Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #597999 > unrolled thread
| Started by | carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-12-21 14:19 -0800 |
| Last post | 2023-01-13 16:12 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 290 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-21 14:19 -0800
Re: climate change Michelle Africano <nccr@amenica.he> - 2022-12-21 22:45 +0000
Re: climate change Michelle Africano <nccr@amenica.he> - 2022-12-21 22:54 +0000
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-22 09:49 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-22 10:07 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-22 11:08 -0800
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-22 12:59 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-22 13:05 -0800
Re: climate change Rico Amato <toaa@araocco.rt> - 2022-12-22 22:04 +0000
Re: climate change Rico Amato <toaa@araocco.rt> - 2022-12-22 22:14 +0000
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-22 14:26 -0800
Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-12-22 18:38 -0800
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-22 19:03 -0800
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-23 11:10 -0800
Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-12-23 13:48 -0800
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-23 15:30 -0800
Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-12-23 20:25 -0800
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-27 12:12 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 15:41 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-27 16:40 -0800
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-27 21:10 -0600
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-28 12:24 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-31 09:33 +0100
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-12-31 00:44 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-01 10:00 +0100
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-28 07:56 +0100
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-29 09:01 +0100
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-29 16:38 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-29 16:40 -0800
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-29 18:54 -0600
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-30 11:14 +0100
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-30 10:57 -0600
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 10:48 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 11:01 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 11:15 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 11:57 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 13:03 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 14:40 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 15:25 -0800
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-30 19:02 -0600
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-30 18:58 -0600
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-31 09:09 +0100
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-31 09:22 +0100
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-31 15:42 -0600
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-31 14:26 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-31 14:43 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-31 15:42 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-01 09:43 +0100
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 16:49 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-01 09:28 +0100
Re: climate change Doodnath Sarti <ttha@dnhnahan.nh> - 2023-01-01 08:49 +0000
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-01 06:21 -0600
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 15:56 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 16:02 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 16:19 -0800
Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 17:10 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 17:56 -0800
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-02 03:36 -0500
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-03 07:36 +0100
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 12:24 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 12:27 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 13:30 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 13:46 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 13:48 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 17:14 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 17:29 -0800
Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 18:13 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-04 10:12 +0100
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-04 12:59 -0500
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-05 07:40 +0100
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 11:17 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-04 11:49 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-04 14:40 -0800
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-05 14:40 -0800
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-04 12:51 -0500
Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-04 23:06 -0600
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-05 00:13 -0600
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-05 08:01 +0100
Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-05 11:47 -0600
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-05 10:17 -0800
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-05 16:33 -0600
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-07 09:42 +0100
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-07 15:21 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-07 15:47 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-07 15:58 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-07 16:04 -0800
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-07 18:31 -0800
Re: climate change Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-08 13:47 +0000
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-08 15:16 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-08 16:49 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-08 17:09 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-09 08:53 +0100
Re: climate change Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-09 08:30 +0000
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-09 10:11 -0800
Re: climate change Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-09 18:58 +0000
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-09 12:47 -0800
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-09 22:18 -0800
