-01 14:39 -0600
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-02 05:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-02 10:47 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-05-02 12:06 +0200
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-05-03 07:57 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2024-04-29 16:02 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-04-29 09:54 -0700
(faith) Greeting Ross Finlayson on 04/29/24 ... HeartDoc Andrew <achung@EmoryCardiology.com> - 2024-04-29 16:01 -0400
(faith) Expertly: How to be perfect (Matt 5:48) as GOD is perfect; Start by greeting (Matt 5:47) others ... HeartDoc Andrew <achung@EmoryCardiology.com> - 2024-04-29 16:03 -0400
(faith) fyi: Ross Finlayson is #StatCOVID19Test **positive** on 04/29/24 ... HeartDoc Andrew <achung@EmoryCardiology.com> - 2024-04-29 16:28 -0400
Re: (faith) fyi: Ross Finlayson is #StatCOVID19Test **positive** on 04/29/24 ... Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-05-02 10:45 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Ren <privatemail@protonmail.com> - 2024-05-25 18:28 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-27 12:05 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-28 03:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-28 10:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-28 19:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-28 22:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-29 11:32 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-28 22:06 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-29 19:01 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-29 09:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-29 10:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-29 15:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-29 13:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-05-29 13:23 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-29 18:33 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Shayne Demihov <heyndin@eavn.ru> - 2024-05-29 21:03 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-29 18:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-29 17:04 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-30 00:17 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-30 09:47 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-30 13:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2024-05-30 18:57 +0100
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-30 17:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-30 12:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-30 17:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-30 22:16 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-31 09:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-31 12:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-05-31 16:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-08 12:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 12:13 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-09 17:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-11 00:04 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-11 06:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-11 11:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-12 05:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-12 10:25 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-12 17:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-12 21:33 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-12 21:47 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-13 08:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-13 11:15 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Mitch Sardelis Hang <siml@ssts.gr> - 2024-06-13 18:44 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-13 08:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-15 13:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. John Ritson <j.ritson@hotmail.co.uk> - 2024-06-16 11:02 +0100
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-16 06:25 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-16 06:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-21 09:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-22 05:37 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-22 10:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-22 18:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-22 20:49 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-23 01:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-23 11:51 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-23 19:43 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Swen Karameros Ping <ron@eaa.gr> - 2024-06-24 11:52 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-22 22:09 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-23 01:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-21 09:18 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-22 05:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Edward McGuire <metaed@metaed.com> - 2024-06-24 16:12 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-24 15:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-12 10:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-04 11:47 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. In the Name of Jesus <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-06-05 10:27 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-04 23:06 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-04 23:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-05 21:58 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Creon <creon@creon.earth> - 2024-06-06 06:58 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Randle Tuboltsev Chin <lnbton@ba.ru> - 2024-06-09 19:30 +0000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-08 12:06 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-06-08 12:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-09 17:24 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. In the Name of Jesus <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-06-10 08:20 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-10 04:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. In the Name of Jesus <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-06-11 09:39 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-11 06:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Andrew" <andrew.321.remov@usa.net> - 2024-06-11 05:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-11 10:02 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. "Andrew" <andrew.321.remov@usa.net> - 2024-06-11 15:40 -0700
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-12 05:18 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. In the Name of Jesus <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-06-12 07:37 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-12 05:20 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. In the Name of Jesus <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> - 2024-06-12 19:43 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-12 17:50 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-06-12 20:00 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-12 14:27 +0200
