Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #599585 > unrolled thread

FoR

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-14 02:10 -0800
    Re: FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-14 10:09 -0800
      Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 16:23 -0800
        Re: FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-14 17:16 -0800
          Re: FoR Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-14 18:05 -0800
            Re: FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-15 02:54 -0800
        Re: FoR Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-14 18:06 -0800
          Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 19:15 -0800
            Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 21:02 -0800
              Re: FoR Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-14 21:47 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 22:15 -0800
                  Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 22:48 -0800
                    Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 00:19 -0800
                      Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 00:44 -0800
                        Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 01:03 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 11:47 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-16 12:37 -0800
                  Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-16 14:41 -0800
                    Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-16 22:56 -0800
                      Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-17 12:24 -0800
                        Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-17 13:36 -0800
                      Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-19 13:52 -0800
                        Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-19 21:27 -0800
                          Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-20 09:23 -0800
              Re: FoR whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-15 00:18 -0600
                Re: FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-15 03:16 -0800
            Re: FoR whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-15 00:16 -0600

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#599585 — FoR

"Use E-PS to check if you have been swallowed." - 
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0995454876 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#599595

On Saturday, 14 January 2023 at 10:10:13 UTC, Peter Kinane wrote:
> "Use E-PS to check if you have been swallowed." - 
> https://www.amazon.com/dp/0995454876

I wrote this subsequent to seeing a post commenting on - ridiculing - some presumed premise that there was enough energy in the first atom to generate the Universe but have lost track of which thread it was so am pasting it here:

The “Big Bang” produced Hydrogen and Helium atoms and tiny percentages of the immediate next ones in the periodic table. Let’s call these atoms 2nd level energy.
As apparently becomes apparent when production of the remaining atoms of the table is studied it only produced these rather simple atoms because the resource energy was not dense enough to sustain more complex ‘cooking’. 
Let’s call that resource energy: 1st level energy.
Clouds of 2nd level energy, through the force of gravity, became denser and eventually this denser than 1st level energy collapsed and exploded producing atoms up to and including Iron on the periodic table.
Let’s call that resource 3rd level energy.
Some of that 3rd level energy is a massive body/star. When it collapses and explodes the remainder of the atoms in the periodic table are produced.
Let’s call it 4th level energy.
So as suggested above the Big Bang was very low density energy – 1st level cooking; it was not dense enough to sustain more complex ‘cooking’, though there probably was lots of it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599606

Peter Kinane wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, 14 January 2023 at 10:10:13 UTC, Peter Kinane wrote:
> > "Use E-PS to check if you have been swallowed." -
> > https://www.amazon.com/dp/0995454876
> 
> I wrote this subsequent to seeing a post commenting on - ridiculing - some presumed premise that there was enough energy in the first atom to generate the Universe but have lost track of which thread it was so am pasting it here:



The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun.

Do the math, let's say the first atom was 50 times bigger than our
Sun...then you will see it all adds up.



> 
> The “Big Bang” produced Hydrogen and Helium atoms and tiny percentages of the immediate next ones in the periodic table. Let’s call these atoms 2nd level energy.
> As apparently becomes apparent when production of the remaining atoms of the table is studied it only produced these rather simple atoms because the resource energy was not dense enough to sustain more complex ‘cooking’.
> Let’s call that resource energy: 1st level energy.
> Clouds of 2nd level energy, through the force of gravity, became denser and eventually this denser than 1st level energy collapsed and exploded producing atoms up to and including Iron on the periodic table.
> Let’s call that resource 3rd level energy.
> Some of that 3rd level energy is a massive body/star. When it collapses and explodes the remainder of the atoms in the periodic table are produced.
> Let’s call it 4th level energy.
> So as suggested above the Big Bang was very low density energy – 1st level cooking; it was not dense enough to sustain more complex ‘cooking’, though there probably was lots of it.







