Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #662065

Re: Modern cosmology's crises

From Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Modern cosmology's crises
Date 2025-03-22 11:43 -0500
Organization Modern Human
Message-ID <vrmpbl$8gd7$3@solani.org> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <2h6cnTK-Wo2HxEH6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <67DCA1C2.1E88@ix.netcom.com> <APSdnSkTq9AawUD6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <67DDBDC3.1464@ix.netcom.com> <D3WdnahSf9Uoo0P6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 3/21/25 11:38 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 03/21/2025 12:28 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Researchers in foundations and physics know that
>>> the data thusly makes it so that the theories of
>>> mechanics and the optical sort of demand a retro-classical
>>> super-classical account of that the theory is a theory
>>> of fields of potential, and that optical light is special
>>> and is not the same as electromagnetic or nuclear radiation,
>>> and that the mechanical has "worlds turn" or for the
>>> free rotational, with space/frames and frame/spaces, and
>>> while still setting up the Galilean and Newtonian and
>>> Lorentzian in the middle, though not necessarily keeping
>>> the gravitational equivalence principle, with regards to
>>> the orbifold instead of the geodesy, and that there's
>>> that momentum isn't a conserved quantity, and that
>>> it's a continuum mechanics what makes any quantum mechanics,
>>> with wave/resonance dichotomy above particle/wave duality,
>>> so that it results the old linear classical is just a
>>> mere differential time-slice, that is itself always
>>> a sum-of-histories sum-of-potentials least-action least-gradient,
>>> theory.
>>
>>
>>
>> The truth is...particles do not behave like waves.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> And your 'one sentence paragrah' looks like it was writen by a girl with
>> her panties in a knot.
>>
>>
>>
> 
> Yeah, shut the fuck up, you frivolous moron.
> 
> 



I see Kosmanson does not like a much more efficiently active rival :)

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-19 17:46 -0700
  Re: Modern cosmology's crises The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-20 10:47 -0700
    Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-20 11:05 -0700
      Re: Modern cosmology's crises The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-20 16:16 -0700
        Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 05:32 -0700
          Re: Modern cosmology's crises The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-21 12:28 -0700
            Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 21:38 -0700
              Re: Modern cosmology's crises Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 11:43 -0500
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises x <x@x.org> - 2025-03-22 13:25 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 13:28 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises x <x@x.org> - 2025-03-22 15:43 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 16:03 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 16:12 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises x <x@x.org> - 2025-03-23 15:55 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-22 22:15 +0000
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-03-23 10:25 -0400
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises Johnny LaRue <xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz> - 2025-03-23 11:16 -0400
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-23 09:48 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-23 21:54 +0000
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-23 23:46 +0000
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 19:01 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-24 05:18 +0000
            Re: Modern cosmology's crises The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-21 23:48 -0700
  Re: Modern cosmology's crises jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-24 13:26 +0000
    Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 08:55 -0700
      Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-25 08:19 +0000
      Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 02:20 -0700

csiph-web