Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #581623

Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is.

From	Python <python@example.invalid>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is.
Date	2022-04-01 19:06 +0200
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<t27bdn$149e$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <t270he$1g5d$2@gioia.aioe.org> <2xpVU1WLhstBbs2ssTkgxOZnD2c@jntp> <t2758u$1v5d$4@gioia.aioe.org> <eb007b0d-8659-437b-ad12-537d25629431n@googlegroups.com> <t279fg$5ap$2@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

Odd Bodkin wrote:
> Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Friday, April 1, 2022 at 12:21:05 PM UTC-3, bodk...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> And that motivation defines both you and why you have no interest in learning relativity.
>>
>> No, Bodkin. You don't learn relativity. That thing is impossible because
>> the entire theory has no sense.
> 
> I do not see it as impossible, because I have learned it and it makes sense
> to me.
> 
> You say this is impossible, that you are smarter than me, and that if you
> cannot make sense of it, then it is impossible for anyone to make sense of
> it.

This is called "Hachel syndrome" in the French scientific literature
about dementia.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 09:27 -0700
  Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 16:55 +0000
  Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-03-31 17:28 +0000
    Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 18:52 +0000
      Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-03-31 19:05 +0000
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 19:12 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-03-31 23:44 +0000
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 13:00 +0000
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Vittorio Lucci <vitl@nharss.ag> - 2022-04-02 00:22 +0000
      Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-31 21:32 +0200
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 13:02 -0700
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 20:19 +0000
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 20:25 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-31 23:23 +0200
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 22:04 -0700
      Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 12:47 -0700
  Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to  define what time is. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-31 10:31 -0700
    Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to   define what time is. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-31 14:10 -0700
  Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-03-31 17:32 +0000
  Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-31 18:50 -0400
    Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 00:07 +0000
      Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-31 22:33 -0400
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 21:45 -0700
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 13:00 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-02 00:17 -0400
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 22:00 -0700
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-01 11:54 +0200
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 13:32 +0000
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 13:41 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 13:45 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-02 00:21 -0400
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-02 10:45 +0000
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 12:33 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-02 15:27 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 15:48 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-02 15:55 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-02 19:20 +0200
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 10:30 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richie Cruze <rcru@bstntap.jp> - 2022-04-02 17:43 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-02 17:44 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 10:52 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-02 23:30 +0200
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 21:42 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 19:40 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-02 16:07 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 10:09 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 19:40 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 10:13 -0700
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 13:48 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 14:00 +0000
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 14:24 +0000
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 15:21 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 09:24 -0700
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 08:37 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 16:04 +0000
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-02 00:25 -0400
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 22:16 -0700
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 13:50 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 14:00 +0000
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-01 16:08 +0200
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 07:14 -0700
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 15:10 +0000
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 14:25 +0000
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 15:21 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 08:50 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 16:32 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 10:02 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 17:10 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 10:14 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-01 19:06 +0200
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 17:10 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 10:53 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 18:24 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 10:10 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 18:56 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define   what time is. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-01 14:22 -0700
  Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 12:08 -0700

csiph-web