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599608

On Sunday, 15 January 2023 at 00:23:08 UTC, The Starmaker wrote:
> Peter Kinane wrote:
> > 
> > On Saturday, 14 January 2023 at 10:10:13 UTC, Peter Kinane wrote: 
> > > "Use E-PS to check if you have been swallowed." - 
> > > https://www.amazon.com/dp/0995454876 
> >
> > I wrote this subsequent to seeing a post commenting on - ridiculing - some presumed premise that there was enough energy in the first atom to generate the Universe but have lost track of which thread it was so am pasting it here: 
> 
> 
> 
> The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun. 
> 
> Do the math, let's say the first atom was 50 times bigger than our 
> Sun...then you will see it all adds up. 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > The “Big Bang” produced Hydrogen and Helium atoms and tiny percentages of the immediate next ones in the periodic table. Let’s call these atoms 2nd level energy. 
> > As apparently becomes apparent when production of the remaining atoms of the table is studied it only produced these rather simple atoms because the resource energy was not dense enough to sustain more complex ‘cooking’. 
> > Let’s call that resource energy: 1st level energy. 
> > Clouds of 2nd level energy, through the force of gravity, became denser and eventually this denser than 1st level energy collapsed and exploded producing atoms up to and including Iron on the periodic table. 
> > Let’s call that resource 3rd level energy. 
> > Some of that 3rd level energy is a massive body/star. When it collapses and explodes the remainder of the atoms in the periodic table are produced. 
> > Let’s call it 4th level energy. 
> > So as suggested above the Big Bang was very low density energy – 1st level cooking; it was not dense enough to sustain more complex ‘cooking’, though there probably was lots of it. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
> and challenge 
> the unchallengeable.


Oh you captured it - the post before I removed it  :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599609

On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 5:16:32 PM UTC-8, Peter Kinane wrote:
> On Sunday, 15 January 2023 at 00:23:08 UTC, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > Peter Kinane wrote: 
> > > 
> > > On Saturday, 14 January 2023 at 10:10:13 UTC, Peter Kinane wrote: 
> > > > "Use E-PS to check if you have been swallowed." - 
> > > > https://www.amazon.com/dp/0995454876 
> > > 
> > > I wrote this subsequent to seeing a post commenting on - ridiculing - some presumed premise that there was enough energy in the first atom to generate the Universe but have lost track of which thread it was so am pasting it here: 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun. 
> > 
> > Do the math, let's say the first atom was 50 times bigger than our 
> > Sun...then you will see it all adds up. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > The “Big Bang” produced Hydrogen and Helium atoms and tiny percentages of the immediate next ones in the periodic table. Let’s call these atoms 2nd level energy. 
> > > As apparently becomes apparent when production of the remaining atoms of the table is studied it only produced these rather simple atoms because the resource energy was not dense enough to sustain more complex ‘cooking’. 
> > > Let’s call that resource energy: 1st level energy. 
> > > Clouds of 2nd level energy, through the force of gravity, became denser and eventually this denser than 1st level energy collapsed and exploded producing atoms up to and including Iron on the periodic table. 
> > > Let’s call that resource 3rd level energy. 
> > > Some of that 3rd level energy is a massive body/star. When it collapses and explodes the remainder of the atoms in the periodic table are produced. 
> > > Let’s call it 4th level energy. 
> > > So as suggested above the Big Bang was very low density energy – 1st level cooking; it was not dense enough to sustain more complex ‘cooking’, though there probably was lots of it. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
> > and challenge 
> > the unchallengeable.

> Oh you captured it - the post before I removed it :)

Not really... Google never forgets...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599626

On Sunday, 15 January 2023 at 02:05:12 UTC, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 5:16:32 PM UTC-8, Peter Kinane wrote: 
> > On Sunday, 15 January 2023 at 00:23:08 UTC, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > Peter Kinane wrote: 
> > > > 
> > > > On Saturday, 14 January 2023 at 10:10:13 UTC, Peter Kinane wrote: 
> > > > > "Use E-PS to check if you have been swallowed." - 
> > > > > https://www.amazon.com/dp/0995454876 
> > > > 
> > > > I wrote this subsequent to seeing a post commenting on - ridiculing - some presumed premise that there was enough energy in the first atom to generate the Universe but have lost track of which thread it was so am pasting it here: 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun. 
> > > 
> > > Do the math, let's say the first atom was 50 times bigger than our 
> > > Sun...then you will see it all adds up. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > The “Big Bang” produced Hydrogen and Helium atoms and tiny percentages of the immediate next ones in the periodic table. Let’s call these atoms 2nd level energy. 
> > > > As apparently becomes apparent when production of the remaining atoms of the table is studied it only produced these rather simple atoms because the resource energy was not dense enough to sustain more complex ‘cooking’. 
> > > > Let’s call that resource energy: 1st level energy. 
> > > > Clouds of 2nd level energy, through the force of gravity, became denser and eventually this denser than 1st level energy collapsed and exploded producing atoms up to and including Iron on the periodic table. 
> > > > Let’s call that resource 3rd level energy. 
> > > > Some of that 3rd level energy is a massive body/star. When it collapses and explodes the remainder of the atoms in the periodic table are produced. 
> > > > Let’s call it 4th level energy. 
> > > > So as suggested above the Big Bang was very low density energy – 1st level cooking; it was not dense enough to sustain more complex ‘cooking’, though there probably was lots of it. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
> > > and challenge 
> > > the unchallengeable. 
> 
> > Oh you captured it - the post before I removed it :)
> Not really... Google never forgets...

