Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #566042 > unrolled thread

Re: Einstein Lied Again

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-03 12:31 -0700
    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-07 11:57 -0800
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-07 16:17 -0800
        Re: Einstein Lied Again Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-07 20:59 -0800
          Re: Einstein Lied Again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2021-11-08 13:28 +0000
            Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-08 13:21 -0800
              Re: Einstein Lied Again Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-09 11:34 -0800
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-13 12:17 -0800
        Re: Einstein Lied Again Ernesto Gaddy <erri@ererg.er> - 2021-11-13 20:25 +0000
        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-15 01:30 -0800
          Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 14:33 -0800
            Re: Einstein Lied Again Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-17 16:08 -0800
              Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 19:55 -0800
                Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 20:07 -0800
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-18 16:28 -0800
                Re: Einstein Lied Again Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-11-17 20:14 -0800
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 21:59 -0800
                    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 22:14 -0800
                      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-17 22:24 -0800
                        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-18 11:11 -0800
            Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-20 10:54 -0800
              Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-21 11:37 -0800
                Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-21 13:24 -0800
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-23 21:59 -0800
                    Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-24 11:12 -0800
                      Re: Einstein Lied Again Brain Hubbs <er@cvbs.nc> - 2021-11-27 01:00 +0000
                        Re: Einstein Lied Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2021-11-27 11:28 -0800
    Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-01 15:06 -0800
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-01 17:37 -0600
        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-01 21:44 -0800
          Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 08:36 -0600
            Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 10:15 -0800
              Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 13:32 -0600
            Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 10:23 -0800
              Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 13:40 -0600
                Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 13:47 -0600
                  Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 12:32 -0800
                    Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-02 17:39 -0600
                      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 20:55 -0800
                        Re: Einstein Lied Again Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 09:12 -0600
                          Hanson was a Middle East mercenary, right ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-12-03 10:24 -0800
                            Re: Hanson was a Middle East mercenary, right ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-03 10:36 -0800
                            Re: Hanson was a Middle East mercenary, right ? Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-12-03 19:32 -0600
      Re: Einstein Lied Again Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2021-12-01 15:39 -0800
        Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-01 16:30 -0800
          Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-01 23:09 -0800
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-02 10:30 -0800
      Re: Einstein Lied Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-12-14 23:58 -0800

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#566042 — Re: Einstein Lied Again

The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...

How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
test? 

Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
hand!


Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.





Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
Torpedo explosion...

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546

Page 1
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
Page 2
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096


https://twitter.com/Starmaker111








On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
>
>I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
>
>The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
>
>
>
>
>The Starmaker wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
>> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
>> >> they did in those
>> >
>> >Still wrong.
>> 
>> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
>> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
>> and he tells her..
>> 
>> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
>> 
>> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
>> 
>> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
>> 
>> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
>> 
>> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
>> begins with a S and small z, ..."
>> 
>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
>> 
>> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
>> 
>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
>> 
>> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
>> 
>> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
>> --
>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
>>  the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#566305

furthermore, what about a) and b)?

https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first

a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."


and 

b)  b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..

'which is at present' 

being carried on

 within the University laboratories. 





Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.


What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
the United States President???? 


b) *to speed up the experimental

His own little private manhattan project?


Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to just...test this theory.



In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.

http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg


He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the scientific community.












The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> 
> How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> test?
> 
> Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> hand!
> 
> Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> 
> Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> Torpedo explosion...
> 
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> 
> Page 1
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> Page 2
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> 
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> 
> On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> >
> >I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> >
> >The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> >> >> they did in those
> >> >
> >> >Still wrong.
> >>
> >> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> >> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> >> and he tells her..
> >>
> >> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> >>
> >> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> >>
> >> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> >>
> >> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> >>
> >> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> >> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> >>
> >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> >>
> >> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> >>
> >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> >>
> >> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> >>
> >> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> >> --
> >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> >>  the unchallengeable.
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566320

IMAGINE all the students who attended these Universities
in which atomic bombs experimental work were
being carried on within these University laboratories
at that time.


How many students were exposed to Uranium radiation,
and died from it *not knowing why) besides everyone who died working at
the
Manhattan project. Even Albert Einstein died from Uranium radiation!

The horror, the horror, the horror...





The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> furthermore, what about a) and b)?
> 
> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> 
> a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."
> 
> and
> 
> b)  b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..
> 
> 'which is at present'
> 
> being carried on
> 
>  within the University laboratories.
> 
> Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.
> 
> What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
> the United States President????
> 
> b) *to speed up the experimental
> 
> His own little private manhattan project?
> 
> Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to just...test this theory.
> 
> In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
> the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
> an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.
> 
> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> 
> He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the scientific community.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> >
> > How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> > test?
> >
> > Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> > short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> > hand!
> >
> > Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> > of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> >
> > Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> > suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> > for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> > Torpedo explosion...
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> >
> > Page 1
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > Page 2
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> >
> > On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> > >
> > >I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> > >
> > >The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> > >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> > >> >> they did in those
> > >> >
> > >> >Still wrong.
> > >>
> > >> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> > >> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> > >> and he tells her..
> > >>
> > >> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> > >>
> > >> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> > >>
> > >> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> > >>
> > >> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> > >>
> > >> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> > >> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> > >>
> > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> > >>
> > >> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> > >>
> > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> > >>
> > >> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> > >>
> > >> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> > >> --
> > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > >>  the unchallengeable.
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566330

