Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #592686 > unrolled thread

YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES:

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Foos Research <cusanusnicolas@gmail.com> - 2022-10-01 03:28 -0700
    Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-10-01 07:05 -0700
      Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-10-01 16:09 +0200
    Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-10-01 12:19 -0700
    Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-10-03 10:22 -0500
      Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-10-03 08:52 -0700
      Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Douglass Nervetti <dlul@esivlen.an> - 2022-10-03 18:17 +0000
        Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-10-03 11:51 -0700
          Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Douglass Nervetti <dlul@esivlen.an> - 2022-10-03 19:18 +0000
            Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-10-03 14:37 -0500
              Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Douglass Nervetti <dlul@esivlen.an> - 2022-10-03 20:22 +0000
                Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-10-03 16:53 -0500
              Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-10-04 00:19 -0400
                Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-10-04 06:39 -0500
                  Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-10-04 18:41 -0400
                    Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-10-04 22:53 -0500
                      Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-10-05 03:56 -0400
                        Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-05 01:52 -0700
                          Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-10-05 08:39 -0500
                Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Douglass Nervetti <dlul@esivlen.an> - 2022-10-04 20:47 +0000
              Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-10-04 14:26 +0200

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#592686 — YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES:

Yes, Einstein was definitely a fake. His notions were logically absurd, and I can’t figure why they were embraced by the PTB. I’m a nobody myself and getting old, but was a dedicated math and science student and advanced problem solver who understood the truth. Most of his critics were indeed crackpots as well, so that hasn’t helped. Indeed, having extra time, have laid out how space, time and gravity work, NOT a theory, but the facts, but just haven’t gotten anybody to listen. I live in a world where the masses are brainwashed and barely proficient in freshman algebra. I need help, not to elevate myself, but to somehow get the truth out there. My web site on this issue is https://foosresearch.com/. I also highly recommend the page on starlight deflection where I find the correct answer using straightforward vector analysis. PLEASE engage me in discussion and help get this ironed out. I’m getting older by the minute.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#592688

On Saturday, October 1, 2022 at 3:28:17 AM UTC-7, cusanus...@gmail.com wrote:
> snip imbecilities<
Fresh crank alert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592690

On 2022-10-01 14:05:07 +0000, Dono. said:

> On Saturday, October 1, 2022 at 3:28:17 AM UTC-7, cusanus...@gmail.com wrote:
>> snip imbecilities<
> Fresh crank alert

I noticed. A brand-new crackpot.

-- 
Athel -- French and British, living mainly in England until 1987.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592703

On Saturday, October 1, 2022 at 3:28:17 AM UTC-7, cusanus...@gmail.com wrote:
> Yes, Einstein was definitely a fake. His notions were logically absurd, and I can’t figure why they were embraced by the PTB. I’m a nobody myself and getting old, but was a dedicated math and science student and advanced problem solver who understood the truth. Most of his critics were indeed crackpots as well, so that hasn’t helped. Indeed, having extra time, have laid out how space, time and gravity work, NOT a theory, but the facts, but just haven’t gotten anybody to listen. I live in a world where the masses are brainwashed and barely proficient in freshman algebra. I need help, not to elevate myself, but to somehow get the truth out there. My web site on this issue is https://foosresearch.com/. I also highly recommend the page on starlight deflection where I find the correct answer using straightforward vector analysis. PLEASE engage me in discussion and help get this ironed out. I’m getting older by the minute.

If you are nobody why do you claim Einstein was?
The liar lies and it is you not Einstein...

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592796

On 10/1/22 5:28 AM, Foos Research wrote:
> Yes, Einstein was definitely a fake.

No, but "Foos Research" sure looks and acts like a fake. Or at least a 
stupidity.

> His notions were logically absurd, and I can’t figure why they were embraced by the PTB. 

Einstein's ideas about relativity are not "logically absurd", and your 
inability here is simply due to the fact that YOU do not understand 
basic physics. Go STUDY. Use real physics textbooks, not popular 
articles or random web pages.

