the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject	the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905
Date	Sun, 02 Jun 2024 16:22:47 -0700
Organization	To protect and to server
Message-ID	<665CFEC7.6BF3@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Info	paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="3763741"; posting-host="nLYg9UBeoMWa070gP9wQcw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A";
X-Antivirus	Avast (VPS 240602-4, 06/02/2024), Outbound message
X-Notice	Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus-Status	Clean
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:654051 sci.physics:887872

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905

Most people are not aware..(expecially in this newsgroup)

that in 1905 there was no papers by Albert Einstein  entitled

'the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905'.

It didn't exist. The titles have different names.

It wasn't called the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905.

Certaintly not in 1906, 1907, 1908, 1909, ...when????


Everybody HERE call the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905

The Special Theory of Relativity - 1905


but there was no such thing!!!!

wats wrong wit you people????

It's INSANITY!

There was no 'the Special Theory of Relativity' in 1905!

Certaintly not in 1906, 1907, 1908, 1909, ...when????


GET IT TOGETHER.

do something right for once!

you people are insane...










-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-02 16:22 -0700
  Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-02 22:12 -0700
    Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-03 10:04 -0700
    Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 x <x@x.org> - 2024-06-03 14:24 -0700
      Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 Richard Hachel <richard.hachel@invalid.fr> - 2024-06-04 10:40 +0000
      Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-04 14:01 +0200
      Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-06-04 15:27 +0200
  Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-04 11:44 -0700
    Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-06-05 07:52 +0200
      Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-04 23:04 -0700
        Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-06-06 07:31 +0200
          Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-06-06 10:55 -0700

csiph-web