Oh right.

I also had a post to someone else's thread, taking up a reference to Putin's mention of new science but my post was probably too good for the thread.

If you cannot find it through Google, it is in my book - 
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0995454876 

It was, shall we say,  a "popularisation" of my alternative theory to General Relativity, expressed with the formula:
The p, w and + of F = G*m1*(m2+(p-w))/r^2

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599610

On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 4:23:08 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:

> The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun. 

And just what amazing evidence do you have to offer for this out-of-your-ass claim?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599611

Paul Alsing wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 4:23:08 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun.
> 
> And just what amazing evidence do you have to offer for this > out-of-your-ass claim?

The evidence is overwhelming!


I mean, a 3 year can explain it...

simply, it just takes one material object to create a whole universe.


Is your question what is the size of the first atom??? Are you using a 
12" ruler??



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599613

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Paul Alsing wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 4:23:08 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > > The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun.
> >
> > And just what amazing evidence do you have to offer for this > out-of-your-ass claim?
> 
> The evidence is overwhelming!
> 
> I mean, a 3 year can explain it...
> 
> simply, it just takes one material object to create a whole universe.
> 
> Is your question what is the size of the first atom??? Are you using a
> 12" ruler??


WHERE did you people get the idea that the universe comes from a itty
bitty tinny winney...atom?


skool?



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599616

On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 9:02:34 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote: 
> > 
> > Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > > 
> > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 4:23:08 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > 
> > > > The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun. 
> > > 
> > > And just what amazing evidence do you have to offer for this > out-of-your-ass claim? 
> > 
> > The evidence is overwhelming! 
> > 
> > I mean, a 3 year can explain it... 
> > 
> > simply, it just takes one material object to create a whole universe. 
> > 
> > Is your question what is the size of the first atom??? Are you using a 
> > 12" ruler??
> WHERE did you people get the idea that the universe comes from a itty 
> bitty tinny winney...atom? 
> 
> 
> skool?

So... you have zero evidence to provide support for your outrageous claim... got it!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599617

Paul Alsing wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 9:02:34 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 4:23:08 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun.
> > > >
> > > > And just what amazing evidence do you have to offer for this > out-of-your-ass claim?
> > >
> > > The evidence is overwhelming!
> > >
> > > I mean, a 3 year can explain it...
> > >
> > > simply, it just takes one material object to create a whole universe.
> > >
> > > Is your question what is the size of the first atom??? Are you using a
> > > 12" ruler??
> > WHERE did you people get the idea that the universe comes from a itty
> > bitty tinny winney...atom?
> >
> >
> > skool?
> 
> So... you have zero evidence to provide support for your outrageous claim... got it!


The evidence is overwhelming! 

I don't even know where to start!

Let's start with...The Code.


'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.'

How much material do you think he needed just to make an ...earth? 









-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599620

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Paul Alsing wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 9:02:34 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 4:23:08 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun.
> > > > >
> > > > > And just what amazing evidence do you have to offer for this > out-of-your-ass claim?
> > > >
> > > > The evidence is overwhelming!
> > > >
> > > > I mean, a 3 year can explain it...
> > > >
> > > > simply, it just takes one material object to create a whole universe.
> > > >
> > > > Is your question what is the size of the first atom??? Are you using a
> > > > 12" ruler??
> > > WHERE did you people get the idea that the universe comes from a itty
> > > bitty tinny winney...atom?
> > >
> > >
> > > skool?
> >
> > So... you have zero evidence to provide support for your outrageous claim... got it!
> 
> The evidence is overwhelming!
> 
> I don't even know where to start!
> 
> Let's start with...The Code.
> 
> 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.'
> 
> How much material do you think he needed just to make an ...earth?

