Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #586178 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-05-30 20:27 -0700 |
| Last post | 2022-06-28 09:24 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 63 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 20:27 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-30 20:41 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-30 20:53 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 20:55 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-30 21:02 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 21:21 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-30 22:43 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-30 23:02 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 23:29 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-04 08:50 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 23:43 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-31 10:58 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-31 11:01 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-31 11:04 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-31 11:52 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-31 16:24 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-31 16:33 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-31 20:53 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-01 21:48 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-01 22:10 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-01 22:24 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-05 13:49 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-31 09:41 +0000
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Python <python@invalid> - 2022-05-31 13:51 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-31 12:17 +0000
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-05-31 17:26 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-31 15:45 +0000
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-05-31 17:47 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-31 11:48 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-01 16:18 +0300
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-01 14:47 +0000
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 11:52 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-06-02 13:20 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 15:00 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-06-03 08:39 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 09:06 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-03 10:32 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-02 15:32 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 15:56 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-02 17:52 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-02 22:14 -0500
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 22:21 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-03 12:16 -0500
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-29 08:56 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 09:18 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-03 10:35 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-28 09:43 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-02 16:00 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-21 07:46 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 09:51 -0700
Odious kapo Eichard Hertz keeps licking the boots of his nazi puppetmasters "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 12:08 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Eichard Hertz keeps licking the boots of his nazi puppetmasters Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 12:28 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Eichard Hertz keeps licking the boots of his nazi puppetmasters "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 13:37 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Eichard Hertz keeps licking the boots of his nazi puppetmasters Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 14:41 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-24 09:37 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-24 09:00 -0400
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 22:47 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-24 23:01 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-25 10:23 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-25 20:34 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 06:42 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-25 22:00 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-28 09:24 +0200
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-02 22:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jftcl3FnvtbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #586338 |
On 6/2/2022 5:56 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 7:31:30 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: >> Richard Hertz wrote: >> >>> Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing, >> You were the one who said: "Are you implying that I'm related to any of >> the 12 tribes?" >> >> >> I was simply putting a light for others on what you meant by...the 12 >> tribes. >> >> >> and I'm not finished... >> -- >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >> and challenge >> the unchallengeable. > > Which lost tribe invited him to Japan and paid him more than 100,000$ for the inconvenience? > > Think thoroughly before you answer any stupid reason. > > https://artsandculture.google.com/story/einstein-s-trip-to-the-far-east-and-palestine-einstein-archive/AAWRQlTfnA8A8A?hl=en > > WWII was in the making, in slow motion. That depends entirely on your frame of reference.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-02 22:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ad2561f0-5ca0-4906-974d-8609470948d6n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586347 |
On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 12:14:46 AM UTC-3, whodat wrote:
> On 6/2/2022 5:56 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 7:31:30 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> >> Richard Hertz wrote:
> >>
> >>> Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing,
> >> You were the one who said: "Are you implying that I'm related to any of
> >> the 12 tribes?"
> >>
> >>
> >> I was simply putting a light for others on what you meant by...the 12
> >> tribes.
> >>
> >>
> >> and I'm not finished...
> >> --
> >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> >> and challenge
> >> the unchallengeable.
> >
> > Which lost tribe invited him to Japan and paid him more than 100,000$ for the inconvenience?
> >
> > Think thoroughly before you answer any stupid reason.
> >
> > https://artsandculture.google.com/story/einstein-s-trip-to-the-far-east-and-palestine-einstein-archive/AAWRQlTfnA8A8A?hl=en
> >
> > WWII was in the making, in slow motion.
> That depends entirely on your frame of reference.
My frame of reference is very simple, but I'm not familiar with the overall geopolitical objectives post-WWI, for allies and germans.
I know these simple facts:
1. Germans considered that the political elite betrayed them by surrendering, even when they believe they were winning.
2. The allies imposed severe conditions to pay compensations, which brought poverty, famine and hyperinflation in the next years.
In particular, the sanctions started to be felt severely by the time Einstein fled from Germany for six months, in a luxury tour.
Meanwhile, his colleagues suffered in health, food and money. Einstein (THE ONLY ONE) was cashing like crazy, for which the
despise against him only increased.
3. While EVERY SCIENTIST at Germany was forbidden to have contact with colleagues from US, France, UK, Belgium, etc., Einstein was
acclaimed as the greatest mind that ever lived, receiving a huge amount of invitations to visit other countries, starting with England
by 1920, US by 1921, etc.
4. It would take a new generation of physicists to break such "prison", by the hand of Bohr and the QM guys, around 1924. Meanwhile,
Einstein remained IN SILENCE, enjoying his premature retirement and cashing his huge salary (under contract) from Berlin University.
5. The desire of revenge was being incubated in those early years of 1920 decade, in particular against the german elite (many jews),
which brought a strong sense of nationalism. This widespread feeling was "captured" by people like Hitler, who was a WWI veteran
that wanted to be a painter (believe or not). His November 1923 Putscht, further judgement and prison, and the writing of his famous
book were the trigger of the development of his national socialism, that opposed to the widespread communism (not against jews, but
against communists, as Hitler himself told to Max Planck).
6. In the years to come, for the rest of that infamous decade of 1920, the seed of change and revolution developed. It only was needed
that Germany could access to vast amount of money, which TPTB was very pleased to send to his puppet (Hitler), once he gained the
power in 1933.
7. Historians are forbidden to write about which forces from USA and UK installed Hitler in power, and financed the monumental
re-industrialization of Germany between 1933 and 1939. Hundred of billion of dollars were poured on the hands of Hitler, and eyes
looked TO OTHER SIDE when he rearmed Germany (violating Verdun Act). One Wolkswagen + 1 tank/airplane.
8. Hitler was used to redirect german hate towards communist USSR, not the West.
The "kabuki theater" in the war against West was shown in full colors when Hitler spared the life of 400,000 britons and french at
Dunkirk. He could have annihilated the concentration on the beach of Dunkirk.
Instead, he started his Barbarrosa Operation against USSR, which didn't end as it was planned by the West cabal.
Einstein, with the worldwide fame provided by the anglosaxon TPTB, was UNTOUCHABLE.
He knew it, he enjoyed his iconic fame (like Rolling Stones or Elvis), and fled his native country (was again a German citizen), when he
was signaled to do so. He continued his golden retirement at Princeton, earning early more than anyone posting here.
He was a privileged witness of the timeline that binded WWI and WWII. He saw, first hand, how WWII was slowly cooking for a decade.
