Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #592928

Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES:

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/5/2022 3:52 AM, Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 12:56:01 AM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
>> On 10/4/2022 11:53 PM, whodat wrote:
>>> On 10/4/2022 5:41 PM, Volney wrote:
>>>> On 10/4/2022 7:39 AM, whodat wrote:
>>>>> On 10/3/2022 11:19 PM, Volney wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/3/2022 3:37 PM, whodat wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/3/2022 2:18 PM, Douglass Nervetti wrote:
>>>>>>>> JanPB wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Einstein's ideas about relativity are not "logically absurd", and
>>>>>>>>>>> your inability here is simply due to the fact that YOU do not
>>>>>>>>>>> understand basic physics. Go STUDY. Use real physics textbooks,
>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>> popular articles or random web pages.
>>>>>>>>>> you just have to prove he wrote those papers. I suspect his wife
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> friends, making him undrestand mathematics. His postmortem brain
>>>>>>>>>> analysis shows he was a thief like Kenseto.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The "wife" angle has been studied (one of the studies by a
>>>>>>>>> Russian woman
>>>>>>>>> scientist BTW) and the result is FAPP negative.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As for the brain analysis, this sort of thing is well-known to be
>>>>>>>>> 100%
>>>>>>>>> useless, in general (unless there is something super-obviously wrong
>>>>>>>>> with the organ). But for a normal average brain nobody knows how
>>>>>>>>> to tell
>>>>>>>>> a Bach apart from a beach bum just by looking at their brains.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> there is a not directly obvious connection, between a woman and the
>>>>>>>> universe. That's why the wive approach. That's how the entering
>>>>>>>> the macro
>>>>>>>> scale is done, through a woman. The young unskilled and unqualified
>>>>>>>> Einstine knew nothing about.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you somehow brain damaged?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you expect? That's the nymshifter troll, who supports
>>>>>> 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia 卐, so of course it's brain damaged. There's no better
>>>>>> evidence than that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually Russian people don't have much of a choice.
>>>>
>>>> I should have said the 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 regime, not Russia itself.
>>>>
>>>>> Look at the USA.
>>>>> Which faction, Biden or Trump supporters are brain damaged? My take is
>>>>> both.
>>>>
>>>> Agreed.
>>>>>
>>>>> IMO he last really good US president was Truman. I don't blame the brain
>>>>> damaged idiot for supporting his country, It is the rest of his crap
>>>>> that sets him apart as brain damaged.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ordinary Russian people aren't evil. I realize that
>>>>
>>>> True. But the Russian propaganda and censorship is so effective,
>>>> substantially most Russians are in support of the war. (at least until
>>>> they get called up to serve!)
>>>>
>>>> This nymshifting troll, on the other hand, is a paid 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐
>>>> operative of some sort. Its claims about the war are straight Russian
>>>> propaganda. Before the war it was spreading all kinds of FUD,
>>>> misinformation and disinformation about Covid, the 2020 election, and
>>>> so forth. I believe it's part of a mission to cause as much disruption
>>>> as possible.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I try to enjoy him. That works for me and might for others as well.
>>>
>>> The advantage we have is that we know what he's about, and he lacks
>>> any ability to counter other than as he has tried, and you see how
>>> effective that has been. He's beaten the moment his target doesn't get
>>> mad.
>>>
>>> Snuffy Smif said, "don't take life so serious son, it ain't noways
>>> permanent." Then again, neither is nymshifter troll.
>>>
>> Yes. I'm here for the entertainment from cranks being cranks. I poke at
>> the cranks with pointy sticks to make them yell louder. The nymshifter
>> is a different kind of crank, but he's still entertaining.
>>
>> I haven't seen a Snuffy Smif comic in decades.
> 
> Why don't you all go kick it.

Because you're too much fun, brain damaged as you are.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Foos Research <cusanusnicolas@gmail.com> - 2022-10-01 03:28 -0700
  Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-10-01 07:05 -0700
    Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-10-01 16:09 +0200
  Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-10-01 12:19 -0700
  Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-10-03 10:22 -0500
    Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-10-03 08:52 -0700
    Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Douglass Nervetti <dlul@esivlen.an> - 2022-10-03 18:17 +0000
      Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-10-03 11:51 -0700
        Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Douglass Nervetti <dlul@esivlen.an> - 2022-10-03 19:18 +0000
          Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-10-03 14:37 -0500
            Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Douglass Nervetti <dlul@esivlen.an> - 2022-10-03 20:22 +0000
              Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-10-03 16:53 -0500
            Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-10-04 00:19 -0400
              Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-10-04 06:39 -0500
                Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-10-04 18:41 -0400
                Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-10-04 22:53 -0500
                Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-10-05 03:56 -0400
                Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-05 01:52 -0700
                Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-10-05 08:39 -0500
              Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Douglass Nervetti <dlul@esivlen.an> - 2022-10-04 20:47 +0000
            Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-10-04 14:26 +0200

csiph-web