Look at the guy who invented the big bang... Georges LeMaitre,

he called it a "Cosmic Egg" , not a cosmic atom.


Now a dinosaur comes from an egg, do the math.

egg - dinosaur
cosmic egg - universe


any 3 year old can tell you dat.

It's when you people turn 4 years old you just get dummber...skool
didittoyou.


an egg is bigger than an atom.

THINK BIG!

wait, yous went to college and got dummber....


Like I told the gentleman, The first atom was probably bigger than our
Sun.

Do the math, let's say the first atom was 50 times bigger than our
Sun...then you will see it all adds up.


Even at 40 times bigger it Still adds up.



but, WHERE did you people get the idea that the universe comes from a
itty
bitty tinny winney...atom?

Einstein? 



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599623

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > >
> > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 9:02:34 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 4:23:08 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And just what amazing evidence do you have to offer for this > out-of-your-ass claim?
> > > > >
> > > > > The evidence is overwhelming!
> > > > >
> > > > > I mean, a 3 year can explain it...
> > > > >
> > > > > simply, it just takes one material object to create a whole universe.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is your question what is the size of the first atom??? Are you using a
> > > > > 12" ruler??
> > > > WHERE did you people get the idea that the universe comes from a itty
> > > > bitty tinny winney...atom?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > skool?
> > >
> > > So... you have zero evidence to provide support for your outrageous claim... got it!
> >
> > The evidence is overwhelming!
> >
> > I don't even know where to start!
> >
> > Let's start with...The Code.
> >
> > 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.'
> >
> > How much material do you think he needed just to make an ...earth?
> 
> Look at the guy who invented the big bang... Georges LeMaitre,
> 
> he called it a "Cosmic Egg" , not a cosmic atom.
> 
> Now a dinosaur comes from an egg, do the math.
> 
> egg - dinosaur
> cosmic egg - universe
> 
> any 3 year old can tell you dat.
> 
> It's when you people turn 4 years old you just get dummber...skool
> didittoyou.
> 
> an egg is bigger than an atom.
> 
> THINK BIG!
> 
> wait, yous went to college and got dummber....
> 
> Like I told the gentleman, The first atom was probably bigger than our
> Sun.
> 
> Do the math, let's say the first atom was 50 times bigger than our
> Sun...then you will see it all adds up.
> 
> Even at 40 times bigger it Still adds up.
> 
> but, WHERE did you people get the idea that the universe comes from a
> itty
> bitty tinny winney...atom?
> 
> Einstein?

Let me put it this way...it was a very very heavy atom.


How heavy? Look around you...




but don't ask your teachers or proffesors...they are lemmings.

Those who can't, teach.



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599624

Probably what happened was a lot of dumb teachers and professors saw the
word "atom" and automically assume it
was something small...

but if you asked the inventor of the big bang (LeMaitre) he would tell
you...it was a BIG particle.


How big? Well, dat is for yous guys to figure out on your own...(if dat 
is possible for yous to figure out on your own)

but how hard is it when i already posted the size on dis thread?



How big is the earth compared to the universe? a single grain of sand or
less.









The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 9:02:34 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 4:23:08 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And just what amazing evidence do you have to offer for this > out-of-your-ass claim?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The evidence is overwhelming!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I mean, a 3 year can explain it...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > simply, it just takes one material object to create a whole universe.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is your question what is the size of the first atom??? Are you using a
> > > > > > 12" ruler??
> > > > > WHERE did you people get the idea that the universe comes from a itty
> > > > > bitty tinny winney...atom?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > skool?
> > > >
> > > > So... you have zero evidence to provide support for your outrageous claim... got it!
> > >
> > > The evidence is overwhelming!
> > >
> > > I don't even know where to start!
> > >
> > > Let's start with...The Code.
> > >
> > > 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.'
> > >
> > > How much material do you think he needed just to make an ...earth?
> >
> > Look at the guy who invented the big bang... Georges LeMaitre,
> >
> > he called it a "Cosmic Egg" , not a cosmic atom.
> >
> > Now a dinosaur comes from an egg, do the math.
> >
> > egg - dinosaur
> > cosmic egg - universe
> >
> > any 3 year old can tell you dat.
> >
> > It's when you people turn 4 years old you just get dummber...skool
> > didittoyou.
> >
> > an egg is bigger than an atom.
> >
> > THINK BIG!
> >
> > wait, yous went to college and got dummber....
> >
> > Like I told the gentleman, The first atom was probably bigger than our
> > Sun.
> >
> > Do the math, let's say the first atom was 50 times bigger than our
> > Sun...then you will see it all adds up.
> >
> > Even at 40 times bigger it Still adds up.
> >
> > but, WHERE did you people get the idea that the universe comes from a
> > itty
> > bitty tinny winney...atom?
> >
> > Einstein?
> 
> Let me put it this way...it was a very very heavy atom.
> 
> How heavy? Look around you...
> 
> but don't ask your teachers or proffesors...they are lemmings.
> 
> Those who can't, teach.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599625