He was smart, not intelligent, but VERY SMART.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-03 12:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jfutvvF1qpoU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #586350 |
On 6/3/2022 12:21 AM, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 12:14:46 AM UTC-3, whodat wrote: >> On 6/2/2022 5:56 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: >>> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 7:31:30 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> Richard Hertz wrote: >>>> >>>>> Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing, >>>> You were the one who said: "Are you implying that I'm related to any of >>>> the 12 tribes?" >>>> >>>> >>>> I was simply putting a light for others on what you meant by...the 12 >>>> tribes. >>>> >>>> >>>> and I'm not finished... >>>> -- >>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>>> and challenge >>>> the unchallengeable. >>> >>> Which lost tribe invited him to Japan and paid him more than 100,000$ for the inconvenience? >>> >>> Think thoroughly before you answer any stupid reason. >>> >>> https://artsandculture.google.com/story/einstein-s-trip-to-the-far-east-and-palestine-einstein-archive/AAWRQlTfnA8A8A?hl=en >>> >>> WWII was in the making, in slow motion. >> That depends entirely on your frame of reference. > > My frame of reference is very simple, but I'm not familiar with the overall geopolitical objectives post-WWI, for allies and germans. > > I know these simple facts: > > 1. Germans considered that the political elite betrayed them by surrendering, even when they believe they were winning. > 2. The allies imposed severe conditions to pay compensations, which brought poverty, famine and hyperinflation in the next years. > In particular, the sanctions started to be felt severely by the time Einstein fled from Germany for six months, in a luxury tour. > Meanwhile, his colleagues suffered in health, food and money. Einstein (THE ONLY ONE) was cashing like crazy, for which the > despise against him only increased. > 3. While EVERY SCIENTIST at Germany was forbidden to have contact with colleagues from US, France, UK, Belgium, etc., Einstein was > acclaimed as the greatest mind that ever lived, receiving a huge amount of invitations to visit other countries, starting with England > by 1920, US by 1921, etc. > 4. It would take a new generation of physicists to break such "prison", by the hand of Bohr and the QM guys, around 1924. Meanwhile, > Einstein remained IN SILENCE, enjoying his premature retirement and cashing his huge salary (under contract) from Berlin University. > 5. The desire of revenge was being incubated in those early years of 1920 decade, in particular against the german elite (many jews), > which brought a strong sense of nationalism. This widespread feeling was "captured" by people like Hitler, who was a WWI veteran > that wanted to be a painter (believe or not). His November 1923 Putscht, further judgement and prison, and the writing of his famous > book were the trigger of the development of his national socialism, that opposed to the widespread communism (not against jews, but > against communists, as Hitler himself told to Max Planck). > 6. In the years to come, for the rest of that infamous decade of 1920, the seed of change and revolution developed. It only was needed > that Germany could access to vast amount of money, which TPTB was very pleased to send to his puppet (Hitler), once he gained the > power in 1933. > 7. Historians are forbidden to write about which forces from USA and UK installed Hitler in power, and financed the monumental > re-industrialization of Germany between 1933 and 1939. Hundred of billion of dollars were poured on the hands of Hitler, and eyes > looked TO OTHER SIDE when he rearmed Germany (violating Verdun Act). One Wolkswagen + 1 tank/airplane. > 8. Hitler was used to redirect german hate towards communist USSR, not the West. > The "kabuki theater" in the war against West was shown in full colors when Hitler spared the life of 400,000 britons and french at > Dunkirk. He could have annihilated the concentration on the beach of Dunkirk. > Instead, he started his Barbarrosa Operation against USSR, which didn't end as it was planned by the West cabal. > > Einstein, with the worldwide fame provided by the anglosaxon TPTB, was UNTOUCHABLE. Einstein became a Swiss citizen in 1901 and was exempt from German laws so long as he stayed out of Germany. Therein was the next problem, he foresaw that Germany might overrun all those sections of Europe that were of interest to him, so he first thought to emigrate to England but then after a visit to the United States emigrated here. You think the buildup to WW2 was slow in Europe, it was not. There was a lot to do for Hitler to acquire dictatorial power and that was a constant fast moving initiative highly visible to anyone who was paying attention. You're looking at events nearly a century old lacking original primary news sources with a lot of modern bias superimposed. Good luck with that. > He knew it, he enjoyed his iconic fame (like Rolling Stones or Elvis), and fled his native country (was again a German citizen), <<https://best-citizenships.com/2020/08/08/how-many-citizenships-albert-einstein-had/> > when he > was signaled to do so. He continued his golden retirement at Princeton, earning early more than anyone posting here. > > He was a privileged witness of the timeline that binded WWI and WWII. He saw, first hand, how WWII was slowly cooking for a decade. Not slow for those who witnessed it first hand. > He was smart, not intelligent, but VERY SMART. Another thing that has fallen out of sight is that the original NAZI party was a nationalist communist party as opposed to the Soviet communism which had international ambitions. An astute reader might wish to dig into this and parallels to the modern day socialist/communist initiatives.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-29 08:56 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ji2bc5Frsu1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #586381 |
Am 03.06.2022 um 19:16 schrieb whodat:
> On 6/3/2022 12:21 AM, Richard Hertz wrote:
>> On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 12:14:46 AM UTC-3, whodat wrote:
>>> On 6/2/2022 5:56 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 7:31:30 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> Richard Hertz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew
>>>>>> thing,
>>>>> You were the one who said: "Are you implying that I'm related to
>>>>> any of
>>>>> the 12 tribes?"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I was simply putting a light for others on what you meant by...the 12
>>>>> tribes.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> and I'm not finished...
>>>>> --
>>>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>>>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the
>>>>> unsayable,
>>>>> and challenge
>>>>> the unchallengeable.
>>>>
>>>> Which lost tribe invited him to Japan and paid him more than
>>>> 100,000$ for the inconvenience?
>>>>
>>>> Think thoroughly before you answer any stupid reason.
>>>>
>>>> https://artsandculture.google.com/story/einstein-s-trip-to-the-far-east-and-palestine-einstein-archive/AAWRQlTfnA8A8A?hl=en
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> WWII was in the making, in slow motion.
>>> That depends entirely on your frame of reference.
>>
>> My frame of reference is very simple, but I'm not familiar with the
>> overall geopolitical objectives post-WWI, for allies and germans.
>>
>> I know these simple facts:
>>
>> 1. Germans considered that the political elite betrayed them by
>> surrendering, even when they believe they were winning.
>> 2. The allies imposed severe conditions to pay compensations, which
>> brought poverty, famine and hyperinflation in the next years.
>> In particular, the sanctions started to be felt severely by the
>> time Einstein fled from Germany for six months, in a luxury tour.
>> Meanwhile, his colleagues suffered in health, food and money.
>> Einstein (THE ONLY ONE) was cashing like crazy, for which the
>> despise against him only increased.
>> 3. While EVERY SCIENTIST at Germany was forbidden to have contact
>> with colleagues from US, France, UK, Belgium, etc., Einstein was
>> acclaimed as the greatest mind that ever lived, receiving a huge
>> amount of invitations to visit other countries, starting with England
>> by 1920, US by 1921, etc.
>> 4. It would take a new generation of physicists to break such
>> "prison", by the hand of Bohr and the QM guys, around 1924. Meanwhile,
>> Einstein remained IN SILENCE, enjoying his premature retirement
>> and cashing his huge salary (under contract) from Berlin University.
>> 5. The desire of revenge was being incubated in those early years of
>> 1920 decade, in particular against the german elite (many jews),
>> which brought a strong sense of nationalism. This widespread
>> feeling was "captured" by people like Hitler, who was a WWI veteran
>> that wanted to be a painter (believe or not). His November 1923
>> Putscht, further judgement and prison, and the writing of his famous
>> book were the trigger of the development of his national
>> socialism, that opposed to the widespread communism (not against jews,
>> but
>> against communists, as Hitler himself told to Max Planck).
>> 6. In the years to come, for the rest of that infamous decade of 1920,
>> the seed of change and revolution developed. It only was needed
>> that Germany could access to vast amount of money, which TPTB was
>> very pleased to send to his puppet (Hitler), once he gained the
>> power in 1933.
>> 7. Historians are forbidden to write about which forces from USA and
>> UK installed Hitler in power, and financed the monumental
>> re-industrialization of Germany between 1933 and 1939. Hundred of
>> billion of dollars were poured on the hands of Hitler, and eyes
>> looked TO OTHER SIDE when he rearmed Germany (violating Verdun
>> Act). One Wolkswagen + 1 tank/airplane.
>> 8. Hitler was used to redirect german hate towards communist USSR, not
>> the West.
>> The "kabuki theater" in the war against West was shown in full
>> colors when Hitler spared the life of 400,000 britons and french at
>> Dunkirk. He could have annihilated the concentration on the
>> beach of Dunkirk.
>> Instead, he started his Barbarrosa Operation against USSR, which
>> didn't end as it was planned by the West cabal.
>>
>> Einstein, with the worldwide fame provided by the anglosaxon TPTB, was
>> UNTOUCHABLE.
>
>
>
> Einstein became a Swiss citizen in 1901 and was exempt from German laws
> so long as he stayed out of Germany. Therein was the next problem, he
> foresaw that Germany might overrun all those sections of Europe that
> were of interest to him, so he first thought to emigrate to England but
> then after a visit to the United States emigrated here.
>
> You think the buildup to WW2 was slow in Europe, it was not. There was a
> lot to do for Hitler to acquire dictatorial power and that was a
> constant fast moving initiative highly visible to anyone who was paying
> attention.
>
> You're looking at events nearly a century old lacking original primary
> news sources with a lot of modern bias superimposed. Good luck with
> that.
