Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #594901

Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement
Date 2022-11-06 17:21 -0800
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <63685DB2.7915@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <74b69e03-a943-4a38-8065-4f399350b9b2n@googlegroups.com> <63641C25.31E7@ix.netcom.com> <6364422A.7BD0@ix.netcom.com> <jsj1nbFed14U1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


whodat wrote:
> 
> On 11/3/2022 5:35 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>> for space contraction universal... or length of the atom changing...
> >>> how do you measure length going away? do we live in a lopsided
> >>> universe by all local motion? NO the universe has an absolute size that
> >>> does not go away but continues to expand. Travel in space does not
> >>> contract universal distance either or the atom.. it slows time instead.
> >>
> >> but time doesn't move so how can it go slow?
> >
> > If you watch a movie
> > in a movie theater...
> > you can see
> > days, months, years
> > pass by on the screen..
> > but the screen does not move.
> >
> > There is light
> > that shoots
> > thru
> > frames..
> > giving the
> > appearance
> > of movement..
> > but the screen
> > does not move.
> >
> > Time does not move.
> 
> What is this "time" that it does not move?
> 
> Can you tell us what time is?

Time is what the clock says.


They say...
a broken clock
is right
twice a day.

But, what if the
broken clock
also broke off
it's hands?

How many times a day is the clock right?


It's Now all the Time. 


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 11:26 -0700
  Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 12:53 -0700
    Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 13:32 -0700
      Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-04 01:36 -0400
        Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Stefan Russo <ftfr@urstsoto.ee> - 2022-11-04 12:00 +0000
    Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 15:35 -0700
      Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-03 18:38 -0500
        Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-11-04 01:18 +0100
          Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-03 23:06 -0500
            Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-11-04 08:40 +0100
            Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-11-04 08:42 +0100
              Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-04 17:53 -0500
          Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 23:19 -0700
          Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Stefan Russo <ftfr@urstsoto.ee> - 2022-11-04 11:13 +0000
            Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-04 18:29 -0400
              Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Stefan Russo <ftfr@urstsoto.ee> - 2022-11-04 22:53 +0000
                Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-07 19:45 -0500
        Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-06 17:21 -0800
          Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-06 21:28 -0600
            Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-06 23:15 -0800
    Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-04 10:37 -0700
      Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-11-07 18:37 +1100
        Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-07 00:00 -0800
        Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-07 09:36 -0800

csiph-web