Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #582794

Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis

From	Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis
Date	2022-04-13 22:37 -0400
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<t381da$1cit$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<2dedba48-1f4a-4bb1-8b28-fe78b0ae6bddn@googlegroups.com> <1pqbjal.22206w1didcfhN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <b6434777-bb8b-409f-9618-e173a239cb0an@googlegroups.com> <t35jim$1nj4$1@gioia.aioe.org> <0c60d151-1dae-42a5-bef8-6ebb2bd576a8n@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/13/2022 1:29 AM, patdolan wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 9:29:13 PM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> On 4/12/2022 8:19 PM, patdolan wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 2:27:14 PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>>>> patdolan <patd...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I lend my name to the following hypothesis: Do atomic clocks, indeed all
>>>>> electronically based clocks, increase their tick rate with decreasing
>>>>> electrostatic field?
>>>>
>>>> No, they are well shielded.
>>>> And just curious: do you really believe that those scientist
>>>> who invented, built, and operated atomic clocks for 70 years now
>>>> are on the level of stupid amateurs like you?
>>>>
>>>>> It is a well known fact that the earth's electrostatic field near its
>>>>> surface has a value from 100 to 300 volts per meter. This field, like
>>>>> all electrostatic fields, diminishes as the reciprocal of the square of
>>>>> the distance.
>>>>
>>>> Not really. More like linear.
>>>>
>>>>> Is this inverse square reduction of electrostatic field the
>>>>> reason for increasing electronic clock rates?
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>>
>>>>> The Dolan Hypothesis is easily tested by operating an atomic clock at
>>>>> various distance from an Van de moo...oops...Van de Graaf generator.
>>>>
>>>> Nonsense. Atomic clocks are well shielded against external disturbances.
>>>> And oops oops: Van de Graaff generator, not a rock band.
>>>> (which you also oopsed) Can't you get anything right?
>>>>
>>>> Apart from that: the clock rate varies with the gravitational potential,
>>>> and this has been verified to great accuracy
>>>> over fifty years of clock operation in many standards labs,
>>>> and by comparing them at the BIPM to compute TAI,
>>>>
>>>> Jan
>>>
>>> Jan, I consider myself quite successful at never trying to appear more intelligent than I actually am.
>> You apparently succeeded, because you sure appear to be really stooopid!
>>> "At present one cannot easily perform tests of relativity with the system because the SV clocks are actively steered to be within 1 microsecond of Universal Coordinated Time (USNO)."
>> Again, all the drift is in the tens of nanosecond range, and is done
>> after the GR correction.
>>
>> Also, your quote states the clocks are steered to be within 1
>> microsecond, yet GR effects are 38 microseconds each and every day? You
>> haven't thought that through, have you.
> 
> It's YOUR quote from YOUR link.

It's a quote you mined (and misinterpreted) from a link I gave.

>  But let me think it through for you, chump.  It stands to reason that each bird must be "steered" at least 38 times per day.

Which is absurd. They are designed to be able to go a couple days with 
NO steering and remain within spec.  Besides, there are portions of 
their orbits where the satellites are out of range of uplink stations 
for a few hours, while 38 "steerings" a day is more often than once 
every 38 minutes.  (also the bird would drift substantially between 
steerings).

Amusingly your claim they'd need adjustments 38 times/day simultaneously 
admits to GR time dilation and denies it.  If there was NO GR time 
dilation, the clock would be set to the equivalent of 9192631770 just 
like all clocks everywhere else and transmit at 10.23 MHz, not at 
10.22999999543 MHz.

>  Obviously they are steered far more often.

Obviously not, when they are out of range of any uplinks for hours at a 
time and designed to stay within spec for days at a time with no 
adjustments.

>  Because, obviously, there are other factors responsible for far greater drift than 38 usec per day.

No, the factors are in the range of several tens of nanoseconds per day, 
much smaller than 38,000 nS/day.

>  And please don't ask me to tell you what those factors might be

OK, I won't ask you for those nonexistent huge adjustment factors.

> until you have held a soldering gun in your delicate little paw.

You should have seen me as a teenager, constantly tinkering with 
electronics with a soldering iron going.  Not as much now but I still do.
> 
> The point being that relativistic considerations have always been swamped by other engineering considerations when it comes to keeping time on a GPS satellite.

Nope.  If factors needing adjustments "swamped" the 38 uS/day factor, 
the GPS system would be completely useless.  Remember, ignoring time 
dilation would push positioning off about 11 km/day, each and every day.

>  But thanks for the research.  Your link to the 1978 document appears to be the only extant experimental for a 38.6 usec per day de-diltation

The GPS systems still has the 38uS/day adjustment, so every time the 
nice lady voice says to turn right on your GPS app, it's proven.  The 
GPS designers were so confident with that initial experimental result 
none of the following satellites had that "Newton/Einstein" switch. 
Besides an experiment only has to be done correctly ONCE.