Tom Roberts

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592800

On Monday, 3 October 2022 at 17:22:25 UTC+2, tjrob137 wrote:
> On 10/1/22 5:28 AM, Foos Research wrote: 
> > Yes, Einstein was definitely a fake.
> No, but "Foos Research" sure looks and acts like a fake. Or at least a 
> stupidity.
> > His notions were logically absurd, and I can’t figure why they were embraced by the PTB.
> Einstein's ideas about relativity are not "logically absurd",

Yes, they are. Poor idiot has even written on 
his own forehead "I'm violating common 
sense".
https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/common%20sense

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592809

Tom Roberts wrote:

> On 10/1/22 5:28 AM, Foos Research wrote:
>> Yes, Einstein was definitely a fake.
> No, but "Foos Research" sure looks and acts like a fake. Or at least a
> stupidity. 
>> His notions were logically absurd, and I can’t figure why they were
>> embraced by the PTB.
> 
> Einstein's ideas about relativity are not "logically absurd", and your
> inability here is simply due to the fact that YOU do not understand
> basic physics. Go STUDY. Use real physics textbooks, not popular
> articles or random web pages.

you just have to prove he wrote those papers. I suspect his wife and 
friends, making him undrestand mathematics. His postmortem brain analysis 
shows he was a thief like Kenseto.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592816

On Monday, October 3, 2022 at 11:17:48 AM UTC-7, Douglass Nervetti wrote:
> Tom Roberts wrote: 
> 
> > On 10/1/22 5:28 AM, Foos Research wrote: 
> >> Yes, Einstein was definitely a fake. 
> > No, but "Foos Research" sure looks and acts like a fake. Or at least a 
> > stupidity. 
> >> His notions were logically absurd, and I can’t figure why they were 
> >> embraced by the PTB. 
> > 
> > Einstein's ideas about relativity are not "logically absurd", and your 
> > inability here is simply due to the fact that YOU do not understand 
> > basic physics. Go STUDY. Use real physics textbooks, not popular 
> > articles or random web pages.
> you just have to prove he wrote those papers. I suspect his wife and 
> friends, making him undrestand mathematics. His postmortem brain analysis 
> shows he was a thief like Kenseto.

The "wife" angle has been studied (one of the studies by a Russian
woman scientist BTW) and the result is FAPP negative.

As for the brain analysis, this sort of thing is well-known to be
100% useless, in general (unless there is something super-obviously
wrong with the organ). But for a normal average brain nobody knows
how to tell a Bach apart from a beach bum just by looking at their brains.

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592819

JanPB wrote:

>> > Einstein's ideas about relativity are not "logically absurd", and
>> > your inability here is simply due to the fact that YOU do not
>> > understand basic physics. Go STUDY. Use real physics textbooks, not
>> > popular articles or random web pages.
>> you just have to prove he wrote those papers. I suspect his wife and
>> friends, making him undrestand mathematics. His postmortem brain
>> analysis shows he was a thief like Kenseto.
> 
> The "wife" angle has been studied (one of the studies by a Russian woman
> scientist BTW) and the result is FAPP negative.
> 
> As for the brain analysis, this sort of thing is well-known to be 100%
> useless, in general (unless there is something super-obviously wrong
> with the organ). But for a normal average brain nobody knows how to tell
> a Bach apart from a beach bum just by looking at their brains.

there is a not directly obvious connection, between a woman and the 
universe. That's why the wive approach. That's how the entering the macro 
scale is done, through a woman. The young unskilled and unqualified 
Einstine knew nothing about.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592820

On 10/3/2022 2:18 PM, Douglass Nervetti wrote:
> JanPB wrote:
> 
>>>> Einstein's ideas about relativity are not "logically absurd", and
>>>> your inability here is simply due to the fact that YOU do not
>>>> understand basic physics. Go STUDY. Use real physics textbooks, not
>>>> popular articles or random web pages.
>>> you just have to prove he wrote those papers. I suspect his wife and
>>> friends, making him undrestand mathematics. His postmortem brain
>>> analysis shows he was a thief like Kenseto.
>>
>> The "wife" angle has been studied (one of the studies by a Russian woman
>> scientist BTW) and the result is FAPP negative.
>>
>> As for the brain analysis, this sort of thing is well-known to be 100%
>> useless, in general (unless there is something super-obviously wrong
>> with the organ). But for a normal average brain nobody knows how to tell
>> a Bach apart from a beach bum just by looking at their brains.
> 
> there is a not directly obvious connection, between a woman and the
> universe. That's why the wive approach. That's how the entering the macro
> scale is done, through a woman. The young unskilled and unqualified
> Einstine knew nothing about.