On Sunday, November 7, 2021 at 9:17:39 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> IMAGINE all the students who attended these Universities 
> in which atomic bombs experimental work were 
> being carried on within these University laboratories 
> at that time. 
> 
> 
> How many students were exposed to Uranium radiation, 
> and died from it *not knowing why) besides everyone who died working at 
> the 
> Manhattan project. Even Albert Einstein died from Uranium radiation! 
> 
> The horror, the horror, the horror...
> The Starmaker wrote: 
> > 
> > furthermore, what about a) and b)? 
> > 
> > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first 
> > 
> > a) "...securing a supply of uranium..." 
> > 
> > and 
> > 
> > b) b) *to speed up the experimental work*, .. 
> > 
> > 'which is at present' 
> > 
> > being carried on 
> > 
> > within the University laboratories. 
> > 
> > Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment. 
> > 
> > What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying 
> > the United States President???? 
> > 
> > b) *to speed up the experimental 
> > 
> > His own little private manhattan project? 
> > 
> > Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to just...test this theory. 
> > 
> > In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking 
> > the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just 
> > an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory. 
> > 
> > http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg 
> > 
> > He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the scientific community. 
> > 
> > The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > 
> > > The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was... 
> > > 
> > > How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a 
> > > test? 
> > > 
> > > Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb.. 
> > > short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your 
> > > hand! 
> > > 
> > > Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation 
> > > of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein. 
> > > 
> > > Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the 
> > > suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons 
> > > for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the 
> > > Torpedo explosion... 
> > > 
> > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546 
> > > 
> > > Page 1 
> > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 
> > > Page 2 
> > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 
> > > 
> > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111 
> > > 
> > > On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker 
> > > <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: 
> > > 
> > > >Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb? 
> > > > 
> > > >I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender. 
> > > > 
> > > >The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right???? 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >The Starmaker wrote: 
> > > >> 
> > > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine...@yahoo.com> 
> > > >> wrote: 
> > > >> 
> > > >> >In article <610DDB...@ix.netcom.com>, 
> > > >> > The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat 
> > > >> >> they did in those 
> > > >> > 
> > > >> >Still wrong. 
> > > >> 
> > > >> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary.. 
> > > >> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse.. 
> > > >> and he tells her.. 
> > > >> 
> > > >> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?" 
> > > >> 
> > > >> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!" 
> > > >> 
> > > >> He looks at it...(then does a spell check) 
> > > >> 
> > > >> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times. 
> > > >> 
> > > >> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it 
> > > >> begins with a S and small z, ..." 
> > > >> 
> > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1 
> > > >> 
> > > >> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter... 
> > > >> 
> > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2 
> > > >> 
> > > >> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!" 
> > > >> 
> > > >> She tells him..."You're the bomb!" 
> > > >> -- 
> > > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> > > >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge 
> > > >> the unchallengeable. 
> > > -- 
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge 
> > > the unchallengeable. 
> > 
> > -- 
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge 
> > the unchallengeable. 
> 
> -- 
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
> and challenge 
> the unchallengeable.

Enrico Fermi died from cancer on November 28, 1954, after years of exposure between 1941 and 1946? (nuclear pile work).
He was a "hands on" person, as well as theoretical physicist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrico_Fermi

From June 2 to 4, 1947, the first international physics conference after World War II was held at Shelter Island. 
The conference brought together 24 physicists from the Manhattan Project, including:

Bethe
Bohm
Breit
Feynman
Kramers,
Lamb
von Neumann
Pauling
Rabi
Schwinger
Teller
Uhlenbeck
Weisskopf
Wheeler
Oppenheimer
 
All of these scumbags (they were willingly working on a genocidal project) were theoretical physicists, calculalists and 
administrators, very far away from the labs. Check how many were "conscience objectors". Teller accused Oppenheimer
for holding him back from development of the H-bomb, during the McCarthy hearings in 1954. After 1945 and Oppenheimer
gone,  he got the job to develop the first 2 Megatons H-Bomb, detonated on November 1, 1952 at the Pacific Marshall Islands.

So, Teller managed to develop means to kill 100 more people than Oppenheimer (about 2 millions/H-bomb). And he survived
to be Reagan's advisor and his killer X-rays laser proposal. He died on September 9, 2003 (aged 95). So, devil pays well.

Check how many of the experimental physicists lived 10 years more after WWII. You'll find difficult to find their names.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566336

Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, November 7, 2021 at 9:17:39 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
>> IMAGINE all the students who attended these Universities 
>> in which atomic bombs experimental work were 
>> being carried on within these University laboratories 
>> at that time. 
>> 
>> 
>> How many students were exposed to Uranium radiation, 
>> and died from it *not knowing why) besides everyone who died working at 
>> the 
>> Manhattan project. Even Albert Einstein died from Uranium radiation! 
>> 
>> The horror, the horror, the horror...
>> The Starmaker wrote: 
>>> 
>>> furthermore, what about a) and b)? 
>>> 
>>> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first 
>>> 
>>> a) "...securing a supply of uranium..." 
>>> 
>>> and 
>>> 
>>> b) b) *to speed up the experimental work*, .. 
>>> 
>>> 'which is at present' 
>>> 
>>> being carried on 
>>> 
>>> within the University laboratories. 
>>> 
>>> Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment. 
>>> 
>>> What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying 
>>> the United States President???? 
>>> 
>>> b) *to speed up the experimental 
>>> 
>>> His own little private manhattan project? 
>>> 
>>> Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to
>>> just...test this theory. 
>>> 
>>> In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking 
>>> the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just 
>>> an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory. 
>>> 
>>> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg 
>>> 
>>> He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the
>>> scientific community. 
>>> 
>>> The Starmaker wrote: 
>>>> 
>>>> The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was... 
>>>> 
>>>> How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a 
>>>> test? 
>>>> 
>>>> Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb.. 
>>>> short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your 
>>>> hand! 
>>>> 
>>>> Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation 
>>>> of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein. 
>>>> 
>>>> Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the 
>>>> suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons 
>>>> for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the 
>>>> Torpedo explosion... 
>>>> 
>>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546 
>>>> 
>>>> Page 1 
>>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 
>>>> Page 2 
>>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 
>>>> 
>>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111 
>>>> 
>>>> On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker 
>>>> <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: 
>>>> 
>>>>> Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb? 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb,
>>>>> ...isn't that Right???? 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine...@yahoo.com> 
>>>>>> wrote: 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> In article <610DDB...@ix.netcom.com>, 
>>>>>>> The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat 
>>>>>>>> they did in those 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Still wrong. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary.. 
>>>>>> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse.. 
>>>>>> and he tells her.. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?" 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!" 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> He looks at it...(then does a spell check) 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it 
>>>>>> begins with a S and small z, ..." 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter... 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!" 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> She tells him..."You're the bomb!" 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
>>>>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge 
>>>>>> the unchallengeable. 
>>>> -- 
>>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
>>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge 
>>>> the unchallengeable. 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge 
>>> the unchallengeable. 
>> 
>> -- 
>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
>> and challenge 
>> the unchallengeable.
> 
> Enrico Fermi died from cancer on November 28, 1954, after years of
> exposure between 1941 and 1946? (nuclear pile work).
> He was a "hands on" person, as well as theoretical physicist.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrico_Fermi
> 
> From June 2 to 4, 1947, the first international physics conference after
> World War II was held at Shelter Island. 
> The conference brought together 24 physicists from the Manhattan Project, including:
> 
> Bethe
> Bohm
> Breit
> Feynman
> Kramers,
> Lamb
> von Neumann
> Pauling
> Rabi
> Schwinger
> Teller
> Uhlenbeck
> Weisskopf
> Wheeler
> Oppenheimer
>  
> All of these scumbags (they were willingly working on a genocidal project) 

Several nations, Germany, Japan, and the US, were all working on a
“genocidal project”. The one that finished it first was in the best
position to end the war quickly, which in fact happened. I’m whether you’d
have preferred that one of the other nations complete the work first, and
whether this would have removed the satin from these men’s work? I also
note that you did not mention the people who created and deployed napalm in
WWII, which caused far more death that the two atomic bombs combined, and
which was also used in the Korean and Vietnam wars to even greater
devastation. 