> during free fall.

Why free fall?

>  And these results, just as with Eddington's eclipse results, have never been duplicated.

Wrong.  As to Eddington, do you realize that there have been many 
eclipses since 1919?  And once we had the ability to launch satellites, 
eclipses weren't even necessary any longer?  All a satellite needs is a 
sun shield disk to make its own "eclipse".  Guess what? GR confirmed 
each and every time.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-10 08:36 -0700
  Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-04-10 17:49 +0200
    Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-10 09:59 -0700
      Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-10 19:19 +0200
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-10 10:24 -0700
    Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-04-10 17:48 -0700
      Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-10 20:30 -0700
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 11:01 +0000
  Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-04-10 23:37 -0500
    Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-10 22:34 -0700
      Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-10 22:46 -0700
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-10 23:02 -0700
          Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 11:07 +0000
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 05:38 -0700
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 12:55 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 06:04 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 15:16 +0000
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 05:56 -0700
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 11:01 +0000
          Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-04-11 12:36 -0500
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 10:51 -0700
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-04-13 19:59 -0500
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Yoel Mazaki <mjdy@xcwrlsug.ga> - 2022-04-17 10:49 +0000
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 18:36 +0000
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-11 21:24 +0200
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 02:55 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-12 12:43 +0200
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 04:28 -0700
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 12:27 -0700
      Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-11 02:04 -0400
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-10 23:20 -0700
          Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-11 03:56 -0400
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 02:05 -0700
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-11 11:56 -0400
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 09:14 -0700
          Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 11:07 +0000
          Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-04-11 12:45 -0500
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 11:36 -0700
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 11:56 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 19:00 +0000
                Cretins Richard Hertz and Pat Dolan are dining together. Eating shit. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 12:01 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 12:35 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-04-11 18:06 -0500
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 16:50 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 02:55 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-12 06:56 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 14:05 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-12 07:47 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 08:08 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 00:15 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-12 17:27 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 00:55 +0000
                Cretins Pat Dolan and Richard Hertz dine together. Eating shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 08:50 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 16:52 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 16:56 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 06:54 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 16:53 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 17:36 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 19:42 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 19:58 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 20:28 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 22:34 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 22:42 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 21:32 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 11:34 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 11:34 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 19:36 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-11 23:11 -0400
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 20:25 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 11:34 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 04:45 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 11:58 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 05:00 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-12 12:40 -0400
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-12 10:00 -0700
                Cretin Pat Dolan perseveres "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 10:49 -0700
                Re: Cretin Pat Dolan perseveres patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-12 11:12 -0700
                Re: Cretin Pat Dolan perseveres "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 11:15 -0700
                Re: Cretin Pat Dolan perseveres Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-13 00:17 -0400
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 20:48 +0000
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 18:57 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 12:11 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 21:37 +0000
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-11 15:15 -0400
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 12:30 -0700
                Cretinoid Pat Dolan perseveres "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 12:38 -0700
                Re: Cretinoid Pat Dolan perseveres patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 12:43 -0700
                Re: Cretinoid Pat Dolan perseveres "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 12:46 -0700
                Re: Cretinoid Pat Dolan perseveres nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-12 23:27 +0200
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-11 16:04 -0400
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 21:00 +0000
      Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 11:01 +0000
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 06:12 -0700
      Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-04-13 16:04 -0500
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-13 17:10 -0700
          Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-13 22:13 -0400
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 23:43 -0700
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 23:41 -0700
    Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 10:10 -0700
  Dumbestfuck Dolan Hypothesis "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 08:54 -0700
  Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-12 23:27 +0200
    Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-12 17:19 -0700
      Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-13 00:29 -0400
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-12 22:29 -0700
          Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-13 22:37 -0400
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-13 20:42 -0700
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-14 03:35 -0400
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 23:49 -0700
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-14 11:15 +0200
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 02:41 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-14 10:25 -0400
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 07:51 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-14 08:50 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 15:54 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-14 15:02 -0400
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Jessi Takeuchi <wwul@jqqqiqup.pj> - 2022-04-14 19:11 +0000
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-14 08:48 -0700
                Lying piece of shit Pat Dolan gets to eat it "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 09:03 -0700
                Re: Lying piece of shit Pat Dolan gets to eat it patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-14 09:13 -0700
                Re: Lying piece of shit Pat Dolan gets to eat it "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 09:21 -0700
                Re: Lying piece of shit Pat Dolan gets to eat it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 16:59 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-14 18:48 +0200
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 19:10 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-15 08:04 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-15 15:33 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-15 23:06 +0200
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-16 00:11 -0700
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 01:43 -0700
      Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-13 10:35 +0200
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-13 08:40 -0700
          Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-13 18:24 +0200
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 09:29 -0700
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-13 10:33 -0700

csiph-web