Are you somehow brain damaged?

There isn't any such connection.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592821

whodat wrote:

>>> The "wife" angle has been studied (one of the studies by a Russian
>>> woman scientist BTW) and the result is FAPP negative.
>>>
>>> As for the brain analysis, this sort of thing is well-known to be 100%
>>> useless, in general (unless there is something super-obviously wrong
>>> with the organ). But for a normal average brain nobody knows how to
>>> tell a Bach apart from a beach bum just by looking at their brains.
>> 
>> there is a not directly obvious connection, between a woman and the
>> universe. That's why the wive approach. That's how the entering the
>> macro scale is done, through a woman. The young unskilled and
>> unqualified Einstine knew nothing about.
> 
> Are you somehow brain damaged? There isn't any such connection.

there is. But I have to shit on your deformed face, before going into 
details.

Khakhlukha refusegee in Greece
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vqYQ6KkdJ4JO/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592826

On 10/3/2022 3:22 PM, Douglass Nervetti wrote:
> whodat wrote:
> 
>>>> The "wife" angle has been studied (one of the studies by a Russian
>>>> woman scientist BTW) and the result is FAPP negative.
>>>>
>>>> As for the brain analysis, this sort of thing is well-known to be 100%
>>>> useless, in general (unless there is something super-obviously wrong
>>>> with the organ). But for a normal average brain nobody knows how to
>>>> tell a Bach apart from a beach bum just by looking at their brains.
>>>
>>> there is a not directly obvious connection, between a woman and the
>>> universe. That's why the wive approach. That's how the entering the
>>> macro scale is done, through a woman. The young unskilled and
>>> unqualified Einstine knew nothing about.
>>
>> Are you somehow brain damaged? There isn't any such connection.
> 
> there is. But I have to shit on your deformed face, before going into
> details.
> 
> Khakhlukha refusegee in Greece
> https://www.bitchute.com/video/vqYQ6KkdJ4JO/

Thank you for confirming your brain damage.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592844

On 10/3/2022 3:37 PM, whodat wrote:
> On 10/3/2022 2:18 PM, Douglass Nervetti wrote:
>> JanPB wrote:
>>
>>>>> Einstein's ideas about relativity are not "logically absurd", and
>>>>> your inability here is simply due to the fact that YOU do not
>>>>> understand basic physics. Go STUDY. Use real physics textbooks, not
>>>>> popular articles or random web pages.
>>>> you just have to prove he wrote those papers. I suspect his wife and
>>>> friends, making him undrestand mathematics. His postmortem brain
>>>> analysis shows he was a thief like Kenseto.
>>>
>>> The "wife" angle has been studied (one of the studies by a Russian woman
>>> scientist BTW) and the result is FAPP negative.
>>>
>>> As for the brain analysis, this sort of thing is well-known to be 100%
>>> useless, in general (unless there is something super-obviously wrong
>>> with the organ). But for a normal average brain nobody knows how to tell
>>> a Bach apart from a beach bum just by looking at their brains.
>>
>> there is a not directly obvious connection, between a woman and the
>> universe. That's why the wive approach. That's how the entering the macro
>> scale is done, through a woman. The young unskilled and unqualified
>> Einstine knew nothing about.
> 
> 
> Are you somehow brain damaged?
> 
What do you expect? That's the nymshifter troll, who supports 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia 
卐, so of course it's brain damaged. There's no better evidence than that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592857

