Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #599606

Re: FoR

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: FoR
Date 2023-01-14 16:23 -0800
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <63C34775.7CD@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <653caf5a-9cbf-4b40-9421-bb486cb9043bn@googlegroups.com> <10d12096-db84-4411-bf78-ce89147527f5n@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Peter Kinane wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, 14 January 2023 at 10:10:13 UTC, Peter Kinane wrote:
> > "Use E-PS to check if you have been swallowed." -
> > https://www.amazon.com/dp/0995454876
> 
> I wrote this subsequent to seeing a post commenting on - ridiculing - some presumed premise that there was enough energy in the first atom to generate the Universe but have lost track of which thread it was so am pasting it here:



The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun.

Do the math, let's say the first atom was 50 times bigger than our
Sun...then you will see it all adds up.



> 
> The “Big Bang” produced Hydrogen and Helium atoms and tiny percentages of the immediate next ones in the periodic table. Let’s call these atoms 2nd level energy.
> As apparently becomes apparent when production of the remaining atoms of the table is studied it only produced these rather simple atoms because the resource energy was not dense enough to sustain more complex ‘cooking’.
> Let’s call that resource energy: 1st level energy.
> Clouds of 2nd level energy, through the force of gravity, became denser and eventually this denser than 1st level energy collapsed and exploded producing atoms up to and including Iron on the periodic table.
> Let’s call that resource 3rd level energy.
> Some of that 3rd level energy is a massive body/star. When it collapses and explodes the remainder of the atoms in the periodic table are produced.
> Let’s call it 4th level energy.
> So as suggested above the Big Bang was very low density energy – 1st level cooking; it was not dense enough to sustain more complex ‘cooking’, though there probably was lots of it.







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-14 02:10 -0800
  Re: FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-14 10:09 -0800
    Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 16:23 -0800
      Re: FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-14 17:16 -0800
        Re: FoR Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-14 18:05 -0800
          Re: FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-15 02:54 -0800
      Re: FoR Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-14 18:06 -0800
        Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 19:15 -0800
          Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 21:02 -0800
            Re: FoR Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-14 21:47 -0800
              Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 22:15 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 22:48 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 00:19 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 00:44 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 01:03 -0800
              Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 11:47 -0800
              Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-16 12:37 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-16 14:41 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-16 22:56 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-17 12:24 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-17 13:36 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-19 13:52 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-19 21:27 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-20 09:23 -0800
            Re: FoR whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-15 00:18 -0600
              Re: FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-15 03:16 -0800
          Re: FoR whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-15 00:16 -0600

csiph-web