Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #582138

Re: Two Clocks

Message-ID <624F2563.4CB6@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2022-04-07 10:54 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: Two Clocks
References <624D3104.6BA7@ix.netcom.com> <624D31E4.8B@ix.netcom.com> <624D3AAA.7AA8@ix.netcom.com> <624DBAB2.2A87@ix.netcom.com> <624E21B3.51A9@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


furthermore, if both twins were dead before on
of them went traveling on a rocketship...

since upon returning he is younger..

does that mean he comes back to life?





The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Okay, here is another example...
> 
> you got twins
> two people
> 
> but both twins are dead...
> 
> when the traveling dead
> twin returns..
> 
> is he younger?
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Okay, here is another example...
> >
> > you got two clocks
> >
> > one on top of a mountain
> >
> > and the other on level ground
> >
> > both clocks run on batteries
> >
> > but both clocks
> > have the batteries removed.
> >
> > (using your lingo)
> >
> > Do any of the clocks run slower?
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Two clocks.
> > > > >
> > > > > One clock
> > > > > is younger
> > > > > than the
> > > > > other clock.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > When the
> > > > traveling
> > > >  clock
> > > > returns...
> > > >
> > > > the
> > > > traveling
> > > > clock is
> > > > younger
> > > > than the
> > > > twin clock.
> > >
> > > But to say the clock runs slower is incorrect.
> > >
> > > The clock is simply getting younger, not slower.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-05 23:19 -0700
  Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-05 23:23 -0700
    Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 00:00 -0700
      Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 09:07 -0700
        Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 16:26 -0700
          Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-07 10:54 -0700
        Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 20:38 -0700
  Re: Two Clocks "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-04-08 15:32 -0700
    Re: Two Clocks Coke Hishikawa <uhva@blseummh.nm> - 2022-04-09 11:51 +0000

csiph-web