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-06-13 00:55 +1000
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-12 19:11 +0200
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2024-06-12 17:49 -0400
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. cld <clowd@nimbus.net.inv> - 2024-05-30 20:27 +0100
Re: Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2024-09-06 18:05 +0000
Page 24 of 24 — ← Prev page 1 … 22 23 [24]
| From | In the Name of Jesus <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-12 19:43 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <v4bqki$1j6kk$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #888014 |
On 12/06/2024 7:20 pm, Attila wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 07:37:42 +1000, In the Name of Jesus > <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with > message-id <v4ag37$187hc$1@dont-email.me> wrote: > >> On 11/06/2024 8:13 pm, Attila wrote: >>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 09:39:54 +1000, In the Name of Jesus >>> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with >>> message-id <v482sa$l4q3$3@dont-email.me> wrote: >>> >>>> On 10/06/2024 6:08 pm, Attila wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 08:20:48 +1000, In the Name of Jesus >>>>> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with >>>>> message-id <v459s0$3r090$2@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 10/06/2024 7:24 am, Attila wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 08 Jun 2024 12:06:38 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>> <6664ABBE.2601@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 May 2024 12:21:49 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>> <6658D1CD.38D1@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 May 2024 09:47:46 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>> <6658ADB2.6E8E@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 29 May 2024 17:04:15 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>> <6657C27F.35B6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existence of any god. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you see trees anywhere else in the universe? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have not looked everywhere. Have you? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You want proof of God, would a California Driver License ID do? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Probably not. What are the conditions for obtaining one? I >>>>>>>>>>> don't trust anything coming out of Cartel West. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The problem here AttiLa is that God is everywhere. Even if you looked 'everywhere' >>>>>>>>>>>> you wouldn't be able to 'see' Him...just as a fish in his aquarium doesn't understand >>>>>>>>>>>> what he sees everywhere pass the glass. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Difficult to analyze and describe...God is subtle. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A pile of poop! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A rock! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A bug! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A ham sandwich! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Take your pick. For some that is all the evidence that is >>>>>>>>>>> needed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think you are not understanding... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So you say. I require a bit more. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> God is everywhere, but >>>>>>>>>> You cannot look everywhere at once. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I didn't say "Look over there." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If you look over there you might see a rock.. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> but if you look eveywhere..you see...God. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> God is everywhere, not ...over there. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> A rock is not everywhere, it's over there. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Where's that ham sandwitch???? i bet it's somewhere overthere. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I rest my case. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: "Oh, look! A ham sandwich! That proves there is a god!" >>>> >>>> It is if you bother to look at what constitutes a ham sandwich, where >>>> that ham sandwich came from, and the impossibility of everything >>>> creating itself. >>> >>> There are too many possible alternatives to attribute >>> anything to an intelligent source. >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> As I said, for some that is all that is necessary. They >>>>>> >>>>>> Everything is evidence there is a God. >>>>> >>>>> That is what I mean. That attitude allows no further >>>>> discussion. >>>> >>>> Well, everything is the evidence for God. >>>> >>>> And yes, we have differing experience. >>> >>> Thus making the experience of someone else useless. >>> >>>> >>>>> BTW, where is any supporting evidence (actual facts) for >>>>> that conclusion? Or is it only your unsupported belief? >>>> >>>> >>>> Is this the point where I say, "Oh look! There is an Attila! That proves >>>> there is no God!" >>> >>> You cannot prove a negative. >> >> Who says? > > Anyone. All possible sources must be investigated to > support a negative and no alternative explanations can > exist. That sounds to me like you are saying nothing. In the Name of Jesus -- God is God in all His Being. Jesus is the everlasting Father, Jesus is God, Jesus is the Lord. John 10:30 I and Father are one. If you can't see that the Lord Jesus is the everlasting Father you are not born again and can't see the Kingdom of God. Colossians 2:9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. Rom 5:8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were YET sinners, Christ died for us. Jeremiah 10:23 O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps. Psalms 53:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Corrupt are they, and have done abominable iniquity: there is none that doeth good. Proverbs 12:15 The way of a fool is right in his own eyes: but he that hearkeneth unto counsel is wise. "To seek your own will is to seek your own glory." "If God is not first in everything He is not first in anything." "What makes the bible the truth? The resonance (voice, the Person) of God. When you find Him you have found the author." "All men were born sinners. Why? Because all men were born not loving God with all their heart, soul, and mind. An abomination. Therefore, sin is not what you do; it is what you are." "Compromise will condemn you." "There are no sinners in Christ Jesus." "My sons are born of Me. In them is no darkness at all." "You can't learn righteousness. Haven't you had enough time already to know that?" "The way of truth is the testimony of life." "I merely speak the truth, what is revealed to me, and the cards fall where God intends." "Nothing that is produced is produced without first being faith." "You can only find proof of God through faith because that is how we all live, by faith." "It is not what you do that matters, it is how you treat Me." "Keep going forward. Forget about the