Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #651745 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-02-23 08:09 +0100 |
| Last post | 2024-04-07 13:12 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 214 — 55 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-23 08:09 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-02-23 15:02 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-23 21:35 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-02-24 07:40 -0500
Re: ? ? ? Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-24 13:07 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-02-24 16:38 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-24 16:55 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Lénárt Szakács Keresztes <fn@jvre.hu> - 2024-02-24 19:58 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-02-24 14:34 -0600
Re: ? ? ? Oga Shiganori Yoshikawa <nooos@nooor.jp> - 2024-02-24 23:22 +0000
Re: ? ? ? pnalsing@gmail.com (palsing) - 2024-02-25 02:51 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Jon-Michael Zhong <ja@llcmz.cn> - 2024-02-25 16:06 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-02-25 14:56 -0500
Re: ? ? ? Wilbert Araújo <rrallri@jreia.pt> - 2024-02-25 20:29 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Kennith Félix Escárcega <egkeb@uefcrake.es> - 2024-02-25 20:49 +0000
Re: ? ? ? tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) - 2024-02-24 16:35 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-23 15:47 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-02-23 16:53 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-24 08:48 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-02-24 11:01 +0200
Re: ? ? ? Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-24 13:06 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-02-24 15:52 +0200
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-02-25 13:30 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-25 07:50 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-25 15:42 +0000
Re: ? ? ? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-02-25 21:36 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-26 07:30 +0100
Re: ? ? ? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-02-26 11:02 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Piotr Babchenko Bakulev <ptpet@ito.ru> - 2024-02-26 20:57 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-27 07:48 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Huy Kántor Hegedűs <re@uushhes.hu> - 2024-02-28 22:22 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-29 06:51 +0100
Re: ? ? ? tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) - 2024-02-29 16:54 +0000
Re: ? ? ? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-02-29 22:23 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-29 20:13 -0800
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-01 07:27 +0100
Re: ? ? ? tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) - 2024-03-01 17:04 +0000
Re: ? ? ? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-03-01 20:47 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-01 23:44 +0100
Re: ? ? ? tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) - 2024-03-02 06:59 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-03 08:04 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Michelle Tatár Buzás <llihpm@selce.hu> - 2024-03-02 09:34 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-01 07:25 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-04-05 09:41 +0200
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-05 00:50 -0700
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-05 00:59 -0700
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-05 09:18 -0700
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-04-16 07:20 +0200
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-16 09:19 -0700
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-04-19 08:17 +0200
Re: ? ? ? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-03-01 14:24 -0500
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-01 23:41 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Bennie Müller Madarász <llye@nuilrnm.hu> - 2024-03-02 00:33 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-05 21:26 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Boris Kuang She <ooo@rsisres.cn> - 2024-03-05 23:16 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-06 06:53 +0100
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-05 23:17 -0800
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-05 23:30 -0800
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-05 23:44 -0800
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-06 00:00 -0800
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-06 09:14 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-06 08:57 -0500
Re: ? ? ? Barros Romão <dko@rddda.pt> - 2024-03-06 14:25 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-03-06 11:03 -0500
Re: ? ? ? Rózsa Szőllősi <nrme@rnaazj.hu> - 2024-03-06 14:07 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-06 16:29 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-07 07:57 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-07 15:41 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-08 09:12 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-08 10:10 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-09 08:20 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Bogdan Guleichik Balagul <gb@giioh.ru> - 2024-03-09 08:04 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-10 08:41 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Hania Pusztai Sebestyén <iuti@aapiz.hu> - 2024-03-10 08:03 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-15 08:14 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Connie Bairashevski Balashoff <ahhe@vks.ru> - 2024-03-15 11:19 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-17 07:59 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Chellos Leontarakis <akbsto@hs.gr> - 2024-03-17 09:05 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-21 07:37 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Péter Juhász <spt@ebn.hu> - 2024-03-21 13:46 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-23 08:03 +0100
Re: ? ? ? TReena Pooja Kishan <iaa@trarin.in> - 2024-03-23 17:21 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-25 07:57 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Smith Matoke Yamamura <ma@maiur.jp> - 2024-03-25 18:03 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-10 11:35 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-12 09:30 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-12 13:01 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-14 08:24 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-14 09:42 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-17 07:55 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-17 09:00 +0100
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-17 13:03 -0700
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-17 21:42 +0100
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-17 16:10 -0700
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-18 06:59 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-18 07:24 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-18 07:54 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-20 08:29 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-20 15:22 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-03-20 16:10 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Elijah Katzuba Bakiev <evekj@bljja.ru> - 2024-03-20 22:34 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-21 10:08 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-23 08:08 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-23 10:29 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Zozrov Bakinov Mikhalev <ozoa@rioiro.ru> - 2024-03-23 19:40 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-25 08:03 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-25 08:17 +0100
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-18 07:24 -0700
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-19 01:01 -0700
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-19 13:16 +0100
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-19 11:58 -0700
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-19 20:33 +0100
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-19 12:09 -0700
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-19 20:35 +0100
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-19 23:22 -0700
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-20 14:53 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Osiris Moy <yoo@mrssiyr.cn> - 2024-03-14 10:09 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-03-06 12:42 -0600
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-06 12:58 -0800
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-06 13:02 -0800
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-06 13:05 -0800
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-06 13:09 -0800
Re: ? ? ? Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-03-06 15:46 -0600
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-06 16:26 +0100
Re: ? ? ? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-03-06 19:42 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-03-06 22:08 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-29 09:22 -0800
Re: ? ? ? Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-02-29 12:23 -0600