On 10/3/2022 11:19 PM, Volney wrote:
> On 10/3/2022 3:37 PM, whodat wrote:
>> On 10/3/2022 2:18 PM, Douglass Nervetti wrote:
>>> JanPB wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Einstein's ideas about relativity are not "logically absurd", and
>>>>>> your inability here is simply due to the fact that YOU do not
>>>>>> understand basic physics. Go STUDY. Use real physics textbooks, not
>>>>>> popular articles or random web pages.
>>>>> you just have to prove he wrote those papers. I suspect his wife and
>>>>> friends, making him undrestand mathematics. His postmortem brain
>>>>> analysis shows he was a thief like Kenseto.
>>>>
>>>> The "wife" angle has been studied (one of the studies by a Russian 
>>>> woman
>>>> scientist BTW) and the result is FAPP negative.
>>>>
>>>> As for the brain analysis, this sort of thing is well-known to be 100%
>>>> useless, in general (unless there is something super-obviously wrong
>>>> with the organ). But for a normal average brain nobody knows how to 
>>>> tell
>>>> a Bach apart from a beach bum just by looking at their brains.
>>>
>>> there is a not directly obvious connection, between a woman and the
>>> universe. That's why the wive approach. That's how the entering the 
>>> macro
>>> scale is done, through a woman. The young unskilled and unqualified
>>> Einstine knew nothing about.
>>
>>
>> Are you somehow brain damaged?
>>
> What do you expect? That's the nymshifter troll, who supports 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia 
> 卐, so of course it's brain damaged. There's no better evidence than that.

Actually Russian people don't have much of a choice. Look at the USA.
Which faction, Biden or Trump supporters are brain damaged? My take is
both.

IMO he last really good US president was Truman. I don't blame the brain
damaged idiot for supporting his country, It is the rest of his crap
that sets him apart as brain damaged.

Ordinary Russian people aren't evil. I realize that

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6-IeNObDnI

see youtubr beloe zlato (white gold.)

has elements of propaganda but other than these young women not being
HUGE they're typical.

I'm old enough and have seen enough to not fall into victimhood for
any faction. Other than that, keep up your good work.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592887

On 10/4/2022 7:39 AM, whodat wrote:
> On 10/3/2022 11:19 PM, Volney wrote:
>> On 10/3/2022 3:37 PM, whodat wrote:
>>> On 10/3/2022 2:18 PM, Douglass Nervetti wrote:
>>>> JanPB wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> Einstein's ideas about relativity are not "logically absurd", and
>>>>>>> your inability here is simply due to the fact that YOU do not
>>>>>>> understand basic physics. Go STUDY. Use real physics textbooks, not
>>>>>>> popular articles or random web pages.
>>>>>> you just have to prove he wrote those papers. I suspect his wife and
>>>>>> friends, making him undrestand mathematics. His postmortem brain
>>>>>> analysis shows he was a thief like Kenseto.
>>>>>
>>>>> The "wife" angle has been studied (one of the studies by a Russian 
>>>>> woman
>>>>> scientist BTW) and the result is FAPP negative.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for the brain analysis, this sort of thing is well-known to be 100%
>>>>> useless, in general (unless there is something super-obviously wrong
>>>>> with the organ). But for a normal average brain nobody knows how to 
>>>>> tell
>>>>> a Bach apart from a beach bum just by looking at their brains.
>>>>
>>>> there is a not directly obvious connection, between a woman and the
>>>> universe. That's why the wive approach. That's how the entering the 
>>>> macro
>>>> scale is done, through a woman. The young unskilled and unqualified
>>>> Einstine knew nothing about.
>>>
>>>
>>> Are you somehow brain damaged?
>>>
>> What do you expect? That's the nymshifter troll, who supports 
>> 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia 卐, so of course it's brain damaged. There's no better 
>> evidence than that.
> 
> Actually Russian people don't have much of a choice.

I should have said the 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 regime, not Russia itself.

> Look at the USA.
> Which faction, Biden or Trump supporters are brain damaged? My take is
> both.

Agreed.
> 
> IMO he last really good US president was Truman. I don't blame the brain
> damaged idiot for supporting his country, It is the rest of his crap
> that sets him apart as brain damaged.
> 
> Ordinary Russian people aren't evil. I realize that

True. But the Russian propaganda and censorship is so effective, 
substantially most Russians are in support of the war. (at least until 
they get called up to serve!)

