Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #587529
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? |
| Date | 2022-06-24 23:01 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <62B6A4D1.598B@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <64ad3dc7-767f-4c7e-93c9-2ec0da8de103n@googlegroups.com> <6c666b87-fcbb-4c61-b91b-215c8e0bf467n@googlegroups.com> <jhd49aFel3lU1@mid.individual.net> <c3f1e498-4410-4151-85ff-e99ac72fe79an@googlegroups.com> <jhl7t3Fo8qeU1@mid.individual.net> |
Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am 21.06.2022 um 18:51 schrieb Richard Hertz: > > >>> Besides efforts of StarMaker to derail this thread with the Jew thing, I notice that NOT ONE has really tried > >>> to debunk the fact that young Einstein did burn every trace of the works in the making of his 1905 papers, > >>> which EASILY (and based on anyone's experience in developing mathematical based theories) may amount > >>> to MORE THAN 500 PAGES of manuscripts, support documentation, side notes, etc. > >> This is actually true. But Einstein was young, worked six day a week at > >> ten hours each in a patent office and had a young family at home. > >> > >> Five-hundred pages would have been impossible to write in such a > >> situation in a couple of month. > >> > >> But besides from that, in 1905 he delived three more groundbreaking > >> papers, from which one won him a Nobel-price and also twenty reviews for > >> 'Annalen der Physik' > >> > >> So, we need to take the possibility into consideration, that he didn't > >> and someone else wrote the article(-s). > >> > >> This would also explain the lack of manuscripts, without the need to > >> burn them. > >>> When he started to gain notoriety, around 1907, accusations of PLAGIARISM inundated the physics community > >>> at Germany. Between 1907 and 1912, the famous paper was called "THE LORENTZ-EINSTEIN THEORY". > >>> > >> .. > >>> His lies continued during all his brief career (10 years): > >>> > >>> - I never heard of Von Soldner and his 1801 paper on light deflection by gravity. > >>> - I never heard of Gerber and his 1898 paper explaining the advance of the perihelion of Mercury. > >>> - I didn't know that Hilbert had solved the GFE two weeks before I presented mine in Nov. 1915. > >>> - It's absolutely false that my FRIEND Lorentz connected me with Mr. Eddington in 1914 (it would have been TREASON, due to WWI). > >>> - It's absolutely false that my FRIEND Dr. Freundlich helped me in 1915 or that he connected me with Dr. Newcomb (at USA). > >>> - I didn't know about Dr. Schwarzschild until I received his letter in Dec. 1915 (He was PRESENT at his presentation at the PAS in Nov.) > >> Much more important was actually Heinrich Hertz. > >> > >> Einstein had used really close copies of some parts of the book of Hertz > >> about the distribution of the electric force. > >> > >> This contained variable names, certain concepts and equations and also > >> the title of chapter 14, which was 'fundamental equations about the > >> electrodynamics of moving bodies'. > >> The book 'Sur le dynamic de l'electron' of Poincaré seems to be used, > >> too. At least a few eqaution look relatively close. > >> > >> > >> ... > >> > >> TH > > > > In your last comment, about Poincaré, very important FACTS are missing, that cover events from 1904 to early 1906. > > > > 1) Poincaré had corrected and gave the name "Lorentz Transforms" to the group of transforms, that Lorentz had used on > > his 1904 paper about relativity, as early as March 1905. Poincaré started to TEACH about this modified Lorentz relativity, > > as early as March 1905. His theory was complemented with some work of his "friend" Langevine, a Jewish French who HAD > > contact with an intimate friend of Einstein by then (Solovine, Olympia Academy). It was Solovine who got a copy of Poincaré's > > "Science et Hypothesis", which was devoured and thoroughly discussed by the Olympia Academy. > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympia_Academy > > > > 2) "Sur la dynamique de l'électron" was not a book, but a theory from Poincaré, adapting Lorentz to the relativity that Einstein plagiarized. > > As Poincaré was NOT a physicist, but a mathematician, he published his theory on an Italian mathematical journal by Jan. 1906. > > > > Henri Poincaré > > Sur la dynamique de l'électron > > 1906 > > Rendiconti del Circolo matematico di Palermo 21: 129–176 > > > > Adunanza del 23 luglio 1905. > > Stampato il 14-16 dicembre 1905 > > The important point is: > Solovine and Langevin spoke French and most likely no German, and the > book of Poincaré was written in French, too. > > Also Marie Curie didn't speak German, but talked to Einstein. > > So, we need to assume, that Einstein was fluent in French, too (besides > of Italian). > > But this wouldn't fit into his official biography, because he was almost > entirely unable to learn English in a decade in the USA. > > This would mean, that he had no particular skills for learning foreign > languages, hence must have been tri-lingual (German, Italian and French) > from early childhood or even birth. > > This would fit to a Swiss citizenship, but not at all to a Swabian from Ulm. > > Einstein didn't have that particular Swabian accent neither, nor the > Bavarian from Munich, but spoke kind of 'twisted' German, that didn't > sound very German. > > ... > > TH Curie spoke 5 languages. What could those 5 languages be? and einstein wrote letters to her somewhere here: https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/ -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 20:27 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-30 20:41 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-30 20:53 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 20:55 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-30 21:02 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 21:21 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-30 22:43 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-30 23:02 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 23:29 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-04 08:50 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 23:43 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-31 10:58 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-31 11:01 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-31 11:04 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-31 11:52 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-31 16:24 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-31 16:33 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-31 20:53 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-01 21:48 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-01 22:10 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-01 22:24 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-05 13:49 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-31 09:41 +0000
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Python <python@invalid> - 2022-05-31 13:51 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-31 12:17 +0000
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-05-31 17:26 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-05-31 15:45 +0000
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-05-31 17:47 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-31 11:48 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-01 16:18 +0300
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-01 14:47 +0000
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 11:52 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-06-02 13:20 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 15:00 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-06-03 08:39 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 09:06 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-03 10:32 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-02 15:32 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 15:56 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-02 17:52 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-02 22:14 -0500
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 22:21 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-03 12:16 -0500
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-29 08:56 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 09:18 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-03 10:35 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-28 09:43 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-02 16:00 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-21 07:46 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 09:51 -0700
Odious kapo Eichard Hertz keeps licking the boots of his nazi puppetmasters "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 12:08 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Eichard Hertz keeps licking the boots of his nazi puppetmasters Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 12:28 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Eichard Hertz keeps licking the boots of his nazi puppetmasters "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 13:37 -0700
Re: Odious kapo Eichard Hertz keeps licking the boots of his nazi puppetmasters Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-21 14:41 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-24 09:37 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-24 09:00 -0400
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 22:47 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-24 23:01 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-25 10:23 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-25 20:34 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 06:42 +0200
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-25 22:00 -0700
Re: What happened with Einstein's 1905 manuscripts, notes and else? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-28 09:24 +0200
csiph-web