The truth is LeMaitre was smarter than Einstein.

LeMaitre only problem was...he wasn't Jewish.


It was LeMaitre who came out with 'expanding universe' before Hubble
did..



But as Einstein would say...'If you're not a Jewish scientists, you're
not a scientist'.


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Probably what happened was a lot of dumb teachers and professors saw the
> word "atom" and automically assume it
> was something small...
> 
> but if you asked the inventor of the big bang (LeMaitre) he would tell
> you...it was a BIG particle.
> 
> How big? Well, dat is for yous guys to figure out on your own...(if dat
> is possible for yous to figure out on your own)
> 
> but how hard is it when i already posted the size on dis thread?
> 
> How big is the earth compared to the universe? a single grain of sand or
> less.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 9:02:34 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 4:23:08 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And just what amazing evidence do you have to offer for this > out-of-your-ass claim?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The evidence is overwhelming!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I mean, a 3 year can explain it...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > simply, it just takes one material object to create a whole universe.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is your question what is the size of the first atom??? Are you using a
> > > > > > > 12" ruler??
> > > > > > WHERE did you people get the idea that the universe comes from a itty
> > > > > > bitty tinny winney...atom?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > skool?
> > > > >
> > > > > So... you have zero evidence to provide support for your outrageous claim... got it!
> > > >
> > > > The evidence is overwhelming!
> > > >
> > > > I don't even know where to start!
> > > >
> > > > Let's start with...The Code.
> > > >
> > > > 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.'
> > > >
> > > > How much material do you think he needed just to make an ...earth?
> > >
> > > Look at the guy who invented the big bang... Georges LeMaitre,
> > >
> > > he called it a "Cosmic Egg" , not a cosmic atom.
> > >
> > > Now a dinosaur comes from an egg, do the math.
> > >
> > > egg - dinosaur
> > > cosmic egg - universe
> > >
> > > any 3 year old can tell you dat.
> > >
> > > It's when you people turn 4 years old you just get dummber...skool
> > > didittoyou.
> > >
> > > an egg is bigger than an atom.
> > >
> > > THINK BIG!
> > >
> > > wait, yous went to college and got dummber....
> > >
> > > Like I told the gentleman, The first atom was probably bigger than our
> > > Sun.
> > >
> > > Do the math, let's say the first atom was 50 times bigger than our
> > > Sun...then you will see it all adds up.
> > >
> > > Even at 40 times bigger it Still adds up.
> > >
> > > but, WHERE did you people get the idea that the universe comes from a
> > > itty
> > > bitty tinny winney...atom?
> > >
> > > Einstein?
> >
> > Let me put it this way...it was a very very heavy atom.
> >
> > How heavy? Look around you...
> >
> > but don't ask your teachers or proffesors...they are lemmings.
> >
> > Those who can't, teach.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599647

Paul Alsing wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 9:02:34 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 4:23:08 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun.
> > > >
> > > > And just what amazing evidence do you have to offer for this > out-of-your-ass claim?
> > >
> > > The evidence is overwhelming!
> > >
> > > I mean, a 3 year can explain it...
> > >
> > > simply, it just takes one material object to create a whole universe.
> > >
> > > Is your question what is the size of the first atom??? Are you using a
> > > 12" ruler??
> > WHERE did you people get the idea that the universe comes from a itty
> > bitty tinny winney...atom?
> >
> >
> > skool?
> 
> So... you have zero evidence to provide support for your outrageous claim... got it!