This nymshifting troll, on the other hand, is a paid 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 
operative of some sort. Its claims about the war are straight Russian 
propaganda. Before the war it was spreading all kinds of FUD, 
misinformation and disinformation about Covid, the 2020 election, and so 
forth. I believe it's part of a mission to cause as much disruption as 
possible.
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6-IeNObDnI
> 
> see youtubr beloe zlato (white gold.)
> 
> has elements of propaganda but other than these young women not being
> HUGE they're typical.
> 
> I'm old enough and have seen enough to not fall into victimhood for
> any faction. Other than that, keep up your good work.
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592898

On 10/4/2022 5:41 PM, Volney wrote:
> On 10/4/2022 7:39 AM, whodat wrote:
>> On 10/3/2022 11:19 PM, Volney wrote:
>>> On 10/3/2022 3:37 PM, whodat wrote:
>>>> On 10/3/2022 2:18 PM, Douglass Nervetti wrote:
>>>>> JanPB wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Einstein's ideas about relativity are not "logically absurd", and
>>>>>>>> your inability here is simply due to the fact that YOU do not
>>>>>>>> understand basic physics. Go STUDY. Use real physics textbooks, not
>>>>>>>> popular articles or random web pages.
>>>>>>> you just have to prove he wrote those papers. I suspect his wife and
>>>>>>> friends, making him undrestand mathematics. His postmortem brain
>>>>>>> analysis shows he was a thief like Kenseto.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The "wife" angle has been studied (one of the studies by a Russian 
>>>>>> woman
>>>>>> scientist BTW) and the result is FAPP negative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As for the brain analysis, this sort of thing is well-known to be 
>>>>>> 100%
>>>>>> useless, in general (unless there is something super-obviously wrong
>>>>>> with the organ). But for a normal average brain nobody knows how 
>>>>>> to tell
>>>>>> a Bach apart from a beach bum just by looking at their brains.
>>>>>
>>>>> there is a not directly obvious connection, between a woman and the
>>>>> universe. That's why the wive approach. That's how the entering the 
>>>>> macro
>>>>> scale is done, through a woman. The young unskilled and unqualified
>>>>> Einstine knew nothing about.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Are you somehow brain damaged?
>>>>
>>> What do you expect? That's the nymshifter troll, who supports 
>>> 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia 卐, so of course it's brain damaged. There's no better 
>>> evidence than that.
>>
>> Actually Russian people don't have much of a choice.
> 
> I should have said the 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 regime, not Russia itself.
> 
>> Look at the USA.
>> Which faction, Biden or Trump supporters are brain damaged? My take is
>> both.
> 
> Agreed.
>>
>> IMO he last really good US president was Truman. I don't blame the brain
>> damaged idiot for supporting his country, It is the rest of his crap
>> that sets him apart as brain damaged.
>>
>> Ordinary Russian people aren't evil. I realize that
> 
> True. But the Russian propaganda and censorship is so effective, 
> substantially most Russians are in support of the war. (at least until 
> they get called up to serve!)
> 
> This nymshifting troll, on the other hand, is a paid 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 
> operative of some sort. Its claims about the war are straight Russian 
> propaganda. Before the war it was spreading all kinds of FUD, 
> misinformation and disinformation about Covid, the 2020 election, and so 
> forth. I believe it's part of a mission to cause as much disruption as 
> possible.



I try to enjoy him. That works for me and might for others as well.

The advantage we have is that we know what he's about, and he lacks
any ability to counter other than as he has tried, and you see how
effective that has been. He's beaten the moment his target doesn't get
mad.

Snuffy Smif said, "don't take life so serious son, it ain't noways
permanent." Then again, neither is nymshifter troll.



