Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #594629 > unrolled thread

Science does not have evidence by the measurement

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 11:26 -0700
    Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 12:53 -0700
      Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 13:32 -0700
        Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-04 01:36 -0400
          Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Stefan Russo <ftfr@urstsoto.ee> - 2022-11-04 12:00 +0000
      Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 15:35 -0700
        Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-03 18:38 -0500
          Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-11-04 01:18 +0100
            Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-03 23:06 -0500
              Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-11-04 08:40 +0100
              Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-11-04 08:42 +0100
                Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-04 17:53 -0500
            Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 23:19 -0700
            Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Stefan Russo <ftfr@urstsoto.ee> - 2022-11-04 11:13 +0000
              Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-04 18:29 -0400
                Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Stefan Russo <ftfr@urstsoto.ee> - 2022-11-04 22:53 +0000
                  Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-07 19:45 -0500
          Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-06 17:21 -0800
            Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-06 21:28 -0600
              Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-06 23:15 -0800
      Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-04 10:37 -0700
        Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-11-07 18:37 +1100
          Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-07 00:00 -0800
          Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-07 09:36 -0800

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#594629 — Science does not have evidence by the measurement

for space contraction universal... or length of the atom changing...
how do you measure length going away? do we live in a lopsided
universe by all local motion? NO the universe has an absolute size that
does not go away but continues to expand. Travel in space does not 
contract universal distance either or the atom.. it slows time instead.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#594635

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> for space contraction universal... or length of the atom changing...
> how do you measure length going away? do we live in a lopsided
> universe by all local motion? NO the universe has an absolute size that
> does not go away but continues to expand. Travel in space does not
> contract universal distance either or the atom.. it slows time instead.

but time doesn't move so how can it go slow?



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594636

On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 12:52:51 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > 
> > for space contraction universal... or length of the atom changing... 
> > how do you measure length going away? do we live in a lopsided 
> > universe by all local motion? NO the universe has an absolute size that 
> > does not go away but continues to expand. Travel in space does not 
> > contract universal distance either or the atom.. it slows time instead.
> but time doesn't move so how can it go slow? 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
> and challenge 
> the unchallengeable.

Einstein said science would fail. He wrote it down on his last day.
He also said the atheists were his problem all along and that
having a personal God already is not against a belief in an impersonal
Side of God. Einstein had his God. His God was his God.
In the end he said his God was two sided.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594675

On 11/3/2022 4:32 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, November 3, 2022 at 12:52:51 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> for space contraction universal... or length of the atom changing...
>>> how do you measure length going away? do we live in a lopsided
>>> universe by all local motion? NO the universe has an absolute size that
>>> does not go away but continues to expand. Travel in space does not
>>> contract universal distance either or the atom.. it slows time instead.
>> but time doesn't move so how can it go slow?
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>> and challenge
>> the unchallengeable.
> 
> Einstein said science would fail. He wrote it down on his last day.

Roy Masters II, now you are adding to your lie!

Show me a pointer to an image of the paper where he allegedly wrote that 
science would fail. You can't, because it doesn't exist. You might as 
well just admit that you are lying.

> He also said the atheists were his problem all along and that
> having a personal God already is not against a belief in an impersonal
> Side of God. Einstein had his God. His God was his God.
> In the end he said his God was two sided.
> 

More lies, Roy Masters II.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594692

Volney wrote:

>> Einstein said science would fail. He wrote it down on his last day.
> 
> Roy Masters II, now you are adding to your lie!
> Show me a pointer to an image of the paper where he allegedly wrote that
> science would fail. You can't, because it doesn't exist. You might as
> well just admit that you are lying.

you are right, last day he was talking with his cousin, he was married with.

Preferential Treatment of Ukrainian Refugees in EU Stirs Anger Amid Claims of ‘Institutional Racism’
https://%73%70%75%74%6e%69%6b%6e%65%77%73.com/20221104/preferential-treatment-of-ukrainian-refugees-in-eu-stirs-anger-amid-claims-of-institutional-racism-1103777096.html

Europe had granted Ukrainians automatic residency and visas after the Ukraine conflict escalated, with this preferential treatment placing them at the front of the queue for refugee services and housing, leaving asylum-seekers from other countries at a distinct disadvantage.
Evident disparities have arisen between the Ukrainians - who are not necessarily fleeing areas of immediate military operations, but hope to seize the opportunity to settle abroad - and those fleeing conflicts in the Middle East. According to some activists helping refugees from countries such as Syria and Afghanistan, a two-tier system has been established that disadvantages and discriminates against asylum seekers who are not from Ukraine.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594650

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > for space contraction universal... or length of the atom changing...
> > how do you measure length going away? do we live in a lopsided
> > universe by all local motion? NO the universe has an absolute size that
> > does not go away but continues to expand. Travel in space does not
> > contract universal distance either or the atom.. it slows time instead.
> 
> but time doesn't move so how can it go slow?

