Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #599759
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: FoR |
| Date | 2023-01-17 12:24 -0800 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <63C703FC.11BE@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <63C388F3.3545@ix.netcom.com> <80f187e9-d47b-48b3-84e2-f0c57cb6b8a8n@googlegroups.com> <63C5B5A7.4889@ix.netcom.com> <63C5D287.7DC5@ix.netcom.com> <63C6468D.7C98@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > Paul Alsing wrote: > > > > > > > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 9:02:34 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Paul Alsing wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 4:23:08 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And just what amazing evidence do you have to offer for this > out-of-your-ass claim? > > > > > > > > > > > > The evidence is overwhelming! > > > > > > > > > > > > I mean, a 3 year can explain it... > > > > > > > > > > > > simply, it just takes one material object to create a whole universe. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is your question what is the size of the first atom??? Are you using a > > > > > > 12" ruler?? > > > > > WHERE did you people get the idea that the universe comes from a itty > > > > > bitty tinny winney...atom? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > skool? > > > > > > > > So... you have zero evidence to provide support for your outrageous claim... got it! > > > > > > Of course I have 100 percent evidence that "The first atom was BIGGER than our Sun.", the same evidence > > > your belief that the first atom is SMALLER than our Sun. > > > > > > But first, I have to layout the foundation... > > > > > > Why do you think he changed the name to...a cosmic egg? > > > > > > Because he was pressured too when they discovered his first atom was bigger that our SUN! > > > > > > Many times bigger than our sun...but you people are not suppose to know that because LeMaitre was not Jewish, he was Catholic. > > > > > > Anybody smaarter than Einstein was simply shot to death. Buried! > > > > > > Now you got to go and dig up LeMaitre's grave and you'll discover... > > > > > > Georges Lemaître who suggested the idea of a 'primeval atom’ (first atom).. He illustrated the idea by imagining an object 30 times larger than the volume of the sun containing all the matter of the Universe. > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmon > > > > > > "a particle named Cosmon." > > > > > > and Today, they (the scientific community) gave that particle a new name... > > > > > > Can you guess the name? > > > (of course they STOLE the idea from LeMaitre) > > > Can you guess the name? > > > > > > I'll give you a clue...a single particle.... the heaviest form of matter at the beginning of the big bang. > > > > > > Bigger than our Sun, right? > > > > > > Now, let me go a step further (if you can handle it)... > > > > > > The earth was contained in what you people call...'the first atom', (which was bigger than our sun) > > > > > > The earth existed even before space and time. > > > > > > Then there was Light.. > > > > That means...dat the age of the Earth is the same age of the universe. > > > > When are yous people going to get that right???? > > > > Are yous just going to remain stupid for the rest of your life?? > > > > waiting for somebody to tell you what to think? > > > > stupid. > > ...and you people keep forgetting The Code: 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' > > In this case, "and" is the operative word. "And" definition means: 'together at the same time'. > > That means, heavens and the earth were both created at the same Time. > > The earth was contained *in* the...singularity.. > > The singularity was 30 times bigger than our sun then. > > dats enoug space for a piece of a grain of sand dis earth is floating in space. > > This singularity, broke up into little pieces...everywhere. > > broke up into little pieces...everywhere is wat yous call the big bang, by the 'big bang man'. > > dey dont tech yous dis stuff in skool because of religious wars between jewish religion and catholic religion. > > Oh, and dat: > > > > "a particle named Cosmon." > > > > > > and Today, they (the scientific community) gave that particle a new name... > > > > > > Can you guess the name? > > > (of course they STOLE the idea from LeMaitre) > > > Can you guess the name? > > The...One. > > #1 Best Seller in Cosmology > https://www.amazon.com/One-Ancient-Holds-Future-Physics/dp/1541674855/ref=zg_bs_14545_sccl_7/135-7395175-6306629?psc=1 > > it's already at a nitroflare near you... but the book is based on only One word... monism. All you have to do is look up the definition of the word: monism and it's like reading the whole book. You know, another one of those ripoffs books where the author takes one idea in a sentence and expands it to 600 pages. but this is worse...one word into 600 pages! you can do the same thing with ChatGPT... Maybe I should write a book! "How To Blow Up the Planet" Number One best seller on Amazon! 600 pages! I'm working on the second book already while ChatGPT is still writing the first one... "How To Blow Up The Moon" oh my gawd, i'm already running out of planets! I'm not going to blow up Pluto, the kids would be angry with me.... no telling wat those little motherfuckers would do. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-14 02:10 -0800
Re: FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-14 10:09 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 16:23 -0800
Re: FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-14 17:16 -0800
Re: FoR Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-14 18:05 -0800
Re: FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-15 02:54 -0800
Re: FoR Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-14 18:06 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 19:15 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 21:02 -0800
Re: FoR Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-14 21:47 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 22:15 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 22:48 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 00:19 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 00:44 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 01:03 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 11:47 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-16 12:37 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-16 14:41 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-16 22:56 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-17 12:24 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-17 13:36 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-19 13:52 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-19 21:27 -0800
Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-20 09:23 -0800
Re: FoR whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-15 00:18 -0600
Re: FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-15 03:16 -0800
Re: FoR whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-15 00:16 -0600
csiph-web