Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #663949 > unrolled thread

Einstein versus Poincaré

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Einstein versus Poincaré Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2025-06-04 16:19 +0000
    Re: Einstein versus Poincaré Valentin Bakinoff <ltif@bnife.ru> - 2025-06-04 17:29 +0000
    Re: Einstein versus Poincaré Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-07 09:01 +0200
      Re: Einstein versus Poincaré Coby Schrijnemakers <ckess@sembo.nl> - 2025-06-07 10:28 +0000
        Re: Einstein versus Poincaré Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-09 07:17 +0200

#663949 — Einstein versus Poincaré

Many people have reported the Einstein scam, a primarily political scam at 
a time when preparations were underway for one of humanity's most 
devastating conflicts, and when, precisely, the French, English, and 
Germans were glaring at each other.
What happened? For several years, a French genius had been introducing a 
brand new theory, writing philosophical, mathematical, and physical texts 
of prime importance (Henri Poincaré was considered the last man in 
humanity to still master the entire science of his time, something that 
would no longer be possible today). In June 1905, he published an article 
on "On the Dynamics of the Electron" which he sent to Bern. In Bern, an 
anonymous copyist (don't laugh, friends) then published an article in 
September entitled "Dynamics of the Electron."
LOL.
I don't believe Albert Einstein wrote a single line of this article, but 
that it was written by the best German specialists, and that he simply 
served as a front. Their goal wasn't to glorify Einstein, but to show that 
Poincaré hadn't discovered anything special. The goal of Einstein's 
article was to pull the rug out from under Poincaré and France.
We couldn't afford a France illuminating the world with a completely 
revolutionary theory.
It's as simple as that.
The most fantastic thing (because God doesn't give credit) is that when 
the physicists met in Oslo (it's beautiful, get out your handkerchiefs, 
it's so beautiful), it was decided that the Nobel Prize in Physics would 
be awarded to the theory of relativity, which was considered an 
exceptional advance. And they said: "We'll award it to Mr. Einstein." 
There, stunned, the French leave the room, disgusted. Once the French have 
left, we're in deep shit. Ooooh, we're in deep shit. What can we do? We 
call the French back, saying that, after all, we're going to award the 
Nobel Prize to Mr. Einstein, but NOT FOR THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY, but for 
a grim half-page article on the photoelectric effect.
The conclusion is then obvious, and if we consider that the Nobel 
committee didn't give a damn about a 27-year-old little pisser, and that 
it wasn't for him that the Nobel was being awarded, nor for his half-page 
article on the photoelectric effect, we realize a miraculously obvious 
fact: it was so as not to award it to Poincaré.

R.H. 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#663950

Richard Hachel wrote:

> The conclusion is then obvious, and if we consider that the Nobel
> committee didn't give a damn about a 27-year-old little pisser, and that
> it wasn't for him that the Nobel was being awarded, nor for his
> half-page article on the photoelectric effect, we realize a miraculously
> obvious fact: it was so as not to award it to Poincaré.

excellent post, we need more like that, as I start loving Poincare; you
should kick the shit out of gay gearmony, once you've been occupied; but
if you were allied to Hitler, as it looks like, then you should shut-up
and be obedient to your gay masters, gearmonia. Your gay president is gay
already, fucked in his as by his wife of a age older than of his father.

disgusting, completely. This stuff you don't learn in schools. You don't
learn that ass face head of natZo is gay, taking cocks in his ass,
smelling the shit. That what your NATzO is. An ass smelling cock shit.

I would even sit at a table with such fucks. Let alone shaking hands. The
muslims are not stupid. They don't jeopardize smelling the shit. The 
Einstine too loved smelling the shit from a man.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#663993

Am Mittwoch000004, 04.06.2025 um 18:19 schrieb Richard Hachel:
> Many people have reported the Einstein scam, a primarily political scam 
> at a time when preparations were underway for one of humanity's most 
> devastating conflicts, and when, precisely, the French, English, and 
> Germans were glaring at each other.
> What happened? For several years, a French genius had been introducing a 
> brand new theory, writing philosophical, mathematical, and physical 
> texts of prime importance (Henri Poincaré was considered the last man in 
> humanity to still master the entire science of his time, something that 
> would no longer be possible today). In June 1905, he published an 
> article on "On the Dynamics of the Electron" which he sent to Bern. In 
> Bern, an anonymous copyist (don't laugh, friends) then published an 
> article in September entitled "Dynamics of the Electron."
> LOL.
> I don't believe Albert Einstein wrote a single line of this article, but 
> that it was written by the best German specialists, and that he simply 
> served as a front. Their goal wasn't to glorify Einstein, but to show 
> that Poincaré hadn't discovered anything special. The goal of Einstein's 
> article was to pull the rug out from under Poincaré and France.
> We couldn't afford a France illuminating the world with a completely 
> revolutionary theory.
> It's as simple as that.