If you watch a movie
in a movie theater...
you can see
days, months, years
pass by on the screen..
but the screen does not move.

There is light
that shoots
thru
frames..
giving the 
appearance
of movement..
but the screen
does not move.

Time does not move.


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594653

On 11/3/2022 5:35 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> for space contraction universal... or length of the atom changing...
>>> how do you measure length going away? do we live in a lopsided
>>> universe by all local motion? NO the universe has an absolute size that
>>> does not go away but continues to expand. Travel in space does not
>>> contract universal distance either or the atom.. it slows time instead.
>>
>> but time doesn't move so how can it go slow?
> 
> If you watch a movie
> in a movie theater...
> you can see
> days, months, years
> pass by on the screen..
> but the screen does not move.
> 
> There is light
> that shoots
> thru
> frames..
> giving the
> appearance
> of movement..
> but the screen
> does not move.
> 
> Time does not move.

What is this "time" that it does not move?

Can you tell us what time is?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594662

whodat wrote:

> On 11/3/2022 5:35 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Time does not move.
> 
> What is this "time" that it does not move?

Not what you think it is.
 
> Can you tell us what time is?

Probably the most concise definition is:

It is a concept and physical quantity with we are using to describe change 
or the lack thereof.

If two values of time differ, and the values of another physical quantity
at those time values (times) differ, then we say that the quantity has 
changed; otherwise it has remained constant (unless it has changed and
then changed back to its original value; so we actually have to consider
all times in-between to be sure).

For details, see the bookshelves filled with books by philosophers and 
natural scientists alike in the past, hm, 6000 years or so :-D


PointedEars
-- 
I heard that entropy isn't what it used to be.

(from: WolframAlpha)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594672

On 11/3/2022 7:18 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> whodat wrote:
> 
>> On 11/3/2022 5:35 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Time does not move.
>>
>> What is this "time" that it does not move?
> 
> Not what you think it is.

What, according to you, do I think time is?

>> Can you tell us what time is?
> 
> Probably the most concise definition is:
> 
> It is a concept and physical quantity with we are using to describe change
> or the lack thereof.
>
> If two values of time differ, 

Time has values? So why isn't "values" part of "the most concise
definition" you've provided above.

> and the values of another physical quantity
> at those time values (times) differ, then we say that the quantity has
> changed; otherwise it has remained constant (unless it has changed and
> then changed back to its original value; so we actually have to consider
> all times in-between to be sure).
> 
> For details, see the bookshelves filled with books by philosophers and
> natural scientists alike in the past, hm, 6000 years or so :-D

This is the point at which I should bring up something about useless
cookie cutter definitions...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594682

whodat wrote:

> On 11/3/2022 7:18 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> whodat wrote:
>>> On 11/3/2022 5:35 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> Time does not move.
>>> What is this "time" that it does not move?
>> Not what you think it is.
> 
> What, according to you, do I think time is?

Whatever you think time would be, it is obviously not that.  You are lacking 
basic physical knowledge.  See below.
 
>>> Can you tell us what time is?
>> 
>> Probably the most concise definition is:
>> 
>> It is a concept and physical quantity with we are using to describe

with _which_

>> change or the lack thereof.
>>
>> If two values of time differ,
> 
> Time has values? So why isn't "values" part of "the most concise
> definition" you've provided above.

It is, implicitly.  Every physical *quantity* has values; that is what that 
word *means*.
 
>> and the values of another physical quantity
>> at those time values (times) differ, then we say that the quantity has
>> changed; otherwise it has remained constant (unless it has changed and
>> then changed back to its original value; so we actually have to consider
>> all times in-between to be sure).
>> 
>> For details, see the bookshelves filled with books by philosophers and
>> natural scientists alike in the past, hm, 6000 years or so :-D
> 
> This is the point at which I should bring up something about useless
> cookie cutter definitions...

While some of those people might also have been “cookie cutters”, that was 
certainly not their only field of expertise.


PointedEars
-- 
Q: What happens when electrons lose their energy?  
A: They get Bohr'ed.