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-10 15:49 +0100
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-10 10:58 -0800
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-10 21:45 +0100
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-10 12:58 -0800
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-10 22:12 +0100
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-10 14:26 -0800
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-10 21:56 -0800
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-10 22:17 -0800
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-10 22:32 -0800
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-11 01:34 -0500
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-10 22:49 -0800
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-11 12:44 -0500
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-11 10:53 -0800
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-11 11:54 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-11 12:03 -0800
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-11 12:39 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-11 14:21 -0800
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-11 22:06 +0100
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-11 14:20 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-11 14:23 -0800
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-12 10:23 +0100
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-12 03:46 -0500
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-12 00:58 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-12 16:53 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-12 17:07 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-12 15:02 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-12 15:09 -0800
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-12 17:57 -0600
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-12 16:26 -0800
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-12 18:32 -0600
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-12 17:23 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-12 17:31 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-12 18:06 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-12 18:12 -0800
Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-12 19:20 -0800
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-13 11:39 -0500
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-12 20:44 -0600
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-12 18:52 -0800
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-13 04:06 -0500
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-13 01:20 -0800
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-13 12:04 -0500
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-13 10:20 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-13 12:11 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-13 12:23 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-13 12:27 -0800
Re: climate change Kobie Locatelli <be@cliietik.oo> - 2023-01-15 11:38 +0000
Re: climate change Kobie Locatelli <be@cliietik.oo> - 2023-01-15 13:23 +0000
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-15 13:14 -0600
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-15 13:10 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-15 13:14 -0800
Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-15 14:48 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-15 16:44 -0800
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-16 17:44 +0100
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-16 12:36 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-16 13:31 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-16 13:39 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-16 14:19 -0800
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-17 00:55 -0500
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-16 22:24 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-17 09:58 -0800
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-17 13:16 -0500
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-17 10:58 -0800
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-18 16:55 -0500
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-19 12:07 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-19 12:11 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-19 12:18 -0800
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-19 15:18 -0600
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-19 13:51 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-19 13:52 -0800
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-19 18:47 -0600
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-20 10:23 -0800
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-20 14:47 -0500
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-20 21:36 -0800
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-20 14:14 -0600
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-20 12:22 -0800
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-20 19:40 -0600
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 01:54 -0500
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-21 20:35 +0100
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-21 15:26 -0800
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-21 21:46 -0600
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-22 12:08 +0100
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-23 13:37 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-23 13:39 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-23 13:39 -0800
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-23 23:10 +0100
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-23 13:45 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-23 13:50 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-23 13:52 -0800
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-23 17:24 -0500
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-23 14:35 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-23 14:37 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-24 08:48 +0100
Re: climate change Faustino Biondo <uinn@bfotboia.nt> - 2023-01-25 19:40 +0000
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-26 16:40 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-27 08:17 +0100
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-27 14:31 -0500
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-28 14:08 +0100
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-30 07:35 +0100
Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-30 07:38 -0600
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-31 09:34 +0100
