Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #620451

Re: There is no edge to the finite universe

Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Date	2023-09-17 10:14 -0700
References	<c69ce609-d22a-4ce9-ab37-b0be17e97766n@googlegroups.com> <64FFFB06.3174@ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID	<6b6fbcc4-ac7f-4f4a-999f-e4d53c0df67dn@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: There is no edge to the finite universe
From	"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 10:45:43 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > 
> > astronomy's quasar edge is a mistake. 
> > Einstein explained the how the closed universe 
> > is boundless. Science accepts Einstein 
> > on that account. 
> > 
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> doesn't finite means having an edge? It's definable. 

No finite means a size... for a closed universe.
There are  no special objects. The quasars are
distributed  everywhere.

The distant objects got to where they are
in time after the Big Bang.


> so, how can there be no edge to an edge? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

There is no edge to the finite universe "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-09-11 10:53 -0700
  Re: There is no edge to the finite universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-11 22:45 -0700
    Re: There is no edge to the finite universe "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 10:14 -0700

csiph-web