Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #662011

Re: Modern cosmology's crises

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Modern cosmology's crises
Date 2025-03-20 16:16 -0700
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <67DCA1C2.1E88@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <VsOdnVcJzYL7-Eb6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> <67DC54B4.7CAE@ix.netcom.com> <2h6cnTK-Wo2HxEH6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Ross Finlayson wrote:
> 
> On 03/20/2025 10:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Ross Finlayson wrote:
> >>
> >> Articles these days about inflationary cosmology,
> >> "well we don't understand apparent galaxies holding
> >> together and call it dark matter, and don't understand
> >> apparent galaxies falling apart and call it dark energy,
> >> and instead of figuring out rotational freedom and
> >> a different linear and rotational to explain what's
> >> called dark matter, and instead of figuring out redshift bias
> >> and that most of the sky survey was just a large local jet
> >> to explain dark energy, now we'll just say that the universe
> >> in the long past simply had entirely opposite laws".
> >>
> >> Trading a non-scientific explanation of a non-scientific
> >> explanation for a non-scientific explanation.
> >>
> >> It's like that one new theory last year, "wobbly bits",
> >> sort of instead of "wobbly bits", just a giant "wobbly bend".
> >>
> >> And those g2 log-linear goofs, ....
> >>
> >> If it was honest scientific reporting it'd say "modern cosmology
> >> is in a crisis since the decades since non-scientific un-explanations".
> >>
> >> Of course a simple difference linear/rotational all the way
> >> down in classical mechanics and then the optical character
> >> of optical light and redshift bias provide mechanism and
> >> explanation, and events like lunar eclipses, or spiral footballs
> >> or gyroscopic action, demonstrate the super-classical optical
> >> and retro-classical mechanical.
> >>
> >> So anyways "scientific reporting" painting itself in pretty
> >> terms is, not so scientific after all.
> >
> >
> > ANY "Articles these days about inflationary cosmology,.." is all WRONG since
> > the inventor of "inflationary cosmology" admited he was mistaken about "inflation".. There is no "inflationary cosmology".
> > Inflation never happen. It's just an ad-hoc, a bandage they put when they are missing something.
> >
> > If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts...tweak it.
> >
> > OH, IT LOOKS GOOD NOW!
> >
> > Now, put it in the fuckin science textbooks books with all the rest of the garbage!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Both "Big Bang" and "Steady State", and even "Cyclic Cosmology",
> are good theories, they're sort of super-scientific, though.
> 
> Good theories, usually then get into Idealism, since, it's so
> that Logicist Positivism or the Analytical Tradition needs
> a good theory.
> 
> "The", good theory, an idealism.
> 
> Anyways saying everything's not rotten in the state of Denmark
> when the sky survey _falsified_ Newtonian and Einsteinian theories,
> has that approaches like linear/rotational differences and the
> fundamentally kinematic and super-classical about the kinetic
> and classical, and, the special character of optical light and
> the Fresnel, can fix these.
> 
> According to science, both the theory and the data.
> 
> All the data, ....
> 
> Yeah, the modern sky-survey has roundly paint-canned
> many un-scientific theories of physics.


don't forget "The" super-un-scientific theories of physics...


take a can of paint and throw it against the wall!










-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-19 17:46 -0700
  Re: Modern cosmology's crises The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-20 10:47 -0700
    Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-20 11:05 -0700
      Re: Modern cosmology's crises The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-20 16:16 -0700
        Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 05:32 -0700
          Re: Modern cosmology's crises The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-21 12:28 -0700
            Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 21:38 -0700
              Re: Modern cosmology's crises Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 11:43 -0500
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises x <x@x.org> - 2025-03-22 13:25 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 13:28 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises x <x@x.org> - 2025-03-22 15:43 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 16:03 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 16:12 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises x <x@x.org> - 2025-03-23 15:55 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-22 22:15 +0000
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-03-23 10:25 -0400
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises Johnny LaRue <xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz> - 2025-03-23 11:16 -0400
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-23 09:48 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-23 21:54 +0000
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-23 23:46 +0000
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 19:01 -0700
                Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-24 05:18 +0000
            Re: Modern cosmology's crises The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-21 23:48 -0700
  Re: Modern cosmology's crises jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-24 13:26 +0000
    Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 08:55 -0700
      Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-25 08:19 +0000
      Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 02:20 -0700

csiph-web