Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #582589

Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis

Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Date 2022-04-11 12:35 -0700
References (3 earlier) <t30gcq$ced$1@gioia.aioe.org> <376dc48b-f2f5-4fd2-b4ec-134680253450n@googlegroups.com> <-Mudne8u9ee_9Mn_nZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> <3348600e-3825-4882-bac0-94ea4eff1599n@googlegroups.com> <4dbe5470-176e-4675-8d2e-9b0ee2b2713an@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <ef5ba3f4-e827-4572-bd73-a90d66af982dn@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis
From patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 11:56:31 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 3:36:36 PM UTC-3, patdolan wrote: 
> 
> <snip>
> > I have also asked myself--given the 69% rate of reporting non-reproducible experimental results by physicists--has anyone other than the initial investigators actually observed any atomic clock slow by 38 usec/day? Other than the un-reproduced light atomic clock results in the last couple of years, this claim appears to have been tested only once, back in 1978. But it was not important enough to get incorporated into modern GPS algorithms as all GPS birds are actively steered back to 1 usec/day from running either too fast or too slow. 
> > 
> > The famous 38 usec/day claim is now exposed as just more science folklore. Like Eddington's 1.75 arcseconds. Both remain un-reproduced values despite numerous attempts to do so. So where are the claims & cries of falsification? This is all explained in Structures.
> CALCULATED 38.5 usec/day, not measured. 
> 
> And this calculation based on the stupid Hilbert-Schwarzschild metric that was published in 1917, 105 years ago. 
> 
> Such metric contemplate an universe VOID OF MATTER AND ENERGY, except for a single point-like, non-charged, non-rotating 
> mass that represented the Sun. Even Mercury (its first application) was a TEST PARTICLE with no mass. 
> 
> But PROPAGANDA says, at every written book on GR, that such metric is the real deal and that explain everything because it has 
> embedded special relativity formulations. 
> 
> Then you have people like Dono, who promptly wrote that Reissner-Nordstrom metric is better, because it includes an electric 
> charge on such point-like, non rotating mass. 
> 
> Weird that Dono didn't claim that Kerr–Newman metric is better, because it adds to Hilbert-Schwarzschild point-like mass 
> charge and rotation. 
> 
Incredible!!!
> And this is all that GR has to offer: 4 solutions of the 200+ non-linear equations that comprises GR set for vacuum. 
> 
All that and GR still can't spit out 9.81 Newtons for a 1 kilogram weight sitting on a tabletop!
> Going beyond such simplistic solutions is impossible with current mathematics. 
> 
> But you HAVE TO BELIEVE everything the useless eaters tell to you, because they are SCIENTISTS and you are not. 
> 
> PROPAGANDA.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-10 08:36 -0700
  Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-04-10 17:49 +0200
    Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-10 09:59 -0700
      Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-10 19:19 +0200
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-10 10:24 -0700
    Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-04-10 17:48 -0700
      Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-10 20:30 -0700
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 11:01 +0000
  Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-04-10 23:37 -0500
    Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-10 22:34 -0700
      Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-10 22:46 -0700
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-10 23:02 -0700
          Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 11:07 +0000
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 05:38 -0700
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 12:55 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 06:04 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 15:16 +0000
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 05:56 -0700
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 11:01 +0000
          Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-04-11 12:36 -0500
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 10:51 -0700
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-04-13 19:59 -0500
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Yoel Mazaki <mjdy@xcwrlsug.ga> - 2022-04-17 10:49 +0000
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 18:36 +0000
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-11 21:24 +0200
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 02:55 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-12 12:43 +0200
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 04:28 -0700
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 12:27 -0700
      Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-11 02:04 -0400
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-10 23:20 -0700
          Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-11 03:56 -0400
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 02:05 -0700
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-11 11:56 -0400
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 09:14 -0700
          Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 11:07 +0000
          Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-04-11 12:45 -0500
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 11:36 -0700
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 11:56 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 19:00 +0000
                Cretins Richard Hertz and Pat Dolan are dining together. Eating shit. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 12:01 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 12:35 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-04-11 18:06 -0500
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 16:50 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 02:55 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-12 06:56 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 14:05 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-12 07:47 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 08:08 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 00:15 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-12 17:27 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 00:55 +0000
                Cretins Pat Dolan and Richard Hertz dine together. Eating shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 08:50 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 16:52 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 16:56 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 06:54 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 16:53 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 17:36 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 19:42 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 19:58 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 20:28 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 22:34 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 22:42 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 21:32 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 11:34 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 11:34 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 19:36 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-11 23:11 -0400
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 20:25 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 11:34 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 04:45 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 11:58 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 05:00 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-12 12:40 -0400
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-12 10:00 -0700
                Cretin Pat Dolan perseveres "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 10:49 -0700
                Re: Cretin Pat Dolan perseveres patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-12 11:12 -0700
                Re: Cretin Pat Dolan perseveres "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 11:15 -0700
                Re: Cretin Pat Dolan perseveres Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-13 00:17 -0400
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 20:48 +0000
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 18:57 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 12:11 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 21:37 +0000
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-11 15:15 -0400
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 12:30 -0700
                Cretinoid Pat Dolan perseveres "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 12:38 -0700
                Re: Cretinoid Pat Dolan perseveres patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-11 12:43 -0700
                Re: Cretinoid Pat Dolan perseveres "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 12:46 -0700
                Re: Cretinoid Pat Dolan perseveres nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-12 23:27 +0200
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-11 16:04 -0400
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 21:00 +0000
      Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 11:01 +0000
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 06:12 -0700
      Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-04-13 16:04 -0500
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-13 17:10 -0700
          Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-13 22:13 -0400
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 23:43 -0700
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 23:41 -0700
    Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 10:10 -0700
  Dumbestfuck Dolan Hypothesis "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 08:54 -0700
  Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-12 23:27 +0200
    Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-12 17:19 -0700
      Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-13 00:29 -0400
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-12 22:29 -0700
          Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-13 22:37 -0400
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-13 20:42 -0700
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-14 03:35 -0400
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 23:49 -0700
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-14 11:15 +0200
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 02:41 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-14 10:25 -0400
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 07:51 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-14 08:50 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 15:54 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-14 15:02 -0400
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Jessi Takeuchi <wwul@jqqqiqup.pj> - 2022-04-14 19:11 +0000
              Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-14 08:48 -0700
                Lying piece of shit Pat Dolan gets to eat it "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 09:03 -0700
                Re: Lying piece of shit Pat Dolan gets to eat it patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-14 09:13 -0700
                Re: Lying piece of shit Pat Dolan gets to eat it "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 09:21 -0700
                Re: Lying piece of shit Pat Dolan gets to eat it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 16:59 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-14 18:48 +0200
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 19:10 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-15 08:04 -0700
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-15 15:33 +0000
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-15 23:06 +0200
                Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-16 00:11 -0700
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 01:43 -0700
      Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-13 10:35 +0200
        Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-13 08:40 -0700
          Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-13 18:24 +0200
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 09:29 -0700
            Re: The Dolan Atomic Clock Hypothesis patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-04-13 10:33 -0700

csiph-web