(from: WolframAlpha)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594684

whodat wrote:

> On 11/3/2022 7:18 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> whodat wrote:
>>> On 11/3/2022 5:35 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> Time does not move.
>>> What is this "time" that it does not move?
>> Not what you think it is.
> 
> What, according to you, do I think time is?

Whatever you think time would be, it is obviously not that.  You are lacking 
basic physical knowledge.  See below.
 
>>> Can you tell us what time is?
>> 
>> Probably the most concise definition is:
>> 
>> It is a concept and physical quantity with we are using to describe

_which_, not “with”

>> change or the lack thereof.
>>
>> If two values of time differ,
> 
> Time has values? So why isn't "values" part of "the most concise
> definition" you've provided above.

It is, implicitly.  Every physical *quantity* has values; that is what that 
word *means*.
 
>> and the values of another physical quantity
>> at those time values (times) differ, then we say that the quantity has
>> changed; otherwise it has remained constant (unless it has changed and
>> then changed back to its original value; so we actually have to consider
>> all times in-between to be sure).
>> 
>> For details, see the bookshelves filled with books by philosophers and
>> natural scientists alike in the past, hm, 6000 years or so :-D
> 
> This is the point at which I should bring up something about useless
> cookie cutter definitions...

While some of those people might also have been “cookie cutters”, that was 
certainly not their only field of expertise.


PointedEars
-- 
Q: What happens when electrons lose their energy?  
A: They get Bohr'ed.

(from: WolframAlpha)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594761

On 11/4/2022 2:42 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> whodat wrote:
> 
>> On 11/3/2022 7:18 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>> whodat wrote:
>>>> On 11/3/2022 5:35 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> Time does not move.
>>>> What is this "time" that it does not move?
>>> Not what you think it is.
>>
>> What, according to you, do I think time is?
> 
> Whatever you think time would be, it is obviously not that.  You are lacking
> basic physical knowledge.  See below.

The fact of the matter is that humanity is lacking basic physical
knowledge. Your attempts at applying playground one upmanship stands you
in poor stead indeed. The most advanced of human theoreticians recognize
how little of the totality we know. It is fools and buffoons including
the cranks posting here who presume to know more.

>>>> Can you tell us what time is?
>>>
>>> Probably the most concise definition is:
>>>
>>> It is a concept and physical quantity with we are using to describe
> 
> _which_, not “with”
> 
>>> change or the lack thereof.
>>>
>>> If two values of time differ,
>>
>> Time has values? So why isn't "values" part of "the most concise
>> definition" you've provided above.
> 
> It is, implicitly.  

So in other words your definition isn't, as you claim, concise because
more is required than you provide.

> Every physical *quantity* has values; that is what that
> word *means*.
>   
>>> and the values of another physical quantity
>>> at those time values (times) differ, then we say that the quantity has
>>> changed; otherwise it has remained constant (unless it has changed and
>>> then changed back to its original value; so we actually have to consider
>>> all times in-between to be sure).
>>>
>>> For details, see the bookshelves filled with books by philosophers and
>>> natural scientists alike in the past, hm, 6000 years or so :-D
>>
>> This is the point at which I should bring up something about useless
>> cookie cutter definitions...
> 
> While some of those people might also have been “cookie cutters”, that was
> certainly not their only field of expertise.

My point, however, is that regardless of any other attributes these
broadly/generally referred to individuals had, there is presently no
meaningful definition of "time" available. The simple fact is that our
knowledge of time itself is limited to those few things that are
considered useful in the context of the limited applications we use.

The fact is you display what has been described as a "superiority
complex." It might be easy, in this particular environment, to achieve
such feelings, but you really should be more careful that you don't end
up the snake eating its own tail as you do here.

https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/what-is-a-superiority-complex

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594676

On Friday, 4 November 2022 at 01:18:12 UTC+1, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> whodat wrote: 
> 
> > On 11/3/2022 5:35 PM, The Starmaker wrote: 
> >> Time does not move. 
> > 
> > What is this "time" that it does not move?
> Not what you think it is.
> > Can you tell us what time is?
> Probably the most concise definition is: 
> 
> It is a concept and physical quantity with we are using to describe change 
> or the lack thereof. 