past. Lift up your head, look ahead." "You cannot be free and free indeed with guilt in your heart." "Priority is everything." "The truth doesn't need evidence, it is evidence." "There is no greater possession a man has than his own will, to squander it or to place it where it truly belongs." "An atheist is a fool who thinks truth is found in living a lie." "Saying "prove it" [as a foundation] is merely an ignorant straw man, to an ignorant straw man." "Wait, rest, be still, and know." "No man can wash his own hands!!!" "I find this in the Christianity religions: 'Nobody's perfect' they say, and they use that as an excuse not to do what is perfect." The Atheist: "They don't believe and put their faith in a Creator (the obvious). So no evidence and proof is to be found!!" "The world is the way it is because God can't compromise who He is." "Man is not the centre of being." "Man is incompatible with the natural world because of his sinful nature." "And then the Lord said, "I see everything." "Man has no greater idol than his own will." "Where is God hiding? He isn't." "If you don't keep all the scriptures, you can't keep any of them." "You can't prove anything because everything depends on a person's willingness to believe." "Atheists are ultimately trying to be pointlessness, meaninglessness, and purposelessness in their point, meaning, and purpose." "The last day of creation will be the last day of time. God is always full of hope." "The veil of the temple was rent in twain, not to have a book pass through it so that a sinner could play God." "A phylactery does not a heart for God make. Not back then, and not today." "No one in heaven is better (or higher) than what makes it heaven. Such is the love of God." "The definition of an atheist: A man full of bluster and bullshit pretending he is the meaning of life." "Free will is not power; it is the choice that I allow; that choice is still according to my power," says the Lord. What does a fool do? A fool looks for a "nothing" in a "something" in order to explain the existence of existence. "Unless you do all because He is who He is, all your religion is in vain." "Every man is subject to God; He judges every man, and He is reality. What a gift in a fallen world!" "Love MUST be a choice or it is nothing but a law!" "Why were all men born sinners? So that God could reveal Himself, so that we would behold the glory of God, and that we should bring forth the glory of God" "God does not and will not arbitrate for any man to love Him! If God isn't everything to you, He is nothing to you where the rubber meets the road." "It is the unforgivable sin not to love God with all your heart, soul, and mind. What do you have that is lasting? It is not so much being punished; it is what you are left with." "Love isn't worth anything without first a free will choice for God to birth it in a man." "The point of salvation: desperation. Anything less than that is self-righteousness." "A sinner is not a believer in God; a sinner is a believer in sin." "A piece of dirt is not the promised land; that is only a reflection. The promised land is knowing Me, says the Lord." "It is all about God or it is all about idolatry." "The Lord Jesus is coming soon. He has always come soon." "There is no revolving door of self-worship in a son of God's life!" "There is no such thing as random!" "You can't truly love without it being with all your heart." "No one can see God without their whole heart. Unless you can see God, you know nothing." "You can't learn God, God has to reveal Himself to you." "No sinner is sinless in any way." "Only God is life; only the Kingdom of God of His "Nature" is life." "What you believe is just a leaning on your own understanding; faith is a leaning on the one you have chosen to trust." "God uses the "letter" to crucify a man and raise him from the dead." "Not fearing God is sheer stupidity for sinners." "Self-righteousness is any exclusion of God in your heart, because any exclusion reveals that you think more about yourself than what you really are." "Atheism: "The claim that life received from itself." "But remember this: always, absolutely always, all the glory is the Lord's and His alone, and anyone who takes any credit for anything, you know, instantly, he is not what he pretends to be and is a false prophet." "That light had to bear (bears all things) the darkness for us, but that light did not ever become darkness." "You must reach beyond the bible that tells you about Him, and into your daily life to find Him in Person. He's there." "What is wrong with Christendom? False understanding based on compromise."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-12 17:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mp5k6j1m01412acojjsvi1023uh6nfprs6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #888015 |
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 19:43:45 +1000, In the Name of Jesus <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <v4bqki$1j6kk$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >On 12/06/2024 7:20 pm, Attila wrote: >> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 07:37:42 +1000, In the Name of Jesus >> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with >> message-id <v4ag37$187hc$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >> >>> On 11/06/2024 8:13 pm, Attila wrote: >>>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 09:39:54 +1000, In the Name of Jesus >>>> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with >>>> message-id <v482sa$l4q3$3@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 10/06/2024 6:08 pm, Attila wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 08:20:48 +1000, In the Name of Jesus >>>>>> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with >>>>>> message-id <v459s0$3r090$2@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 10/06/2024 7:24 am, Attila wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 08 Jun 2024 12:06:38 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>> <6664ABBE.2601@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 May 2024 12:21:49 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>> <6658D1CD.38D1@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 May 2024 09:47:46 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>> <6658ADB2.6E8E@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 29 May 2024 17:04:15 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <6657C27F.35B6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existence of any god. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you see trees anywhere else in the universe? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have not looked everywhere. Have you? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You want proof of God, would a California Driver License ID do? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Probably not. What are the conditions for obtaining one? I >>>>>>>>>>>> don't trust anything coming out of Cartel West. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The problem here AttiLa is that God is everywhere. Even if you looked 'everywhere' >>>>>>>>>>>>> you wouldn't be able to 'see' Him...just as a fish in his aquarium doesn't understand >>>>>>>>>>>>> what he sees everywhere pass the glass. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Difficult to analyze and describe...God is subtle. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A pile of poop! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A rock! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A bug! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A ham sandwich! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Take your pick. For some that is all the evidence that is >>>>>>>>>>>> needed. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think you are not understanding... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So you say. I require a bit more. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> God is everywhere, but >>>>>>>>>>> You cannot look everywhere at once. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I didn't say "Look over there." >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If you look over there you might see a rock.. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> but if you look eveywhere..you see...God. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> God is everywhere, not ...over there. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> A rock is not everywhere, it's over there. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Where's that ham sandwitch???? i bet it's somewhere overthere. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I rest my case. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: "Oh, look! A ham sandwich! That proves there is a god!" >>>>> >>>>> It is if you bother to look at what constitutes a ham sandwich, where >>>>> that ham sandwich came from, and the impossibility of everything >>>>> creating itself. >>>> >>>> There are too many possible alternatives to attribute >>>> anything to an intelligent source. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> As I said, for some that is all that is necessary. They >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Everything is evidence there is a God. >>>>>> >>>>>> That is what I mean. That attitude allows no further >>>>>> discussion. >>>>> >>>>> Well, everything is the evidence for God. >>>>> >>>>> And yes, we have differing experience. >>>> >>>> Thus making the experience of someone else useless. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> BTW, where is any supporting evidence (actual facts) for >>>>>> that conclusion? Or is it only your unsupported belief? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is this the point where I say, "Oh look! There is an Attila! That proves >>>>> there is no God!" >>>> >>>> You cannot prove a negative. >>> >>> Who says? >> >> Anyone. All possible sources must be investigated to >> support a negative and no alternative explanations can >> exist. > >That sounds to me like you are saying nothing. I am sure it does. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying. Whatever it takes - Stop the Democrats. Or the Dims as I prefer to call them The most dangerous enemies the United States has: Biden the Senile Bastard and his Bitch and supported by the Sluts and Pimps including Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, Jamaal Bowman, Cori Bush, Adam Schiff, Maxine Waters, Jerry Nadler, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi and Cory Booker. They have stepped over the line and are working against the country and what it stands for. Do not work with them but oppose everything they attempt. Stop the Green Raw Deal! I dare call it treason. Go WOKE. Go broke. CRT - Criminals Recruiting Thugs DEI - Dumbass Egotistical Idiocy End all social engineering programs. I don't know how Comical Karine can still hold a straight face with what she has to say. Did the last sane person leaving California remember to turn off the lights? Did he do the same for the Rotten Apple? Abortion should be like any other medical procedure and be the decision of the patient and the doctor. It is the business of no one else. There is only one reason for a woman to get an abortion. She want's it. All else is irrelevant I support a Pro-Choice Constitutional Amendment. Don't build a wall, build a kill zone. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software. www.norton.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-12 20:00 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <lct9udFm9b0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #888014 |
Attila wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 07:37:42 +1000, In the Name of Jesus > <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with > message-id <v4ag37$187hc$1@dont-email.me> wrote: > >> On 11/06/2024 8:13 pm, Attila wrote: >>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 09:39:54 +1000, In the Name of Jesus >>> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with >>> message-id <v482sa$l4q3$3@dont-email.me> wrote: >>> >>>> On 10/06/2024 6:08 pm, Attila wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 08:20:48 +1000, In the Name of Jesus >>>>> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with >>>>> message-id <v459s0$3r090$2@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 10/06/2024 7:24 am, Attila wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 08 Jun 2024 12:06:38 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>> <6664ABBE.2601@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 May 2024 12:21:49 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>> <6658D1CD.38D1@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 May 2024 09:47:46 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>> <6658ADB2.6E8E@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 29 May 2024 17:04:15 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>> <6657C27F.35B6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existence of any god. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you see trees anywhere else in the universe? >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have not looked everywhere. Have you? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You want proof of God, would a California Driver License ID do? >>>>>>>>>>> Probably not. What are the conditions for obtaining one? I >>>>>>>>>>> don't trust anything coming out of Cartel West. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The problem here AttiLa is that God is everywhere. Even if you looked 'everywhere' >>>>>>>>>>>> you wouldn't be able to 'see' Him...just as a fish in his aquarium doesn't understand >>>>>>>>>>>> what he sees everywhere pass the glass. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Difficult to analyze and describe...God is subtle. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A pile of poop! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A rock! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A bug! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A ham sandwich! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Take your pick. For some that is all the evidence that is >>>>>>>>>>> needed. >>>>>>>>>> I think you are not understanding... >>>>>>>>> So you say. I require a bit more. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> God is everywhere, but >>>>>>>>>> You cannot look everywhere at once. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I didn't say "Look over there." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If you look over there you might see a rock.. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> but if you look eveywhere..you see...God. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> God is everywhere, not ...over there. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> A rock is not everywhere, it's over there. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Where's that ham sandwitch???? i bet it's somewhere overthere. >>>>>>>>> I rest my case. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: "Oh, look! A ham sandwich! That proves there is a god!" >>>> It is if you bother to look at what constitutes a ham sandwich, where >>>> that ham sandwich came from, and the impossibility of everything >>>> creating itself. >>> There are too many possible alternatives to attribute >>> anything to an intelligent source. >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> As I said, for some that is all that is necessary. They >>>>>> Everything is evidence there is a God. >>>>> That is what I mean. That attitude allows no further >>>>> discussion. >>>> Well, everything is the evidence for God. >>>> >>>> And yes, we have differing experience. >>> Thus making the experience of someone else useless. >>> >>>>> BTW, where is any supporting evidence (actual facts) for >>>>> that conclusion? Or is it only your unsupported belief? >>>> >>>> Is this the point where I say, "Oh look! There is an Attila! That proves >>>> there is no God!" >>> You cannot prove a negative. >> Who says? > Anyone. All possible sources must be investigated to > support a negative and no alternative explanations can > exist. > some negatives can be proven. I could prove there's no gorilla in my car. -- “Atheism is the birth right of all human, remember that!”- hhyapster 7.4.23 "Christian beliefs fail against reason, facts, and knowledge" "Religion is not about truth, it's about lifestyle" "God is a convenient explanation for what man does not understand. The less that's inexplicable, the less need for a 'God' explanation'."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-12 14:27 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <f27fd3fd-06db-6911-cf1a-318149e1e65a@example.net> |
| In reply to | #888016 |
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, Maximus wrote: > Attila wrote: >> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 07:37:42 +1000, In the Name of Jesus >> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with >> message-id <v4ag37$187hc$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >> >>> On 11/06/2024 8:13 pm, Attila wrote: >>>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 09:39:54 +1000, In the Name of Jesus >>>> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with >>>> message-id <v482sa$l4q3$3@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 10/06/2024 6:08 pm, Attila wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 08:20:48 +1000, In the Name of Jesus >>>>>> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with >>>>>> message-id <v459s0$3r090$2@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 10/06/2024 7:24 am, Attila wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 08 Jun 2024 12:06:38 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>> <6664ABBE.2601@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 May 2024 12:21:49 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>> <6658D1CD.38D1@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 May 2024 09:47:46 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>> <6658ADB2.6E8E@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 29 May 2024 17:04:15 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <6657C27F.35B6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existence of any god. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you see trees anywhere else in the universe? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have not looked everywhere. Have you? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You want proof of God, would a California Driver License ID do? >>>>>>>>>>>> Probably not. What are the conditions for obtaining one? I >>>>>>>>>>>> don't trust anything coming out of Cartel West. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The problem here AttiLa is that God is everywhere. Even if you >>>>>>>>>>>>> looked 'everywhere' >>>>>>>>>>>>> you wouldn't be able to 'see' Him...just as a fish in his >>>>>>>>>>>>> aquarium doesn't understand >>>>>>>>>>>>> what he sees everywhere pass the glass. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Difficult to analyze and describe...God is subtle. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A pile of poop! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A rock! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A bug! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A ham sandwich! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Take your pick. For some that is all the evidence that is >>>>>>>>>>>> needed. >>>>>>>>>>> I think you are not understanding... >>>>>>>>>> So you say. I require a bit more. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> God is everywhere, but >>>>>>>>>>> You cannot look everywhere at once. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I didn't say "Look over there." >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If you look over there you might see a rock.. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> but if you look eveywhere..you see...God. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> God is everywhere, not ...over there. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> A rock is not everywhere, it's over there. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Where's that ham sandwitch???? i bet it's somewhere overthere. >>>>>>>>>> I rest my case. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: "Oh, look! A ham sandwich! That proves there is a >>>>>>>>> god!" >>>>> It is if you bother to look at what constitutes a ham sandwich, where >>>>> that ham sandwich came from, and the impossibility of everything >>>>> creating itself. >>>> There are too many possible alternatives to attribute >>>> anything to an intelligent source. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> As I said, for some that is all that is necessary. They >>>>>>> Everything is evidence there is a God. >>>>>> That is what I mean. That attitude allows no further >>>>>> discussion. >>>>> Well, everything is the evidence for God. >>>>> >>>>> And yes, we have differing experience. >>>> Thus making the experience of someone else useless. >>>> >>>>>> BTW, where is any supporting evidence (actual facts) for >>>>>> that conclusion? Or is it only your unsupported belief? >>>>> >>>>> Is this the point where I say, "Oh look! There is an Attila! That proves >>>>> there is no God!" >>>> You cannot prove a negative. >>> Who says? >> Anyone. All possible sources must be investigated to >> support a negative and no alternative explanations can >> exist. >> > > some negatives can be proven. I could prove there's no gorilla in my car. Not strictly conclusively. You could be mistaken, one could have snuck in there when you were not watching, one could in fact be there _right now_. I'd say that you would make a stronger claim by saying that you can logically prove a negative such as for instance, there is no gorilla of specified size in your microwave due to the laws of physics. But that is not scientific proof, just a tautology that follows from the premises. But once the gorilla is seen, and documented, it is proven to at least have existed forever. Ok, ok, for the philosophical fans out there, you could always argue eternal and supreme doubt, but that leads nowhere which is why it is not taken seriously in academic circles.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-13 00:55 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <lctr6nFoq8bU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #888018 |
