Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #620156
| Message-ID | <64FFFB06.3174@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-11 22:45 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: There is no edge to the finite universe |
| References | <c69ce609-d22a-4ce9-ab37-b0be17e97766n@googlegroups.com> |
mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > > astronomy's quasar edge is a mistake. > Einstein explained the how the closed universe > is boundless. Science accepts Einstein > on that account. > > Mitchell Raemsch doesn't finite means having an edge? It's definable. so, how can there be no edge to an edge? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
There is no edge to the finite universe "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-09-11 10:53 -0700
Re: There is no edge to the finite universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-11 22:45 -0700
Re: There is no edge to the finite universe "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 10:14 -0700
csiph-web