>
>
>
>> He knew it, he enjoyed his iconic fame (like Rolling Stones or Elvis),
>> and fled his native country (was again a German citizen),
>
>
> <<https://best-citizenships.com/2020/08/08/how-many-citizenships-albert-einstein-had/>
"Albert Einstein Citizenships
Kingdom of Württemberg German Empire (1879–1896)
Stateless (1896–1901)
Switzerland (1901–1955)
Austria during the Austro-Hungarian Empire (1911–1912)
Kingdom of Prussia during the German Empire (1914–1918)
Free State of Prussia (Germany, 1918–1933)
United States (1940–1955)
"
As far as I know, this was not allowed in Germany.
The Geramn rules for citizenship after WWI were, that you may only have
one citizenship and this belongs to the nation called 'Deutsches Reich'
(later 'Bundesrepublik Deutschland') and not to its subdivisions called
'Bundesstaaten' or the former kingdoms, from which the Reich was composed.
see here:
https://uk.diplo.de/uk-en/02/citizenship/acquiring-german-citizenship/2463622
More likely is a Swiss citizenship by birth and a faked identity in his
early years in Germany.
The reason to think so, are:
it was fantastically unlikely, that young Einstein wanted to stay alone
in Munich, went from there to Italy and denounced his German citizenship.
He spoke most likely all the main languages of Switzerland, but very
poor English. Also his German was quite poor.
To aquirre Swiss citizenship was very hard in those days and you could
not become a Swiss citizen just by asking.
It was very unlikely, that a teenager would like to split from his
family in Italy, to go to school in Switzerland, if he had never been
there before.
Much more convincing than his offcial CV is the assumption, that his CV
was faked and he was in fact Swiss from birth.
This would also fit to his extremely anti-German attitudes, what would
not make much sense, if he was in fact German.
But if his vita was a fake, we would need skilled fakes for this task, too.
Such agencies exist, of course, and are usually called 'agencies' (its
members 'agents').
Now we need to search for contacts to agencies of some sort in
Einstein's life and will find, that he had actually a diplomatic
passport, too.
This is a little strange for a physicist, to say the least.
TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-29 09:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5c825f2a-5045-42ca-b935-f17ce7798f45n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587654 |
On Wednesday, June 29, 2022 at 3:56:10 AM UTC-3, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 03.06.2022 um 19:16 schrieb whodat: > > On 6/3/2022 12:21 AM, Richard Hertz wrote: > >> On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 12:14:46 AM UTC-3, whodat wrote: > >>> On 6/2/2022 5:56 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > >>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 7:31:30 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>> Richard Hertz wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew > >>>>>> thing, > >>>>> You were the one who said: "Are you implying that I'm related to > >>>>> any of > >>>>> the 12 tribes?" > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> I was simply putting a light for others on what you meant by...the 12 > >>>>> tribes. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> and I'm not finished... > >>>>> -- > >>>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > >>>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the > >>>>> unsayable, > >>>>> and challenge > >>>>> the unchallengeable. > >>>> > >>>> Which lost tribe invited him to Japan and paid him more than > >>>> 100,000$ for the inconvenience? > >>>> > >>>> Think thoroughly before you answer any stupid reason. > >>>> > >>>> https://artsandculture.google.com/story/einstein-s-trip-to-the-far-east-and-palestine-einstein-archive/AAWRQlTfnA8A8A?hl=en > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> WWII was in the making, in slow motion. > >>> That depends entirely on your frame of reference. > >> > >> My frame of reference is very simple, but I'm not familiar with the > >> overall geopolitical objectives post-WWI, for allies and germans. > >> > >> I know these simple facts: > >> > >> 1. Germans considered that the political elite betrayed them by > >> surrendering, even when they believe they were winning. > >> 2. The allies imposed severe conditions to pay compensations, which > >> brought poverty, famine and hyperinflation in the next years. > >> In particular, the sanctions started to be felt severely by the > >> time Einstein fled from Germany for six months, in a luxury tour. > >> Meanwhile, his colleagues suffered in health, food and money. > >> Einstein (THE ONLY ONE) was cashing like crazy, for which the > >> despise against him only increased. > >> 3. While EVERY SCIENTIST at Germany was forbidden to have contact > >> with colleagues from US, France, UK, Belgium, etc., Einstein was > >> acclaimed as the greatest mind that ever lived, receiving a huge > >> amount of invitations to visit other countries, starting with England > >> by 1920, US by 1921, etc. > >> 4. It would take a new generation of physicists to break such > >> "prison", by the hand of Bohr and the QM guys, around 1924. Meanwhile, > >> Einstein remained IN SILENCE, enjoying his premature retirement > >> and cashing his huge salary (under contract) from Berlin University. > >> 5. The desire of revenge was being incubated in those early years of > >> 1920 decade, in particular against the german elite (many jews), > >> which brought a strong sense of nationalism. This widespread > >> feeling was "captured" by people like Hitler, who was a WWI veteran > >> that wanted to be a painter (believe or not). His November 1923 > >> Putscht, further judgement and prison, and the writing of his famous > >> book were the trigger of the development of his national > >> socialism, that opposed to the widespread communism (not against jews, > >> but > >> against communists, as Hitler himself told to Max Planck). > >> 6. In the years to come, for the rest of that infamous decade of 1920, > >> the seed of change and revolution developed. It only was needed > >> that Germany could access to vast amount of money, which TPTB was > >> very pleased to send to his puppet (Hitler), once he gained the > >> power in 1933. > >> 7. Historians are forbidden to write about which forces from USA and > >> UK installed Hitler in power, and financed the monumental > >> re-industrialization of Germany between 1933 and 1939. Hundred of > >> billion of dollars were poured on the hands of Hitler, and eyes > >> looked TO OTHER SIDE when he rearmed Germany (violating Verdun > >> Act). One Wolkswagen + 1 tank/airplane. > >> 8. Hitler was used to redirect german hate towards communist USSR, not > >> the West. > >> The "kabuki theater" in the war against West was shown in full > >> colors when Hitler spared the life of 400,000 britons and french at > >> Dunkirk. He could have annihilated the concentration on the > >> beach of Dunkirk. > >> Instead, he started his Barbarrosa Operation against USSR, which > >> didn't end as it was planned by the West cabal. > >> > >> Einstein, with the worldwide fame provided by the anglosaxon TPTB, was > >> UNTOUCHABLE. > > > > > > > > Einstein became a Swiss citizen in 1901 and was exempt from German laws > > so long as he stayed out of Germany. Therein was the next problem, he > > foresaw that Germany might overrun all those sections of Europe that > > were of interest to him, so he first thought to emigrate to England but > > then after a visit to the United States emigrated here. > > > > You think the buildup to WW2 was slow in Europe, it was not. There was a > > lot to do for Hitler to acquire dictatorial power and that was a > > constant fast moving initiative highly visible to anyone who was paying > > attention. > > > > You're looking at events nearly a century old lacking original primary > > news sources with a lot of modern bias superimposed. Good luck with > > that. > > > > > > > >> He knew it, he enjoyed his iconic fame (like Rolling Stones or Elvis), > >> and fled his native country (was again a German citizen), > > > > > > <<https://best-citizenships.com/2020/08/08/how-many-citizenships-albert-einstein-had/> > "Albert Einstein Citizenships > > Kingdom of Württemberg German Empire (1879–1896) > Stateless (1896–1901) > Switzerland (1901–1955) > Austria during the Austro-Hungarian Empire (1911–1912) > Kingdom of Prussia during the German Empire (1914–1918) > Free State of Prussia (Germany, 1918–1933) > United States (1940–1955) > " > As far as I know, this was not allowed in Germany. > > The Geramn rules for citizenship after WWI were, that you may only have > one citizenship and this belongs to the nation called 'Deutsches Reich' > (later 'Bundesrepublik Deutschland') and not to its subdivisions called > 'Bundesstaaten' or the former kingdoms, from which the Reich was composed. > > > see here: > https://uk.diplo.de/uk-en/02/citizenship/acquiring-german-citizenship/2463622 > > More likely is a Swiss citizenship by birth and a faked identity in his > early years in Germany. > > > The reason to think so, are: > > it was fantastically unlikely, that young Einstein wanted to stay alone > in Munich, went from there to Italy and denounced his German citizenship. > > He spoke most likely all the main languages of Switzerland, but very > poor English. Also his German was quite poor. > > To aquirre Swiss citizenship was very hard in those days and you could > not become a Swiss citizen just by asking. > > It was very unlikely, that a teenager would like to split from his > family in Italy, to go to school in Switzerland, if he had never been > there before. > > > Much more convincing than his offcial CV is the assumption, that his CV > was faked and he was in fact Swiss from birth. > > This would also fit to his extremely anti-German attitudes, what would > not make much sense, if he was in fact German. > > But if his vita was a fake, we would need skilled fakes for this task, too. > > Such agencies exist, of course, and are usually called 'agencies' (its > members 'agents'). > > Now we need to search for contacts to agencies of some sort in > Einstein's life and will find, that he had actually a diplomatic > passport, too. > > This is a little strange for a physicist, to say the least. > > > > TH Because he was a fraud, an asset of the cabal.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-03 10:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <629A466C.6A0D@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #586350 |
Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 12:14:46 AM UTC-3, whodat wrote: > > On 6/2/2022 5:56 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 7:31:30 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > > >> Richard Hertz wrote: > > >> > > >>> Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing, > > >> You were the one who said: "Are you implying that I'm related to any of > > >> the 12 tribes?" > > >> > > >> > > >> I was simply putting a light for others on what you meant by...the 12 > > >> tribes. > > >> > > >> > > >> and I'm not finished... > > >> -- > > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > >> and challenge > > >> the unchallengeable. > > > > > > Which lost tribe invited him to Japan and paid him more than 100,000$ for the inconvenience? > > > > > > Think thoroughly before you answer any stupid reason. > > > > > > https://artsandculture.google.com/story/einstein-s-trip-to-the-far-east-and-palestine-einstein-archive/AAWRQlTfnA8A8A?hl=en > > > > > > WWII was in the making, in slow motion. > > That depends entirely on your frame of reference. > > My frame of reference is very simple, but I'm not familiar with the overall geopolitical objectives post-WWI, for allies and germans. > > I know these simple facts: > > 1. Germans considered that the political elite betrayed them by surrendering, even when they believe they were winning. > 2. The allies imposed severe conditions to pay compensations, which brought poverty, famine and hyperinflation in the next years. > In particular, the sanctions started to be felt severely by the time Einstein fled from Germany for six months, in a luxury tour. > Meanwhile, his colleagues suffered in health, food and money. Einstein (THE ONLY ONE) was cashing like crazy, for which the > despise against him only increased. > 3. While EVERY SCIENTIST at Germany was forbidden to have contact with colleagues from US, France, UK, Belgium, etc., Einstein was > acclaimed as the greatest mind that ever lived, receiving a huge amount of invitations to visit other countries, starting with England > by 1920, US by 1921, etc. > 4. It would take a new generation of physicists to break such "prison", by the hand of Bohr and the QM guys, around 1924. Meanwhile, > Einstein remained IN SILENCE, enjoying his premature retirement and cashing his huge salary (under contract) from Berlin University. > 5. The desire of revenge was being incubated in those early years of 1920 decade, in particular against the german elite (many jews), > which brought a strong sense of nationalism. This widespread feeling was "captured" by people like Hitler, who was a WWI veteran > that wanted to be a painter (believe or not). His November 1923 Putscht, further judgement and prison, and the writing of his famous > book were the trigger of the development of his national socialism, that opposed to the widespread communism (not against jews, but > against communists, as Hitler himself told to Max Planck). > 6. In the years to come, for the rest of that infamous decade of 1920, the seed of change and revolution developed. It only was needed > that Germany could access to vast amount of money, which TPTB was very pleased to send to his puppet (Hitler), once he gained the > power in 1933. > 7. Historians are forbidden to write about which forces from USA and UK installed Hitler in power, and financed the monumental > re-industrialization of Germany between 1933 and 1939. Hundred of billion of dollars were poured on the hands of Hitler, and eyes > looked TO OTHER SIDE when he rearmed Germany (violating Verdun Act). One Wolkswagen + 1 tank/airplane. > 8. Hitler was used to redirect german hate towards communist USSR, not the West. > The "kabuki theater" in the war against West was shown in full colors when Hitler spared the life of 400,000 britons and french at > Dunkirk. He could have annihilated the concentration on the beach of Dunkirk. > Instead, he started his Barbarrosa Operation against USSR, which didn't end as it was planned by the West cabal. > > Einstein, with the worldwide fame provided by the anglosaxon TPTB, was UNTOUCHABLE. > > He knew it, he enjoyed his iconic fame (like Rolling Stones or Elvis), and fled his native country (was again a German citizen), when he > was signaled to do so. He continued his golden retirement at Princeton, earning early more than anyone posting here. > > He was a privileged witness of the timeline that binded WWI and WWII. He saw, first hand, how WWII was slowly cooking for a decade. Albert Einstein was slowly cooking for a decade...WWII. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-28 09:43 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <jhvpobFfbm4U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #586350 |
Am 03.06.2022 um 07:21 schrieb Richard Hertz: >>> WWII was in the making, in slow motion. >> That depends entirely on your frame of reference. > > My frame of reference is very simple, but I'm not familiar with the overall geopolitical objectives post-WWI, for allies and germans. > > I know these simple facts: > > 1. Germans considered that the political elite betrayed them by surrendering, even when they believe they were winning. > 2. The allies imposed severe conditions to pay compensations, which brought poverty, famine and hyperinflation in the next years. > In particular, the sanctions started to be felt severely by the time Einstein fled from Germany for six months, in a luxury tour. > Meanwhile, his colleagues suffered in health, food and money. Einstein (THE ONLY ONE) was cashing like crazy, for which the > despise against him only increased. > 3. While EVERY SCIENTIST at Germany was forbidden to have contact with colleagues from US, France, UK, Belgium, etc., Einstein was > acclaimed as the greatest mind that ever lived, receiving a huge amount of invitations to visit other countries, starting with England > by 1920, US by 1921, etc. > 4. It would take a new generation of physicists to break such "prison", by the hand of Bohr and the QM guys, around 1924. Meanwhile, > Einstein remained IN SILENCE, enjoying his premature retirement and cashing his huge salary (under contract) from Berlin University. > 5. The desire of revenge was being incubated in those early years of 1920 decade, in particular against the german elite (many jews), > which brought a strong sense of nationalism. This widespread feeling was "captured" by people like Hitler, who was a WWI veteran > that wanted to be a painter (believe or not). His November 1923 Putscht, further judgement and prison, and the writing of his famous > book were the trigger of the development of his national socialism, that opposed to the widespread communism (not against jews, but > against communists, as Hitler himself told to Max Planck). > 6. In the years to come, for the rest of that infamous decade of 1920, the seed of change and revolution developed. It only was needed > that Germany could access to vast amount of money, which TPTB was very pleased to send to his puppet (Hitler), once he gained the > power in 1933. > 7. Historians are forbidden to write about which forces from USA and UK installed Hitler in power, and financed the monumental > re-industrialization of Germany between 1933 and 1939. Hundred of billion of dollars were poured on the hands of Hitler, and eyes > looked TO OTHER SIDE when he rearmed Germany (violating Verdun Act). One Wolkswagen + 1 tank/airplane. Only German historians were forbbiden to research that. British/US/Canadian and so forth were allowed. E.g. look at this https://www.amazon.de/Hitler-Britischer-Agent-Solving-History/dp/0985227818 Or: https://www.amazon.de/Wall-Street-Hitler-Antony-Sutton/dp/0892450045 ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-02 16:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <629940F8.56C2@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #586324 |
Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 12:27:58 AM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote: > > This is the question that nobody makes today (or yesterday), and the very > > uncomfortable silence of the fucking relativists (historians, etc.). > > > > Because nothing original remains of the original papers of his "miraculous year". > > > > Deleted, burnt or never existed (others wrote that shit)? > > > > Why, for instance, the shameful & full of ignorant crap "Einstein's & Besso's manuscript - 54 pages" appeared only by 1954, in Besso's house and after > > his death?. This one, which tried to calculate shit on Mercury, following > > Grossman 1913 Entwurf, is available online (along with more than 30,000 > > manuscripts and documents at Princeton site). > > > > But EVERYTHING related to the DARK YEAR of 1905 disappeared. > > > > There is a "black hole" regarding any scientific document of that year. But, > > as a contrast, even documents from 1895 requiring Eintein's presence at > > Germany for draft services exist (when he rapidly run to ask for Swiss > > citizenship. > > > > Have fanatic relativists at this site any IDEA about what happened? > > > > Fabricating history. Fascinating narratives that brainwashed retarded > > imbeciles like you, fanatic relativist, who read this post. > > > > Yes, YOU. Don't like sideways. I'm addressing you, asshole. > > Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing, I notice that NOT ONE has really tried > to debunk the fact that young Einstein did burn every trace of the works in the making of his 1905 papers, > which EASILY (and based on anyone's experience in developing mathematical based theories) may amount > to MORE THAN 500 PAGES of manuscripts, support documentation, side notes, etc. > > When he started to gain notoriety, around 1907, accusations of PLAGIARISM inundated the physics community > at Germany. Between 1907 and 1912, the famous paper was called "THE LORENTZ-EINSTEIN THEORY". > > The fucking fraudster knew, by 1906, that his life was going to be UNDER THE MICROSCOPE of historians of science, > as it happened FOR CENTURIES BEFORE. > > The CRETIN get rid of anything that could disprove his assertions in that epoch. INFANTILE, CYNICAL ASSERTIONS. > > - I did't know about the MMX experiment nor I did about Lorentz work, in particular his 1904 paper. > - I didn't know about the work of Poincaré (even when by 1903, at his homo Academia with Solovine, etc., the book > Science and Hypothesis was widely discussed). > - I didn't know about the works of Heaviside, Larmor and other (Heaviside exploded in anger as his name was used). > - I didn't know about the works of FitzGerald and, in particular Voigt (he used Voigt's notation, but it was a cosmic coincidence). > - I didn't know that a mechanism to use light to synchronize clocks in railway stations was patented around 1900 (EM signaling). > - It's wise to HIDE YOUR SOURCES (1907, to a journalist). > - I didn't know about the work of Dr. Lenard with UV Rays and the photoelectric effect (Mileva worked with him for 6 months by 1903)- > > He was a fucking LIAR, DECEIVER, FRAUDSTER, SOCIOPATH who received full support of the Jewish network of power (Cabal). > > His lies continued during all his brief career (10 years): > > - I never heard of Von Soldner and his 1801 paper on light deflection by gravity. > - I never heard of Gerber and his 1898 paper explaining the advance of the perihelion of Mercury. > - I didn't know that Hilbert had solved the GFE two weeks before I presented mine in Nov. 1915. > - It's absolutely false that my FRIEND Lorentz connected me with Mr. Eddington in 1914 (it would have been TREASON, due to WWI). > - It's absolutely false that my FRIEND Dr. Freundlich helped me in 1915 or that he connected me with Dr. Newcomb (at USA). > - I didn't know about Dr. Schwarzschild until I received his letter in Dec. 1915 (He was PRESENT at his presentation at the PAS in Nov.) > > ** I never did fundraising for the zionist movement in my travels abroad (the first thing he did at Argentina was to meet zionists at La Plata). > > ** I didn't know about Eotvos work with gravitational mass before I conceived "the happiest thought of my life". > > *************************************** > > HOW MUCH SHOULD I DETAIL HERE (BACKED BY DOCUMENTS) UNTIL IT'S UNDERSTOOD HOW CORRUPT WAS THE FUCKING SOB? Now, you mentioned "who received full support of the Jewish network of power (Cabal)." There are many examples of this "Jewish network of power (Cabal) on the internet and institutions." Here is one example: You will see on this website TWO pdf links https://nuclearprinceton.princeton.edu/atomic-energy-military-purposes-smyth-report It reads: A PDF of the Smyth Report can be accessed here: https://www.orau.org/ptp/pdf/smythreport.pdf https://www.osti.gov/opennet/manhattan-project-history/publications/smyth_report.pdf Now, here is the coverup of trying to remove anything negative about Albert Einstein... The first pdf if you notice when you open it begins at Chapter 6 (VI) (they purposly removed Chaperts 1-5 because it mentions Albert Einstein references to the atomic bomb.) (and they gave it the first Link because it is common for people to click the first link more than the second link in search engine results) (that also means that more of the first link will be copied and circulated then the second link will) The second pdf contains the missing chapters 1-5. Now, everyone here knows already that there are those out there that are hiding information about Albert Einstein that they don't want the world to see. But, what are you going to do about it???? COMPLAIN?? That doesn't help. You have to find the information , and STEAL IT FROM THEM, and then release it free to the public. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-21 07:46 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <jhd49aFel3lU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #586324 |
Am 02.06.2022 um 20:52 schrieb Richard Hertz: >> Because nothing original remains of the original papers of his "miraculous year". >> >> Deleted, burnt or never existed (others wrote that shit)? >> >> Why, for instance, the shameful & full of ignorant crap "Einstein's & Besso's manuscript - 54 pages" appeared only by 1954, in Besso's house and after >> his death?. This one, which tried to calculate shit on Mercury, following >> Grossman 1913 Entwurf, is available online (along with more than 30,000 >> manuscripts and documents at Princeton site). >> >> But EVERYTHING related to the DARK YEAR of 1905 disappeared. ... >> >> Fabricating history. Fascinating narratives that brainwashed retarded >> imbeciles like you, fanatic relativist, who read this post. >> >> Yes, YOU. Don't like sideways. I'm addressing you, asshole. > > Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing, I notice that NOT ONE has really tried > to debunk the fact that young Einstein did burn every trace of the works in the making of his 1905 papers, > which EASILY (and based on anyone's experience in developing mathematical based theories) may amount > to MORE THAN 500 PAGES of manuscripts, support documentation, side notes, etc. This is actually true. But Einstein was young, worked six day a week at ten hours each in a patent office and had a young family at home. Five-hundred pages would have been impossible to write in such a situation in a couple of month. But besides from that, in 1905 he delived three more groundbreaking papers, from which one won him a Nobel-price and also twenty reviews for 'Annalen der Physik' So, we need to take the possibility into consideration, that he didn't and someone else wrote the article(-s). This would also explain the lack of manuscripts, without the need to burn them. > When he started to gain notoriety, around 1907, accusations of PLAGIARISM inundated the physics community > at Germany. Between 1907 and 1912, the famous paper was called "THE LORENTZ-EINSTEIN THEORY". > .. > His lies continued during all his brief career (10 years): > > - I never heard of Von Soldner and his 1801 paper on light deflection by gravity. > - I never heard of Gerber and his 1898 paper explaining the advance of the perihelion of Mercury. > - I didn't know that Hilbert had solved the GFE two weeks before I presented mine in Nov. 1915. > - It's absolutely false that my FRIEND Lorentz connected me with Mr. Eddington in 1914 (it would have been TREASON, due to WWI). > - It's absolutely false that my FRIEND Dr. Freundlich helped me in 1915 or that he connected me with Dr. Newcomb (at USA). > - I didn't know about Dr. Schwarzschild until I received his letter in Dec. 1915 (He was PRESENT at his presentation at the PAS in Nov.) Much more important was actually Heinrich Hertz. Einstein had used really close copies of some parts of the book of Hertz about the distribution of the electric force. This contained variable names, certain concepts and equations and also the title of chapter 14, which was 'fundamental equations about the electrodynamics of moving bodies'. The book 'Sur le dynamic de l'electron' of Poincaré seems to be used, too. At least a few eqaution look relatively close. ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-21 09:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c3f1e498-4410-4151-85ff-e99ac72fe79an@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587341 |
On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 2:46:23 AM UTC-3, Thomas Heger wrote:
> Am 02.06.2022 um 20:52 schrieb Richard Hertz:
>
> >> Because nothing original remains of the original papers of his "miraculous year".
> >>
> >> Deleted, burnt or never existed (others wrote that shit)?
