Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #663949

Einstein versus Poincaré

Show all headers | View raw

Many people have reported the Einstein scam, a primarily political scam at 
a time when preparations were underway for one of humanity's most 
devastating conflicts, and when, precisely, the French, English, and 
Germans were glaring at each other.
What happened? For several years, a French genius had been introducing a 
brand new theory, writing philosophical, mathematical, and physical texts 
of prime importance (Henri Poincaré was considered the last man in 
humanity to still master the entire science of his time, something that 
would no longer be possible today). In June 1905, he published an article 
on "On the Dynamics of the Electron" which he sent to Bern. In Bern, an 
anonymous copyist (don't laugh, friends) then published an article in 
September entitled "Dynamics of the Electron."
LOL.
I don't believe Albert Einstein wrote a single line of this article, but 
that it was written by the best German specialists, and that he simply 
served as a front. Their goal wasn't to glorify Einstein, but to show that 
Poincaré hadn't discovered anything special. The goal of Einstein's 
article was to pull the rug out from under Poincaré and France.
We couldn't afford a France illuminating the world with a completely 
revolutionary theory.
It's as simple as that.
The most fantastic thing (because God doesn't give credit) is that when 
the physicists met in Oslo (it's beautiful, get out your handkerchiefs, 
it's so beautiful), it was decided that the Nobel Prize in Physics would 
be awarded to the theory of relativity, which was considered an 
exceptional advance. And they said: "We'll award it to Mr. Einstein." 
There, stunned, the French leave the room, disgusted. Once the French have 
left, we're in deep shit. Ooooh, we're in deep shit. What can we do? We 
call the French back, saying that, after all, we're going to award the 
Nobel Prize to Mr. Einstein, but NOT FOR THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY, but for 
a grim half-page article on the photoelectric effect.
The conclusion is then obvious, and if we consider that the Nobel 
committee didn't give a damn about a 27-year-old little pisser, and that 
it wasn't for him that the Nobel was being awarded, nor for his half-page 
article on the photoelectric effect, we realize a miraculously obvious 
fact: it was so as not to award it to Poincaré.

R.H. 

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Einstein versus Poincaré Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2025-06-04 16:19 +0000
  Re: Einstein versus Poincaré Valentin Bakinoff <ltif@bnife.ru> - 2025-06-04 17:29 +0000
  Re: Einstein versus Poincaré Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-07 09:01 +0200
    Re: Einstein versus Poincaré Coby Schrijnemakers <ckess@sembo.nl> - 2025-06-07 10:28 +0000
      Re: Einstein versus Poincaré Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-09 07:17 +0200

csiph-web