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-31 13:19 +0100
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-02-03 11:13 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-03 21:49 +0100
Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-03 19:23 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-04 21:10 +0100
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 12:06 -0800
Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 22:06 -0800
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-23 16:55 -0600
Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-23 16:52 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <carleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-23 17:36 -0800
Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-23 18:39 -0800
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-23 23:10 +0100
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-17 09:57 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-17 10:28 -0800
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-17 16:20 -0500
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-18 00:10 -0800
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-18 16:57 -0500
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-19 11:57 -0800
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-16 23:25 +0100
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-16 15:40 -0800
Re: climate change Edurardo De felice <eduu@eiudece.co> - 2023-01-17 13:49 +0000
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-11 10:36 +0100
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-11 02:09 -0800
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-11 10:36 +0100
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-11 02:06 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-11 11:29 +0100
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-11 13:00 -0500
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-11 10:44 -0800
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-11 11:17 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-11 10:51 -0800
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-11 14:36 -0600
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-12 08:09 +0100
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-12 03:55 -0500
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-13 08:11 +0100
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-13 13:12 +0100
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-13 04:41 -0800
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-13 16:11 +0100
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-13 08:54 -0800
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-13 21:52 +0100
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-13 11:21 -0500
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-14 09:54 +0100
Re: climate change Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2023-01-14 10:07 +0100
Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-14 12:03 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-14 12:24 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-14 12:26 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-15 08:11 +0100
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-10 07:18 +0100
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-02 08:06 +0100
Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-02 10:22 -0600
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-03 07:27 +0100
Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-02 10:43 -0600
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 14:54 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 14:57 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 15:03 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 15:10 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 17:29 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 16:20 -0800
Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-01 20:24 -0600
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-01 19:27 -0600
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 18:02 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 18:20 -0800
Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-01 20:48 -0600
Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-01 21:29 -0600
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-02 08:28 +0100
Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-01 20:29 -0600
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-01 19:26 -0600
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-01 06:16 -0600
Re: climate change "kellehe...@gmail.com" <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2022-12-23 01:59 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-28 08:10 +0100
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-28 11:34 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-29 08:45 +0100
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-28 11:47 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-28 12:18 -0800
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-28 12:34 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-28 13:06 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-28 15:29 -0800
Re: climate change Santos Anselmetti <ttln@niitstsm.sa> - 2022-12-28 23:33 +0000
Re: climate change Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-01-05 20:08 +1100
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-05 16:17 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-06 08:11 +0100
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-06 11:29 -0800
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-06 11:30 -0800
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-06 13:21 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-06 14:20 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-06 14:09 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-06 14:29 -0800
Re: climate change George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2023-01-12 23:45 -0800
Re: climate change Otto Fiscella <tfit@tiselelc.it> - 2023-01-13 16:06 +0000
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-13 12:03 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-13 12:08 -0800
Re: climate change Otto Fiscella <tfit@tiselelc.it> - 2023-01-13 21:10 +0000
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-13 16:12 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-13 16:12 -0800
Page 2 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 15 Next page →
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-27 21:10 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k11qdcFe1f8U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #598403 |