A definition of a child, deeply believing the world
is spinning around his childish games. No, time
is not a concept off physical quantity.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594689

inbreed cretin Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn, one more time:

> whodat wrote: 
>> Can you tell us what time is?
>
> I̶f̶ t̶w̶o̶ v̶a̶l̶u̶e̶s̶ o̶f̶ t̶i̶m̶e̶ d̶i̶f̶f̶e̶r̶, a̶n̶d̶ t̶h̶e̶ v̶a̶l̶u̶e̶s̶ o̶f̶ a̶n̶o̶t̶h̶e̶r̶ p̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶a̶l̶
> q̶u̶a̶n̶t̶i̶t̶y̶ a̶t̶ t̶h̶o̶s̶e̶ t̶i̶m̶e̶ v̶a̶l̶u̶e̶s̶ (t̶i̶m̶e̶s̶) d̶i̶f̶f̶e̶r̶, t̶h̶e̶n̶ w̶e̶ s̶a̶y̶ t̶h̶a̶t̶ t̶h̶e̶
> q̶u̶a̶n̶t̶i̶t̶y̶ h̶a̶s̶ c̶h̶a̶n̶g̶e̶d̶; o̶t̶h̶e̶r̶w̶i̶s̶e̶ i̶t̶ h̶a̶s̶ r̶e̶m̶a̶i̶n̶e̶d̶ c̶o̶n̶s̶t̶a̶n̶t̶ (u̶n̶l̶e̶s̶s̶ i̶t̶ h̶a̶s̶
> c̶h̶a̶n̶g̶e̶d̶ a̶n̶d̶ t̶h̶e̶n̶ c̶h̶a̶n̶g̶e̶d̶ b̶a̶c̶k̶ t̶o̶ i̶t̶s̶ o̶r̶i̶g̶i̶n̶a̶l̶ v̶a̶l̶u̶e̶; s̶o̶ w̶e̶ a̶c̶t̶u̶a̶l̶l̶y̶ h̶a̶v̶e̶
> t̶o̶ c̶o̶n̶s̶i̶d̶e̶r̶ a̶l̶l̶ t̶i̶m̶e̶s̶ i̶n̶-b̶e̶t̶w̶e̶e̶n̶ t̶o̶ b̶e̶ s̶u̶r̶e̶).

obvious, this impertinent cretin never heard about Entropy. As soon you have time, you have Entropy, and no quantity need to change at macro scale. 

*I_fart_you!* here is where your EU *fake_funny_money* goes on:

Zelensky’s wife hopes Musk tweet about peace was ‘mistake’ 
https://%72%74.com/%72%75%73%73%69%61/565920-zelenska-elon-musk-peace-mistake/
The billionaire must have fallen victim to propaganda, the Ukrainian first lady has claimed. (from Israel or other country)

Roger Waters writes letter to the khazar bitch wife of Zelensky
https://%72%74.com/pop-culture/562311-pink-floyd-waters-zelensky-ukraine/
The rock legend pleaded with the first lady to help “stop the slaughter” in Ukraine 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594754

On 11/4/2022 7:13 AM, Stefan Russo wrote:

> Roger Waters writes letter to the khazar bitch wife of Zelensky
> https://%72%74.com/pop-culture/562311-pink-floyd-waters-zelensky-ukraine/
> The rock legend pleaded with the first lady to help “stop the slaughter” in Ukraine

Did you notice that Pink Floyd, the legendary band which Waters was once 
part of, released a single explicitly to support Ukraine, vatnik?

How's the blyatskreig going, vatnik? It's been about a week of 700-800 
Russians getting denazified every day.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594760

Volney wrote:

> On 11/4/2022 7:13 AM, Stefan Russo wrote:
> 
>> Roger Waters writes letter to the khazar bitch wife of Zelensky
>> https://%72%74.com/pop-culture/562311-pink-floyd-waters-zelensky-
ukraine/
>> The rock legend pleaded with the first lady to help “stop the
>> slaughter”
>> in Ukraine
> 
> Did you notice that Pink Floyd, the legendary band which Waters was once
> part of, released a single explicitly to support Ukraine, vatnik?
> How's the blyatskreig going, vatnik? It's been about a week of 700-800
> Russians getting denazified every day.

completely delusional. Can't you engilsh the words or Waters, idiot.

here is how the denazification looks like. Send more fascist capitalist weapons to "uKraine". Thanks for the metal in advance. Read them all.

