Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #582138
| Message-ID | <624F2563.4CB6@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-04-07 10:54 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Two Clocks |
| References | <624D3104.6BA7@ix.netcom.com> <624D31E4.8B@ix.netcom.com> <624D3AAA.7AA8@ix.netcom.com> <624DBAB2.2A87@ix.netcom.com> <624E21B3.51A9@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
furthermore, if both twins were dead before on of them went traveling on a rocketship... since upon returning he is younger.. does that mean he comes back to life? The Starmaker wrote: > > Okay, here is another example... > > you got twins > two people > > but both twins are dead... > > when the traveling dead > twin returns.. > > is he younger? > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Okay, here is another example... > > > > you got two clocks > > > > one on top of a mountain > > > > and the other on level ground > > > > both clocks run on batteries > > > > but both clocks > > have the batteries removed. > > > > (using your lingo) > > > > Do any of the clocks run slower? > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Two clocks. > > > > > > > > > > One clock > > > > > is younger > > > > > than the > > > > > other clock. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When the > > > > traveling > > > > clock > > > > returns... > > > > > > > > the > > > > traveling > > > > clock is > > > > younger > > > > than the > > > > twin clock. > > > > > > But to say the clock runs slower is incorrect. > > > > > > The clock is simply getting younger, not slower. > > > > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-05 23:19 -0700
Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-05 23:23 -0700
Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 00:00 -0700
Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 09:07 -0700
Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 16:26 -0700
Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-07 10:54 -0700
Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 20:38 -0700
Re: Two Clocks "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-04-08 15:32 -0700
Re: Two Clocks Coke Hishikawa <uhva@blseummh.nm> - 2022-04-09 11:51 +0000
csiph-web