On 12/27/2022 6:40 PM, thor stoneman wrote: > > "This process slows down the escape of heat from the earth." > > Heat does not escape the earth. At night the heat of the earth is reduced and the heated water has a heat capacity six time more than the earth atmosphere. Have you every been close to a nuclear power plant's cooling tower functioning at full blast? Then imagine 30,000 cooling towers running at full steam 24/7. > > Genius is not being EXTRAORDINARILY smart but not being stupid. > > When did climate change start?---the inception of nuclear power. Climate change has existed since the formation of the earth. Humanity is probably skewing the consequences that find roots in natural events.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-28 12:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63ACA5FA.1666@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #598403 |
thor stoneman wrote: > > "This process slows down the escape of heat from the earth." > > Heat does not escape the earth. At night the heat of the earth is reduced and the heated water has a heat capacity six time more than the earth atmosphere. Have you every been close to a nuclear power plant's cooling tower functioning at full blast? Then imagine 30,000 cooling towers running at full steam 24/7. > > Genius is not being EXTRAORDINARILY smart but not being stupid. > > When did climate change start?---the inception of nuclear power. "climate change" started when they changed it from the words...'global warming'. (maybe you forgot) But, if..IF you want to know that which you call "climate change" and when did it started.. it is caused by gravitational waves from the Black Holes. Just as the black holes gravitational waves are causing the earth to lose course of it's magnetic poles and are the REAL cause of waht you call Climate Change, or to change the climate... but, it is also the reason why BEES are disappearing...since bees use the magnetic fields to...navigate. Since the north magnetic pole is shifting to Siberia, so are the bees shifting, and the weather. But of course like always the STUPID scientist of the world are saying Climate Change is making the bees disappear..stupid, stupid, stupid. Scientist have their noses in Textbooks. (fraudalent information contained in academic books) "Unusual weather we're having, ain't it?" --Wizard of Oz, 1939 -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-31 09:33 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k1aafoFnf8eU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #598455 |
Am 28.12.2022 um 21:24 schrieb The Starmaker: > > But of course like always the STUPID scientist of the world are saying > Climate Change is making the bees disappear..stupid, stupid, stupid. > > Scientist have their noses in Textbooks. (fraudalent information contained in academic books) > I have started with Eeinstein's article of 1905, but continued with a mathbook for physicists and made comments into that. I found, that the math they teach to physics students is full of errors, too. It is like a coordinated brainwashing, which is applied to futur scientist and comes from different angles. Math is one of these 'containers', by which BS is stuffed into the brains of the students. It's a fraudulent scheme and to the great disadvantage of the students. But usually, young students in their first weeks at a college have little or no defense against fraudulent math. Later they become used to it and much later they forget, why they actually wanted to study physics. This causes kind of 'zombification', which is apparently a requirement to be selcted into the club of the few, who have a right to earn their bread with science and eventually get a glimps at the real physics, which is hidden somewhere in deep caves and away from the young students. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-31 00:44 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b581e5f9-55ca-4409-96a1-d3522ef717bcn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #598704 |
On Saturday, 31 December 2022 at 09:34:03 UTC+1, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 28.12.2022 um 21:24 schrieb The Starmaker: > > > > > But of course like always the STUPID scientist of the world are saying > > Climate Change is making the bees disappear..stupid, stupid, stupid. > > > > Scientist have their noses in Textbooks. (fraudalent information contained in academic books) > > > I have started with Eeinstein's article of 1905, but continued with a > mathbook for physicists and made comments into that. > > > I found, that the math they teach to physics students is The Shit is not any math, though they like to pretend it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-01 10:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k1d0e5F5e25U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #598705 |
Am 31.12.2022 um 09:44 schrieb Maciej Wozniak: > On Saturday, 31 December 2022 at 09:34:03 UTC+1, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am 28.12.2022 um 21:24 schrieb The Starmaker: >> >>> >>> But of course like always the STUPID scientist of the world are saying >>> Climate Change is making the bees disappear..stupid, stupid, stupid. >>> >>> Scientist have their noses in Textbooks. (fraudalent information contained in academic books) >>> >> I have started with Eeinstein's article of 1905, but continued with a >> mathbook for physicists and made comments into that. >> >> >> I found, that the math they teach to physics students is > > The Shit is not any math, though they like to pretend it. > I like quaternions and a certain branch of mathematics 'called geometric algebra'. One of the pioneers of the use of this concept in physics was David Heestenes. But for decades his works was regarded as very exotic stuff from the far end of science. In common books about general relativity, for instance, a different type of math is tought. This math is very strange in my oppinion. For instance I dislike the use of superscripts for indices. (That space should be reserved for exponents). This strange habit makes it very difficult to say, if x² means x*x or a second x variable with the index two. Another strange habit is something like y=y(x). This sounds familliar, but one y is an dependent variable and the other y (in y(x) ) is the name of a function. These are two different types of mathematical objects, hence cannot possibly be equal. Therefore the one y is not equal to the other y, while indistinguishable from the apperance. It is therefore required, to distiguish different types of objects by certain signs, like e.g. a bold font or little arrows over vectors. Another issue is the missing separation between math and physics. I would like math to provide mathematical tools and physics to connect them to the real world. In other words: math books for physicists should not discuss physical questions, while physics books should not attempt to create new forms of math. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-28 07:56 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k127lmFfui8U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #598179 |
