Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #592898
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: |
| Date | 2022-10-04 22:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jq4ddjF75idU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <thfchm$29oma$6@dont-email.me> <jq0s0iFl0qdU1@mid.individual.net> <thgc8a$2fget$1@dont-email.me> <jq2kblFt5svU1@mid.individual.net> <thicqi$2os5f$1@dont-email.me> |
On 10/4/2022 5:41 PM, Volney wrote: > On 10/4/2022 7:39 AM, whodat wrote: >> On 10/3/2022 11:19 PM, Volney wrote: >>> On 10/3/2022 3:37 PM, whodat wrote: >>>> On 10/3/2022 2:18 PM, Douglass Nervetti wrote: >>>>> JanPB wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> Einstein's ideas about relativity are not "logically absurd", and >>>>>>>> your inability here is simply due to the fact that YOU do not >>>>>>>> understand basic physics. Go STUDY. Use real physics textbooks, not >>>>>>>> popular articles or random web pages. >>>>>>> you just have to prove he wrote those papers. I suspect his wife and >>>>>>> friends, making him undrestand mathematics. His postmortem brain >>>>>>> analysis shows he was a thief like Kenseto. >>>>>> >>>>>> The "wife" angle has been studied (one of the studies by a Russian >>>>>> woman >>>>>> scientist BTW) and the result is FAPP negative. >>>>>> >>>>>> As for the brain analysis, this sort of thing is well-known to be >>>>>> 100% >>>>>> useless, in general (unless there is something super-obviously wrong >>>>>> with the organ). But for a normal average brain nobody knows how >>>>>> to tell >>>>>> a Bach apart from a beach bum just by looking at their brains. >>>>> >>>>> there is a not directly obvious connection, between a woman and the >>>>> universe. That's why the wive approach. That's how the entering the >>>>> macro >>>>> scale is done, through a woman. The young unskilled and unqualified >>>>> Einstine knew nothing about. >>>> >>>> >>>> Are you somehow brain damaged? >>>> >>> What do you expect? That's the nymshifter troll, who supports >>> 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia 卐, so of course it's brain damaged. There's no better >>> evidence than that. >> >> Actually Russian people don't have much of a choice. > > I should have said the 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 regime, not Russia itself. > >> Look at the USA. >> Which faction, Biden or Trump supporters are brain damaged? My take is >> both. > > Agreed. >> >> IMO he last really good US president was Truman. I don't blame the brain >> damaged idiot for supporting his country, It is the rest of his crap >> that sets him apart as brain damaged. >> >> Ordinary Russian people aren't evil. I realize that > > True. But the Russian propaganda and censorship is so effective, > substantially most Russians are in support of the war. (at least until > they get called up to serve!) > > This nymshifting troll, on the other hand, is a paid 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 > operative of some sort. Its claims about the war are straight Russian > propaganda. Before the war it was spreading all kinds of FUD, > misinformation and disinformation about Covid, the 2020 election, and so > forth. I believe it's part of a mission to cause as much disruption as > possible. I try to enjoy him. That works for me and might for others as well. The advantage we have is that we know what he's about, and he lacks any ability to counter other than as he has tried, and you see how effective that has been. He's beaten the moment his target doesn't get mad. Snuffy Smif said, "don't take life so serious son, it ain't noways permanent." Then again, neither is nymshifter troll. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6-IeNObDnI >> >> see youtubr beloe zlato (white gold.) >> >> has elements of propaganda but other than these young women not being >> HUGE they're typical. >> >> I'm old enough and have seen enough to not fall into victimhood for >> any faction. Other than that, keep up your good work. >> >> >
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Foos Research <cusanusnicolas@gmail.com> - 2022-10-01 03:28 -0700
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-10-01 07:05 -0700
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-10-01 16:09 +0200
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-10-01 12:19 -0700
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-10-03 10:22 -0500
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-10-03 08:52 -0700
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Douglass Nervetti <dlul@esivlen.an> - 2022-10-03 18:17 +0000
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-10-03 11:51 -0700
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Douglass Nervetti <dlul@esivlen.an> - 2022-10-03 19:18 +0000
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-10-03 14:37 -0500
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Douglass Nervetti <dlul@esivlen.an> - 2022-10-03 20:22 +0000
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-10-03 16:53 -0500
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-10-04 00:19 -0400
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-10-04 06:39 -0500
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-10-04 18:41 -0400
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-10-04 22:53 -0500
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-10-05 03:56 -0400
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-10-05 01:52 -0700
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-10-05 08:39 -0500
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Douglass Nervetti <dlul@esivlen.an> - 2022-10-04 20:47 +0000
Re: YES: Einstein was a fake. YES: I do have the correct answers. YES: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-10-04 14:26 +0200
csiph-web