> >>
> >> Why, for instance, the shameful & full of ignorant crap "Einstein's & Besso's manuscript - 54 pages" appeared only by 1954, in Besso's house and after
> >> his death?. This one, which tried to calculate shit on Mercury, following
> >> Grossman 1913 Entwurf, is available online (along with more than 30,000
> >> manuscripts and documents at Princeton site).
> >>
> >> But EVERYTHING related to the DARK YEAR of 1905 disappeared.
> ...
> >>
> >> Fabricating history. Fascinating narratives that brainwashed retarded
> >> imbeciles like you, fanatic relativist, who read this post.
> >>
> >> Yes, YOU. Don't like sideways. I'm addressing you, asshole.
> >
> > Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing, I notice that NOT ONE has really tried
> > to debunk the fact that young Einstein did burn every trace of the works in the making of his 1905 papers,
> > which EASILY (and based on anyone's experience in developing mathematical based theories) may amount
> > to MORE THAN 500 PAGES of manuscripts, support documentation, side notes, etc.
> This is actually true. But Einstein was young, worked six day a week at
> ten hours each in a patent office and had a young family at home.
>
> Five-hundred pages would have been impossible to write in such a
> situation in a couple of month.
>
> But besides from that, in 1905 he delived three more groundbreaking
> papers, from which one won him a Nobel-price and also twenty reviews for
> 'Annalen der Physik'
>
> So, we need to take the possibility into consideration, that he didn't
> and someone else wrote the article(-s).
>
> This would also explain the lack of manuscripts, without the need to
> burn them.
> > When he started to gain notoriety, around 1907, accusations of PLAGIARISM inundated the physics community
> > at Germany. Between 1907 and 1912, the famous paper was called "THE LORENTZ-EINSTEIN THEORY".
> >
> ..
> > His lies continued during all his brief career (10 years):
> >
> > - I never heard of Von Soldner and his 1801 paper on light deflection by gravity.
> > - I never heard of Gerber and his 1898 paper explaining the advance of the perihelion of Mercury.
> > - I didn't know that Hilbert had solved the GFE two weeks before I presented mine in Nov. 1915.
> > - It's absolutely false that my FRIEND Lorentz connected me with Mr. Eddington in 1914 (it would have been TREASON, due to WWI).
> > - It's absolutely false that my FRIEND Dr. Freundlich helped me in 1915 or that he connected me with Dr. Newcomb (at USA).
> > - I didn't know about Dr. Schwarzschild until I received his letter in Dec. 1915 (He was PRESENT at his presentation at the PAS in Nov.)
> Much more important was actually Heinrich Hertz.
>
> Einstein had used really close copies of some parts of the book of Hertz
> about the distribution of the electric force.
>
> This contained variable names, certain concepts and equations and also
> the title of chapter 14, which was 'fundamental equations about the
> electrodynamics of moving bodies'.
> The book 'Sur le dynamic de l'electron' of Poincaré seems to be used,
> too. At least a few eqaution look relatively close.
>
>
> ...
>
> TH
In your last comment, about Poincaré, very important FACTS are missing, that cover events from 1904 to early 1906.
1) Poincaré had corrected and gave the name "Lorentz Transforms" to the group of transforms, that Lorentz had used on
his 1904 paper about relativity, as early as March 1905. Poincaré started to TEACH about this modified Lorentz relativity,
as early as March 1905. His theory was complemented with some work of his "friend" Langevine, a Jewish French who HAD
contact with an intimate friend of Einstein by then (Solovine, Olympia Academy). It was Solovine who got a copy of Poincaré's
"Science et Hypothesis", which was devoured and thoroughly discussed by the Olympia Academy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympia_Academy
2) "Sur la dynamique de l'électron" was not a book, but a theory from Poincaré, adapting Lorentz to the relativity that Einstein plagiarized.
As Poincaré was NOT a physicist, but a mathematician, he published his theory on an Italian mathematical journal by Jan. 1906.
Henri Poincaré
Sur la dynamique de l'électron
1906
Rendiconti del Circolo matematico di Palermo 21: 129–176
Adunanza del 23 luglio 1905.
Stampato il 14-16 dicembre 1905
However, Poincaré presented his theory in Paris by June 3, 1905. The theory was known and taught much earlier that year:
https://annales.org/archives/x/marchal3.pdf
EXCERPT:
************
Monday, June 5, 1905. At the French Academy of Science, Henri Poincaré presents : “On the
dynamic of the electron ”, a four pages note, maximum length. That text is edited Friday, June 9 and
sent to all universities. At the beginning of the following week it arrived at Bern where a clerk of the
patent office, that will become famous, prepares for the ‘’Beïblatter zu der Annalen der Physik’’
summaries of the most interesting physics texts, including those of the French Academy of Sciences...
July 1905. Henri Poincaré develops his text and send it for publication, under the same title,
to the ‘’Rendiconti del circolo matematico di Palermo’’. That second text, 47 pages, will be received
July 23 and will be published in January 1906.
Why to such a far away paper that is not even a physics newspaper ? Above all because the
Director of this journal was his friend, but also because the physicists of this time considered Henri
Poincaré as a mathematician, and a mathematician cannot write in a physics journal ! Consequently
that work - the founding work of relativity - will remain almost ignored during the begibbing of the
twentieth century while Sciences were progressing at giant steps...
Because of this injustice against a great pionneer, physicist, mathematician, astronomer and
philosopher of Science, a Russian admirer, the physicist ans academician Anatoly A Logubov,
republished these two texts in 1984 with an update of their mathematical and physical expressions,
and with suitale commands. These new texts have been translated into english in 1995 and have
already been three times republished.
************
3) The theory was advanced, corrected some missunderstandings from Lorentz and included first steps onto gravitation and SR.
https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Sur_la_dynamique_de_l%E2%80%99%C3%A9lectron
Sommaire
Introduction.
§ 1. — Transformation de Lorentz.
§ 2. — Principe de moindre action.
§ 3. — La transformation de Lorentz et le principe de moindre action.
§ 4. — Le Groupe de Lorentz.
§ 5. — Ondes de Langevin.
§ 6. — Contraction des Électrons.
§ 7. — Mouvement quasi-stationnaire.
§ 8. — Mouvement quelconque.
§ 9. — Hypothèses sur la Gravitation.
4) Except some Jewish traitors (Langevine, etc.) in France, the entire scientific community REPUDIATED the theft performed by
Germans (Einstein & Co) and the sentiment was SO STRONG supporting Poincaré's relativity, that Einstein's theory was not
accepted there until 1952, after WWII finished.
Because of this injustice against a great pioneer, physicist, mathematician, astronomer and philosopher of Science, a Russian
admirer, the physicist and academician Anatoly A Logubov, republished these two texts in 1984 with an update of their mathematical
and physical expressions, and with suitable commands. These new texts have been translated into English in 1995 and have already
been three times republished.
*********
Poincaré is the real father of relativity. Einstein and his network of spies and collaborators were just scumbags, thieves, supported
by the zionist cabal, in Europe and USA. The CRETIN was the "Manchurian Candidate" of his time, hand-picked among a bunch of
retarded looking for fame and glory, who lacked honesty and scruples. It was a hard time for the cabal to select a candidate, which had
to be german and jew, in order to push the agenda of jew supremacy in science(physics, mathematics, chemistry).
As it didn't work well initially, because Poincaré kept advancing of concepts of spacetime and gravity, a gifted cretin (Minkowski) that
already had a name in the field and had connections with Poincaré, took relativity to the next step and then suddenly died.
The third in the row, after Levi-Civita completed his work, was Marcel Grossman, who developed the framework of general relativity
in 1912-1913 (his Entwurf).
It has to be noted by anyone here the timeline in the development of relativity, and the jewish network supporting developments.
I can't accept that forum members can be so blind or stupid and refuse to acknowledge the evidence.
I forgot: Include Schwarzschild in the timeline, and you have the picture complete.
Lorentz - Poincaré - Langevin - Solovine - Besso - Drude - Einstein - Planck - Minkowski - Georg Pick -Paul Ehrenfest - Levi-Civita -
Grossman - Schwarzschild - (Lorentz again) - Freundlich (link to Newcomb, USA and Eddington, UK) - Hilbert - etc, etc.