> were theoretical physicists, calculalists and 
> administrators, very far away from the labs. 

How far is “very far”? 100 ft? 300ft?

> Check how many were "conscience objectors". Teller accused Oppenheimer
> for holding him back from development of the H-bomb, during the McCarthy
> hearings in 1954. After 1945 and Oppenheimer
> gone,  he got the job to develop the first 2 Megatons H-Bomb, detonated
> on November 1, 1952 at the Pacific Marshall Islands.

Yes Teller was a hawk, terrified of Russia. 

> 
> So, Teller managed to develop means to kill 100 more people than
> Oppenheimer (about 2 millions/H-bomb). And he survived
> to be Reagan's advisor and his killer X-rays laser proposal. He died on
> September 9, 2003 (aged 95). So, devil pays well.
> 
> Check how many of the experimental physicists lived 10 years more after
> WWII. You'll find difficult to find their names.
> 

YOU found it difficult. It’s not difficult. Have you tried Googling? 
Oh yes, I understand, you’re thinking about physicists whose names you
RECOGNIZE because of popular press notoriety for theoreticians. Ah yes, the
popular press bugaboo you’re hung up on. 

> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566374

Odd Bodkin wrote:
> 
> Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday, November 7, 2021 at 9:17:39 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> >> IMAGINE all the students who attended these Universities
> >> in which atomic bombs experimental work were
> >> being carried on within these University laboratories
> >> at that time.
> >>
> >>
> >> How many students were exposed to Uranium radiation,
> >> and died from it *not knowing why) besides everyone who died working at
> >> the
> >> Manhattan project. Even Albert Einstein died from Uranium radiation!
> >>
> >> The horror, the horror, the horror...
> >> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>
> >>> furthermore, what about a) and b)?
> >>>
> >>> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> >>>
> >>> a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."
> >>>
> >>> and
> >>>
> >>> b) b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..
> >>>
> >>> 'which is at present'
> >>>
> >>> being carried on
> >>>
> >>> within the University laboratories.
> >>>
> >>> Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.
> >>>
> >>> What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
> >>> the United States President????
> >>>
> >>> b) *to speed up the experimental
> >>>
> >>> His own little private manhattan project?
> >>>
> >>> Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to
> >>> just...test this theory.
> >>>
> >>> In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
> >>> the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
> >>> an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.
> >>>
> >>> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> >>>
> >>> He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the
> >>> scientific community.
> >>>
> >>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> >>>>
> >>>> How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> >>>> test?
> >>>>
> >>>> Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> >>>> short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> >>>> hand!
> >>>>
> >>>> Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> >>>> of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> >>>>
> >>>> Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> >>>> suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> >>>> for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> >>>> Torpedo explosion...
> >>>>
> >>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> >>>>
> >>>> Page 1
> >>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> >>>> Page 2
> >>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> >>>>
> >>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> >>>> <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb,
> >>>>> ...isn't that Right????
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine...@yahoo.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In article <610DDB...@ix.netcom.com>,
> >>>>>>> The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> >>>>>>>> they did in those
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Still wrong.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> >>>>>> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> >>>>>> and he tells her..
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> >>>>>> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >>>>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> >>>>>> the unchallengeable.
> >>>> --
> >>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> >>>> the unchallengeable.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >>> the unchallengeable.
> >>
> >> --
> >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> >> and challenge
> >> the unchallengeable.
> >
> > Enrico Fermi died from cancer on November 28, 1954, after years of
> > exposure between 1941 and 1946? (nuclear pile work).
> > He was a "hands on" person, as well as theoretical physicist.
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrico_Fermi
> >
> > From June 2 to 4, 1947, the first international physics conference after
> > World War II was held at Shelter Island.
> > The conference brought together 24 physicists from the Manhattan Project, including:
> >
> > Bethe
> > Bohm
> > Breit
> > Feynman
> > Kramers,
> > Lamb
> > von Neumann
> > Pauling
> > Rabi
> > Schwinger
> > Teller
> > Uhlenbeck
> > Weisskopf
> > Wheeler
> > Oppenheimer
> >
> > All of these scumbags (they were willingly working on a genocidal project)
> 
> Several nations, Germany, Japan, and the US, were all working on a
> “genocidal project”. The one that finished it first was in the best
> position to end the war quickly, which in fact happened. I’m whether you’d
> have preferred that one of the other nations complete the work first, and
> whether this would have removed the satin from these men’s work? I also
> note that you did not mention the people who created and deployed napalm in
> WWII, which caused far more death that the two atomic bombs combined, and
> which was also used in the Korean and Vietnam wars to even greater
> devastation.

> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables


Japan, Korea, Vietnam...U.S.A. loves to kill  CHINKS! This time it's CHINA  time for usa get some chink ass.


I'm sure China's leaders are asking, "Why are those white people always killing chinks????"


The United States should use mock up of chineese laundries as target practice.


no tickkee no shirtee

fish face

Nuke those chinks back to the fish age....








-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566418

On Monday, November 8, 2021 at 6:21:35 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:

<snip>

> > >>>>> Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb? 
> > >>>>> I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender. 
> > >>>>> The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, 
...................
> > > All of these scumbags (they were willingly working on a genocidal project) 
> > Several nations, Germany, Japan, and the US, were all working on a  “genocidal project”. The one that finished it first was in the best 
> > position to end the war quickly, which in fact happened. 
.........
> I'm sure China's leaders are asking, "Why are those white people always killing chinks????" 
> The United States should use mock up of chineese laundries as target practice. 
......... 
> Nuke those chinks back to the fish age....