Of course I have 100 percent evidence that "The first atom was BIGGER than our Sun.", the same evidence 
your belief that the first atom is SMALLER than our Sun.

But first, I have to layout the foundation...

Why do you think he changed the name to...a cosmic egg?


Because he was pressured too when they discovered his first atom was bigger that our SUN!


Many times bigger than our sun...but you people are not suppose to know that because LeMaitre was not Jewish, he was Catholic.


Anybody smaarter than Einstein was simply shot to death. Buried!

Now you got to go and dig up LeMaitre's grave and you'll discover...



 Georges Lemaître who suggested the idea of a 'primeval atom’ (first atom).. He illustrated the idea by imagining an object 30 times larger than the volume of the sun containing all the matter of the Universe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmon


"a particle named Cosmon."


and Today, they (the scientific community) gave that particle a new name...



Can you guess the name?
(of course they STOLE the idea from LeMaitre)
Can you guess the name?



I'll give you a clue...a single particle.... the heaviest form of matter at the beginning of the big bang.


Bigger than our Sun, right?


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599690

Paul Alsing wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 9:02:34 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 4:23:08 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun.
> > > >
> > > > And just what amazing evidence do you have to offer for this > out-of-your-ass claim?
> > >
> > > The evidence is overwhelming!
> > >
> > > I mean, a 3 year can explain it...
> > >
> > > simply, it just takes one material object to create a whole universe.
> > >
> > > Is your question what is the size of the first atom??? Are you using a
> > > 12" ruler??
> > WHERE did you people get the idea that the universe comes from a itty
> > bitty tinny winney...atom?
> >
> >
> > skool?
> 
> So... you have zero evidence to provide support for your outrageous claim... got it!

Of course I have 100 percent evidence that "The first atom was BIGGER than our Sun.", the same evidence 
your belief that the first atom is SMALLER than our Sun.

But first, I have to layout the foundation...

Why do you think he changed the name to...a cosmic egg?


Because he was pressured too when they discovered his first atom was bigger that our SUN!


Many times bigger than our sun...but you people are not suppose to know that because LeMaitre was not Jewish, he was Catholic.


Anybody smaarter than Einstein was simply shot to death. Buried!

Now you got to go and dig up LeMaitre's grave and you'll discover...



 Georges Lemaître who suggested the idea of a 'primeval atom’ (first atom).. He illustrated the idea by imagining an object 30 times larger than the volume of the sun containing all the matter of the Universe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmon


"a particle named Cosmon."


and Today, they (the scientific community) gave that particle a new name...



Can you guess the name?
(of course they STOLE the idea from LeMaitre)
Can you guess the name?



I'll give you a clue...a single particle.... the heaviest form of matter at the beginning of the big bang.


Bigger than our Sun, right?


Now, let me go a step further (if you can handle it)...

The earth was contained in what you people call...'the first atom', (which was bigger than our sun)

The earth existed even before space and time.

Then there was Light..










-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599697

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Paul Alsing wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 9:02:34 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 4:23:08 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun.
> > > > >
> > > > > And just what amazing evidence do you have to offer for this > out-of-your-ass claim?
> > > >
> > > > The evidence is overwhelming!
> > > >
> > > > I mean, a 3 year can explain it...
> > > >
> > > > simply, it just takes one material object to create a whole universe.
> > > >
> > > > Is your question what is the size of the first atom??? Are you using a
> > > > 12" ruler??
> > > WHERE did you people get the idea that the universe comes from a itty
> > > bitty tinny winney...atom?
> > >
> > >
> > > skool?
> >
> > So... you have zero evidence to provide support for your outrageous claim... got it!
> 
> Of course I have 100 percent evidence that "The first atom was BIGGER than our Sun.", the same evidence
> your belief that the first atom is SMALLER than our Sun.
> 
> But first, I have to layout the foundation...
> 
> Why do you think he changed the name to...a cosmic egg?
> 
> Because he was pressured too when they discovered his first atom was bigger that our SUN!
> 
> Many times bigger than our sun...but you people are not suppose to know that because LeMaitre was not Jewish, he was Catholic.
> 
> Anybody smaarter than Einstein was simply shot to death. Buried!
> 
> Now you got to go and dig up LeMaitre's grave and you'll discover...
> 
>  Georges Lemaître who suggested the idea of a 'primeval atom’ (first atom).. He illustrated the idea by imagining an object 30 times larger than the volume of the sun containing all the matter of the Universe.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmon
> 
> "a particle named Cosmon."
> 
> and Today, they (the scientific community) gave that particle a new name...
> 
> Can you guess the name?
> (of course they STOLE the idea from LeMaitre)
> Can you guess the name?
> 
> I'll give you a clue...a single particle.... the heaviest form of matter at the beginning of the big bang.
> 
> Bigger than our Sun, right?
> 
> Now, let me go a step further (if you can handle it)...
> 
> The earth was contained in what you people call...'the first atom', (which was bigger than our sun)
> 
> The earth existed even before space and time.
> 
> Then there was Light..

