Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #657449

Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo

From	Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo
Date	2024-09-24 21:55 -0500
Organization	Modern Human
Message-ID	<vcvu3s$q9ar$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <17f7f7f5b46186da$2$822353$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <aev8sk-sksm.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <6786f79b6fc42e31eb7e247423acfa09@www.novabbs.com> <5oo9sk-c1tn.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <cf5472d9795d3c9ff78902232f8c2760@www.novabbs.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 9/24/24 07:15, ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 3:37:11 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Last of the old guard here in Usenet, Pennino
>>>
>>>
>>> All the other e=mcc thumpers have died off or legged it.
>>
>> Yep, they got tired of the same old insane, babbling nonsense of the
>> mental patients that infected the group.
> 
> Why do you bother responding? In my case, I respond when I feel that
> I have a useful insight or bit of knowledge to share that the sane
> people on these groups might appreciate. For instance, I recently made
> several posts on the topic of correlated rate-change analysis, and I
> estimate that possibly 1-6 sane readers might not already have been
> familiar with the technique. But your posts merely reflect your
> disgust at the narcissistic, egomaniacal delusions held by the
> patients of this mental ward, and provide nothing new for those of
> us looking for new ideas or useful insights.



Jealousy is what runs him and others.

He is jealous of my dick. I call them "engineers."

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-17 11:19 +0000
  Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-17 08:49 -0700
    Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-18 00:32 +0000
      Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-17 18:45 -0700
        Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-18 02:13 +0000
          Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-18 08:07 -0700
            Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-18 22:36 +0000
              Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-18 15:52 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-19 02:22 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-19 07:16 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-19 21:48 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-19 15:18 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-20 00:21 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-19 18:06 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2024-09-25 15:30 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2024-09-25 15:31 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-25 23:07 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-25 19:31 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-26 03:35 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-01 23:50 +0200
  Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-20 22:57 +0000
    Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-20 19:55 -0700
      Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-21 07:44 +0000
        Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-21 06:49 -0700
          Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-21 23:13 +0000
            Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-21 16:52 -0700
              Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-22 00:19 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-22 12:02 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-22 22:15 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-22 13:18 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-23 08:20 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 08:31 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-23 18:29 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 10:02 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-23 19:40 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 11:45 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-23 21:07 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 12:30 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-23 22:00 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 13:25 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-24 01:17 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 20:37 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-24 07:25 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) - 2024-09-24 12:15 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-24 14:48 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-09-24 21:55 -0500
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-25 12:36 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-09-25 10:00 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-24 07:05 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-23 00:39 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-22 18:32 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-23 01:58 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 08:34 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-24 12:42 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-24 22:20 +0000
  Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-26 14:12 +0000
    Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-26 07:59 -0700
      Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-26 21:22 +0000
        Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-26 16:22 -0700
          Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-28 01:48 +0000

csiph-web