Einstein hated China and Chinese, but the commie "One world government" Al liked Japanese very much (and they hated Chinese). 

Oh the irony! The filthy imbecile Al thought of Chinese as "filthy and imbeciles".

And for such "slip", after his tour by Asia, he gained the hate of 1.4 billion Chinese, who are coming back to power with revenge.

Chinese scholars of pure breed are tired of disproving Einstein and relativity. Only "sold-out" western chinese agree with NATO science.

Pure Chinese scientists, living in China, are censored in the fucking west. You have to dig in Chinese language and on chinese web sites,
to find proofs and NEW THEORIES about gravity, SR, the universe, the atom, the electron, the counter theories many western theories.

One day, you'll wake up and realize that China dominates the world. with Russia as its task force. Then, 400 years of western despise
and humiliation will start to be monetized by Chinese and partners. And nothing hurts more to a western than giving up his money.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566688

Another... Einstein Lied Again

is how Albert Einstein talks about a stranger in this letter..


https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first


"In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more

permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group

of physicists  working on chain reactions in America."

(between the Administration and the group

of physicists)

"One possible way

of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person

who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial

capacity."


("a person...in an inofficial capacity.")

"His task might comprise the following:"

(now i know it's a guy!)


"to approach Government Departments,"
"keep them informed of the further development"
"put forward recommendations for Government action"
"giving particular attention securing a supply of uranium..."
"to speed up the experimental work"
"providing funds"
"through his contacts with private persons"
"obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories"


Who is this masked man????

Albert Einstein is pretending he doesn't have a person in mind.


"inofficial capacity."????? wat does that mean (besides no suchs word)

Meaning: Somebody not connected to your government but connected to US.


Who else...Leo Szilard.



Notice how Albert Einstein 'worded' the letter not to give any
indication of who that person might be with words like:

"a person who has your confidence"

but then Albert Einstein takes away that thought with:

"and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial

capacity."




So, who can that possibly be, a person who has the President of the United States confidence but
is NOT official, not authorized or acknowledged by the United States Government.


Einstein Lied Again.


Only Einstein can lie like that.





oh, did you see the draft?

https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1459615686255251456/photo/1

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEGXjsNVkAEhrh0?format=jpg&name=4096x4096






The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> furthermore, what about a) and b)?
> 
> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> 
> a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."
> 
> and
> 
> b)  b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..
> 
> 'which is at present'
> 
> being carried on
> 
>  within the University laboratories.
> 
> Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.
> 
> What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
> the United States President????
> 
> b) *to speed up the experimental
> 
> His own little private manhattan project?
> 
> Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to just...test this theory.
> 
> In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
> the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
> an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.
> 
> http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> 
> He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the scientific community.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> >
> > How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> > test?
> >
> > Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> > short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> > hand!
> >
> > Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> > of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> >
> > Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> > suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> > for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> > Torpedo explosion...
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> >
> > Page 1
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > Page 2
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> >
> > On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> > >
> > >I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> > >
> > >The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> > >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> > >> >> they did in those
> > >> >
> > >> >Still wrong.
> > >>
> > >> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> > >> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> > >> and he tells her..
> > >>
> > >> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> > >>
> > >> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> > >>
> > >> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> > >>
> > >> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> > >>
> > >> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> > >> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> > >>
> > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> > >>
> > >> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> > >>
> > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> > >>
> > >> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> > >>
> > >> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> > >> --
> > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > >>  the unchallengeable.
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566689

The Starmaker wrote:

> but then Albert Einstein takes away that thought with:
> 
> "and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial capacity."

that's how they changed his paper to "relativity", having nothing to do 
with relativity, much less "Special".

It's actually impossible to have something "Special" when you don't know 
a "General" version *even_exists*.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566753

As I mentioned before..

Albert Einstein knew that they were going to drop the bomb on japan
months earilier...

and Albert Einstein was the master spy passing atomic secrets to the russians..

one other method I didn't mentioned was
passing information to the russians with...
comic books...

This was published before
they dropped the bomb on Japan..

"“Now the explosion of a pound of U-235,” he said, “wouldn’t be too unbearably violent, though it re- leases as much energy as a hun- dred million pounds of TNT. 
Set off on an island, it might lay waste the whole island, uprooting trees, killing all animal life, but even that fifty thousand tons of TNT wouldn’t s
eriously disturb the really unimaginable tonnage which even a small island represents.”
“I assume,” she broke in, “that you’re going to make a point ? You’re not just giving me a lecture on high explosives?”
“Wait. The trouble is, they’re afraid that that explosion of en- ergy would be so incomparably vio- lent, its sheer, minute concentration of unbearable 
energy so great, that surrounding matter would be set off. If you could imagine concen- trating half a billion of the most violent lightning strokes you ever saw, 
compressing all their fury into a space less than half the size of a pack of cigarettes — ^you’d get some idea of the concentrated es- sence 
of hyperviolence tl\at explo- sion would represent. It’s not sim- ply the amount of energy; it’s the frightful concentration of intensity in a minute volume.
“The surrounding matter, un- able to maintain a self-supportin.."
atomic explosion normally, might be hyper-stimulated to atomic ex- plosion under U-235’s forces and, in the immediate neighborhood, re- lease its energy, too. 
That is, the explosion would not involve only one pound of U-23S, but also five or fifty or five thousand tons of other matter. The extent of the explosion is a matter of conjec- ture.”
“Get to the point,” she said im- patiently.
“Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet. 
It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and 
utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
explosion. And I mean every- thing.
“So they haven’t experimented. They could end the war overnight with controlled U-235 bombs. They could end this cycle of civili- zation with one or
 two uncontroUed bombs. And they don’t know which they’d have if they made ’em. So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explo- sion of U-235."

