Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #657528

Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo

From	bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor)
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo
Date	2024-09-26 21:22 +0000
Organization	novaBBS
Message-ID	<838d9e68a4e7b87efa855079356090cb@www.novabbs.com> (permalink)
References	<f429e76238b2d398d867e0ef814062c9@www.novabbs.com> <bb48bec2828275ded1eff95d17d3086c@www.novabbs.com> <2g9gsk-8ut3.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 14:59:48 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:19:24 +0000, bertietaylor wrote:
>>
>>> https://www.facebook.com/100000534193755/videos/350814810783223
>>>
>>> All relevant links and details in
>>>
>>> https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=12218&group=sci.physics#12218
>>>
>>> Woof-woof
>>>
>>> Bertietaylor (Arindam Banerjee's celestial cyberdogs)
>>
>> So the question is, can anyone show from the above experiment that
>> inertia is NOT violated?
>
> Yes, and you have been shown so.

Good. When inertia is violated the whole of physics gets revised. The
world becomes much saner and richer.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-17 11:19 +0000
  Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-17 08:49 -0700
    Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-18 00:32 +0000
      Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-17 18:45 -0700
        Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-18 02:13 +0000
          Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-18 08:07 -0700
            Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-18 22:36 +0000
              Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-18 15:52 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-19 02:22 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-19 07:16 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-19 21:48 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-19 15:18 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-20 00:21 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-19 18:06 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2024-09-25 15:30 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2024-09-25 15:31 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-25 23:07 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-25 19:31 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-26 03:35 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-01 23:50 +0200
  Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-20 22:57 +0000
    Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-20 19:55 -0700
      Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-21 07:44 +0000
        Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-21 06:49 -0700
          Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-21 23:13 +0000
            Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-21 16:52 -0700
              Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-22 00:19 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-22 12:02 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-22 22:15 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-22 13:18 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-23 08:20 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 08:31 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-23 18:29 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 10:02 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-23 19:40 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 11:45 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-23 21:07 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 12:30 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-23 22:00 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 13:25 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-24 01:17 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 20:37 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-24 07:25 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) - 2024-09-24 12:15 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-24 14:48 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-09-24 21:55 -0500
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-25 12:36 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-09-25 10:00 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-09-24 07:05 +0200
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-23 00:39 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-22 18:32 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-23 01:58 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-23 08:34 -0700
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-24 12:42 +0000
                Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-24 22:20 +0000
  Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-26 14:12 +0000
    Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-26 07:59 -0700
      Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-26 21:22 +0000
        Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-09-26 16:22 -0700
          Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-09-28 01:48 +0000

csiph-web