Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #582103

Re: Two Clocks

Message-ID	<624E5C9C.65A5@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2022-04-06 20:38 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Newsgroups	sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Two Clocks
References	<624D3104.6BA7@ix.netcom.com> <624D31E4.8B@ix.netcom.com> <624D3AAA.7AA8@ix.netcom.com> <624DBAB2.2A87@ix.netcom.com> <5d538edb-8310-4953-a32a-f113fed18767n@googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:06:57 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Okay, here is another example...
> >
> > you got two clocks
> >
> > one on top of a mountain
> >
> > and the other on level ground
> >
> > both clocks run on batteries
> >
> > but both clocks
> > have the batteries removed.
> >
> > (using your lingo)
> >
> > Do any of the clocks run slower?
> >
> >
> That is a stupid question...
> >
> >
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Two clocks.
> > > > >
> > > > > One clock
> > > > > is younger
> > > > > than the
> > > > > other clock.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > When the
> > > > traveling
> > > > clock
> > > > returns...
> > > >
> > > > the
> > > > traveling
> > > > clock is
> > > > younger
> > > > than the
> > > > twin clock.
> > >
> > > But to say the clock runs slower is incorrect.
> 
> Clocks run slower under gravity. And high speed  motion.

What part of the clock is running slower if there are no batteries running the click?





> 
> > > The clock is simply getting younger, not slower.
> 
> It is staying younger by being slower in space.
> Slow time is real.
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch
> 
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-05 23:19 -0700
  Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-05 23:23 -0700
    Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 00:00 -0700
      Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 09:07 -0700
        Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 16:26 -0700
          Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-07 10:54 -0700
        Re: Two Clocks The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-06 20:38 -0700
  Re: Two Clocks "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-04-08 15:32 -0700
    Re: Two Clocks Coke Hishikawa <uhva@blseummh.nm> - 2022-04-09 11:51 +0000

csiph-web