>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6-IeNObDnI
>>
>> see youtubr beloe zlato (white gold.)
>>
>> has elements of propaganda but other than these young women not being
>> HUGE they're typical.
>>
>> I'm old enough and have seen enough to not fall into victimhood for
>> any faction. Other than that, keep up your good work.
>>
>>
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592902

On 10/4/2022 11:53 PM, whodat wrote:
> On 10/4/2022 5:41 PM, Volney wrote:
>> On 10/4/2022 7:39 AM, whodat wrote:
>>> On 10/3/2022 11:19 PM, Volney wrote:
>>>> On 10/3/2022 3:37 PM, whodat wrote:
>>>>> On 10/3/2022 2:18 PM, Douglass Nervetti wrote:
>>>>>> JanPB wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Einstein's ideas about relativity are not "logically absurd", and
>>>>>>>>> your inability here is simply due to the fact that YOU do not
>>>>>>>>> understand basic physics. Go STUDY. Use real physics textbooks, 
>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>> popular articles or random web pages.
>>>>>>>> you just have to prove he wrote those papers. I suspect his wife 
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> friends, making him undrestand mathematics. His postmortem brain
>>>>>>>> analysis shows he was a thief like Kenseto.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The "wife" angle has been studied (one of the studies by a 
>>>>>>> Russian woman
>>>>>>> scientist BTW) and the result is FAPP negative.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As for the brain analysis, this sort of thing is well-known to be 
>>>>>>> 100%
>>>>>>> useless, in general (unless there is something super-obviously wrong
>>>>>>> with the organ). But for a normal average brain nobody knows how 
>>>>>>> to tell
>>>>>>> a Bach apart from a beach bum just by looking at their brains.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> there is a not directly obvious connection, between a woman and the
>>>>>> universe. That's why the wive approach. That's how the entering 
>>>>>> the macro
>>>>>> scale is done, through a woman. The young unskilled and unqualified
>>>>>> Einstine knew nothing about.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you somehow brain damaged?
>>>>>
>>>> What do you expect? That's the nymshifter troll, who supports 
>>>> 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia 卐, so of course it's brain damaged. There's no better 
>>>> evidence than that.
>>>
>>> Actually Russian people don't have much of a choice.
>>
>> I should have said the 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 regime, not Russia itself.
>>
>>> Look at the USA.
>>> Which faction, Biden or Trump supporters are brain damaged? My take is
>>> both.
>>
>> Agreed.
>>>
>>> IMO he last really good US president was Truman. I don't blame the brain
>>> damaged idiot for supporting his country, It is the rest of his crap
>>> that sets him apart as brain damaged.
>>>
>>> Ordinary Russian people aren't evil. I realize that
>>
>> True. But the Russian propaganda and censorship is so effective, 
>> substantially most Russians are in support of the war. (at least until 
>> they get called up to serve!)
>>
>> This nymshifting troll, on the other hand, is a paid 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 
>> operative of some sort. Its claims about the war are straight Russian 
>> propaganda. Before the war it was spreading all kinds of FUD, 
>> misinformation and disinformation about Covid, the 2020 election, and 
>> so forth. I believe it's part of a mission to cause as much disruption 
>> as possible.
> 
> 
> 
> I try to enjoy him. That works for me and might for others as well.
> 
> The advantage we have is that we know what he's about, and he lacks
> any ability to counter other than as he has tried, and you see how
> effective that has been. He's beaten the moment his target doesn't get
> mad.
> 
> Snuffy Smif said, "don't take life so serious son, it ain't noways
> permanent." Then again, neither is nymshifter troll.
> 
Yes. I'm here for the entertainment from cranks being cranks. I poke at 
the cranks with pointy sticks to make them yell louder. The nymshifter 
is a different kind of crank, but he's still entertaining.