D wrote: > > > On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, Maximus wrote: > >> Attila wrote: >>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 07:37:42 +1000, In the Name of Jesus >>> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with >>> message-id <v4ag37$187hc$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/06/2024 8:13 pm, Attila wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 09:39:54 +1000, In the Name of Jesus >>>>> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with >>>>> message-id <v482sa$l4q3$3@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 10/06/2024 6:08 pm, Attila wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 08:20:48 +1000, In the Name of Jesus >>>>>>> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with >>>>>>> message-id <v459s0$3r090$2@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 10/06/2024 7:24 am, Attila wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 08 Jun 2024 12:06:38 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>> <6664ABBE.2601@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 May 2024 12:21:49 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>> <6658D1CD.38D1@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 May 2024 09:47:46 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>> <6658ADB2.6E8E@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 29 May 2024 17:04:15 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <6657C27F.35B6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existence of any god. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you see trees anywhere else in the universe? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have not looked everywhere. Have you? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You want proof of God, would a California Driver License >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID do? >>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably not. What are the conditions for obtaining one? I >>>>>>>>>>>>> don't trust anything coming out of Cartel West. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The problem here AttiLa is that God is everywhere. Even >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if you looked 'everywhere' >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you wouldn't be able to 'see' Him...just as a fish in his >>>>>>>>>>>>>> aquarium doesn't understand >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what he sees everywhere pass the glass. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Difficult to analyze and describe...God is subtle. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A pile of poop! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A rock! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A bug! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A ham sandwich! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Take your pick. For some that is all the evidence that is >>>>>>>>>>>>> needed. >>>>>>>>>>>> I think you are not understanding... >>>>>>>>>>> So you say. I require a bit more. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> God is everywhere, but >>>>>>>>>>>> You cannot look everywhere at once. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't say "Look over there." >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you look over there you might see a rock.. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> but if you look eveywhere..you see...God. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> God is everywhere, not ...over there. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A rock is not everywhere, it's over there. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Where's that ham sandwitch???? i bet it's somewhere overthere. >>>>>>>>>>> I rest my case. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: "Oh, look! A ham sandwich! That proves there >>>>>>>>>> is a god!" >>>>>> It is if you bother to look at what constitutes a ham sandwich, >>>>>> where >>>>>> that ham sandwich came from, and the impossibility of everything >>>>>> creating itself. >>>>> There are too many possible alternatives to attribute >>>>> anything to an intelligent source. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As I said, for some that is all that is necessary. They >>>>>>>> Everything is evidence there is a God. >>>>>>> That is what I mean. That attitude allows no further >>>>>>> discussion. >>>>>> Well, everything is the evidence for God. >>>>>> >>>>>> And yes, we have differing experience. >>>>> Thus making the experience of someone else useless. >>>>> >>>>>>> BTW, where is any supporting evidence (actual facts) for >>>>>>> that conclusion? Or is it only your unsupported belief? >>>>>> >>>>>> Is this the point where I say, "Oh look! There is an Attila! That >>>>>> proves >>>>>> there is no God!" >>>>> You cannot prove a negative. >>>> Who says? >>> Anyone. All possible sources must be investigated to >>> support a negative and no alternative explanations can >>> exist. >>> >> >> some negatives can be proven. I could prove there's no gorilla in my >> car. > > Not strictly conclusively. at any particular point in time is/was implied > You could be mistaken, one could have snuck in there when you were not > watching, one could in fact be there _right now_. > > I'd say that you would make a stronger claim by saying that you can > logically prove a negative such as for instance, there is no gorilla > of specified size in your microwave due to the laws of physics. But > that is not scientific proof, just a tautology that follows from the > premises. > > But once the gorilla is seen, and documented, it is proven to at least > have existed forever. > > Ok, ok, for the philosophical fans out there, you could always argue > eternal and supreme doubt, but that leads nowhere which is why it is > not taken seriously in academic circles. -- “Atheism is the birth right of all human, remember that!”- hhyapster 7.4.23 "Christian beliefs fail against reason, facts, and knowledge" "Religion is not about truth, it's about lifestyle" "God is a convenient explanation for what man does not understand. The less that's inexplicable, the less need for a 'God' explanation'."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-12 19:11 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <fef9a450-def6-2fb0-ae98-a2aef4d0f914@example.net> |
| In reply to | #888021 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024, Maximus wrote:
>>>>>> You cannot prove a negative.