That means...dat the age of the Earth is the same age of the universe.


When are yous people going to get that right????


Are yous just going to remain stupid for the rest of your life??


waiting for somebody to tell you what to think? 

stupid.






> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599720

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > >
> > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 9:02:34 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 4:23:08 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And just what amazing evidence do you have to offer for this > out-of-your-ass claim?
> > > > >
> > > > > The evidence is overwhelming!
> > > > >
> > > > > I mean, a 3 year can explain it...
> > > > >
> > > > > simply, it just takes one material object to create a whole universe.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is your question what is the size of the first atom??? Are you using a
> > > > > 12" ruler??
> > > > WHERE did you people get the idea that the universe comes from a itty
> > > > bitty tinny winney...atom?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > skool?
> > >
> > > So... you have zero evidence to provide support for your outrageous claim... got it!
> >
> > Of course I have 100 percent evidence that "The first atom was BIGGER than our Sun.", the same evidence
> > your belief that the first atom is SMALLER than our Sun.
> >
> > But first, I have to layout the foundation...
> >
> > Why do you think he changed the name to...a cosmic egg?
> >
> > Because he was pressured too when they discovered his first atom was bigger that our SUN!
> >
> > Many times bigger than our sun...but you people are not suppose to know that because LeMaitre was not Jewish, he was Catholic.
> >
> > Anybody smaarter than Einstein was simply shot to death. Buried!
> >
> > Now you got to go and dig up LeMaitre's grave and you'll discover...
> >
> >  Georges Lemaître who suggested the idea of a 'primeval atom’ (first atom).. He illustrated the idea by imagining an object 30 times larger than the volume of the sun containing all the matter of the Universe.
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmon
> >
> > "a particle named Cosmon."
> >
> > and Today, they (the scientific community) gave that particle a new name...
> >
> > Can you guess the name?
> > (of course they STOLE the idea from LeMaitre)
> > Can you guess the name?
> >
> > I'll give you a clue...a single particle.... the heaviest form of matter at the beginning of the big bang.
> >
> > Bigger than our Sun, right?
> >
> > Now, let me go a step further (if you can handle it)...
> >
> > The earth was contained in what you people call...'the first atom', (which was bigger than our sun)
> >
> > The earth existed even before space and time.
> >
> > Then there was Light..
> 
> That means...dat the age of the Earth is the same age of the universe.
> 
> When are yous people going to get that right????
> 
> Are yous just going to remain stupid for the rest of your life??
> 
> waiting for somebody to tell you what to think?
> 
> stupid.

...and you people keep forgetting The Code: 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.'


In this case, "and" is the operative word. "And" definition means: 'together at the same time'.


That means, heavens and the earth were both created at the same Time. 


The earth was contained *in* the...singularity..




The singularity was 30 times bigger than our sun then.


dats enoug space for a piece of a grain of sand dis earth is floating in space.


This singularity, broke up into little pieces...everywhere.


broke up into little pieces...everywhere is wat yous call the big bang, by the 'big bang man'.




dey dont tech yous dis stuff in skool because of religious wars between jewish religion and catholic religion.




Oh, and dat:

> > "a particle named Cosmon."
> >
> > and Today, they (the scientific community) gave that particle a new name...
> >
> > Can you guess the name?
> > (of course they STOLE the idea from LeMaitre)
> > Can you guess the name?

The...One.

 #1 Best Seller in Cosmology 
https://www.amazon.com/One-Ancient-Holds-Future-Physics/dp/1541674855/ref=zg_bs_14545_sccl_7/135-7395175-6306629?psc=1


it's already at a nitroflare near you...