Poincaré, Lorentz, Planck, Hilbert and Eddington were not chosenites.
Lorentz, Planck and Eddington were zionist assets. Not the case of Hilbert.
*********
If the network is completely exposed, you'd be surprised of the involvement of zionists in the push to develop and establish relativity
as THE NEW PHYSICS.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-21 12:08 -0700 |
| Subject | Odious kapo Eichard Hertz keeps licking the boots of his nazi puppetmasters |
| Message-ID | <1e72ca48-8d9c-4af8-a2b5-44dbcdc5e529n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587377 |
On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 9:51:19 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > 4) Except some Jewish traitors (Langevine, etc.) in France Odious kapo Langevin (not "Langevine") was not Jewish. Keep licking the boots of your nazi puppetmasters.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-21 12:28 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Odious kapo Eichard Hertz keeps licking the boots of his nazi puppetmasters |
| Message-ID | <a6f097eb-abc2-4117-a1cc-a3ade4e179b9n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587396 |
On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 4:08:36 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 9:51:19 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > 4) Except some Jewish traitors (Langevine, etc.) in France > Odious kapo > > Langevin (not "Langevine") was not Jewish. Keep licking the boots of your nazi puppetmasters. A fucking communist all his life. There is the link with Einstein. During his career, Paul Langevin also spread the theory of relativity in academic circles in France and created what is now called the twin paradox.[7][8] Lunch in honour of Albert Einstein, with (front row) Paul Langevin, Einstein, Comtesse de Noailles, Paul Painlevé. Photograph by H. Manuel, 1922. https://wellcomecollection.org/works/y58p7zqy Description "This photo was taken in Paris, France, and most likely at the home of Paul Langevin, who had invited Einstein to Paris. Those seated are (l. to r.): Langevin, Einstein, Anna Comtesse de Noailles, and Paul Painleve. Those standing are (l. to r.): Thomas Barclay, Leo Strisower, Paul Appell, Emile Borel, and Henri Lichtenberger."—Archives Center, Institute of Advanced Study, Princeton Publication/Creation 1922 He invited Einstein to Paris, to lecture at the Academy of Physics. Most scientists refused to hear Einstein's lecture, and abandoned the room. Einstein couldn't make his fucking speech and left the building. Langevin had to live with the stigma of a TRAITOR to the memory of Poincaré, who had helped him so much. Fact-check the above, cretin. The connection between Langevin and commies (Einstein's friends all over) provided the means to spy, copy and send to the commie network the work of Poincaré. Solovine's family had connections with french commies and Langevin.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-21 13:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Odious kapo Eichard Hertz keeps licking the boots of his nazi puppetmasters |
| Message-ID | <4888c2f1-5f6b-487f-a590-e78edf7f68fcn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587402 |
On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 12:28:28 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 4:08:36 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 9:51:19 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > > > 4) Except some Jewish traitors (Langevine, etc.) in France > > Odious kapo > > > > Langevin (not "Langevine") was not Jewish. Keep licking the boots of your nazi puppetmasters. > A fucking communist all his life. There is no record of Langevin being a commie. You were caught lying (once again) claiming that he was Jewish, kapo piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-21 14:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Odious kapo Eichard Hertz keeps licking the boots of his nazi puppetmasters |
| Message-ID | <1cc05707-dd99-4566-bc8e-2b4a53232ffan@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587413 |
On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 5:37:09 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 12:28:28 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 4:08:36 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > > > On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 9:51:19 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > > > > > 4) Except some Jewish traitors (Langevine, etc.) in France > > > Odious kapo > > > > > > Langevin (not "Langevine") was not Jewish. Keep licking the boots of your nazi puppetmasters. > > A fucking communist all his life. > There is no record of Langevin being a commie. You were caught lying (once again) claiming that he was Jewish, kapo piece of shit. He also fucked Madam Curie at the restaurant in the Eiffel Tower. Big scandal by then, which almost cost her the Nobel Prize.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-24 09:37 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <jhl7t3Fo8qeU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #587377 |
Am 21.06.2022 um 18:51 schrieb Richard Hertz: >>> Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing, I notice that NOT ONE has really tried >>> to debunk the fact that young Einstein did burn every trace of the works in the making of his 1905 papers, >>> which EASILY (and based on anyone's experience in developing mathematical based theories) may amount >>> to MORE THAN 500 PAGES of manuscripts, support documentation, side notes, etc. >> This is actually true. But Einstein was young, worked six day a week at >> ten hours each in a patent office and had a young family at home. >> >> Five-hundred pages would have been impossible to write in such a >> situation in a couple of month. >> >> But besides from that, in 1905 he delived three more groundbreaking >> papers, from which one won him a Nobel-price and also twenty reviews for >> 'Annalen der Physik' >> >> So, we need to take the possibility into consideration, that he didn't >> and someone else wrote the article(-s). >> >> This would also explain the lack of manuscripts, without the need to >> burn them. >>> When he started to gain notoriety, around 1907, accusations of PLAGIARISM inundated the physics community >>> at Germany. Between 1907 and 1912, the famous paper was called "THE LORENTZ-EINSTEIN THEORY". >>> >> .. >>> His lies continued during all his brief career (10 years): >>> >>> - I never heard of Von Soldner and his 1801 paper on light deflection by gravity. >>> - I never heard of Gerber and his 1898 paper explaining the advance of the perihelion of Mercury. >>> - I didn't know that Hilbert had solved the GFE two weeks before I presented mine in Nov. 1915. >>> - It's absolutely false that my FRIEND Lorentz connected me with Mr. Eddington in 1914 (it would have been TREASON, due to WWI). >>> - It's absolutely false that my FRIEND Dr. Freundlich helped me in 1915 or that he connected me with Dr. Newcomb (at USA). >>> - I didn't know about Dr. Schwarzschild until I received his letter in Dec. 1915 (He was PRESENT at his presentation at the PAS in Nov.) >> Much more important was actually Heinrich Hertz. >> >> Einstein had used really close copies of some parts of the book of Hertz >> about the distribution of the electric force. >> >> This contained variable names, certain concepts and equations and also >> the title of chapter 14, which was 'fundamental equations about the >> electrodynamics of moving bodies'. >> The book 'Sur le dynamic de l'electron' of Poincaré seems to be used, >> too. At least a few eqaution look relatively close. >> >> >> ... >> >> TH > > In your last comment, about Poincaré, very important FACTS are missing, that cover events from 1904 to early 1906. > > 1) Poincaré had corrected and gave the name "Lorentz Transforms" to the group of transforms, that Lorentz had used on > his 1904 paper about relativity, as early as March 1905. Poincaré started to TEACH about this modified Lorentz relativity, > as early as March 1905. His theory was complemented with some work of his "friend" Langevine, a Jewish French who HAD > contact with an intimate friend of Einstein by then (Solovine, Olympia Academy). It was Solovine who got a copy of Poincaré's > "Science et Hypothesis", which was devoured and thoroughly discussed by the Olympia Academy. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympia_Academy > > 2) "Sur la dynamique de l'électron" was not a book, but a theory from Poincaré, adapting Lorentz to the relativity that Einstein plagiarized. > As Poincaré was NOT a physicist, but a mathematician, he published his theory on an Italian mathematical journal by Jan. 1906. > > Henri Poincaré > Sur la dynamique de l'électron > 1906 > Rendiconti del Circolo matematico di Palermo 21: 129–176 > > Adunanza del 23 luglio 1905. > Stampato il 14-16 dicembre 1905 The important point is: Solovine and Langevin spoke French and most likely no German, and the book of Poincaré was written in French, too. Also Marie Curie didn't speak German, but talked to Einstein. So, we need to assume, that Einstein was fluent in French, too (besides of Italian). But this wouldn't fit into his official biography, because he was almost entirely unable to learn English in a decade in the USA. This would mean, that he had no particular skills for learning foreign languages, hence must have been tri-lingual (German, Italian and French) from early childhood or even birth. This would fit to a Swiss citizenship, but not at all to a Swabian from Ulm. Einstein didn't have that particular Swabian accent neither, nor the Bavarian from Munich, but spoke kind of 'twisted' German, that didn't sound very German. ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-24 09:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <t94cgn$nas$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #587489 |