Am 24.12.2022 um 05:25 schrieb Paul Alsing: >>> "There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity." >>> - Dr. Fausi >> >> That is something Dr. Fausi would say... > > But it is not, it was said by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, a man with one of the highest IQs ever. No exactly, but close... The guy which about Goethe had written was 'Dr. Faust'. He (Faust) sold is sole to the devil and had some trouble afterwards. Dr. Fausi apparently did that, too, but I'm not secure. Possibly he sold his sole to more earthly entities. > Who exactly is Dr. Fausi? > '...that is here the question' (or was that Shakespear?) TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-29 09:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k14vr3FsspbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #598424 |
Am 28.12.2022 um 07:56 schrieb Thomas Heger: > Am 24.12.2022 um 05:25 schrieb Paul Alsing: > >>>> "There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity." >>>> - Dr. Fausi >>> >>> That is something Dr. Fausi would say... >> >> But it is not, it was said by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, a man with >> one of the highest IQs ever. > > > No exactly, but close... > > The guy which about Goethe had written was 'Dr. Faust'. > > He (Faust) sold is sole to the devil and had some trouble afterwards. (Actually meant was 'soul'). The 'Playmobil summery' of 'Faust, first part of the tragedy' can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIY6xO7A7Qw ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-29 16:38 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <fa899694-3d06-4729-96d9-4b0b0493b3cdn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #598510 |
"Well, we have sunshine and that is warming up the earth. But the 'mechanics' of sunshine are not well understood, because we only know, how sunshine looks like within the atmosphere." (TH, sci.relativity at ttps://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/RZyx-BOEAFQ) What does looking have to do with the mechanism? __________________________________________________________________ The heating of the earth, caused by the sun, is produce by photons that are interacting with the air molecules or water molecules, and any object that the photons encounter. The air and water molecules that contact the sunlight (photons) are affected by the photons (energy) which results in the increases in the kinetic energy of the air and water molecules which causes heat. Now it should be noted that the motion of the air and water molecules are localized and do not result in the heated air molecules to escape into outer space to dissipate the earth's atmospheric heat as believe by some people but of course not the reader since you are much much smarter then that. The dissipation of the atmospheric heat is caused when the sun sets which reduces the kinetic energy of the air and water molecules which is the mechanism that reduces the earth's atmospheric temperature. Proof: the coldest temperature of the Earth's surface occurs at dawn (daybreak -- not the dish soap).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-29 16:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <1a404644-63d4-4c64-bb71-b87de80dbafan@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #598574 |
There are two types of nuclear reactors. One is the once-through cooled reactor and the other is the nuclear reactor that use a cooling towers which I will discuss next time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-29 18:54 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k16r6oF76hkU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #598574 |
On 12/29/2022 6:38 PM, thor stoneman wrote: > "Well, we have sunshine and that is warming up the earth. But the 'mechanics' of sunshine are not well understood, because we only know, how sunshine looks like within the atmosphere." (TH, sci.relativity at ttps://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/RZyx-BOEAFQ) > > What does looking have to do with the mechanism? > > __________________________________________________________________ > > > The heating of the earth, caused by the sun, is produce by photons that are interacting with the air molecules or water molecules, and any object that the photons encounter. The air and water molecules that contact the sunlight (photons) are affected by the photons (energy) which results in the increases in the kinetic energy of the air and water molecules which causes heat. Now it should be noted that the motion of the air and water molecules are localized and do not result in the heated air molecules to escape into outer space to dissipate the earth's atmospheric heat as believe by some people but of course not the reader since you are much much smarter then that. The dissipation of the atmospheric heat is caused when the sun sets which reduces the kinetic energy of the air and water molecules which is the mechanism that reduces the earth's atmospheric temperature. Proof: the coldest temperature of the Earth's surface occurs at dawn (daybreak -- not the dish soap). Actually we know (as the human race) what sunshine looks like in space.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-30 11:14 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k17rvrFbuk6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #598579 |
Am 30.12.2022 um 01:54 schrieb whodat: >> The heating of the earth, caused by the sun, is produce by photons >> that are interacting with the air molecules or water molecules, and >> any object that the photons encounter. The air and water molecules >> that contact the sunlight (photons) are affected by the photons >> (energy) which results in the increases in the kinetic energy of the >> air and water molecules which causes heat. This explanation is most likely wrong. One reason to think so is, that you regard photons as real lasting entities like particles. But that would also 'materialise' energy, because photons are quanta of the em-radiation. But that would be a really bad idea, because energy is not a substance and not quantised into photons, which also do not behave like particles. ... > > Actually we know (as the human race) what sunshine looks like in space. > Our usual experience is restricted to the lower atmosphere. A few humans have left the surface of planet Earth and actually know, how sunshine looks like, if seen from a spaceship in orbit. But that was certainly not a very common experience. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-30 10:57 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k18jkrFf1s0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #598620 |