https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up


https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up

https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up


https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Another... Einstein Lied Again
> 
> is how Albert Einstein talks about a stranger in this letter..
> 
> https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> 
> "In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more
> 
> permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group
> 
> of physicists  working on chain reactions in America."
> 
> (between the Administration and the group
> 
> of physicists)
> 
> "One possible way
> 
> of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person
> 
> who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> 
> capacity."
> 
> ("a person...in an inofficial capacity.")
> 
> "His task might comprise the following:"
> 
> (now i know it's a guy!)
> 
> "to approach Government Departments,"
> "keep them informed of the further development"
> "put forward recommendations for Government action"
> "giving particular attention securing a supply of uranium..."
> "to speed up the experimental work"
> "providing funds"
> "through his contacts with private persons"
> "obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories"
> 
> Who is this masked man????
> 
> Albert Einstein is pretending he doesn't have a person in mind.
> 
> "inofficial capacity."????? wat does that mean (besides no suchs word)
> 
> Meaning: Somebody not connected to your government but connected to US.
> 
> Who else...Leo Szilard.
> 
> Notice how Albert Einstein 'worded' the letter not to give any
> indication of who that person might be with words like:
> 
> "a person who has your confidence"
> 
> but then Albert Einstein takes away that thought with:
> 
> "and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> 
> capacity."
> 
> So, who can that possibly be, a person who has the President of the United States confidence but
> is NOT official, not authorized or acknowledged by the United States Government.
> 
> Einstein Lied Again.
> 
> Only Einstein can lie like that.
> 
> oh, did you see the draft?
> 
> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1459615686255251456/photo/1
> 
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEGXjsNVkAEhrh0?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > furthermore, what about a) and b)?
> >
> > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> >
> > a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."
> >
> > and
> >
> > b)  b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..
> >
> > 'which is at present'
> >
> > being carried on
> >
> >  within the University laboratories.
> >
> > Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.
> >
> > What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
> > the United States President????
> >
> > b) *to speed up the experimental
> >
> > His own little private manhattan project?
> >
> > Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to just...test this theory.
> >
> > In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
> > the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
> > an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.
> >
> > http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> >
> > He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the scientific community.
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> > >
> > > How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> > > test?
> > >
> > > Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> > > short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> > > hand!
> > >
> > > Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> > > of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> > >
> > > Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> > > suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> > > for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> > > Torpedo explosion...
> > >
> > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> > >
> > > Page 1
> > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > Page 2
> > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > >
> > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> > >
> > > On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> > > >
> > > >I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> > > >
> > > >The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> > > >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> > > >> >> they did in those
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Still wrong.
> > > >>
> > > >> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> > > >> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> > > >> and he tells her..
> > > >>
> > > >> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> > > >>
> > > >> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> > > >>
> > > >> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> > > >>
> > > >> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> > > >>
> > > >> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> > > >> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> > > >>
> > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> > > >>
> > > >> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> > > >>
> > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> > > >>
> > > >> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> > > >>
> > > >> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> > > >> --
> > > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > >>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > >>  the unchallengeable.
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#567031

and the last sentence reads: "So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explosion of U-235." - astounding science fiction march 1944



The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan on August 1945...

and this book was published March 1944..

so I guess the comic book were still getting updates from Albert Einstein on it's progess.



dats why Albert Einstein said:


"....starting a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." - Albert Einstein

"...imagine the earth being destroyed like a nova by a stellar explosion" -Albert Einstein 


"Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet.
 It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and
 utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
 explosion. And I mean every- thing."  - astounding science fiction march 1944



Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells)