Re: ? ? ? Vinson Makricosta Stamatelos <nnnncv@sk.gr> - 2024-02-29 20:39 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-02-29 15:27 -0600
Re: ? ? ? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2024-03-21 13:05 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-23 08:18 +0100
Re: ? ? ? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2024-03-23 10:24 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2024-03-26 07:19 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Thean Nogushi Hatoyama <nllah@eeele.jp> - 2024-03-26 12:05 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2024-03-26 23:53 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-03-27 09:18 +0100
Re: ? ? ? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-03-27 12:43 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2024-03-27 13:00 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2024-03-27 13:01 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Jed László Barabás <sx@sajd.hu> - 2024-03-27 11:24 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2024-03-27 12:47 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Thaddeus Horiatis Demetrious <sit@ssdiet.gr> - 2024-03-27 14:56 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2024-03-27 23:02 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Yasmani Hasekura <asna@unnsmahua.jp> - 2024-03-28 02:38 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2024-03-28 03:14 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Leland Behtenev Basov <ene@thdnt.ru> - 2024-03-28 04:02 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2024-03-28 04:35 +0000
Re: ? ? ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-27 21:49 -0700
Getting there at last... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2024-03-26 23:49 +0000
Re: Getting there at last... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-28 07:14 +0100
Re: Getting there at last... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2024-03-28 07:09 +0000
Re: Getting there at last... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-30 08:54 +0100
Re: Getting there at last... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2024-03-30 10:38 +0000
Re: Getting there at last... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-04-02 07:56 +0200
Re: Getting there at last... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-02 00:07 -0700
Re: Getting there at last... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-04-03 08:03 +0200
Re: Getting there at last... Yusney Turaev Momotov <tnoyn@ou.ru> - 2024-04-03 06:53 +0000
Re: Getting there at last... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2024-04-04 02:18 +0000
Re: Getting there at last... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-04-05 09:54 +0200
Re: Getting there at last... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2024-04-06 00:07 +0000
Re: Getting there at last... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-04-06 09:03 +0200
Re: Getting there at last... Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-04-06 13:54 +0200
Re: Getting there at last... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-06 12:11 -0700
Re: Getting there at last... Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-04-06 12:51 -0700
Re: Getting there at last... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-06 16:01 -0700
Re: Getting there at last... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-06 15:03 -0700
Re: Getting there at last... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-06 16:05 -0700
Re: Getting there at last... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2024-04-07 01:25 +0000
Re: Getting there at last... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-04-07 21:03 +0200
Re: Getting there at last... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2024-04-08 01:36 +0000
Re: Getting there at last... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2024-04-02 07:38 +0000
Re: Getting there at last... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-02 10:23 -0700
Re: Getting there at last... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-04-02 11:31 -0700
Re: Getting there at last... Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2024-04-03 00:16 +0000
Re: Getting there at last... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-03 00:38 -0700
Re: Getting there at last... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-03 01:02 -0700
Re: Getting there at last... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-03 22:58 -0700
Re: Getting there at last... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-04 11:11 -0700
Re: Getting there at last... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-04-08 20:08 +0200
Re: Getting there at last... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-08 21:19 -0700
Re: ? ? ? Yatzyk Trampotova <ezyey@kynyrt.ru> - 2024-03-23 17:39 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-03-25 08:06 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Evasio Alexandropoulos <ouep@seood.gr> - 2024-03-25 17:48 +0000
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-26 22:30 -0700
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-27 16:31 -0700
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-27 17:26 -0700
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-29 17:05 -0700
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-31 12:27 -0700
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-03-31 14:46 -0700
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-01 10:15 -0700
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-01 21:36 -0700
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-02 00:15 -0700
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-02 09:52 -0700
Re: ? ? ? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-04-02 10:16 -0700
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-02 12:26 -0700
Re: ? ? ? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-04-02 12:48 -0700
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-03 23:03 -0700
Re: ? ? ? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-04-04 05:57 -0700
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-04 09:00 -0700
Re: ? ? ? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-04-04 10:45 -0700
Re: ? ? ? Colin Mcdonald <mna@aincmic.uk> - 2024-04-04 22:59 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-04-04 16:20 -0700
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-05 00:45 -0700
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-04-05 01:20 -0700
Re: ? ? ? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-04-05 06:24 -0700
Re: ? ? ? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-02-26 13:36 +0100
Re: ? ? ? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-02-27 09:27 -0500
Re: ? ? ? Maria Komáromi Forgács <vcro@fmma.hu> - 2024-02-25 17:10 +0000
Re: ? ? ? Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-02-25 15:47 -0600
Re: ? ? ? Ionio Sabbag Nassar <ibabn@nagaig.eg> - 2024-02-25 23:18 +0000
Re: ? ? ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-02-25 15:50 -0800
Re: ? ? ? Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-02-24 12:59 +0000
Re: ? ? ? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-04-07 13:12 +0200
Page 10 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-04-08 21:19 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Getting there at last... |
| Message-ID | <6614C1B9.774E@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #652777 |
Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am 04.04.2024 um 07:58 schrieb The Starmaker: > ... > >> > > While Albert Einstein was busy designing new bombs for the military, he > > started > > working on his 'Grand Unified theory' and told the military, a ship can > > be made to disapear and > > reappear somewhere else. But of course he needs money to finish his > > grand unified theiroy. > > > > He always figured out how to 'attach' his theories to the military war > > department. > > > > Didn't Albert Einstein design airplanes for the Germans in Germany? > > > > As far as I know he didn't. https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol6-doc/430 > > But he worked together with Leo Szillard in Berlin and Leo Szillard is > assumed to be the 'father' of the atomic bomb. > > So, I assume, that Albert Einstein was at least an uncle. > > TH "He is the father" of the atom bomb, says Beser, who is the grandson of the only U.S. serviceman aboard both planes that carried the atomic bombs to Japan. https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1680282648881819648/photo/1 https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1758508135550222422/photo/1 https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1491839255168966666 -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yatzyk Trampotova <ezyey@kynyrt.ru> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-23 17:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <utn453$2jes1$3@paganini.bofh.team> |
| In reply to | #652312 |
