Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #582015 > unrolled thread

Two Clocks

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-05 23:19 -0700
    Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-05 23:23 -0700
      Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 00:00 -0700
        Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 09:07 -0700
          Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 16:26 -0700
            Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-07 10:54 -0700
          Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 20:38 -0700
    Re: Two Clocks "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-04-08 15:32 -0700
      Re: Two Clocks Coke Hishikawa <uhva@blseummh.nm> - 2022-04-09 11:51 +0000
        Re: Two Clocks Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-04-13 12:21 +0200
          Re: Two Clocks Calon Nishihara <cwxr@yntatyan.bb> - 2022-04-13 10:30 +0000
          Re: Two Clocks Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-13 16:46 -0400
            Re: Two Clocks Codi Hisamatsu <sgwy@phawcecb.um> - 2022-04-13 20:50 +0000

#582015 — Two Clocks

Two clocks.

One clock
is younger
than the 
other clock.




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#582016

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Two clocks.
> 
> One clock
> is younger
> than the
> other clock.
> 
>

When the
traveling
 clock
returns...

the 
traveling 
clock is
younger
than the
twin clock.







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582028

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Two clocks.
> >
> > One clock
> > is younger
> > than the
> > other clock.
> >
> >
> 
> When the
> traveling
>  clock
> returns...
> 
> the
> traveling
> clock is
> younger
> than the
> twin clock.


But to say the clock runs slower is incorrect.

The clock is simply getting younger, not slower.







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582054

Okay, here is another example...

you got two clocks

one on top of a mountain

and the other on level ground

both clocks run on batteries

but both clocks
have the batteries removed.

(using your lingo)

Do any of the clocks run slower?





The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Two clocks.
> > >
> > > One clock
> > > is younger
> > > than the
> > > other clock.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > When the
> > traveling
> >  clock
> > returns...
> >
> > the
> > traveling
> > clock is
> > younger
> > than the
> > twin clock.
> 
> But to say the clock runs slower is incorrect.
> 
> The clock is simply getting younger, not slower.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582091

Okay, here is another example...

you got twins
two people

but both twins are dead...

when the traveling dead 
twin returns..

is he younger?



The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Okay, here is another example...
> 
> you got two clocks
> 
> one on top of a mountain
> 
> and the other on level ground
> 
> both clocks run on batteries
> 
> but both clocks
> have the batteries removed.
> 
> (using your lingo)
> 
> Do any of the clocks run slower?
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Two clocks.
> > > >
> > > > One clock
> > > > is younger
> > > > than the
> > > > other clock.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > When the
> > > traveling
> > >  clock
> > > returns...
> > >
> > > the
> > > traveling
> > > clock is
> > > younger
> > > than the
> > > twin clock.
> >
> > But to say the clock runs slower is incorrect.
> >
> > The clock is simply getting younger, not slower.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582138

furthermore, if both twins were dead before on
of them went traveling on a rocketship...

since upon returning he is younger..

does that mean he comes back to life?





The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Okay, here is another example...
> 
> you got twins
> two people
> 
> but both twins are dead...
> 
> when the traveling dead
> twin returns..
> 
> is he younger?
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Okay, here is another example...
> >
> > you got two clocks
> >
> > one on top of a mountain
> >
> > and the other on level ground
> >
> > both clocks run on batteries
> >
> > but both clocks
> > have the batteries removed.
> >
> > (using your lingo)
> >
> > Do any of the clocks run slower?
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Two clocks.
> > > > >
> > > > > One clock
> > > > > is younger
> > > > > than the
> > > > > other clock.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > When the
> > > > traveling
> > > >  clock
> > > > returns...
> > > >
> > > > the
> > > > traveling
> > > > clock is
> > > > younger
> > > > than the
> > > > twin clock.
> > >
> > > But to say the clock runs slower is incorrect.
> > >
> > > The clock is simply getting younger, not slower.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582103

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:06:57 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Okay, here is another example...
> >
> > you got two clocks
> >
> > one on top of a mountain
> >
> > and the other on level ground
> >
> > both clocks run on batteries
> >
> > but both clocks
> > have the batteries removed.
> >
> > (using your lingo)
> >
> > Do any of the clocks run slower?
> >
> >
> That is a stupid question...
> >
> >
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Two clocks.
> > > > >
> > > > > One clock
> > > > > is younger
> > > > > than the
> > > > > other clock.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > When the
> > > > traveling
> > > > clock
> > > > returns...
> > > >
> > > > the
> > > > traveling
> > > > clock is
> > > > younger
> > > > than the
> > > > twin clock.
> > >
> > > But to say the clock runs slower is incorrect.
> 
> Clocks run slower under gravity. And high speed  motion.

