Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #662011
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Modern cosmology's crises |
| Date | 2025-03-20 16:16 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <67DCA1C2.1E88@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <VsOdnVcJzYL7-Eb6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> <67DC54B4.7CAE@ix.netcom.com> <2h6cnTK-Wo2HxEH6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Ross Finlayson wrote: > > On 03/20/2025 10:47 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Ross Finlayson wrote: > >> > >> Articles these days about inflationary cosmology, > >> "well we don't understand apparent galaxies holding > >> together and call it dark matter, and don't understand > >> apparent galaxies falling apart and call it dark energy, > >> and instead of figuring out rotational freedom and > >> a different linear and rotational to explain what's > >> called dark matter, and instead of figuring out redshift bias > >> and that most of the sky survey was just a large local jet > >> to explain dark energy, now we'll just say that the universe > >> in the long past simply had entirely opposite laws". > >> > >> Trading a non-scientific explanation of a non-scientific > >> explanation for a non-scientific explanation. > >> > >> It's like that one new theory last year, "wobbly bits", > >> sort of instead of "wobbly bits", just a giant "wobbly bend". > >> > >> And those g2 log-linear goofs, .... > >> > >> If it was honest scientific reporting it'd say "modern cosmology > >> is in a crisis since the decades since non-scientific un-explanations". > >> > >> Of course a simple difference linear/rotational all the way > >> down in classical mechanics and then the optical character > >> of optical light and redshift bias provide mechanism and > >> explanation, and events like lunar eclipses, or spiral footballs > >> or gyroscopic action, demonstrate the super-classical optical > >> and retro-classical mechanical. > >> > >> So anyways "scientific reporting" painting itself in pretty > >> terms is, not so scientific after all. > > > > > > ANY "Articles these days about inflationary cosmology,.." is all WRONG since > > the inventor of "inflationary cosmology" admited he was mistaken about "inflation".. There is no "inflationary cosmology". > > Inflation never happen. It's just an ad-hoc, a bandage they put when they are missing something. > > > > If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts...tweak it. > > > > OH, IT LOOKS GOOD NOW! > > > > Now, put it in the fuckin science textbooks books with all the rest of the garbage! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both "Big Bang" and "Steady State", and even "Cyclic Cosmology", > are good theories, they're sort of super-scientific, though. > > Good theories, usually then get into Idealism, since, it's so > that Logicist Positivism or the Analytical Tradition needs > a good theory. > > "The", good theory, an idealism. > > Anyways saying everything's not rotten in the state of Denmark > when the sky survey _falsified_ Newtonian and Einsteinian theories, > has that approaches like linear/rotational differences and the > fundamentally kinematic and super-classical about the kinetic > and classical, and, the special character of optical light and > the Fresnel, can fix these. > > According to science, both the theory and the data. > > All the data, .... > > Yeah, the modern sky-survey has roundly paint-canned > many un-scientific theories of physics. don't forget "The" super-un-scientific theories of physics... take a can of paint and throw it against the wall! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-19 17:46 -0700
Re: Modern cosmology's crises The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-20 10:47 -0700
Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-20 11:05 -0700
Re: Modern cosmology's crises The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-20 16:16 -0700
Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 05:32 -0700
Re: Modern cosmology's crises The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-21 12:28 -0700
Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 21:38 -0700
Re: Modern cosmology's crises Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 11:43 -0500
Re: Modern cosmology's crises x <x@x.org> - 2025-03-22 13:25 -0700
Re: Modern cosmology's crises % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 13:28 -0700
Re: Modern cosmology's crises x <x@x.org> - 2025-03-22 15:43 -0700
Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 16:03 -0700
Re: Modern cosmology's crises % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 16:12 -0700
Re: Modern cosmology's crises x <x@x.org> - 2025-03-23 15:55 -0700
Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-22 22:15 +0000
Re: Modern cosmology's crises Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-03-23 10:25 -0400
Re: Modern cosmology's crises Johnny LaRue <xxxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz> - 2025-03-23 11:16 -0400
Re: Modern cosmology's crises Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-23 09:48 -0700
Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-23 21:54 +0000
Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-23 23:46 +0000
Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-23 19:01 -0700
Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-24 05:18 +0000
Re: Modern cosmology's crises The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-21 23:48 -0700
Re: Modern cosmology's crises jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-24 13:26 +0000
Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-24 08:55 -0700
Re: Modern cosmology's crises bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-25 08:19 +0000
Re: Modern cosmology's crises Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 02:20 -0700
csiph-web