-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599759

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 9:02:34 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 4:23:08 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And just what amazing evidence do you have to offer for this > out-of-your-ass claim?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The evidence is overwhelming!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I mean, a 3 year can explain it...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > simply, it just takes one material object to create a whole universe.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is your question what is the size of the first atom??? Are you using a
> > > > > > 12" ruler??
> > > > > WHERE did you people get the idea that the universe comes from a itty
> > > > > bitty tinny winney...atom?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > skool?
> > > >
> > > > So... you have zero evidence to provide support for your outrageous claim... got it!
> > >
> > > Of course I have 100 percent evidence that "The first atom was BIGGER than our Sun.", the same evidence
> > > your belief that the first atom is SMALLER than our Sun.
> > >
> > > But first, I have to layout the foundation...
> > >
> > > Why do you think he changed the name to...a cosmic egg?
> > >
> > > Because he was pressured too when they discovered his first atom was bigger that our SUN!
> > >
> > > Many times bigger than our sun...but you people are not suppose to know that because LeMaitre was not Jewish, he was Catholic.
> > >
> > > Anybody smaarter than Einstein was simply shot to death. Buried!
> > >
> > > Now you got to go and dig up LeMaitre's grave and you'll discover...
> > >
> > >  Georges Lemaître who suggested the idea of a 'primeval atom’ (first atom).. He illustrated the idea by imagining an object 30 times larger than the volume of the sun containing all the matter of the Universe.
> > >
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmon
> > >
> > > "a particle named Cosmon."
> > >
> > > and Today, they (the scientific community) gave that particle a new name...
> > >
> > > Can you guess the name?
> > > (of course they STOLE the idea from LeMaitre)
> > > Can you guess the name?
> > >
> > > I'll give you a clue...a single particle.... the heaviest form of matter at the beginning of the big bang.
> > >
> > > Bigger than our Sun, right?
> > >
> > > Now, let me go a step further (if you can handle it)...
> > >
> > > The earth was contained in what you people call...'the first atom', (which was bigger than our sun)
> > >
> > > The earth existed even before space and time.
> > >
> > > Then there was Light..
> >
> > That means...dat the age of the Earth is the same age of the universe.
> >
> > When are yous people going to get that right????
> >
> > Are yous just going to remain stupid for the rest of your life??
> >
> > waiting for somebody to tell you what to think?
> >
> > stupid.
> 
> ...and you people keep forgetting The Code: 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.'
> 
> In this case, "and" is the operative word. "And" definition means: 'together at the same time'.
> 
> That means, heavens and the earth were both created at the same Time.
> 
> The earth was contained *in* the...singularity..
> 
> The singularity was 30 times bigger than our sun then.
> 
> dats enoug space for a piece of a grain of sand dis earth is floating in space.
> 
> This singularity, broke up into little pieces...everywhere.
> 
> broke up into little pieces...everywhere is wat yous call the big bang, by the 'big bang man'.
> 
> dey dont tech yous dis stuff in skool because of religious wars between jewish religion and catholic religion.
> 
> Oh, and dat:
> 
> > > "a particle named Cosmon."
> > >
> > > and Today, they (the scientific community) gave that particle a new name...
> > >
> > > Can you guess the name?
> > > (of course they STOLE the idea from LeMaitre)
> > > Can you guess the name?
> 
> The...One.
> 
>  #1 Best Seller in Cosmology
> https://www.amazon.com/One-Ancient-Holds-Future-Physics/dp/1541674855/ref=zg_bs_14545_sccl_7/135-7395175-6306629?psc=1
> 
> it's already at a nitroflare near you...


but the book is based on only One word... monism.

All you have to do is look up the definition of the word:  monism 

and it's like reading the whole book.


You know, another one of those ripoffs books where the author takes one idea in
a sentence and expands it to 600 pages.

but this is worse...one word into 600 pages!

you can do the same thing with ChatGPT...

Maybe I should write a book! "How To Blow Up the Planet"



Number One best seller on Amazon!


600 pages!



I'm working on the second book already while ChatGPT is still writing the first one...


"How To Blow Up The Moon"


oh my gawd, i'm already running out of planets!


I'm not going to blow up Pluto, the kids would be angry with me....


no telling wat those little motherfuckers would do.





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web