On 6/24/2022 3:37 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: > The important point is: > Solovine and Langevin spoke French and most likely no German, and the > book of Poincaré was written in French, too. > > Also Marie Curie didn't speak German, but talked to Einstein. > > So, we need to assume, that Einstein was fluent in French, too (besides > of Italian). > > But this wouldn't fit into his official biography, because he was almost > entirely unable to learn English in a decade in the USA. > > This would mean, that he had no particular skills for learning foreign > languages, hence must have been tri-lingual (German, Italian and French) > from early childhood or even birth. > > This would fit to a Swiss citizenship, but not at all to a Swabian from > Ulm. > > Einstein didn't have that particular Swabian accent neither, nor the > Bavarian from Munich, but spoke kind of 'twisted' German, that didn't > sound very German. > Why do you make up garbage and pretend that it's true?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-24 22:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c81316e5-f397-4911-b891-ca438c6b3f27n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587494 |
On Friday, June 24, 2022 at 10:00:10 AM UTC-3, Volney wrote: > On 6/24/2022 3:37 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: > > > The important point is: > > Solovine and Langevin spoke French and most likely no German, and the > > book of Poincaré was written in French, too. > > > > Also Marie Curie didn't speak German, but talked to Einstein. > > > > So, we need to assume, that Einstein was fluent in French, too (besides > > of Italian). > > > > But this wouldn't fit into his official biography, because he was almost > > entirely unable to learn English in a decade in the USA. > > > > This would mean, that he had no particular skills for learning foreign > > languages, hence must have been tri-lingual (German, Italian and French) > > from early childhood or even birth. > > > > This would fit to a Swiss citizenship, but not at all to a Swabian from > > Ulm. > > > > Einstein didn't have that particular Swabian accent neither, nor the > > Bavarian from Munich, but spoke kind of 'twisted' German, that didn't > > sound very German. > > > Why do you make up garbage and pretend that it's true? Moroney, you are one of the most ardent supporters of ALL the narrative around Einstein. You worship him since your first posts here, almost 15 years ago. Or you are a drooling brainless Einstein's fanatic, or you know something that I don't. Please, share your explanation about the MISSING technical papers (like the HIDDEN 54 pages Einstein-Besso 1913 manuscript) that correspond to the years 1901-1906/1907. In those 5 or 6 years, Einstein HAD TO HAVE WRITTEN hundred and hundred of notes, "entwurf", ANY KIND OF TECHNICAL MANUSCRIPTS Where are they? Left under the bed of some partners at their houses in Berlin, like Max Planck ENTIRE library, burnt by bombs in WWII? Come on, don't be shy, Volney. Enlighten us with your version of the narrative: Einstein did it all in the head (Tesla?), Einstein used invisible ink, which vanished after a while?, Einstein didn't think that he was going to be famous so burnt everything?,...... I expect to hear something extraordinary from you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-24 23:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <62B6A4D1.598B@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #587489 |
Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am 21.06.2022 um 18:51 schrieb Richard Hertz: > > >>> Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing, I notice that NOT ONE has really tried > >>> to debunk the fact that young Einstein did burn every trace of the works in the making of his 1905 papers, > >>> which EASILY (and based on anyone's experience in developing mathematical based theories) may amount > >>> to MORE THAN 500 PAGES of manuscripts, support documentation, side notes, etc. > >> This is actually true. But Einstein was young, worked six day a week at > >> ten hours each in a patent office and had a young family at home. > >> > >> Five-hundred pages would have been impossible to write in such a > >> situation in a couple of month. > >> > >> But besides from that, in 1905 he delived three more groundbreaking > >> papers, from which one won him a Nobel-price and also twenty reviews for > >> 'Annalen der Physik' > >> > >> So, we need to take the possibility into consideration, that he didn't > >> and someone else wrote the article(-s). > >> > >> This would also explain the lack of manuscripts, without the need to > >> burn them. > >>> When he started to gain notoriety, around 1907, accusations of PLAGIARISM inundated the physics community > >>> at Germany. Between 1907 and 1912, the famous paper was called "THE LORENTZ-EINSTEIN THEORY". > >>> > >> .. > >>> His lies continued during all his brief career (10 years): > >>> > >>> - I never heard of Von Soldner and his 1801 paper on light deflection by gravity. > >>> - I never heard of Gerber and his 1898 paper explaining the advance of the perihelion of Mercury. > >>> - I didn't know that Hilbert had solved the GFE two weeks before I presented mine in Nov. 1915. > >>> - It's absolutely false that my FRIEND Lorentz connected me with Mr. Eddington in 1914 (it would have been TREASON, due to WWI). > >>> - It's absolutely false that my FRIEND Dr. Freundlich helped me in 1915 or that he connected me with Dr. Newcomb (at USA). > >>> - I didn't know about Dr. Schwarzschild until I received his letter in Dec. 1915 (He was PRESENT at his presentation at the PAS in Nov.) > >> Much more important was actually Heinrich Hertz. > >> > >> Einstein had used really close copies of some parts of the book of Hertz > >> about the distribution of the electric force. > >> > >> This contained variable names, certain concepts and equations and also > >> the title of chapter 14, which was 'fundamental equations about the > >> electrodynamics of moving bodies'. > >> The book 'Sur le dynamic de l'electron' of Poincaré seems to be used, > >> too. At least a few eqaution look relatively close. > >> > >> > >> ... > >> > >> TH > > > > In your last comment, about Poincaré, very important FACTS are missing, that cover events from 1904 to early 1906. > > > > 1) Poincaré had corrected and gave the name "Lorentz Transforms" to the group of transforms, that Lorentz had used on > > his 1904 paper about relativity, as early as March 1905. Poincaré started to TEACH about this modified Lorentz relativity, > > as early as March 1905. His theory was complemented with some work of his "friend" Langevine, a Jewish French who HAD > > contact with an intimate friend of Einstein by then (Solovine, Olympia Academy). It was Solovine who got a copy of Poincaré's > > "Science et Hypothesis", which was devoured and thoroughly discussed by the Olympia Academy. > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympia_Academy > > > > 2) "Sur la dynamique de l'électron" was not a book, but a theory from Poincaré, adapting Lorentz to the relativity that Einstein plagiarized. > > As Poincaré was NOT a physicist, but a mathematician, he published his theory on an Italian mathematical journal by Jan. 1906. > > > > Henri Poincaré > > Sur la dynamique de l'électron > > 1906 > > Rendiconti del Circolo matematico di Palermo 21: 129–176 > > > > Adunanza del 23 luglio 1905. > > Stampato il 14-16 dicembre 1905 > > The important point is: > Solovine and Langevin spoke French and most likely no German, and the > book of Poincaré was written in French, too. > > Also Marie Curie didn't speak German, but talked to Einstein. > > So, we need to assume, that Einstein was fluent in French, too (besides > of Italian). > > But this wouldn't fit into his official biography, because he was almost > entirely unable to learn English in a decade in the USA. > > This would mean, that he had no particular skills for learning foreign > languages, hence must have been tri-lingual (German, Italian and French) > from early childhood or even birth. > > This would fit to a Swiss citizenship, but not at all to a Swabian from Ulm. > > Einstein didn't have that particular Swabian accent neither, nor the > Bavarian from Munich, but spoke kind of 'twisted' German, that didn't > sound very German. > > ... > > TH Curie spoke 5 languages. What could those 5 languages be? and einstein wrote letters to her somewhere here: https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/ -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-25 10:23 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1pu3n14.1w44d5d1bbvtgwN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #587529 |
The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: [-] > > Curie spoke 5 languages. What could those 5 languages be? Polish, Russian, German, French, and English. > and einstein wrote letters to her In German, no doubt, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-25 20:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <62B7D3DE.48B4@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #587532 |
J. J. Lodder wrote: > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > [-] > > > > Curie spoke 5 languages. What could those 5 languages be? > > Polish, Russian, German, French, and English. > > > and einstein wrote letters to her > > In German, no doubt, i don't read pig latin. > > Jan -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web