I haven't seen a Snuffy Smif comic in decades.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592903

On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 12:56:01 AM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
> On 10/4/2022 11:53 PM, whodat wrote: 
> > On 10/4/2022 5:41 PM, Volney wrote: 
> >> On 10/4/2022 7:39 AM, whodat wrote: 
> >>> On 10/3/2022 11:19 PM, Volney wrote: 
> >>>> On 10/3/2022 3:37 PM, whodat wrote: 
> >>>>> On 10/3/2022 2:18 PM, Douglass Nervetti wrote: 
> >>>>>> JanPB wrote: 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> Einstein's ideas about relativity are not "logically absurd", and 
> >>>>>>>>> your inability here is simply due to the fact that YOU do not 
> >>>>>>>>> understand basic physics. Go STUDY. Use real physics textbooks, 
> >>>>>>>>> not 
> >>>>>>>>> popular articles or random web pages. 
> >>>>>>>> you just have to prove he wrote those papers. I suspect his wife 
> >>>>>>>> and 
> >>>>>>>> friends, making him undrestand mathematics. His postmortem brain 
> >>>>>>>> analysis shows he was a thief like Kenseto. 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> The "wife" angle has been studied (one of the studies by a 
> >>>>>>> Russian woman 
> >>>>>>> scientist BTW) and the result is FAPP negative. 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> As for the brain analysis, this sort of thing is well-known to be 
> >>>>>>> 100% 
> >>>>>>> useless, in general (unless there is something super-obviously wrong 
> >>>>>>> with the organ). But for a normal average brain nobody knows how 
> >>>>>>> to tell 
> >>>>>>> a Bach apart from a beach bum just by looking at their brains. 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> there is a not directly obvious connection, between a woman and the 
> >>>>>> universe. That's why the wive approach. That's how the entering 
> >>>>>> the macro 
> >>>>>> scale is done, through a woman. The young unskilled and unqualified 
> >>>>>> Einstine knew nothing about. 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Are you somehow brain damaged? 
> >>>>> 
> >>>> What do you expect? That's the nymshifter troll, who supports 
> >>>> 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia 卐, so of course it's brain damaged. There's no better 
> >>>> evidence than that. 
> >>> 
> >>> Actually Russian people don't have much of a choice. 
> >> 
> >> I should have said the 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 regime, not Russia itself. 
> >> 
> >>> Look at the USA. 
> >>> Which faction, Biden or Trump supporters are brain damaged? My take is 
> >>> both. 
> >> 
> >> Agreed. 
> >>> 
> >>> IMO he last really good US president was Truman. I don't blame the brain 
> >>> damaged idiot for supporting his country, It is the rest of his crap 
> >>> that sets him apart as brain damaged. 
> >>> 
> >>> Ordinary Russian people aren't evil. I realize that 
> >> 
> >> True. But the Russian propaganda and censorship is so effective, 
> >> substantially most Russians are in support of the war. (at least until 
> >> they get called up to serve!) 
> >> 
> >> This nymshifting troll, on the other hand, is a paid 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 
> >> operative of some sort. Its claims about the war are straight Russian 
> >> propaganda. Before the war it was spreading all kinds of FUD, 
> >> misinformation and disinformation about Covid, the 2020 election, and 
> >> so forth. I believe it's part of a mission to cause as much disruption 
> >> as possible. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I try to enjoy him. That works for me and might for others as well. 
> > 
> > The advantage we have is that we know what he's about, and he lacks 
> > any ability to counter other than as he has tried, and you see how 
> > effective that has been. He's beaten the moment his target doesn't get 
> > mad. 
> > 
> > Snuffy Smif said, "don't take life so serious son, it ain't noways 
> > permanent." Then again, neither is nymshifter troll. 
> >
> Yes. I'm here for the entertainment from cranks being cranks. I poke at 
> the cranks with pointy sticks to make them yell louder. The nymshifter 
> is a different kind of crank, but he's still entertaining. 
> 
> I haven't seen a Snuffy Smif comic in decades.

