Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #594904

Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement

Show all headers | View raw

On 11/6/2022 7:21 PM, The Starmaker the ultimate cookie cutter kid wrote:
> whodat wrote:
>>
>> On 11/3/2022 5:35 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> for space contraction universal... or length of the atom changing...
>>>>> how do you measure length going away? do we live in a lopsided
>>>>> universe by all local motion? NO the universe has an absolute size that
>>>>> does not go away but continues to expand. Travel in space does not
>>>>> contract universal distance either or the atom.. it slows time instead.
>>>>
>>>> but time doesn't move so how can it go slow?
>>>
>>> If you watch a movie
>>> in a movie theater...
>>> you can see
>>> days, months, years
>>> pass by on the screen..
>>> but the screen does not move.
>>>
>>> There is light
>>> that shoots
>>> thru
>>> frames..
>>> giving the
>>> appearance
>>> of movement..
>>> but the screen
>>> does not move.
>>>
>>> Time does not move.
>>
>> What is this "time" that it does not move?
>>
>> Can you tell us what time is?
> 
> Time is what the clock says.
> 
> 
> They say...
> a broken clock
> is right
> twice a day.

That depends on how wide "now" is. Cab you tell me?

> But, what if the
> broken clock
> also broke off
> it's hands?

Separating this from the previous...

> How many times a day is the clock right?

Depends on whether the clock is continuously moving or jumps
periodically.

> It's Now all the Time.

And of course "now" is self-defining. Really? How wide is now?
It cannot have zero width and have any meaning.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 11:26 -0700
  Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 12:53 -0700
    Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 13:32 -0700
      Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-04 01:36 -0400
        Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Stefan Russo <ftfr@urstsoto.ee> - 2022-11-04 12:00 +0000
    Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-03 15:35 -0700
      Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-03 18:38 -0500
        Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-11-04 01:18 +0100
          Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-03 23:06 -0500
            Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-11-04 08:40 +0100
            Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-11-04 08:42 +0100
              Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-04 17:53 -0500
          Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-03 23:19 -0700
          Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Stefan Russo <ftfr@urstsoto.ee> - 2022-11-04 11:13 +0000
            Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-04 18:29 -0400
              Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Stefan Russo <ftfr@urstsoto.ee> - 2022-11-04 22:53 +0000
                Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-07 19:45 -0500
        Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-06 17:21 -0800
          Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-06 21:28 -0600
            Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-06 23:15 -0800
    Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-04 10:37 -0700
      Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2022-11-07 18:37 +1100
        Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-07 00:00 -0800
        Re: Science does not have evidence by the measurement "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-11-07 09:36 -0800

csiph-web