Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #620118 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-09-11 10:53 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-09-17 10:14 -0700 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
There is no edge to the finite universe "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-09-11 10:53 -0700
Re: There is no edge to the finite universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-11 22:45 -0700
Re: There is no edge to the finite universe "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 10:14 -0700
| From | "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-11 10:53 -0700 |
| Subject | There is no edge to the finite universe |
| Message-ID | <c69ce609-d22a-4ce9-ab37-b0be17e97766n@googlegroups.com> |
astronomy's quasar edge is a mistake. Einstein explained the how the closed universe is boundless. Science accepts Einstein on that account. Mitchell Raemsch
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-11 22:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <64FFFB06.3174@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #620118 |
mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > > astronomy's quasar edge is a mistake. > Einstein explained the how the closed universe > is boundless. Science accepts Einstein > on that account. > > Mitchell Raemsch doesn't finite means having an edge? It's definable. so, how can there be no edge to an edge? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-17 10:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6b6fbcc4-ac7f-4f4a-999f-e4d53c0df67dn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #620156 |
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 10:45:43 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > astronomy's quasar edge is a mistake. > > Einstein explained the how the closed universe > > is boundless. Science accepts Einstein > > on that account. > > > > Mitchell Raemsch > doesn't finite means having an edge? It's definable. No finite means a size... for a closed universe. There are no special objects. The quasars are distributed everywhere. The distant objects got to where they are in time after the Big Bang. > so, how can there be no edge to an edge? > > > > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web