On 12/30/2022 4:14 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 30.12.2022 um 01:54 schrieb whodat: > >>> The heating of the earth, caused by the sun, is produce by photons >>> that are interacting with the air molecules or water molecules, and >>> any object that the photons encounter. The air and water molecules >>> that contact the sunlight (photons) are affected by the photons >>> (energy) which results in the increases in the kinetic energy of the >>> air and water molecules which causes heat. > > This explanation is most likely wrong. Whether it is right or wrong I did not write the above. Why did you attribute it to me by editing? > One reason to think so is, that you regard photons as real lasting > entities like particles. So who was the "YOU"??? And is billions of light years not "long lasting" in your lexicon? > But that would also 'materialise' energy, because photons are quanta of > the em-radiation. > > But that would be a really bad idea, because energy is not a substance > and not quantised into photons, which also do not behave like particles. Raging confusion displayed here... >> Actually we know (as the human race) what sunshine looks like in space. This I wrote and stand by. Why did you edit out what I was answering? Here's what you took out: "Well, we have sunshine and that is warming up the earth. But the 'mechanics' of sunshine are not well understood, because we only know, how sunshine looks like within the atmosphere." (TH, sci.relativity at ttps://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/RZyx-BOEAFQ) Ahhh. You were defending your error! You did write "we only know" that implicates the whole human race. And you haven't figured out that the difference in scattering is the primary difference between light in space and light in our atmosphere. > Our usual experience is restricted to the lower atmosphere. Nitpicking. The CDC reports that only 144 out of 100000 die of cancer. Does that make cancer unworthy of consideration? Do you have to experience cancer to understand it? Or is it sufficient that those who have experienced cancer have reported what that's like? Your real problem appears to be that we have lots of information about how the earth is heated but we don't understand it well enough as yet. > A few humans have left the surface of planet Earth and actually know, > how sunshine looks like, if seen from a spaceship in orbit. > > But that was certainly not a very common experience. Admit your error, you are human after all, no? And lets move on.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-30 10:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <763301ef-dbfa-402f-ac3d-e4f40b8afdbfn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #598644 |
"This explanation is most likely wrong. One reason to think so is, that you regard photons as real lasting entities like particles but that would also 'materialize' energy, because photons are quanta of the em-radiation. But that would be a really bad idea, because energy is not a substance and not quantized into photons, which also do not behave like particles." https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/RZyx-BOEAFQ _________________________________________________________ Light is composed of optic particles (photoelectric effect) that produce heat (sunlight) which is pretty much excepted. What is important is sunlight is producing heat by interacting with air molecules where the structure of the optic particles is not relevant to the discussion. Also, an expanding em field cannot form a particle structure of a photon that implies an em particle of light.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-30 11:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a3c34a24-462c-475d-aab2-1f1508f69c99n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #598648 |
"An expanding em field doesn't form a particle structure. An em wave does, when it gets "wrapped and trapped" in a double loop. See https://physicsdetective.com/how-pair-production-works/. I wrote it." https://physicsdiscussionforum.org/why-field-theory-is-wrong-t2403-s30.html _______________________________________________________________________________ Is an em wave composed of an electromagnetic field of Faraday's law and do em radio waves expand? Graduate students in physics have submitted PhD thesis's on how to bound a field, so do not feel bad.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-30 11:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5ae23b56-4bc2-450d-a6e9-c6470fe5de22n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #598649 |
> One reason to think so is, that you regard photons as real lasting > entities like particles. So who was the "YOU"??? And is billions of light years not "long lasting" in your lexicon? > But that would also 'materialise' energy, because photons are quanta of > the em-radiation. > > But that would be a really bad idea, because energy is not a substance > and not quantised into photons, which also do not behave like particles. Raging confusion displayed here...https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/RZyx-BOEAFQ Whodat ___________________________________________________ Whodat, you make a good point but only one good point. It would be better to complete the answer to the second part. Also, could you tone down you responds. Personally, I am a sensitive person and do not need all this additional bile. I can understand a simple polite statement just a well. Thank you. Also, you do agree that sunshine produces heat which is the main point.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-30 11:57 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <60dcd273-92ba-4593-9eb4-c2894d869d6dn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #598650 |