 https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up
 
 https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up
 
 https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up
 
 https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation







The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> As I mentioned before..
> 
> Albert Einstein knew that they were going to drop the bomb on japan
> months earilier...
> 
> and Albert Einstein was the master spy passing atomic secrets to the russians..
> 
> one other method I didn't mentioned was
> passing information to the russians with...
> comic books...
> 
> This was published before
> they dropped the bomb on Japan..
> 
> "“Now the explosion of a pound of U-235,” he said, “wouldn’t be too unbearably violent, though it re- leases as much energy as a hun- dred million pounds of TNT.
> Set off on an island, it might lay waste the whole island, uprooting trees, killing all animal life, but even that fifty thousand tons of TNT wouldn’t s
> eriously disturb the really unimaginable tonnage which even a small island represents.”
> “I assume,” she broke in, “that you’re going to make a point ? You’re not just giving me a lecture on high explosives?”
> “Wait. The trouble is, they’re afraid that that explosion of en- ergy would be so incomparably vio- lent, its sheer, minute concentration of unbearable
> energy so great, that surrounding matter would be set off. If you could imagine concen- trating half a billion of the most violent lightning strokes you ever saw,
> compressing all their fury into a space less than half the size of a pack of cigarettes — ^you’d get some idea of the concentrated es- sence
> of hyperviolence tl\at explo- sion would represent. It’s not sim- ply the amount of energy; it’s the frightful concentration of intensity in a minute volume.
> “The surrounding matter, un- able to maintain a self-supportin.."
> atomic explosion normally, might be hyper-stimulated to atomic ex- plosion under U-235’s forces and, in the immediate neighborhood, re- lease its energy, too.
> That is, the explosion would not involve only one pound of U-23S, but also five or fifty or five thousand tons of other matter. The extent of the explosion is a matter of conjec- ture.”
> “Get to the point,” she said im- patiently.
> “Wait. Let me give you the main picture. Such an explosion would be serious. It would blow an island, or a hunk of continent, right off the planet.
> It would shake Cathor from pole to pole, cause earthquakes violent enough to do serious damage on the other side of the planet, and
> utterly destroy everything within at least one thousand miles of the site of the
> explosion. And I mean every- thing.
> “So they haven’t experimented. They could end the war overnight with controlled U-235 bombs. They could end this cycle of civili- zation with one or
>  two uncontroUed bombs. And they don’t know which they’d have if they made ’em. So far, they haven’t worked out any way to control the explo- sion of U-235."
> 
> https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n163/mode/2up
> 
> https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/page/n153/mode/2up
> 
> https://archive.org/details/Astounding_v33n01_1944-03_dtsg0318-LennyS/mode/2up
> 
> https://www.google.com/search?q=U-235+separation
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Another... Einstein Lied Again
> >
> > is how Albert Einstein talks about a stranger in this letter..
> >
> > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> >
> > "In view of the situation you may think it desirable to have more
> >
> > permanent contact maintained between the Administration and the group
> >
> > of physicists  working on chain reactions in America."
> >
> > (between the Administration and the group
> >
> > of physicists)
> >
> > "One possible way
> >
> > of achieving this might be for you to entrust with this task a person
> >
> > who has your confidence and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> >
> > capacity."
> >
> > ("a person...in an inofficial capacity.")
> >
> > "His task might comprise the following:"
> >
> > (now i know it's a guy!)
> >
> > "to approach Government Departments,"
> > "keep them informed of the further development"
> > "put forward recommendations for Government action"
> > "giving particular attention securing a supply of uranium..."
> > "to speed up the experimental work"
> > "providing funds"
> > "through his contacts with private persons"
> > "obtaining the co-operation of industrial laboratories"
> >
> > Who is this masked man????
> >
> > Albert Einstein is pretending he doesn't have a person in mind.
> >
> > "inofficial capacity."????? wat does that mean (besides no suchs word)
> >
> > Meaning: Somebody not connected to your government but connected to US.
> >
> > Who else...Leo Szilard.
> >
> > Notice how Albert Einstein 'worded' the letter not to give any
> > indication of who that person might be with words like:
> >
> > "a person who has your confidence"
> >
> > but then Albert Einstein takes away that thought with:
> >
> > "and who could perhaps serve in an inofficial
> >
> > capacity."
> >
> > So, who can that possibly be, a person who has the President of the United States confidence but
> > is NOT official, not authorized or acknowledged by the United States Government.
> >
> > Einstein Lied Again.
> >
> > Only Einstein can lie like that.
> >
> > oh, did you see the draft?
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1459615686255251456/photo/1
> >
> > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEGXjsNVkAEhrh0?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > furthermore, what about a) and b)?
> > >
> > > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first
> > >
> > > a) "...securing a supply of uranium..."
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > > b)  b) *to speed up the experimental work*, ..
> > >
> > > 'which is at present'
> > >
> > > being carried on
> > >
> > >  within the University laboratories.
> > >
> > > Get the Uranium and speed up the experiment.
> > >
> > > What was Albert Einstein doing? Already building an atomic bomb BEFORE notifying
> > > the United States President????
> > >
> > > b) *to speed up the experimental
> > >
> > > His own little private manhattan project?
> > >
> > > Certaintly not to kill Germans...it was just 'an experiment', to just...test this theory.
> > >
> > > In other words, Albert Einstein HOODWINKED the entire planet into thinking
> > > the atomic bomb was to protect the world, when in fact...it was just
> > > an experiment', to just...test his 1905 theory.
> > >
> > > http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg
> > >
> > > He lied to everbody. Had everybody beliving it...even everyone in the scientific community.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Biggest problem they had at the Manhattan Project was...
> > > >
> > > > How do you blow up that atomic bomb without getting killed during a
> > > > test?
> > > >
> > > > Same problem you had when you lit a firecracker or cherry bomb..
> > > > short fuse...you had to throw it away fact before it explodes in your
> > > > hand!
> > > >
> > > > Of course, there is only one person that was an Expert in Denotation
> > > > of bombs in those days...Albert Einstein.
> > > >
> > > > Albert Einstein lifted his finger and wrote: According to the
> > > > suggestion you expressed in your letter I am giving you here reasons
> > > > for my opinion concerning the best localization for initiation of the
> > > > Torpedo explosion...
> > > >
> > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1455974257809260546
> > > >
> > > > Page 1
> > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSoXXFUUAApz8f?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > > Page 2
> > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FDSojvRVQAAjcLq?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > >
> > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:32:05 -0700, The Starmaker
> > > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Shouldn't have Albert Einstein have gotten The Nobel Peace Prize for The Atomic Bomb?
> > > > >
> > > > >I mean, 'it' got Japan to surrender.
> > > > >
> > > > >The fact is, Albert Einstein is The Godfather of the Atomic Bomb, ...isn't that Right????
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:17:32 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >In article <610DDBC4.431@ix.netcom.com>,
> > > > >> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >> Of course I know that...he dictated the letter to his secretary..(dats wat
> > > > >> >> they did in those
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >Still wrong.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> So, Albert Einstein is groping his secretary..
> > > > >> rubbing her butt and putting his hand up her blouse..
> > > > >> and he tells her..
> > > > >>
> > > > >> "Did you finish typing that letter for me, honey?"
> > > > >>
> > > > >> She sez "Here it is, you pervert!"
> > > > >>
> > > > >> He looks at it...(then does a spell check)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Understandably, she misspelled Dr. Zsilard's name a few times.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> He tells her "You wrote Zillard, but there is only one L, and it
> > > > >> begins with a S and small z, ..."
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/1
> > > > >>
> > > > >> So she buttons up her blouse and retypes the letter...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1425847669000343552/photo/2
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Then he tells her..."BEND OVER YOU FUCKING RUSSIAN BITCH!"
> > > > >>
> > > > >> She tells him..."You're the bomb!"
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > >>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > > >>  the unchallengeable.
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#567036

On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:32:43 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:

<snip>

> Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells)

But not a single one, from 1910 to 1965 (classic scify books were written in that period) dared to mess with any relativity.

They were very imaginative, but they were not crazy: gravitational waves, distorted space and time, no faster than c, .......

That would have put narrative boundaries in the unphysical "cage" that the fucker created while hallucinated.

Shitty histories start early in the '70s: blackholes, wormholes, multiverse, etc.

How many times did you see a movie "explaining" wormholes by using a folded page and a pencil making a hole through both sides?

Or personal "proper time" much slower than the others, so that person is invisible to humans (I wonder why never is depicted as a statue).

Fuck Al and heirs. They killed storylines, so we have to deal with Alien, Predator, Transformers,.... What a SOB!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#567049

Richard Hertz wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:32:43 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells)
> 
> But not a single one, from 1910 to 1965 (classic scify books were written in that period) dared to mess with any relativity.

wat about:

“Time for the Stars”, (1956) by Robert Heinlein is the classic two 18
year old twins separated when one goes on an interstellar voyage and 
returns about 70 years later having aged a personal 2 or 3 years story?




> 
> They were very imaginative, but they were not crazy: gravitational waves, distorted space and time, no faster than c, .......
> 
> That would have put narrative boundaries in the unphysical "cage" that the fucker created while hallucinated.
> 
> Shitty histories start early in the '70s: blackholes, wormholes, multiverse, etc.
> 
> How many times did you see a movie "explaining" wormholes by using a folded page and a pencil making a hole through both sides?
> 
> Or personal "proper time" much slower than the others, so that person is invisible to humans (I wonder why never is depicted as a statue).
> 
> Fuck Al and heirs. They killed storylines, so we have to deal with Alien, Predator, Transformers,.... What a SOB!

