Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #581604

Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is.

Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Date	2022-04-01 07:14 -0700
References	(2 earlier) <oL6ybkmLqDyzwkEHZF7maG9IxZs@jntp> <t25oag$1a0j$1@gioia.aioe.org> <-0qWPulrjd6PDy0m2DsQ4EAFE60@jntp> <t270he$1g5d$2@gioia.aioe.org> <t27114$1nsf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Message-ID	<cb44dbd8-2dda-4345-a960-e736110cf818n@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is.
From	Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Friday, 1 April 2022 at 16:08:39 UTC+2, Python wrote:
> Odd Bodkin wrote: 
> > Richard Hachel <r.ha...@tiscali.fr> wrote: 
> >> Le 01/04/2022 à 04:33, Michael Moroney a écrit : 
> >> 
> >>>> but the amazing thing is that NO ONE before me has explained why. 
> >>> 
> >>> So many cranks love writing exactly that... 
> >>> 
> >>> Your post measured 3 of 4 on the kook-o-meter. 
> >> 
> >> Which I really don't care about. 
> >> 
> >> R.H. 
> >> 
> > 
> > No, of course not. What you care about is attention being paid to you and 
> > your ideas.
> Calling Hachel/Lengrand's bunch of garbage "ideas" is very indulgent, 

Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again,
and trying to pretend he knows something.
Tell me, poor stinker, what is your definition of
a "theory" in the terms of Peano arithmetic?
See: if a theorem is going to be a part of a theory,
it has to be formulable in the language of the
theory. Do you get it? Or are you too stupid even for
that, poor stinker?

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 09:27 -0700
  Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 16:55 +0000
  Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-03-31 17:28 +0000
    Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 18:52 +0000
      Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-03-31 19:05 +0000
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 19:12 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-03-31 23:44 +0000
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 13:00 +0000
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Vittorio Lucci <vitl@nharss.ag> - 2022-04-02 00:22 +0000
      Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-31 21:32 +0200
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 13:02 -0700
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 20:19 +0000
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 20:25 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-03-31 23:23 +0200
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 22:04 -0700
      Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 12:47 -0700
  Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to  define what time is. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-31 10:31 -0700
    Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to   define what time is. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-03-31 14:10 -0700
  Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-03-31 17:32 +0000
  Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-31 18:50 -0400
    Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 00:07 +0000
      Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-03-31 22:33 -0400
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 21:45 -0700
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 13:00 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-02 00:17 -0400
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 22:00 -0700
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-01 11:54 +0200
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 13:32 +0000
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 13:41 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 13:45 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-02 00:21 -0400
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-02 10:45 +0000
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 12:33 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-02 15:27 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 15:48 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-02 15:55 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-02 19:20 +0200
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 10:30 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richie Cruze <rcru@bstntap.jp> - 2022-04-02 17:43 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-02 17:44 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 10:52 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-02 23:30 +0200
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 21:42 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 19:40 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-02 16:07 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 10:09 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 19:40 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 10:13 -0700
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 13:48 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 14:00 +0000
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 14:24 +0000
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 15:21 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 09:24 -0700
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 08:37 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 16:04 +0000
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-02 00:25 -0400
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 22:16 -0700
        Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 13:50 +0000
          Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 14:00 +0000
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-01 16:08 +0200
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 07:14 -0700
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 15:10 +0000
            Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 14:25 +0000
              Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 15:21 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 08:50 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 16:32 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 10:02 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 17:10 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 10:14 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-01 19:06 +0200
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 17:10 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 10:53 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 18:24 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 10:10 -0700
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define  what time is. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-01 18:56 +0000
                Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define   what time is. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-04-01 14:22 -0700
  Re: If precognition is true, then it shows how pathetic is trying to define what time is. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 12:08 -0700

csiph-web