Why don't you all go kick it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592928

On 10/5/2022 3:52 AM, Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 12:56:01 AM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
>> On 10/4/2022 11:53 PM, whodat wrote:
>>> On 10/4/2022 5:41 PM, Volney wrote:
>>>> On 10/4/2022 7:39 AM, whodat wrote:
>>>>> On 10/3/2022 11:19 PM, Volney wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/3/2022 3:37 PM, whodat wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/3/2022 2:18 PM, Douglass Nervetti wrote:
>>>>>>>> JanPB wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Einstein's ideas about relativity are not "logically absurd", and
>>>>>>>>>>> your inability here is simply due to the fact that YOU do not
>>>>>>>>>>> understand basic physics. Go STUDY. Use real physics textbooks,
>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>> popular articles or random web pages.
>>>>>>>>>> you just have to prove he wrote those papers. I suspect his wife
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> friends, making him undrestand mathematics. His postmortem brain
>>>>>>>>>> analysis shows he was a thief like Kenseto.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The "wife" angle has been studied (one of the studies by a
>>>>>>>>> Russian woman
>>>>>>>>> scientist BTW) and the result is FAPP negative.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As for the brain analysis, this sort of thing is well-known to be
>>>>>>>>> 100%
>>>>>>>>> useless, in general (unless there is something super-obviously wrong
>>>>>>>>> with the organ). But for a normal average brain nobody knows how
>>>>>>>>> to tell
>>>>>>>>> a Bach apart from a beach bum just by looking at their brains.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> there is a not directly obvious connection, between a woman and the
>>>>>>>> universe. That's why the wive approach. That's how the entering
>>>>>>>> the macro
>>>>>>>> scale is done, through a woman. The young unskilled and unqualified
>>>>>>>> Einstine knew nothing about.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you somehow brain damaged?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you expect? That's the nymshifter troll, who supports
>>>>>> 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia 卐, so of course it's brain damaged. There's no better
>>>>>> evidence than that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually Russian people don't have much of a choice.
>>>>
>>>> I should have said the 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 regime, not Russia itself.
>>>>
>>>>> Look at the USA.
>>>>> Which faction, Biden or Trump supporters are brain damaged? My take is
>>>>> both.
>>>>
>>>> Agreed.
>>>>>
>>>>> IMO he last really good US president was Truman. I don't blame the brain
>>>>> damaged idiot for supporting his country, It is the rest of his crap
>>>>> that sets him apart as brain damaged.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ordinary Russian people aren't evil. I realize that
>>>>
>>>> True. But the Russian propaganda and censorship is so effective,
>>>> substantially most Russians are in support of the war. (at least until
>>>> they get called up to serve!)
>>>>
>>>> This nymshifting troll, on the other hand, is a paid 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐
>>>> operative of some sort. Its claims about the war are straight Russian
>>>> propaganda. Before the war it was spreading all kinds of FUD,
>>>> misinformation and disinformation about Covid, the 2020 election, and
>>>> so forth. I believe it's part of a mission to cause as much disruption
>>>> as possible.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I try to enjoy him. That works for me and might for others as well.
>>>
>>> The advantage we have is that we know what he's about, and he lacks
>>> any ability to counter other than as he has tried, and you see how
>>> effective that has been. He's beaten the moment his target doesn't get
>>> mad.
>>>
>>> Snuffy Smif said, "don't take life so serious son, it ain't noways
>>> permanent." Then again, neither is nymshifter troll.
>>>
>> Yes. I'm here for the entertainment from cranks being cranks. I poke at
>> the cranks with pointy sticks to make them yell louder. The nymshifter
>> is a different kind of crank, but he's still entertaining.
>>
>> I haven't seen a Snuffy Smif comic in decades.
> 
> Why don't you all go kick it.

Because you're too much fun, brain damaged as you are.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592879

Volney wrote:

>>> there is a not directly obvious connection, between a woman and the
>>> universe. That's why the wive approach. That's how the entering the
>>> macro scale is done, through a woman. The young unskilled and
>>> unqualified Einstine knew nothing about.
>> Are you somehow brain damaged?
>> 
> What do you expect? That's the nymshifter troll, who supports 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia
> 卐, so of course it's brain damaged. There's no better evidence than that.

he has to shit on you ugly face likewise, before going into details 
explaining the phenomenon in physics. How did you two meet together?? You 
stinking cacapitalist americacan *state_terrorist* blowing up life 
essential infrastructure, out of your domain. You disgusting pigs. The 
entire planet knows now you are the *fucking_pigs*. I don't trust you, 
pigs.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web