>>>>> Who says?
>>>> Anyone. All possible sources must be investigated to
>>>> support a negative and no alternative explanations can
>>>> exist.
>>>>
>>>
>>> some negatives can be proven. I could prove there's no gorilla in my car.
>>
>> Not strictly conclusively.
>
> at any particular point in time is/was implied
And a certain design of the car as well so that you have full view of it.
Probably, for strictness sake, a few extra observers as well. But that
is not a proof, it is an observation. ;)
Difference Between Proof and Observation:
Proof: Proof is a conclusive demonstration that establishes the truth of a
statement or proposition beyond any doubt. It involves a logical and
rigorous argument or series of steps that lead to the verification of a
claim. In mathematics, for example, a proof is a formal explanation that
shows why a theorem or statement is true based on axioms, definitions, and
previously proven results.
Observation: An observation, on the other hand, is a statement or fact
that can be readily perceived or noticed without the need for an elaborate
or detailed explanation. Observations are typically evident through simple
inspection or direct experience. In mathematical contexts, an observation
may refer to a statement whose truth is immediately apparent based on
basic principles or common knowledge.
Key Differences:
Conclusiveness: Proof is conclusive and leaves no room for doubt
regarding the truth of a statement, while an observation may be more
intuitive and apparent but lacks the formal rigor of a proof.
Complexity: Proofs often involve intricate logical reasoning and
structured arguments, whereas observations are usually straightforward and
easily discernible.
Formality: Proofs follow specific rules of logic and deduction to
establish validity, while observations may rely more on intuition or
common sense.
In summary, while both proofs and observations contribute to understanding
in various fields such as mathematics, science, and law, they differ in
terms of their level of conclusiveness, complexity, and formality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-12 17:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8r5k6j9fcp9h4gs3erifpnqn1b57ls83g8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #888016 |
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 20:00:42 +1000, Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with message-id <lct9udFm9b0U1@mid.individual.net> wrote: >Attila wrote: >> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 07:37:42 +1000, In the Name of Jesus >> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with >> message-id <v4ag37$187hc$1@dont-email.me> wrote: >> >>> On 11/06/2024 8:13 pm, Attila wrote: >>>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 09:39:54 +1000, In the Name of Jesus >>>> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with >>>> message-id <v482sa$l4q3$3@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 10/06/2024 6:08 pm, Attila wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 08:20:48 +1000, In the Name of Jesus >>>>>> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism with >>>>>> message-id <v459s0$3r090$2@dont-email.me> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 10/06/2024 7:24 am, Attila wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 08 Jun 2024 12:06:38 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>> <6664ABBE.2601@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 May 2024 12:21:49 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>> <6658D1CD.38D1@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 May 2024 09:47:46 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>> <6658ADB2.6E8E@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 29 May 2024 17:04:15 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <6657C27F.35B6@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existence of any god. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you see trees anywhere else in the universe? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have not looked everywhere. Have you? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You want proof of God, would a California Driver License ID do? >>>>>>>>>>>> Probably not. What are the conditions for obtaining one? I >>>>>>>>>>>> don't trust anything coming out of Cartel West. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The problem here AttiLa is that God is everywhere. Even if you looked 'everywhere' >>>>>>>>>>>>> you wouldn't be able to 'see' Him...just as a fish in his aquarium doesn't understand >>>>>>>>>>>>> what he sees everywhere pass the glass. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Difficult to analyze and describe...God is subtle. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A pile of poop! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A rock! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A bug! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>>> "Oh, look! A ham sandwich! That proves there is a god!" >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Take your pick. For some that is all the evidence that is >>>>>>>>>>>> needed. >>>>>>>>>>> I think you are not understanding... >>>>>>>>>> So you say. I require a bit more. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> God is everywhere, but >>>>>>>>>>> You cannot look everywhere at once. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I didn't say "Look over there." >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If you look over there you might see a rock.. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> but if you look eveywhere..you see...God. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> God is everywhere, not ...over there. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> A rock is not everywhere, it's over there. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Where's that ham sandwitch???? i bet it's somewhere overthere. >>>>>>>>>> I rest my case. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Attila < wrote: "Oh, look! A ham sandwich! That proves there is a god!" >>>>> It is if you bother to look at what constitutes a ham sandwich, where >>>>> that ham sandwich came from, and the impossibility of everything >>>>> creating itself. >>>> There are too many possible alternatives to attribute >>>> anything to an intelligent source. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> As I said, for some that is all that is necessary. They >>>>>>> Everything is evidence there is a God. >>>>>> That is what I mean. That attitude allows no further >>>>>> discussion. >>>>> Well, everything is the evidence for God. >>>>> >>>>> And yes, we have differing experience. >>>> Thus making the experience of someone else useless. >>>> >>>>>> BTW, where is any supporting evidence (actual facts) for >>>>>> that conclusion? Or is it only your unsupported belief? >>>>> >>>>> Is this the point where I say, "Oh look! There is an Attila! That proves >>>>> there is no God!" >>>> You cannot prove a negative. >>> Who says? >> Anyone. All possible sources must be investigated to >> support a negative and no alternative explanations can >> exist. >> > >some negatives can be proven. I could prove there's no gorilla in my car. You mean there was not one when you looked. There may be one now. Or do you spend 24/7 watching for gorillas in your car? -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying. Whatever it takes - Stop the Democrats. Or the Dims as I prefer to call them The most dangerous enemies the United States has: Biden the Senile Bastard and his Bitch and supported by the Sluts and Pimps including Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, Jamaal Bowman, Cori Bush, Adam Schiff, Maxine Waters, Jerry Nadler, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi and Cory Booker. They have stepped over the line and are working against the country and what it stands for. Do not work with them but oppose everything they attempt. Stop the Green Raw Deal! I dare call it treason. Go WOKE. Go broke. CRT - Criminals Recruiting Thugs DEI - Dumbass Egotistical Idiocy End all social engineering programs. I don't know how Comical Karine can still hold a straight face with what she has to say. Did the last sane person leaving California remember to turn off the lights? Did he do the same for the Rotten Apple? Abortion should be like any other medical procedure and be the decision of the patient and the doctor. It is the business of no one else. There is only one reason for a woman to get an abortion. She want's it. All else is irrelevant I support a Pro-Choice Constitutional Amendment. Don't build a wall, build a kill zone. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software. www.norton.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | cld <clowd@nimbus.net.inv> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-05-30 20:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <0n-dnZrDKP2jTsX7nZ2dnZeNn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #887805 |
The Starmaker wrote: > Attila < wrote: >> >> On Wed, 29 May 2024 09:44:34 -0700, The Starmaker >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >> <66575B72.7656@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> >>> Maximus wrote: >>>> >>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> Maximus wrote: >>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 10:57:02 -0700, The Starmaker >>>>>>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Atheism is a belief, it's not a science. >>>>>>> So, since Atheism is a belief, and it's not a science... >>>>>> who is claiming atheism is a science? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Most books on atheism are written by scientists and the 'scientific community', not christians. >>>> >>>> if so that doesn't mean atheism is a science >>> >>> >>> People who write books mostly write about ..what they know. >>> >>> Since most atheism books are writteb by the 'scientific community', it >>> is they who claiming >>> atheism is a science (even if they don't believe it themslves). >>> >>> I already explained this, Atheism books is not about atheism...it's >>> about How To Murder God. >> >> I was not aware there is a law against killing a god. Any >> god.. > > > > There are laws that are called Laws of Nature, that are not written in > books... > > and God does not allow anyone to get away with...Murder...especially > His. > > > God will get you for dat. ------------------------- "but here in this bank and shoal of time, ... we still have judgement here; that we but teach bloody instructions, which being taught, return to plague th'inventor: Macbeth, 1.vii.6 > > > > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-09-06 18:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ef727beb5247aae34a9e67a21d146d2d@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #886961 |
Not if you properly define it: Atheism is withholding belief in a soul that survives death until sufficient evidence exists. It is not the belief that souls don't exist.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 24 of 24 — ← Prev page 1 … 22 23 [24]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web