What part of the clock is running slower if there are no batteries running the click?





> 
> > > The clock is simply getting younger, not slower.
> 
> It is staying younger by being slower in space.
> Slow time is real.
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch
> 
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582270

On Tuesday, April 5, 2022 at 11:18:57 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> Two clocks. 
> 
> One clock 
> is younger 
> than the 
> other clock. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 

One was under stronger gravity or higher motion.
The other is fast by less gravity or less motion in space.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582309

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

>> Two clocks. One clock is younger than the other clock.
> 
> One was under stronger gravity or higher motion.
> The other is fast by less gravity or less motion in space.

Australia Senator Confirms: COVID Vax Contains Nanotechnology; self-
assembling inside PEOPLE. Calls it “Genocide”
https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=251927

The true importance of the Bucha false flag: a change of narrative
https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=251918

hence, no *western* capitalist politician, with their 
*mass_media_conglomerates* collaborators, are arrested and hanged, for the 
reason of wanting russian people be hanged, for the same reason, namely 
*war_crimes* committed by them, with their anglo-saxon oriented slavic 
"ukrainian" nazis. 

"When the western *corrupt* governments and the nazi "ukraine" are 
committing *war_crimes*, those are not war_crimes."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582728

On 2022-04-09 11:51:47 +0000, Coke Hishikawa said:

> 
> [ … ]
> 
> Australia Senator Confirms: COVID Vax Contains Nanotechnology; self-
> assembling inside PEOPLE. Calls it “Genocide”
> https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=251927
> [ … ]

All these spam rants are too similar to one another to come from 
different posters. Presumably just one who uses many different names 
and false email addresses (where the heck is .nm?).

> 
-- 
Athel -- French and British, living mainly in England until 1987.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582729

Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

>> Australia Senator Confirms: COVID Vax Contains Nanotechnology; self-
>> assembling inside PEOPLE. Calls it “Genocide”
>> https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=251927 [ … ]
> 
> All these spam rants are too similar to one another to come from
> different posters. Presumably just one who uses many different names and
> false email addresses (where the heck is .nm?).

how can it be "spam" when a mainstream senator is talking, you pig. You 
can't do engilsh or something, or like are retard from birth, like the 
majority posting here.

“Good day. I am a Ukrainian citizen, I am in Kiev. We were evacuated from 
Bucha on March 12.
Our house (250 apartments) is completely looted. The Ukrainian press 
accuses the “Russian orcs” to have looted Bucha, and people believed it … 
But a week has passed, and these single neighbors who still live in the 
house, whispering after you swore at mom, the health of your children and 
all the saints, horrified by the lawlessness they have seen, tells the 
truth….

The Russians left Bucha on March 30. And in the evening of the 31st the 
looting began. A brigade of more than 10 people in civilian clothes 
worked, but they were guarded and commanded around the clock by the 
military of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. At night by headlamps.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582774

On 4/13/2022 6:21 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> On 2022-04-09 11:51:47 +0000, Coke Hishikawa said:
> 
>>
>> [ … ]
>>
>> Australia Senator Confirms: COVID Vax Contains Nanotechnology; self-
>> assembling inside PEOPLE. Calls it “Genocide”
>> https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=251927
>> [ … ]
> 
> All these spam rants are too similar to one another to come from 
> different posters. Presumably just one who uses many different names and 
> false email addresses (where the heck is .nm?).
> 
Congratulations. You just discovered the nymshifter troll.  It has been 
around for years, and probably has used thousands of fake nyms by now, a 
new nym every few days or so.  It is one Putin's many minions, here to 
try and create trouble. Right now it is acting as an apologist for 
Putin's war crimes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582775

Michael Moroney wrote:

>> All these spam rants are too similar to one another to come from
>> different posters. Presumably just one who uses many different names
>> and false email addresses (where the heck is .nm?).
>> 
> Congratulations. You just discovered the nymshifter troll.  It has been
> around for years, and probably has used thousands of fake nyms by now, a
> new nym every few days or so.  It is one Putin's many minions, here to
> try and create trouble. Right now it is acting as an apologist for
> Putin's war crimes.

This can be any other guy. And btw, Dr. Putin is about to annihilate war 
crimes. See bio_weapons labs, nazis, genocide on citizens taken as 
"russians", fuel and gas sold on fake money, a gay actor knighted 
illegally as "president" by the foreigners stealing the country, and so 
on.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web