Thomas Heger wrote: >>>> the Entropy 𝗜𝗦 time. Please stop 𝗻𝗼𝘁 undrestanding tensors. Look at >>> No, because both terms are related, but not equal. >>> Second law of thermodynamics means actually heat distribution. >> >> They had no clue about the radiant nature of heat when they started >> talking about entropy. > > Heat transfer is possible in three different ways: > transport of heated media (convection) > dissipation of heat within some sort of stuff (conduction) > radiation Therefore it is not true, that thermal energy is always > transported by radiation. totally irrelevant. It's about you don't know what time is. 𝗠𝗼𝘀𝗰𝗼𝘄_𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸_𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀_𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗱_𝘁𝗼_𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗲_𝘁𝗼_𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲_–_𝗙𝗦𝗕 Russia’s domestic security service has reported that four assailants were detained in Bryansk Region near the border https://r%74.com/russia/594771-fsb-moscow-terrorists-flee-ukraine/ Anybody wandered why "Islamic State" has not shot single bullet aiming at Israel? Faux Noise is already claiming it was ISIS. Anything to deflect from the Ukrainian Nazis. We shall see. This was horrifying. If you haven't noticed it already, I will spell it out for you. ISIS is a creation and under orders by ISrael and USA. isis is aka al quelda, aka controlled by cia's middle east branch office. Ukraine learns terrorism tactics from the u.s state department's cia branch, and using ANY mercenaries they can find, to do the dirty job inside russia. This is not the first attempt at Terrorism against russia by cia,mi6 and also by ukraine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-25 08:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <l6clpiFclo2U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #652318 |
Am 23.03.2024 um 18:39 schrieb Yatzyk Trampotova: > Thomas Heger wrote: > >>>>> the Entropy 𝗜𝗦 time. Please stop 𝗻𝗼𝘁 undrestanding tensors. Look at >>>> No, because both terms are related, but not equal. >>>> Second law of thermodynamics means actually heat distribution. >>> >>> They had no clue about the radiant nature of heat when they started >>> talking about entropy. >> >> Heat transfer is possible in three different ways: >> transport of heated media (convection) >> dissipation of heat within some sort of stuff (conduction) >> radiation Therefore it is not true, that thermal energy is always >> transported by radiation. > > totally irrelevant. It's about you don't know what time is. Well, yes, because actually most people do not really know what time is. We have watches and clocks, but do not really know, what makes time move. ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Evasio Alexandropoulos <ouep@seood.gr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-25 17:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <utsddq$34ssg$1@paganini.bofh.team> |
| In reply to | #652365 |
Thomas Heger wrote: >>> radiation Therefore it is not true, that thermal energy is always >>> transported by radiation. >> >> totally irrelevant. It's about you don't know what time is. > > Well, yes, because actually most people do not really know what time is. > We have watches and clocks, but do not really know, what makes time > move. yet again, the Entropy "moves", not the time, lol. Here's more for you to undrestand covid governments, wanting you killed with vaccines. 𝗪𝗲𝘀𝘁_𝗵𝗮𝘀_𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗱_𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁_𝗠𝗼𝘀𝗰𝗼𝘄_𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁_𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸_–_𝗕𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗵_𝗠𝗣 Washington and London were too quick to pin the blame on Islamists, George Galloway has said https://www.r%74.com/news/594888-west-lie-moscow-terrorist-attack/ “When the US and the UK and others swiftly tried to reassure me that it was only ISIS [that] carried out this mass murder in Moscow, I knew automatically that they were lying,” Galloway said. He then pointed to what he called suspicious and “unexplained” activities by some Western politicians and officials, including Kirby’s statement. READ MORE: Three more suspects in Moscow terrorist attack arrested The British lawmaker drew particular attention to the fact that the US official had confirmed that Washington had called on its citizens to stay away from crowded places in Moscow as recently as the beginning of March March 7, warning that “extremists” were planning an imminent attack in Moscow. He still denied that it had anything to do with last Friday’s assault. “I don’t think that was related to this specific attack,” he said. Another episode mentioned by Galloway involved US Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland, who promised some “nice surprises on the battlefield” for Moscow this year. “Ukraine will make some very strong success,” she said in January, without providing any further comments on the issue Galloway cited these facts as “pieces of evidence” suggesting that “the US, its NATO allies and their proxy servant… [the] state of Ukraine… were in fact responsible for this mass murder.” Biden when asked said NS2 will be gone. And shortly after N S 2 was destroyed. Nuland not asked, said Russia is in for a surprise and shortly after the shooting of 137 people happens. Wow, The nastier they are the better they seem to be at foreseeing the future What is suspicious is that the attackers were trying to escape to Ukraine which's border is well protected not to Estonia ,Latvia or Belarus. About time Russia closes down the American embassy like anywhere else it's a den of thieves and murderers Victoria Nuland steps aside, Barrack Hussein Obama visits London, and ISIS makes a Historic Comeback. That's a lot of coincidences! Only Genocide Joe's loyal supporters/donors and voters could believe that! I have it confirmed that western and Israelis are behind behind the whole thing, isis = Israeli security intelligence services
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-26 22:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6603AF12.5708@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #652365 |
Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am 23.03.2024 um 18:39 schrieb Yatzyk Trampotova: > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > >>>>> the Entropy ð—œð—¦ time. Please stop ð—»ð—¼ð˜ undrestanding tensors. Look at > >>>> No, because both terms are related, but not equal. > >>>> Second law of thermodynamics means actually heat distribution. > >>> > >>> They had no clue about the radiant nature of heat when they started > >>> talking about entropy. > >> > >> Heat transfer is possible in three different ways: > >> transport of heated media (convection) > >> dissipation of heat within some sort of stuff (conduction) > >> radiation Therefore it is not true, that thermal energy is always > >> transported by radiation. > > > > totally irrelevant. It's about you don't know what time is. > > Well, yes, because actually most people do not really know what time is. > > We have watches and clocks, but do not really know, what makes time move. > > ... > > TH I don't know how else to explain it in terms that you can understand... (especially since this is being posted to a ...math group of people?) So, go back to the clock..whose hands on the clock are simply a mechanical shadow... From the perspective of a 'math group of people' who believe that mathematical objects are ...real, by the exact same person who told them the 'shadow' is not a real world. Yous people are in a matrix. The shadows whether in a cave or on the face of a clock is not reality. The clock is displaying...shadows. Math are shadows. Yous people are in a matrix. You're prisoners of shadows. Mathematical objects are shadows... leave the cave... leave the matrix.. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-27 16:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6604AC3B.77D5@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #652414 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > Am 23.03.2024 um 18:39 schrieb Yatzyk Trampotova: > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > >>>>> the Entropy ð—œð—¦ time. Please stop ð—»ð—¼ð˜ undrestanding tensors. Look at > > >>>> No, because both terms are related, but not equal. > > >>>> Second law of thermodynamics means actually heat distribution. > > >>> > > >>> They had no clue about the radiant nature of heat when they started > > >>> talking about entropy. > > >> > > >> Heat transfer is possible in three different ways: > > >> transport of heated media (convection) > > >> dissipation of heat within some sort of stuff (conduction) > > >> radiation Therefore it is not true, that thermal energy is always > > >> transported by radiation. > > > > > > totally irrelevant. It's about you don't know what time is. > > > > Well, yes, because actually most people do not really know what time is. > > > > We have watches and clocks, but do not really know, what makes time move. > > > > ... > > > > TH > > I don't know how else to explain it in terms that you can understand... > > (especially since this is being posted to a ...math group of people?) > > So, go back to the clock..whose hands on the clock are simply > a mechanical shadow... > > From the perspective of a 'math group of people' who believe that > mathematical objects are ...real, by the exact same person who told > them the 'shadow' is not a real world. > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > The shadows whether in a cave or on the face of a clock is not reality. > > The clock is displaying...shadows. > > Math are shadows. > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > You're prisoners of shadows. > > Mathematical objects are shadows... > > leave the cave... > > leave the matrix.. notice that Plato never mentions anything about the shadows on sundials... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-27 17:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6604B933.6C7F@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #652445 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > Am 23.03.2024 um 18:39 schrieb Yatzyk Trampotova: > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>> the Entropy ð—œð—¦ time. Please stop ð—»ð—¼ð˜ undrestanding tensors. Look at > > > >>>> No, because both terms are related, but not equal. > > > >>>> Second law of thermodynamics means actually heat distribution. > > > >>> > > > >>> They had no clue about the radiant nature of heat when they started > > > >>> talking about entropy. > > > >> > > > >> Heat transfer is possible in three different ways: > > > >> transport of heated media (convection) > > > >> dissipation of heat within some sort of stuff (conduction) > > > >> radiation Therefore it is not true, that thermal energy is always > > > >> transported by radiation. > > > > > > > > totally irrelevant. It's about you don't know what time is. > > > > > > Well, yes, because actually most people do not really know what time is. > > > > > > We have watches and clocks, but do not really know, what makes time move. > > > > > > ... > > > > > > TH > > > > I don't know how else to explain it in terms that you can understand... > > > > (especially since this is being posted to a ...math group of people?) > > > > So, go back to the clock..whose hands on the clock are simply > > a mechanical shadow... > > > > From the perspective of a 'math group of people' who believe that > > mathematical objects are ...real, by the exact same person who told > > them the 'shadow' is not a real world. > > > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > > > The shadows whether in a cave or on the face of a clock is not reality. > > > > The clock is displaying...shadows. > > > > Math are shadows. > > > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > > > You're prisoners of shadows. > > > > Mathematical objects are shadows... > > > > leave the cave... > > > > leave the matrix.. > > notice that Plato never mentions anything about the shadows on > sundials... > Plato looks at the Sundial and exclaims "THAT CANNOT BE THE CORRECT TIME, IT'S SHADOWS!!!!" -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-29 17:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66075733.3803@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #652447 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > > > Am 23.03.2024 um 18:39 schrieb Yatzyk Trampotova: > > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>>> the Entropy ð—œð—¦ time. Please stop ð—»ð—¼ð˜ undrestanding tensors. Look at > > > > >>>> No, because both terms are related, but not equal. > > > > >>>> Second law of thermodynamics means actually heat distribution. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> They had no clue about the radiant nature of heat when they started > > > > >>> talking about entropy. > > > > >> > > > > >> Heat transfer is possible in three different ways: > > > > >> transport of heated media (convection) > > > > >> dissipation of heat within some sort of stuff (conduction) > > > > >> radiation Therefore it is not true, that thermal energy is always > > > > >> transported by radiation. > > > > > > > > > > totally irrelevant. It's about you don't know what time is. > > > > > > > > Well, yes, because actually most people do not really know what time is. > > > > > > > > We have watches and clocks, but do not really know, what makes time move. > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > TH > > > > > > I don't know how else to explain it in terms that you can understand... > > > > > > (especially since this is being posted to a ...math group of people?) > > > > > > So, go back to the clock..whose hands on the clock are simply > > > a mechanical shadow... > > > > > > From the perspective of a 'math group of people' who believe that > > > mathematical objects are ...real, by the exact same person who told > > > them the 'shadow' is not a real world. > > > > > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > > > > > The shadows whether in a cave or on the face of a clock is not reality. > > > > > > The clock is displaying...shadows. > > > > > > Math are shadows. > > > > > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > > > > > You're prisoners of shadows. > > > > > > Mathematical objects are shadows... > > > > > > leave the cave... > > > > > > leave the matrix.. > > > > notice that Plato never mentions anything about the shadows on > > sundials... > > > > Plato looks at the Sundial and exclaims "THAT CANNOT BE THE CORRECT TIME, IT'S SHADOWS!!!!" I mean, I just don't understand... Plato looks at the shadows and says those shadows are not reality, while he sees everyone using the shadows on sundials for measuring Time. On the other side of his mouth he claims NUMBERS are real physical objects. The Sundial contains shadows and Numbers! Are the numbers real and the shadows not.. Or are the shadows real and the numbers not... or are the shadows and numbers are real? The shadows and the numbers are not reality is the Answer. Numbers don't exist out there.. and the shadows are not physical objects. So, shadows tell you the time? Those hands on the clock are mechanical shadows.. yous still using sundials to measure time with shadows... and imaginary numbers. YOU PEOPLE ARE INSANE!!! 'notice that Plato never mentions anything about the shadows on sundials...' -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-31 12:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6609B924.23B4@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #652540 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Am 23.03.2024 um 18:39 schrieb Yatzyk Trampotova: > > > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> the Entropy ð—œð—¦ time. Please stop ð—»ð—¼ð˜ undrestanding tensors. Look at > > > > > >>>> No, because both terms are related, but not equal. > > > > > >>>> Second law of thermodynamics means actually heat distribution. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> They had no clue about the radiant nature of heat when they started > > > > > >>> talking about entropy. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Heat transfer is possible in three different ways: > > > > > >> transport of heated media (convection) > > > > > >> dissipation of heat within some sort of stuff (conduction) > > > > > >> radiation Therefore it is not true, that thermal energy is always > > > > > >> transported by radiation. > > > > > > > > > > > > totally irrelevant. It's about you don't know what time is. > > > > > > > > > > Well, yes, because actually most people do not really know what time is. > > > > > > > > > > We have watches and clocks, but do not really know, what makes time move. > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > TH > > > > > > > > I don't know how else to explain it in terms that you can understand... > > > > > > > > (especially since this is being posted to a ...math group of people?) > > > > > > > > So, go back to the clock..whose hands on the clock are simply > > > > a mechanical shadow... > > > > > > > > From the perspective of a 'math group of people' who believe that > > > > mathematical objects are ...real, by the exact same person who told > > > > them the 'shadow' is not a real world. > > > > > > > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > > > > > > > The shadows whether in a cave or on the face of a clock is not reality. > > > > > > > > The clock is displaying...shadows. > > > > > > > > Math are shadows. > > > > > > > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > > > > > > > You're prisoners of shadows. > > > > > > > > Mathematical objects are shadows... > > > > > > > > leave the cave... > > > > > > > > leave the matrix.. > > > > > > notice that Plato never mentions anything about the shadows on > > > sundials... > > > > > > > Plato looks at the Sundial and exclaims "THAT CANNOT BE THE CORRECT TIME, IT'S SHADOWS!!!!" > > I mean, I just don't understand... > > Plato looks at the shadows and > says those shadows are not reality, > while he sees everyone using the shadows > on sundials for measuring Time. > > On the other side of his mouth he > claims NUMBERS are real physical objects. > > The Sundial contains shadows and Numbers! > > Are the numbers real and the shadows not.. > > Or are the shadows real and the numbers not... > > or are the shadows and numbers are real? > > The shadows and the numbers are not reality is the Answer. > > Numbers don't exist out there.. > > and the shadows are not physical objects. > > So, shadows tell you the time? > > Those hands on the clock are > mechanical shadows.. > > yous still using sundials > to measure time with shadows... > > and imaginary numbers. > > YOU PEOPLE ARE INSANE!!! > > 'notice that Plato never mentions anything about the shadows on > sundials...' > Now, you take the clock apart.. first you remove the mechanical shadows what you call hands on the clock actually high tech shadows... then you remove the numbers from the face of the clock... numbers don't exist out there.. Now what? You take apart the actusl cover and what do you see... a Machine! No different than removing that warm smile from a womans' face and seeing behind it.. a Machine! The clock and the woman are illusions. 'Very stubborn illusions' as someone once siad. So, what is measuring Time? Illusions?? Is Time an illusion too! It's just the Sun's shadow. Does the shadow...tick? Does the shadow make sudden tik tok movements? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-31 14:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6609D9CD.24AE@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #652589 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 23.03.2024 um 18:39 schrieb Yatzyk Trampotova: > > > > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> the Entropy ð—œð—¦ time. Please stop ð—»ð—¼ð˜ undrestanding tensors. Look at > > > > > > >>>> No, because both terms are related, but not equal. > > > > > > >>>> Second law of thermodynamics means actually heat distribution. > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> They had no clue about the radiant nature of heat when they started > > > > > > >>> talking about entropy. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Heat transfer is possible in three different ways: > > > > > > >> transport of heated media (convection) > > > > > > >> dissipation of heat within some sort of stuff (conduction) > > > > > > >> radiation Therefore it is not true, that thermal energy is always > > > > > > >> transported by radiation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > totally irrelevant. It's about you don't know what time is. > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, yes, because actually most people do not really know what time is. > > > > > > > > > > > > We have watches and clocks, but do not really know, what makes time move. > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > TH > > > > > > > > > > I don't know how else to explain it in terms that you can understand... > > > > > > > > > > (especially since this is being posted to a ...math group of people?) > > > > > > > > > > So, go back to the clock..whose hands on the clock are simply > > > > > a mechanical shadow... > > > > > > > > > > From the perspective of a 'math group of people' who believe that > > > > > mathematical objects are ...real, by the exact same person who told > > > > > them the 'shadow' is not a real world. > > > > > > > > > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > > > > > > > > > The shadows whether in a cave or on the face of a clock is not reality. > > > > > > > > > > The clock is displaying...shadows. > > > > > > > > > > Math are shadows. > > > > > > > > > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > > > > > > > > > You're prisoners of shadows. > > > > > > > > > > Mathematical objects are shadows... > > > > > > > > > > leave the cave... > > > > > > > > > > leave the matrix.. > > > > > > > > notice that Plato never mentions anything about the shadows on > > > > sundials... > > > > > > > > > > Plato looks at the Sundial and exclaims "THAT CANNOT BE THE CORRECT TIME, IT'S SHADOWS!!!!" > > > > I mean, I just don't understand... > > > > Plato looks at the shadows and > > says those shadows are not reality, > > while he sees everyone using the shadows > > on sundials for measuring Time. > > > > On the other side of his mouth he > > claims NUMBERS are real physical objects. > > > > The Sundial contains shadows and Numbers! > > > > Are the numbers real and the shadows not.. > > > > Or are the shadows real and the numbers not... > > > > or are the shadows and numbers are real? > > > > The shadows and the numbers are not reality is the Answer. > > > > Numbers don't exist out there.. > > > > and the shadows are not physical objects. > > > > So, shadows tell you the time? > > > > Those hands on the clock are > > mechanical shadows.. > > > > yous still using sundials > > to measure time with shadows... > > > > and imaginary numbers. > > > > YOU PEOPLE ARE INSANE!!! > > > > 'notice that Plato never mentions anything about the shadows on > > sundials...' > > > > Now, you take the clock apart.. > > first you remove the mechanical shadows > what you call hands on the clock > actually high tech shadows... > > then you remove the numbers from > the face of the clock... > numbers don't exist out there.. > > Now what? You take apart the > actusl cover and what do you see... > > a Machine! > > No different than removing > that warm smile from a > womans' face and seeing behind it.. > > a Machine! > > The clock and the woman > are illusions. > > 'Very stubborn illusions' as someone once siad. > > So, what is measuring Time? Illusions?? > > Is Time an illusion too! > > It's just the Sun's shadow. > > Does the shadow...tick? > > Does the shadow make sudden > tik tok movements? Keep in mind, I understand you need these illusions to survive.. you need the shadows the imaginary numbers and especially.. her warm smile... otherwise you would be seeing not her..but a monster. But don't tell me the universe is mathematical, because you insult my intelligence. Buy her some lipstick. Tell her how pretty she looks while she mocks you with her smile. She is just a ...machine. (with lipstick) Machines need illusions too! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-04-01 10:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <660AEBCA.74B7@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #652595 |
I mean, come on..let's be real here... a clock does not detect time it doesn't even measure the flow of time or the direction of time or the arrow of time (or which way is it going?) okay, i got the bow of time, which way am i pointing the arrow of time? just follow the arrow. The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 23.03.2024 um 18:39 schrieb Yatzyk Trampotova: > > > > > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> the Entropy ð—œð—¦ time. Please stop ð—»ð—¼ð˜ undrestanding tensors. Look at > > > > > > > >>>> No, because both terms are related, but not equal. > > > > > > > >>>> Second law of thermodynamics means actually heat distribution. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> They had no clue about the radiant nature of heat when they started > > > > > > > >>> talking about entropy. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Heat transfer is possible in three different ways: > > > > > > > >> transport of heated media (convection) > > > > > > > >> dissipation of heat within some sort of stuff (conduction) > > > > > > > >> radiation Therefore it is not true, that thermal energy is always > > > > > > > >> transported by radiation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > totally irrelevant. It's about you don't know what time is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, yes, because actually most people do not really know what time is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have watches and clocks, but do not really know, what makes time move. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TH > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know how else to explain it in terms that you can understand... > > > > > > > > > > > > (especially since this is being posted to a ...math group of people?) > > > > > > > > > > > > So, go back to the clock..whose hands on the clock are simply > > > > > > a mechanical shadow... > > > > > > > > > > > > From the perspective of a 'math group of people' who believe that > > > > > > mathematical objects are ...real, by the exact same person who told > > > > > > them the 'shadow' is not a real world. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > > > > > > > > > > > The shadows whether in a cave or on the face of a clock is not reality. > > > > > > > > > > > > The clock is displaying...shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > Math are shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > > > > > > > > > > > You're prisoners of shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mathematical objects are shadows... > > > > > > > > > > > > leave the cave... > > > > > > > > > > > > leave the matrix.. > > > > > > > > > > notice that Plato never mentions anything about the shadows on > > > > > sundials... > > > > > > > > > > > > > Plato looks at the Sundial and exclaims "THAT CANNOT BE THE CORRECT TIME, IT'S SHADOWS!!!!" > > > > > > I mean, I just don't understand... > > > > > > Plato looks at the shadows and > > > says those shadows are not reality, > > > while he sees everyone using the shadows > > > on sundials for measuring Time. > > > > > > On the other side of his mouth he > > > claims NUMBERS are real physical objects. > > > > > > The Sundial contains shadows and Numbers! > > > > > > Are the numbers real and the shadows not.. > > > > > > Or are the shadows real and the numbers not... > > > > > > or are the shadows and numbers are real? > > > > > > The shadows and the numbers are not reality is the Answer. > > > > > > Numbers don't exist out there.. > > > > > > and the shadows are not physical objects. > > > > > > So, shadows tell you the time? > > > > > > Those hands on the clock are > > > mechanical shadows.. > > > > > > yous still using sundials > > > to measure time with shadows... > > > > > > and imaginary numbers. > > > > > > YOU PEOPLE ARE INSANE!!! > > > > > > 'notice that Plato never mentions anything about the shadows on > > > sundials...' > > > > > > > Now, you take the clock apart.. > > > > first you remove the mechanical shadows > > what you call hands on the clock > > actually high tech shadows... > > > > then you remove the numbers from > > the face of the clock... > > numbers don't exist out there.. > > > > Now what? You take apart the > > actusl cover and what do you see... > > > > a Machine! > > > > No different than removing > > that warm smile from a > > womans' face and seeing behind it.. > > > > a Machine! > > > > The clock and the woman > > are illusions. > > > > 'Very stubborn illusions' as someone once siad. > > > > So, what is measuring Time? Illusions?? > > > > Is Time an illusion too! > > > > It's just the Sun's shadow. > > > > Does the shadow...tick? > > > > Does the shadow make sudden > > tik tok movements? > > Keep in mind, I understand you > need these illusions to survive.. > you need the shadows > the imaginary numbers > and especially.. > her warm smile... > > otherwise you would be > seeing not her..but a monster. > > But don't tell me the > universe is mathematical, because > you insult my intelligence. > > Buy her some lipstick. > > Tell her how pretty she looks > while she mocks you with her smile. > > She is just a ...machine. > (with lipstick) > > Machines need illusions too! > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-04-01 21:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <660B8B5A.7FBF@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #652607 |