There are two types of nuclear reactors. One is a nuclear reactor that uses a cooling tower to discharge the steam created by the reactor core where the heated uranium fuel rods are cool with water similar to a car engine that is cooled with a radiator and water pump. The original water of a nuclear power plant that is used to cool the reactor comes from a large river, lake or the ocean which after cooling the reactor core produces steam. The second type of reactor is a once-through cooled reactor that does not use cooling tower and uses the water from a river, lake or the ocean to cool the core then dumps the water directly back into the water source where 75% of the 1390 world wide nuclear reactors use a once-through cooling system (911 once-through cooled reactor worldwide) since they are cheaper and require less maintenance then using a cooling tower. The difference between a cooling tower reactor and once-through cooled reactor is that in a once-through cooled reactor's thermodynamic pollution (heat) is being directly discharged into the rivers and lakes that eventually drains into the ocean where water has a heat capacity six times greater than that of the atmosphere.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-30 13:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <075003af-c3bb-4c9b-89c0-ba37324a56d4n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #598654 |
Now, the earth's atmospheric temperature is in an equilibrium where the heating of the earth is offset by the cooling of the earth at night where the main reduction in the heat of the earth occurs at night when the temperature drops because of the lack of sunlight since sun light is heating the earth. This balance is being offset by nuclear power since the described once-thought cooled reactors are dumping thermodynamics pollution into the oceans where the heated oceans are causing climate change. It is believed that the atmospheric temperature rise is causing the change in the weather and the sea level rise but the ocean has a more profound effect on the weather then the earth's atmosphere since 72% of the earth's surface is covered with water. The 911 once through nuclear reactors world wide are directly dumping thermodynamic pollution into the oceans that has a heat capacity six times that of the earth's atmosphere; therefore, an enormous amount of heat water is being trapped near the surface of the oceans since the heat capacity of the ocean water is trapping the heat six time more than the atmosphere. The beginning of climate change began with inception of nuclear power. Ironically, the person that manifested the green house effect, not the originator, but got worldwide attention was a high school student his first name was Ed and latter he became an engineer major at sac state and I told a physical chemistry class (1982) with him but he only came to class to take the tests. So, a high school student is the main originator of climate change.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-30 14:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <add6053c-01aa-4ea7-b592-04aa39ba7728n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #598661 |
Is an em wave composed of an electromagnetic field of Faraday's law? Do em radio waves expand? A graduate students in physics (Princeton) has submitted PhD thesis on how to bound a field, so do not feel bad. Himanshu Khanchandani : Quantum Field theory at the Boundary. Certainly you can mathematically do practically anything in physics but the physical structure (expanding em field) has precedence. Plus, you did not address the especially important question regarding Faraday's induction law and light in which Faraday's law is mutually exclusive with light, unless you have some other physical proof which I will be enthusiastically waiting for a completely responds to my humble request. Happy new year, plus, hugs and kisses to everyone especially if you are a cutie pie and remember do not drink and drive, cutie pie, 🚔🎛
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-30 15:25 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <d3cf4e49-73d2-4ec5-be50-9d98473dbd84n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #598666 |
In war soldiers always commit atrocities. Look at Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Plus, the fire bombing of Japan and the bombing of the German civilians. Let set a date and say that the boundary line on that day are the boundary of Ukraine-Russia. Least as January 23 , 2023 would be a good day, it would be like the penalty kicks of the world cup and very exciting since we got some serious problem that we need to solve and Putin would be excellent at solving this problem which would be penance for his mistake but maybe human extinction is inevitable. We need to find the deplete uranium, dumped in the oceans, then retrieve it then melt granite and mix the melt the deplete uranium with the granite to 6% then store it in then desert 3,999 meter underground so no one will every try to build a house or wall out of it. Thinking about human extinction===I was thinking that human cannot live without gravity since the renal and circulatory system is based on gravity and the ISS is probably fake. How could the ISS be propagating at 11 km/s around the earth. If it hit a small screw the ISS would have a hole in it. Certainly a person can live lying down for a long time but zero gravity, come on....not for very long and after a month of zero gravity, back on earth, you would suffer badly and die of a heart attack.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-12-30 19:02 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k19g1tFjiouU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #598675 |
On 12/30/2022 5:25 PM, thor stoneman wrote: > In war soldiers always commit atrocities. Look at Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Plus, the fire bombing of Japan and the bombing of the German civilians. Let set a date and say that the boundary line on that day are the boundary of Ukraine-Russia. Least as January 23 , 2023 would be a good day, it would be like the penalty kicks of the world cup and very exciting since we got some serious problem that we need to solve and Putin would be excellent at solving this problem which would be penance for his mistake but maybe human extinction is inevitable. We need to find the deplete uranium, dumped in the oceans, then retrieve it then melt granite and mix the melt the deplete uranium with the granite to 6% then store it in then desert 3,999 meter underground so no one will every try to build a house or wall out of it. Thinking about human extinction===I was thinking that human cannot live without gravity since the renal and circulatory system is based on gravity and the ISS is probably fake. How could the ISS be propagating at 11 km/s around the earth. If it hit a small screw the ISS would have a hole in it. Certainly a person can live lying down for a long time but zero gravity, come on....not for very long and after a month of zero gravity, back on earth, you would suffer badly and die of a heart attack. What does this have to do with physics?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 15 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web