Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #657357

Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo

From	Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo
Date	2024-09-21 06:49 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<mgv2sk-caje.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> (permalink)
References	<f429e76238b2d398d867e0ef814062c9@www.novabbs.com> <a8c81bf6f7eeb4030df1039a482e2f07@www.novabbs.com> <k6p1sk-4n2d.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <27fb6050d8f8f1b8c4ac498e912ed69e@www.novabbs.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 2:55:50 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:19:24 +0000, bertietaylor wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://www.facebook.com/100000534193755/videos/350814810783223
>>>>
>>>> All relevant links and details in
>>>>
>>>> https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=12218&group=sci.physics#12218
>>>>
>>>> Woof-woof
>>>>
>>>> Bertietaylor (Arindam Banerjee's celestial cyberdogs)
>>>
>>> Exposes the Einstein-Feynman electrodynamics as rubbish. Trashes all of
>>> modern physics papers.
>>
>> How do you plan to spend your Nobel Prize money, crackpot?
> 
> Who cares for trifles, Penisnino? That too from those racist and bigoted
> unscientific hypocrites. Arindam goes for quintillions worth of stuff
> and over the centuries to come. Not counting the immense joy and
> purpose...

Yeah, sure, Arindam.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-17 11:19 +0000
  Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-17 08:49 -0700
    Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-18 00:32 +0000
      Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-17 18:45 -0700
        Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-18 02:13 +0000
          Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-18 08:07 -0700
            Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-18 22:36 +0000
              Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-18 15:52 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-19 02:22 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-19 07:16 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-19 21:48 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-19 15:18 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-20 00:21 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-19 18:06 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2024-09-25 15:30 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2024-09-25 15:31 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-25 23:07 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-25 19:31 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-26 03:35 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-01 23:50 +0200
  Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-20 22:57 +0000
    Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-20 19:55 -0700
      Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-21 07:44 +0000
        Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-21 06:49 -0700
          Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-21 23:13 +0000
            Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-21 16:52 -0700
              Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-22 00:19 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-22 12:02 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-22 22:15 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-22 13:18 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-23 08:20 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 08:31 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-23 18:29 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 10:02 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-23 19:40 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 11:45 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-23 21:07 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 12:30 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-23 22:00 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 13:25 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-24 01:17 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 20:37 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-24 07:25 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) - 2024-09-24 12:15 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-24 14:48 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-09-24 21:55 -0500
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-25 12:36 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-09-25 10:00 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-24 07:05 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-23 00:39 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-22 18:32 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-23 01:58 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 08:34 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-24 12:42 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-24 22:20 +0000
  Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-26 14:12 +0000
    Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-26 07:59 -0700
      Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-26 21:22 +0000
        Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-26 16:22 -0700
          Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-28 01:48 +0000

csiph-web