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#567050

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Richard Hertz wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:32:43 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells)
> >
> > But not a single one, from 1910 to 1965 (classic scify books were written in that period) dared to mess with any relativity.
> 
> wat about:
> 
> “Time for the Stars”, (1956) by Robert Heinlein is the classic two 18
> year old twins separated when one goes on an interstellar voyage and
> returns about 70 years later having aged a personal 2 or 3 years story?


and of course ...astounding science fiction march 1944 based on Albert Einstein atomic bomb from Relativity 1905.



> 
> >
> > They were very imaginative, but they were not crazy: gravitational waves, distorted space and time, no faster than c, .......
> >
> > That would have put narrative boundaries in the unphysical "cage" that the fucker created while hallucinated.
> >
> > Shitty histories start early in the '70s: blackholes, wormholes, multiverse, etc.
> >
> > How many times did you see a movie "explaining" wormholes by using a folded page and a pencil making a hole through both sides?
> >
> > Or personal "proper time" much slower than the others, so that person is invisible to humans (I wonder why never is depicted as a statue).
> >
> > Fuck Al and heirs. They killed storylines, so we have to deal with Alien, Predator, Transformers,.... What a SOB!
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#567137

On June 28, 1943, Bryon Price, director of the United States Office of Censorship (OoC) and former executive news editor of the Associated Press, sent out a 
confidential note to 2,000 daily newspapers and 11,000 weeklies as well as all radio stations in the U.S. The note requested that editors prevent any articles or broadcasts from mentioning:

    Production or utilization of atom smashing, atomic energy, atomic fission, atomic splitting, or any of their equivalents.

    The use for military purposes of radium or radioactive materials, heavy water, high voltage discharge equipment, cyclotrons.

    The following elements or any of their compounds: polonium, uranium, ytterbium, hafnium, protactinium, radium, rhenium, thorium, deuterium.







Kevrob wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 11:07:00 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > and of course ...astounding science fiction march 1944 based on Albert Einstein atomic bomb from Relativity 1905.
> 
> Well-known to fen, of course.
> 
> https://www.nyrsf.com/2017/06/steve-carper-beyond-deadline-three-additional-wwii-atomic-war-stories-and-the-office-of-censorship.html
> 
> "The Battle of the Atoms" was delayed six months in SUPERMAN, and the OWI even
> looked into the Man of Tomorrow's newspaper strip.
> 
> https://www.cbr.com/superman-atomic-bomb-censored-united-states-government/
> 
> I read the "The Battle of the Atoms" when it was reprinted in the summer of 1971.
> 
> https://www.comics.org/issue/24554/cover/4/ - SUPERMAN 243 (Vol 1)
> 
> Others may have grumbled when DC-National added reprint pages and raised the price
> by 2/3rds,   but I enjoyed the "golden oldies." I had never had the chance to read.
> 
> --
> Kevin R
> 
> 

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#567052

On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 12:54:33 AM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> Richard Hertz wrote: 
> > 
> > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:32:43 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > 
> > <snip> 
> > 
> > > Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells) 
> > 
> > But not a single one, from 1910 to 1965 (classic scify books were written in that period) dared to mess with any relativity.
> wat about: 
> 
> “Time for the Stars”, (1956) by Robert Heinlein is the classic two 18 
> year old twins separated when one goes on an interstellar voyage and 
> returns about 70 years later having aged a personal 2 or 3 years story?
> > 
> > They were very imaginative, but they were not crazy: gravitational waves, distorted space and time, no faster than c, ....... 
> > 
> > That would have put narrative boundaries in the unphysical "cage" that the fucker created while hallucinated. 
> > 
> > Shitty histories start early in the '70s: blackholes, wormholes, multiverse, etc. 
> > 
> > How many times did you see a movie "explaining" wormholes by using a folded page and a pencil making a hole through both sides? 
> > 
> > Or personal "proper time" much slower than the others, so that person is invisible to humans (I wonder why never is depicted as a statue). 
> > 
> > Fuck Al and heirs. They killed storylines, so we have to deal with Alien, Predator, Transformers,.... What a SOB!
> -- 
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
> and challenge 
> the unchallengeable.

Never heard of it. I'll try to find it at several online repositories.

Anyway, I was talking about famous books written in the golden age of scify. Now, ideas for a baseline of narratives are scarce,
and popular books, films and TV series are blending scify+fantasy+terror+action+CGI+gender agenda+....

I have to stop. I have to see a re-run of Grimm.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#567053

Richard Hertz wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 12:54:33 AM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:32:43 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > > Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells)
> > >
> > > But not a single one, from 1910 to 1965 (classic scify books were written in that period) dared to mess with any relativity.
> > wat about:
> >
> > “Time for the Stars”, (1956) by Robert Heinlein is the classic two 18
> > year old twins separated when one goes on an interstellar voyage and
> > returns about 70 years later having aged a personal 2 or 3 years story?
> > >
> > > They were very imaginative, but they were not crazy: gravitational waves, distorted space and time, no faster than c, .......
> > >
> > > That would have put narrative boundaries in the unphysical "cage" that the fucker created while hallucinated.
> > >
> > > Shitty histories start early in the '70s: blackholes, wormholes, multiverse, etc.
> > >
> > > How many times did you see a movie "explaining" wormholes by using a folded page and a pencil making a hole through both sides?
> > >
> > > Or personal "proper time" much slower than the others, so that person is invisible to humans (I wonder why never is depicted as a statue).
> > >
> > > Fuck Al and heirs. They killed storylines, so we have to deal with Alien, Predator, Transformers,.... What a SOB!
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
> 
> Never heard of it. I'll try to find it at several online repositories.
> 
> Anyway, I was talking about famous books written in the golden age of scify.

You didn't say "famous books", so you cannot raise the bar after the fact...

Pierre Boulle’s 1963 novel La Planète des Singes, via its Hollywood movie adaptation, arguably remains the most famous illustration of relativity in sci-fi.





