Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #581552

Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is.

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is.
Date	2022-03-31 14:10 -0700
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<624618DE.59C7@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	<3afd9c9e-a6d9-4990-88b3-aa1d88274ce0n@googlegroups.com> <6245E56B.137F@ix.netcom.com>

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Richard Hertz wrote:
> >
> > Humans are brainwashed to accept that nothing travels faster than c speed.
> >
> > This BS has roots on the cult/religion of relativity, since 1905.
> >
> > But if efforts of "science" would be focused on the understanding of what
> > precognition means and if it's possible to, somehow, manage it, then the
> > entire physics building constructed around relativity would collapse forever.
> >
> > It would prove that "time" is an illusory perception of the flow of events in a
> > positive direction of accumulation of effects, which ARE previously defined.
> >
> > Precognition would be the ability to move forward (for an instant) into the
> > flow of time, and go back with some information of the future.
> >
> > Try to apply Lorentz to that!
> 
> If you move forward even for an instant..what you would see would be
> TOTALLY BLANK.
> 
> There is no information there that exist.
> 
> So there is nothing to bring back.
> 
> You got to live for the moment...


Sure there are things that can travel faster than light...information
travels faster than light...

but nothing travel faster than information.


 If you move forward even for an instant..what you would see would be
 TOTALLY BLANK.
 
 There is no information there that exist.
 
 So there is nothing to bring back.




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 09:27 -0700
  Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 16:55 +0000
  Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-03-31 17:28 +0000
    Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 18:52 +0000
      Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-03-31 19:05 +0000
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 19:12 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-03-31 23:44 +0000
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 13:00 +0000
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Vittorio Lucci <vitl@nharss.ag> - 2022-04-02 00:22 +0000
      Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-31 21:32 +0200
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 13:02 -0700
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 20:19 +0000
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 20:25 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-31 23:23 +0200
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 22:04 -0700
      Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 12:47 -0700
  Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to  define what time is. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-31 10:31 -0700
    Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to   define what time is. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-31 14:10 -0700
  Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-03-31 17:32 +0000
  Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-31 18:50 -0400
    Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 00:07 +0000
      Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-31 22:33 -0400
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 21:45 -0700
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 13:00 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-02 00:17 -0400
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 22:00 -0700
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-01 11:54 +0200
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 13:32 +0000
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 13:41 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 13:45 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-02 00:21 -0400
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-02 10:45 +0000
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 12:33 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-02 15:27 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 15:48 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-02 15:55 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-02 19:20 +0200
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 10:30 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richie Cruze <rcru@bstntap.jp> - 2022-04-02 17:43 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-02 17:44 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 10:52 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-02 23:30 +0200
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 21:42 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 19:40 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-02 16:07 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 10:09 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 19:40 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 10:13 -0700
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 13:48 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 14:00 +0000
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 14:24 +0000
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 15:21 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 09:24 -0700
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 08:37 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 16:04 +0000
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-02 00:25 -0400
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 22:16 -0700
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 13:50 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 14:00 +0000
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-01 16:08 +0200
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 07:14 -0700
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 15:10 +0000
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 14:25 +0000
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 15:21 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 08:50 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 16:32 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 10:02 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 17:10 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 10:14 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-01 19:06 +0200
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 17:10 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 10:53 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 18:24 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 10:10 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 18:56 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define   what time is. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-01 14:22 -0700
  Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 12:08 -0700

csiph-web