I would mostly agree, but would exchange 'Swiss' or 'Switzerland' with 
'German'.

I actually do think, that Einstein wasn't a German, but most likely 
Swiss. Possibly he wasn't even a Jew and possibly his name wasn't 
'Einstein'.

I had also doubts about the sources of 'On the electrodynamics of moving 
bodies' and especially about the alleged date.

I think, that Einstein's text contains actually quotes from "On the 
Dynamics of the Electron", which was published two weeks later.

Einstein had most likely also quoted Heinrich Hertz, but without 
reference and also incorrectly.


...

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#663995

Thomas Heger wrote:

> I had also doubts about the sources of 'On the electrodynamics of moving
> bodies' and especially about the alleged date.
> 
> I think, that Einstein's text contains actually quotes from "On the
> Dynamics of the Electron", which was published two weeks later.
> 
> Einstein had most likely also quoted Heinrich Hertz, but without
> reference and also incorrectly.

quoting?? the Einstine was so stupid not remembering his own quotes. Not remembering he had any quotes. He was just delivering patents to other people to undrestand. You take from the left and give it to the right.

US firebombed hundreds of Japanese towns constructed entirely of bamboo, killing hundreds of thousands-all civilians before dropping two atomic bombs unnecessarily. Nagasaki had no military installments to target.
But Nagasaki did have the highest concentration of Japanese Christians in all of Japan. And ’D-Day’ (Operation Overlord-1944) was launched on June 6th at exactly 6 am. Sixth month…sixth day…sixth hour…666

Exactly. D-Day is short for Devil’s Day. The Devil was the «Overlord» of the whole operation. That's the day the english jews killed Jesus for their master, the god of this world, read satan, telling them to cut off the head of their own children.

that's what good old Christian Russia is dealing with right now. The fake Christians satanists pigs of this world.

US is a global thug and sponsor of genocidal Zionist scum and all these wars around the world and the holocaust of Palestine is being sponsored by the deadbeat US warmongers. Iran has proven be a good reliable ally of Russia along with DPRK and Russia will stand by Iran. It is time Iran just test a nuclear weapon as that is the only language these Anglo-Zionist genocidal criminals understand.

https://r%74.com/news/618757-iranian-mp-russia-us-threats-nuclear-talks-trap/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664016

Am Samstag000007, 07.06.2025 um 12:28 schrieb Coby Schrijnemakers:
> Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
>> I had also doubts about the sources of 'On the electrodynamics of moving
>> bodies' and especially about the alleged date.
>>
>> I think, that Einstein's text contains actually quotes from "On the
>> Dynamics of the Electron", which was published two weeks later.
>>
>> Einstein had most likely also quoted Heinrich Hertz, but without
>> reference and also incorrectly.
> 
> quoting?? the Einstine was so stupid not remembering his own quotes. Not remembering he had any quotes. He was just delivering patents to other people to undrestand. You take from the left and give it to the right.


I have actually obtained copies of the books of Heinrich Hertz and spent 
some time on searching for similarities to Einstein's text.

As German is my primary language, I had no difficulty in reading them.

Hertz was also a very good writer and so it was not hat difficult to 
read his papers.

I have searched his works (few, actually, as he died relatively young) 
and found a lot of things, which looked like Einstein's text.

As Einstein actually had mentioned the name 'Hertz', I was allowed to 
assume, that Einstein had read the books of Heinrich Hertz, too.

But Hertz was a convinced 'aetherist', while Einstein wasn't.

Hertz also used very similar equations, but with total derivatives, 
where Einstein used partial derivatives.

Hertz used also almost the same variable names, especially for the 
components of the electric and magnetic field strength vectors.

So: I found similarities, but also differences.

These differences are now, what is actually critical, because 'wrong 
quotes' are actually worse than 'no quotes'.

...


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web