> Now, ideas for a baseline of narratives are scarce,
> and popular books, films and TV series are blending scify+fantasy+terror+action+CGI+gender agenda+....
> 
> I have to stop. I have to see a re-run of Grimm.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#567054

The Parallel  1963
Written by: Rod Serling






The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Richard Hertz wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 12:54:33 AM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:32:43 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > <snip>
> > > >
> > > > > Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells)
> > > >
> > > > But not a single one, from 1910 to 1965 (classic scify books were written in that period) dared to mess with any relativity.
> > > wat about:
> > >
> > > “Time for the Stars”, (1956) by Robert Heinlein is the classic two 18
> > > year old twins separated when one goes on an interstellar voyage and
> > > returns about 70 years later having aged a personal 2 or 3 years story?
> > > >
> > > > They were very imaginative, but they were not crazy: gravitational waves, distorted space and time, no faster than c, .......
> > > >
> > > > That would have put narrative boundaries in the unphysical "cage" that the fucker created while hallucinated.
> > > >
> > > > Shitty histories start early in the '70s: blackholes, wormholes, multiverse, etc.
> > > >
> > > > How many times did you see a movie "explaining" wormholes by using a folded page and a pencil making a hole through both sides?
> > > >
> > > > Or personal "proper time" much slower than the others, so that person is invisible to humans (I wonder why never is depicted as a statue).
> > > >
> > > > Fuck Al and heirs. They killed storylines, so we have to deal with Alien, Predator, Transformers,.... What a SOB!
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > and challenge
> > > the unchallengeable.
> >
> > Never heard of it. I'll try to find it at several online repositories.
> >
> > Anyway, I was talking about famous books written in the golden age of scify.
> 
> You didn't say "famous books", so you cannot raise the bar after the fact...
> 
> Pierre Boulle’s 1963 novel La Planète des Singes, via its Hollywood movie adaptation, arguably remains the most famous illustration of relativity in sci-fi.
> 
> > Now, ideas for a baseline of narratives are scarce,
> > and popular books, films and TV series are blending scify+fantasy+terror+action+CGI+gender agenda+....
> >
> > I have to stop. I have to see a re-run of Grimm.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#567056

Original title: La Planète des singes
Publication date: 1963

In inglish Planet of the Apes


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Parallel  1963
> Written by: Rod Serling
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 12:54:33 AM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:32:43 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > <snip>
> > > > >
> > > > > > Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells)
> > > > >
> > > > > But not a single one, from 1910 to 1965 (classic scify books were written in that period) dared to mess with any relativity.
> > > > wat about:
> > > >
> > > > “Time for the Stars”, (1956) by Robert Heinlein is the classic two 18
> > > > year old twins separated when one goes on an interstellar voyage and
> > > > returns about 70 years later having aged a personal 2 or 3 years story?
> > > > >
> > > > > They were very imaginative, but they were not crazy: gravitational waves, distorted space and time, no faster than c, .......
> > > > >
> > > > > That would have put narrative boundaries in the unphysical "cage" that the fucker created while hallucinated.
> > > > >
> > > > > Shitty histories start early in the '70s: blackholes, wormholes, multiverse, etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > How many times did you see a movie "explaining" wormholes by using a folded page and a pencil making a hole through both sides?
> > > > >
> > > > > Or personal "proper time" much slower than the others, so that person is invisible to humans (I wonder why never is depicted as a statue).
> > > > >
> > > > > Fuck Al and heirs. They killed storylines, so we have to deal with Alien, Predator, Transformers,.... What a SOB!
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > and challenge
> > > > the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > Never heard of it. I'll try to find it at several online repositories.
> > >
> > > Anyway, I was talking about famous books written in the golden age of scify.
> >
> > You didn't say "famous books", so you cannot raise the bar after the fact...
> >
> > Pierre Boulle’s 1963 novel La Planète des Singes, via its Hollywood movie adaptation, arguably remains the most famous illustration of relativity in sci-fi.
> >
> > > Now, ideas for a baseline of narratives are scarce,
> > > and popular books, films and TV series are blending scify+fantasy+terror+action+CGI+gender agenda+....
> > >
> > > I have to stop. I have to see a re-run of Grimm.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#567112

I should add that when  astounding science fiction published it in march 1944...
the FBI told them to stop talking about atomic bombs.

Albert Einstein and all his science friends were investigated, arrested, or sent to the electric chair
for being...Communist, and passing atomic secrets.

So, it was a time to stay away from communist scientist.

What writer wants to be associated with 'these people' in those days?

Hollywood writers were not allowed to use the word "Mafia". (they used outfit or organization)

Even Albert Einstein friends didn't want to be near him...


dis guy was a hot potato.


Confess you are a communist or go to the electric chair.


wats it going to be?








The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Original title: La Planète des singes
> Publication date: 1963
> 
> In inglish Planet of the Apes
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Parallel  1963
> > Written by: Rod Serling
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 12:54:33 AM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:32:43 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Just a note: Science fiction writers in those days get their information from...scientists. (ask H.G.Wells)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But not a single one, from 1910 to 1965 (classic scify books were written in that period) dared to mess with any relativity.
> > > > > wat about:
> > > > >
> > > > > “Time for the Stars”, (1956) by Robert Heinlein is the classic two 18
> > > > > year old twins separated when one goes on an interstellar voyage and
> > > > > returns about 70 years later having aged a personal 2 or 3 years story?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > They were very imaginative, but they were not crazy: gravitational waves, distorted space and time, no faster than c, .......
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That would have put narrative boundaries in the unphysical "cage" that the fucker created while hallucinated.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Shitty histories start early in the '70s: blackholes, wormholes, multiverse, etc.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How many times did you see a movie "explaining" wormholes by using a folded page and a pencil making a hole through both sides?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Or personal "proper time" much slower than the others, so that person is invisible to humans (I wonder why never is depicted as a statue).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fuck Al and heirs. They killed storylines, so we have to deal with Alien, Predator, Transformers,.... What a SOB!
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > and challenge
> > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > Never heard of it. I'll try to find it at several online repositories.
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, I was talking about famous books written in the golden age of scify.
> > >
> > > You didn't say "famous books", so you cannot raise the bar after the fact...
> > >
> > > Pierre Boulle’s 1963 novel La Planète des Singes, via its Hollywood movie adaptation, arguably remains the most famous illustration of relativity in sci-fi.
> > >
> > > > Now, ideas for a baseline of narratives are scarce,
> > > > and popular books, films and TV series are blending scify+fantasy+terror+action+CGI+gender agenda+....
> > > >
> > > > I have to stop. I have to see a re-run of Grimm.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web