Wait a minute, wait a minute...are you trying to tell me that a sundial is only a devise that ...follows the sun? The Starmaker wrote: > > I mean, come on..let's be real here... > > a clock does not detect time > > it doesn't even measure the flow of time > > or the direction of time > > or the arrow of time > > (or which way is it going?) > > okay, i got the bow of time, which > way am i pointing the arrow of time? > > just follow the arrow. > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 23.03.2024 um 18:39 schrieb Yatzyk Trampotova: > > > > > > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> the Entropy ð—œð—¦ time. Please stop ð—»ð—¼ð˜ undrestanding tensors. Look at > > > > > > > > >>>> No, because both terms are related, but not equal. > > > > > > > > >>>> Second law of thermodynamics means actually heat distribution. > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> They had no clue about the radiant nature of heat when they started > > > > > > > > >>> talking about entropy. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Heat transfer is possible in three different ways: > > > > > > > > >> transport of heated media (convection) > > > > > > > > >> dissipation of heat within some sort of stuff (conduction) > > > > > > > > >> radiation Therefore it is not true, that thermal energy is always > > > > > > > > >> transported by radiation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > totally irrelevant. It's about you don't know what time is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, yes, because actually most people do not really know what time is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have watches and clocks, but do not really know, what makes time move. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TH > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know how else to explain it in terms that you can understand... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (especially since this is being posted to a ...math group of people?) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, go back to the clock..whose hands on the clock are simply > > > > > > > a mechanical shadow... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From the perspective of a 'math group of people' who believe that > > > > > > > mathematical objects are ...real, by the exact same person who told > > > > > > > them the 'shadow' is not a real world. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The shadows whether in a cave or on the face of a clock is not reality. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The clock is displaying...shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Math are shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're prisoners of shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mathematical objects are shadows... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave the cave... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave the matrix.. > > > > > > > > > > > > notice that Plato never mentions anything about the shadows on > > > > > > sundials... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Plato looks at the Sundial and exclaims "THAT CANNOT BE THE CORRECT TIME, IT'S SHADOWS!!!!" > > > > > > > > I mean, I just don't understand... > > > > > > > > Plato looks at the shadows and > > > > says those shadows are not reality, > > > > while he sees everyone using the shadows > > > > on sundials for measuring Time. > > > > > > > > On the other side of his mouth he > > > > claims NUMBERS are real physical objects. > > > > > > > > The Sundial contains shadows and Numbers! > > > > > > > > Are the numbers real and the shadows not.. > > > > > > > > Or are the shadows real and the numbers not... > > > > > > > > or are the shadows and numbers are real? > > > > > > > > The shadows and the numbers are not reality is the Answer. > > > > > > > > Numbers don't exist out there.. > > > > > > > > and the shadows are not physical objects. > > > > > > > > So, shadows tell you the time? > > > > > > > > Those hands on the clock are > > > > mechanical shadows.. > > > > > > > > yous still using sundials > > > > to measure time with shadows... > > > > > > > > and imaginary numbers. > > > > > > > > YOU PEOPLE ARE INSANE!!! > > > > > > > > 'notice that Plato never mentions anything about the shadows on > > > > sundials...' > > > > > > > > > > Now, you take the clock apart.. > > > > > > first you remove the mechanical shadows > > > what you call hands on the clock > > > actually high tech shadows... > > > > > > then you remove the numbers from > > > the face of the clock... > > > numbers don't exist out there.. > > > > > > Now what? You take apart the > > > actusl cover and what do you see... > > > > > > a Machine! > > > > > > No different than removing > > > that warm smile from a > > > womans' face and seeing behind it.. > > > > > > a Machine! > > > > > > The clock and the woman > > > are illusions. > > > > > > 'Very stubborn illusions' as someone once siad. > > > > > > So, what is measuring Time? Illusions?? > > > > > > Is Time an illusion too! > > > > > > It's just the Sun's shadow. > > > > > > Does the shadow...tick? > > > > > > Does the shadow make sudden > > > tik tok movements? > > > > Keep in mind, I understand you > > need these illusions to survive.. > > you need the shadows > > the imaginary numbers > > and especially.. > > her warm smile... > > > > otherwise you would be > > seeing not her..but a monster. > > > > But don't tell me the > > universe is mathematical, because > > you insult my intelligence. > > > > Buy her some lipstick. > > > > Tell her how pretty she looks > > while she mocks you with her smile. > > > > She is just a ...machine. > > (with lipstick) > > > > Machines need illusions too! > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-04-02 00:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <660BB099.CE8@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #652617 |
ok, a sundial is for dialing the sun. "Hi Sun, where are you?" "Well, at 12:pm I was here and it's now 3:pm so I'm over here. a sundial is for making phone calls to the Sun. "I'm over here now." You know, you make a phonecall and you ask your girlfriend "Where are you at?" She says, "I'm over here!" You say, "When are you coming over here?" She sez..."I'll be there by sundown." Now you gotta call the sun... The Starmaker wrote: > > Wait a minute, wait a minute...are > you trying to tell > me that a sundial is only a devise > that ...follows the sun? > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > I mean, come on..let's be real here... > > > > a clock does not detect time > > > > it doesn't even measure the flow of time > > > > or the direction of time > > > > or the arrow of time > > > > (or which way is it going?) > > > > okay, i got the bow of time, which > > way am i pointing the arrow of time? > > > > just follow the arrow. > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 23.03.2024 um 18:39 schrieb Yatzyk Trampotova: > > > > > > > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> the Entropy ð—œð—¦ time. Please stop ð—»ð—¼ð˜ undrestanding tensors. Look at > > > > > > > > > >>>> No, because both terms are related, but not equal. > > > > > > > > > >>>> Second law of thermodynamics means actually heat distribution. > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> They had no clue about the radiant nature of heat when they started > > > > > > > > > >>> talking about entropy. > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Heat transfer is possible in three different ways: > > > > > > > > > >> transport of heated media (convection) > > > > > > > > > >> dissipation of heat within some sort of stuff (conduction) > > > > > > > > > >> radiation Therefore it is not true, that thermal energy is always > > > > > > > > > >> transported by radiation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > totally irrelevant. It's about you don't know what time is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, yes, because actually most people do not really know what time is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have watches and clocks, but do not really know, what makes time move. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TH > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know how else to explain it in terms that you can understand... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (especially since this is being posted to a ...math group of people?) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, go back to the clock..whose hands on the clock are simply > > > > > > > > a mechanical shadow... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From the perspective of a 'math group of people' who believe that > > > > > > > > mathematical objects are ...real, by the exact same person who told > > > > > > > > them the 'shadow' is not a real world. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The shadows whether in a cave or on the face of a clock is not reality. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The clock is displaying...shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Math are shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're prisoners of shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mathematical objects are shadows... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave the cave... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave the matrix.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > notice that Plato never mentions anything about the shadows on > > > > > > > sundials... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Plato looks at the Sundial and exclaims "THAT CANNOT BE THE CORRECT TIME, IT'S SHADOWS!!!!" > > > > > > > > > > I mean, I just don't understand... > > > > > > > > > > Plato looks at the shadows and > > > > > says those shadows are not reality, > > > > > while he sees everyone using the shadows > > > > > on sundials for measuring Time. > > > > > > > > > > On the other side of his mouth he > > > > > claims NUMBERS are real physical objects. > > > > > > > > > > The Sundial contains shadows and Numbers! > > > > > > > > > > Are the numbers real and the shadows not.. > > > > > > > > > > Or are the shadows real and the numbers not... > > > > > > > > > > or are the shadows and numbers are real? > > > > > > > > > > The shadows and the numbers are not reality is the Answer. > > > > > > > > > > Numbers don't exist out there.. > > > > > > > > > > and the shadows are not physical objects. > > > > > > > > > > So, shadows tell you the time? > > > > > > > > > > Those hands on the clock are > > > > > mechanical shadows.. > > > > > > > > > > yous still using sundials > > > > > to measure time with shadows... > > > > > > > > > > and imaginary numbers. > > > > > > > > > > YOU PEOPLE ARE INSANE!!! > > > > > > > > > > 'notice that Plato never mentions anything about the shadows on > > > > > sundials...' > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, you take the clock apart.. > > > > > > > > first you remove the mechanical shadows > > > > what you call hands on the clock > > > > actually high tech shadows... > > > > > > > > then you remove the numbers from > > > > the face of the clock... > > > > numbers don't exist out there.. > > > > > > > > Now what? You take apart the > > > > actusl cover and what do you see... > > > > > > > > a Machine! > > > > > > > > No different than removing > > > > that warm smile from a > > > > womans' face and seeing behind it.. > > > > > > > > a Machine! > > > > > > > > The clock and the woman > > > > are illusions. > > > > > > > > 'Very stubborn illusions' as someone once siad. > > > > > > > > So, what is measuring Time? Illusions?? > > > > > > > > Is Time an illusion too! > > > > > > > > It's just the Sun's shadow. > > > > > > > > Does the shadow...tick? > > > > > > > > Does the shadow make sudden > > > > tik tok movements? > > > > > > Keep in mind, I understand you > > > need these illusions to survive.. > > > you need the shadows > > > the imaginary numbers > > > and especially.. > > > her warm smile... > > > > > > otherwise you would be > > > seeing not her..but a monster. > > > > > > But don't tell me the > > > universe is mathematical, because > > > you insult my intelligence. > > > > > > Buy her some lipstick. > > > > > > Tell her how pretty she looks > > > while she mocks you with her smile. > > > > > > She is just a ...machine. > > > (with lipstick) > > > > > > Machines need illusions too! > > > > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > and challenge the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-04-02 09:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <660C37CE.3209@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #652620 |
the fact is...there is no devise on earth that can detect ...time. The Starmaker wrote: > > ok, a sundial is for dialing the sun. > > "Hi Sun, where are you?" > > "Well, at 12:pm I was here and it's now 3:pm so I'm over here. > > a sundial is for making phone calls to the Sun. > > "I'm over here now." > > You know, you make a phonecall and you ask your girlfriend "Where are > you at?" > > She says, "I'm over here!" > > You say, "When are you coming over here?" > > She sez..."I'll be there by sundown." > > Now you gotta call the sun... > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Wait a minute, wait a minute...are > > you trying to tell > > me that a sundial is only a devise > > that ...follows the sun? > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > I mean, come on..let's be real here... > > > > > > a clock does not detect time > > > > > > it doesn't even measure the flow of time > > > > > > or the direction of time > > > > > > or the arrow of time > > > > > > (or which way is it going?) > > > > > > okay, i got the bow of time, which > > > way am i pointing the arrow of time? > > > > > > just follow the arrow. > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 23.03.2024 um 18:39 schrieb Yatzyk Trampotova: > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> the Entropy ð—œð—¦ time. Please stop ð—»ð—¼ð˜ undrestanding tensors. Look at > > > > > > > > > > >>>> No, because both terms are related, but not equal. > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Second law of thermodynamics means actually heat distribution. > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> They had no clue about the radiant nature of heat when they started > > > > > > > > > > >>> talking about entropy. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> Heat transfer is possible in three different ways: > > > > > > > > > > >> transport of heated media (convection) > > > > > > > > > > >> dissipation of heat within some sort of stuff (conduction) > > > > > > > > > > >> radiation Therefore it is not true, that thermal energy is always > > > > > > > > > > >> transported by radiation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > totally irrelevant. It's about you don't know what time is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, yes, because actually most people do not really know what time is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have watches and clocks, but do not really know, what makes time move. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TH > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know how else to explain it in terms that you can understand... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (especially since this is being posted to a ...math group of people?) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, go back to the clock..whose hands on the clock are simply > > > > > > > > > a mechanical shadow... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From the perspective of a 'math group of people' who believe that > > > > > > > > > mathematical objects are ...real, by the exact same person who told > > > > > > > > > them the 'shadow' is not a real world. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The shadows whether in a cave or on the face of a clock is not reality. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The clock is displaying...shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Math are shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're prisoners of shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mathematical objects are shadows... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave the cave... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave the matrix.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > notice that Plato never mentions anything about the shadows on > > > > > > > > sundials... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Plato looks at the Sundial and exclaims "THAT CANNOT BE THE CORRECT TIME, IT'S SHADOWS!!!!" > > > > > > > > > > > > I mean, I just don't understand... > > > > > > > > > > > > Plato looks at the shadows and > > > > > > says those shadows are not reality, > > > > > > while he sees everyone using the shadows > > > > > > on sundials for measuring Time. > > > > > > > > > > > > On the other side of his mouth he > > > > > > claims NUMBERS are real physical objects. > > > > > > > > > > > > The Sundial contains shadows and Numbers! > > > > > > > > > > > > Are the numbers real and the shadows not.. > > > > > > > > > > > > Or are the shadows real and the numbers not... > > > > > > > > > > > > or are the shadows and numbers are real? > > > > > > > > > > > > The shadows and the numbers are not reality is the Answer. > > > > > > > > > > > > Numbers don't exist out there.. > > > > > > > > > > > > and the shadows are not physical objects. > > > > > > > > > > > > So, shadows tell you the time? > > > > > > > > > > > > Those hands on the clock are > > > > > > mechanical shadows.. > > > > > > > > > > > > yous still using sundials > > > > > > to measure time with shadows... > > > > > > > > > > > > and imaginary numbers. > > > > > > > > > > > > YOU PEOPLE ARE INSANE!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > 'notice that Plato never mentions anything about the shadows on > > > > > > sundials...' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, you take the clock apart.. > > > > > > > > > > first you remove the mechanical shadows > > > > > what you call hands on the clock > > > > > actually high tech shadows... > > > > > > > > > > then you remove the numbers from > > > > > the face of the clock... > > > > > numbers don't exist out there.. > > > > > > > > > > Now what? You take apart the > > > > > actusl cover and what do you see... > > > > > > > > > > a Machine! > > > > > > > > > > No different than removing > > > > > that warm smile from a > > > > > womans' face and seeing behind it.. > > > > > > > > > > a Machine! > > > > > > > > > > The clock and the woman > > > > > are illusions. > > > > > > > > > > 'Very stubborn illusions' as someone once siad. > > > > > > > > > > So, what is measuring Time? Illusions?? > > > > > > > > > > Is Time an illusion too! > > > > > > > > > > It's just the Sun's shadow. > > > > > > > > > > Does the shadow...tick? > > > > > > > > > > Does the shadow make sudden > > > > > tik tok movements? > > > > > > > > Keep in mind, I understand you > > > > need these illusions to survive.. > > > > you need the shadows > > > > the imaginary numbers > > > > and especially.. > > > > her warm smile... > > > > > > > > otherwise you would be > > > > seeing not her..but a monster. > > > > > > > > But don't tell me the > > > > universe is mathematical, because > > > > you insult my intelligence. > > > > > > > > Buy her some lipstick. > > > > > > > > Tell her how pretty she looks > > > > while she mocks you with her smile. > > > > > > > > She is just a ...machine. > > > > (with lipstick) > > > > > > > > Machines need illusions too! > > > > > > > > -- > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > and challenge the unchallengeable. > > > > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > and challenge the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-04-02 10:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <k3rtdk-fib71.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #652639 |
In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > the fact is...there is no devise on earth that can detect ...time. That depends on which definition of the word time you are using. a : the measured or measurable period during which an action, process, or condition exists or continues b : a nonspatial continuum that is measured in terms of events which succeed one another from past through present to future < snip old crap >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-04-02 12:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <660C5BF3.1FEE@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #652641 |
Jim Pennino wrote: > > In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > the fact is...there is no devise on earth that can detect ...time. > > That depends on which definition of the word time you are using. > > a : the measured or measurable period during which an action, process, > or condition exists or continues > > b : a nonspatial continuum that is measured in terms of events which > succeed one another from past through present to future > > < snip old crap > The operative word is "detect" not time. de·tect /d?'tek(t)/ verb discover or identify the presence or existence of. to discover the true character of https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+detect identify the presence of time. identify the existence of time. The fact is...there is no devise on earth that can detect, identify, the presence and existence of ...time. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-04-02 12:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <514udk-mcm71.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #652647 |
In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > Jim Pennino wrote: >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> > the fact is...there is no devise on earth that can detect ...time. >> >> That depends on which definition of the word time you are using. >> >> a : the measured or measurable period during which an action, process, >> or condition exists or continues >> >> b : a nonspatial continuum that is measured in terms of events which >> succeed one another from past through present to future >> >> < snip old crap > > > > The operative word is "detect" not time. > > > > > de·tect > /d?'tek(t)/ > verb > discover or identify the presence or existence of. > to discover the true character of > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+detect > > > identify the presence of time. > > > identify the existence of time. > > > The fact is...there is no devise on earth that can detect, identify, the presence and existence of ...time. The fact is what you post is childish, ignorant twaddle.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-04-03 23:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <660E42C6.7993@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #652648 |
Jim Pennino wrote: > > In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > Jim Pennino wrote: > >> > >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> > the fact is...there is no devise on earth that can detect ...time. > >> > >> That depends on which definition of the word time you are using. > >> > >> a : the measured or measurable period during which an action, process, > >> or condition exists or continues > >> > >> b : a nonspatial continuum that is measured in terms of events which > >> succeed one another from past through present to future > >> > >> < snip old crap > > > > > > > The operative word is "detect" not time. > > > > > > > > > > de·tect > > /d?'tek(t)/ > > verb > > discover or identify the presence or existence of. > > to discover the true character of > > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+detect > > > > > > identify the presence of time. > > > > > > identify the existence of time. > > > > > > The fact is...there is no devise on earth that can detect, identify, the presence and existence of ...time. > > The fact is what you post is childish, ignorant twaddle. I was using 3rd grade reading levels so that anyone can understand...but in your case I might need to use...kindergarten. twaddle twaddle twaddle see spot run -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-04-04 05:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0nk2ek-pamc1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #652675 |
In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > Jim Pennino wrote: >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> > Jim Pennino wrote: >> >> >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> >> > the fact is...there is no devise on earth that can detect ...time. >> >> >> >> That depends on which definition of the word time you are using. >> >> >> >> a : the measured or measurable period during which an action, process, >> >> or condition exists or continues >> >> >> >> b : a nonspatial continuum that is measured in terms of events which >> >> succeed one another from past through present to future >> >> >> >> < snip old crap > >> > >> > >> > The operative word is "detect" not time. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > de·tect >> > /d?'tek(t)/ >> > verb >> > discover or identify the presence or existence of. >> > to discover the true character of >> > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+detect >> > >> > >> > identify the presence of time. >> > >> > >> > identify the existence of time. >> > >> > >> > The fact is...there is no devise on earth that can detect, identify, the presence and existence of ...time. >> >> The fact is what you post is childish, ignorant twaddle. > > > I was using 3rd grade reading levels so that anyone can understand...but Everything you post is at best 3rd grade level.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-04-04 09:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <660ECE8C.2684@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #652678 |
Jim Pennino wrote: > > In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > Jim Pennino wrote: > >> > >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> > Jim Pennino wrote: > >> >> > >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> >> > the fact is...there is no devise on earth that can detect ...time. > >> >> > >> >> That depends on which definition of the word time you are using. > >> >> > >> >> a : the measured or measurable period during which an action, process, > >> >> or condition exists or continues > >> >> > >> >> b : a nonspatial continuum that is measured in terms of events which > >> >> succeed one another from past through present to future > >> >> > >> >> < snip old crap > > >> > > >> > > >> > The operative word is "detect" not time. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > de·tect > >> > /d?'tek(t)/ > >> > verb > >> > discover or identify the presence or existence of. > >> > to discover the true character of > >> > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+detect > >> > > >> > > >> > identify the presence of time. > >> > > >> > > >> > identify the existence of time. > >> > > >> > > >> > The fact is...there is no devise on earth that can detect, identify, the presence and existence of ...time. > >> > >> The fact is what you post is childish, ignorant twaddle. > > > > > > I was using 3rd grade reading levels so that anyone can understand...but > > Everything you post is at best 3rd grade level. All I'm sayin is a sundial is not a clock, it's a telephone. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web