US-backed terrorists continue to suffer heavy loses near Kherson
https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/2EdCSLSJAoYv/

Germans out in force with one message in Dresden, they don't want to
starve and freeze!!!
https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/bOO26sY0aK5Q/

these nazis are so stupid, you beat them with one hand:

Ukrainian Neo-Nazi Training Session
https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/DPAzfp4p055z/

Zelensky’s wife hopes Musk tweet about peace was ‘mistake’
https://%72%74.com/%72%75%73%73%69%61/565920-zelenska-elon-musk-peace-mistake/
The billionaire must have fallen victim to propaganda, the Ukrainian first
lady has claimed. (from Israel or other country)

and you are telling me that you americans and english pigs are humans? Destroying vital energy structures in europe, which are not yours.

how the fuck you ever would become a human?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594935

On 11/4/2022 6:53 PM, Stefan Russo wrote:
> Volney wrote:
> 
>> On 11/4/2022 7:13 AM, Stefan Russo wrote:
>>
>>> Roger Waters writes letter to the khazar bitch wife of Zelensky
>>> https://%72%74.com/pop-culture/562311-pink-floyd-waters-zelensky-
> ukraine/
>>> The rock legend pleaded with the first lady to help “stop the
>>> slaughter”
>>> in Ukraine
>>
>> Did you notice that Pink Floyd, the legendary band which Waters was once
>> part of, released a single explicitly to support Ukraine, vatnik?
>> How's the blyatskreig going, vatnik? It's been about a week of 700-800
>> Russians getting denazified every day.
> 
> completely delusional. Can't you engilsh the words or Waters, idiot.

English please, nymshifter. I don't know gibberish.
> 
> here is how the denazification looks like.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fpIm28yzFQ

Several 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 soldiers almost getting denazified at a pontoon 
bridge in Kherson during the blyatskreig.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594901

whodat wrote:
> 
> On 11/3/2022 5:35 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>> for space contraction universal... or length of the atom changing...
> >>> how do you measure length going away? do we live in a lopsided
> >>> universe by all local motion? NO the universe has an absolute size that
> >>> does not go away but continues to expand. Travel in space does not
> >>> contract universal distance either or the atom.. it slows time instead.
> >>
> >> but time doesn't move so how can it go slow?
> >
> > If you watch a movie
> > in a movie theater...
> > you can see
> > days, months, years
> > pass by on the screen..
> > but the screen does not move.
> >
> > There is light
> > that shoots
> > thru
> > frames..
> > giving the
> > appearance
> > of movement..
> > but the screen
> > does not move.
> >
> > Time does not move.
> 
> What is this "time" that it does not move?
> 
> Can you tell us what time is?

Time is what the clock says.


They say...
a broken clock
is right
twice a day.

But, what if the
broken clock
also broke off
it's hands?

How many times a day is the clock right?


It's Now all the Time. 


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594904

On 11/6/2022 7:21 PM, The Starmaker the ultimate cookie cutter kid wrote:
> whodat wrote:
>>
>> On 11/3/2022 5:35 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> for space contraction universal... or length of the atom changing...
>>>>> how do you measure length going away? do we live in a lopsided
>>>>> universe by all local motion? NO the universe has an absolute size that
>>>>> does not go away but continues to expand. Travel in space does not
>>>>> contract universal distance either or the atom.. it slows time instead.
>>>>
>>>> but time doesn't move so how can it go slow?
>>>
>>> If you watch a movie
>>> in a movie theater...
>>> you can see
>>> days, months, years
>>> pass by on the screen..
>>> but the screen does not move.
>>>
>>> There is light
>>> that shoots
>>> thru
>>> frames..
>>> giving the
>>> appearance
>>> of movement..
>>> but the screen
>>> does not move.
>>>
>>> Time does not move.
>>
>> What is this "time" that it does not move?
>>
>> Can you tell us what time is?
> 
> Time is what the clock says.
> 
> 
> They say...
> a broken clock
> is right
> twice a day.

That depends on how wide "now" is. Cab you tell me?

> But, what if the
> broken clock
> also broke off
> it's hands?

Separating this from the previous...

> How many times a day is the clock right?

Depends on whether the clock is continuously moving or jumps
periodically.

> It's Now all the Time.

And of course "now" is self-defining. Really? How wide is now?
It cannot have zero width and have any meaning.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594908

On Monday, 7 November 2022 at 04:29:04 UTC+1, whodat wrote:

> And of course "now" is self-defining. Really? How wide is now? 
> It cannot have zero width and have any meaning.

Any experiment confirming this idiotic claim, poor
halfbrain?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web