Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #662008

Re: Modern cosmology's crises

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Modern cosmology's crises
Date 2025-03-20 10:47 -0700
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <67DC54B4.7CAE@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <VsOdnVcJzYL7-Eb6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Ross Finlayson wrote:
> 
> Articles these days about inflationary cosmology,
> "well we don't understand apparent galaxies holding
> together and call it dark matter, and don't understand
> apparent galaxies falling apart and call it dark energy,
> and instead of figuring out rotational freedom and
> a different linear and rotational to explain what's
> called dark matter, and instead of figuring out redshift bias
> and that most of the sky survey was just a large local jet
> to explain dark energy, now we'll just say that the universe
> in the long past simply had entirely opposite laws".
> 
> Trading a non-scientific explanation of a non-scientific
> explanation for a non-scientific explanation.
> 
> It's like that one new theory last year, "wobbly bits",
> sort of instead of "wobbly bits", just a giant "wobbly bend".
> 
> And those g2 log-linear goofs, ....
> 
> If it was honest scientific reporting it'd say "modern cosmology
> is in a crisis since the decades since non-scientific un-explanations".
> 
> Of course a simple difference linear/rotational all the way
> down in classical mechanics and then the optical character
> of optical light and redshift bias provide mechanism and
> explanation, and events like lunar eclipses, or spiral footballs
> or gyroscopic action, demonstrate the super-classical optical
> and retro-classical mechanical.
> 
> So anyways "scientific reporting" painting itself in pretty
> terms is, not so scientific after all.


ANY "Articles these days about inflationary cosmology,.." is all WRONG since
the inventor of "inflationary cosmology" admited he was mistaken about "inflation".. There is no "inflationary cosmology".
Inflation never happen. It's just an ad-hoc, a bandage they put when they are missing something. 

If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts...tweak it. 

OH, IT LOOKS GOOD NOW!

Now, put it in the fuckin science textbooks books with all the rest of the garbage!








-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-19 17:46 -0700
  Re: Modern cosmology's crises The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-20 10:47 -0700
    Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-20 11:05 -0700
      Re: Modern cosmology's crises The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-20 16:16 -0700
        Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 05:32 -0700
          Re: Modern cosmology's crises The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-21 12:28 -0700
            Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 21:38 -0700
              Re: Modern cosmology's crises Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 11:43 -0500
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises x <x@x.org> - 2025-03-22 13:25 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 13:28 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises x <x@x.org> - 2025-03-22 15:43 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 16:03 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 16:12 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises x <x@x.org> - 2025-03-23 15:55 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-22 22:15 +0000
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-03-23 10:25 -0400
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises Johnny LaRue <xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz> - 2025-03-23 11:16 -0400
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-23 09:48 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-23 21:54 +0000
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-23 23:46 +0000
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 19:01 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-24 05:18 +0000
            Re: Modern cosmology's crises The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-21 23:48 -0700
  Re: Modern cosmology's crises jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-24 13:26 +0000
    Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 08:55 -0700
      Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-25 08:19 +0000
      Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 02:20 -0700

csiph-web