Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #654074

Re: SpaceTime

Show all headers | View raw

Am Sonntag000002, 02.06.2024 um 20:07 schrieb Ross Finlayson:
> On 06/02/2024 10:48 AM, gharnagel wrote:
>> Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>
>>> Most people know that dead-reckoning isn't really a thing,
>>> then there's wide reliance on the constancy of light-speed,
>>> and its effectively large value.
>>
>>
>> Actually, the speed of light is really, really slow compared
>> to the size of the universe.  This, of course, is a proof
>> that tachyons MUST exist.
> 
> That's a great idea, you'll find that most all the "-ino"
> partner particles for the "-on" particles are such super-luminal
> flux for the otherwise usual flow of things and flux of light.
> 
> I don't get why optical light or nuclear radiation is called
> "electromagnetic" when it doesn't interact with the fields
> of electricity and magnetism at all. They're two different things.
> 
> Lots of people rely on energy being everything or, you know,
> the quantity of exchange and interchange, yet, it's only of
> a particular form or exchange at any given time.
> 
> This is that after the great "electron physics" and "ultraviolet
> catastrophe" is for a "neutrino physics" and "infrared perestroika",
> where both catastrophe and perestroika are the same term about
> openings in singularity theories, which are multiplicity theories.
> 
> The Aspect-type experiments and photinos represent an own sort
> of re-flux about the photon sector.
> 
> Anyways "electromagnetic radiation" isn't the same as "optical
> or radionuclear radiation".
> 
> Why light follows the geoedesy though it's massless has it
> that the geodesy is still the shortest distance everywhere,
> while also there's Fresnel effects in the large, one avers.
> 
> 
> 
> I still take the newpaper every day, yet I've found that
> the mindless feuilletons, constant pandering, and yellow
> journalism of the usual boob-tube media, are not very
> level-headed. There's also that many estimates of click-fraud
> in Internet media advertising are on the order of 20-50 percent
> or the profits, where you figure advertising successful works
> out about zero-sum. If Internet media advertising were regulated
> just like regular advertising, it would sort of be a thing,
> and taking uncommon profits and all, looks like wind-fall.
> 
> 
> 
> The "Standard Model of Particle Physics" is sort of closed,
> yet there's a great and tremendous milieu of, "The Zoo",
> about things like muon physics and beta decay, and why
> it's a continuum mechanics again, and superluminal flux
> and larger or more global and total symmetries, again is
> about how it's a continuum mechanics.
> 
> It's a continuum mechanics, ....
> 

Think about this:


https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing

I take spacetime of GR as 'background with features'.

This could be electric fields, magnetism or even matter, if we regard 
timelike stable structures as material objects.

Spacetime is essentially continous, but not in common space it is not. 
Why that?


That is a question, which is easy to solve:

if matter is a timelike stable structure and we humans are material 
objects, too, we regard our local subset of spacetime as real and 
devided into objects and background (space).

But this is only the case for us in our current environment, equipped 
with our local axis of time.

Other worlds exist besides our own, too, where material objects there 
are radiation for us, (because the other world has a local axis of time, 
which has an angle towards ours).

TH



> 

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: SpaceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-30 07:48 +0200
  Re: SpaceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-30 13:30 +0200
    Re: SpaceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-31 09:17 +0200
  Re: SpaceTime Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2024-05-30 23:25 -0500
    Re: SpaceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-31 09:16 +0200
    Re: SpaceTime hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-06-01 13:35 +0000
      Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-01 09:35 -0700
      Re: SpaceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-06-02 08:01 +0200
        Re: SpaceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-02 08:20 +0200
        Re: SpaceTime hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-06-02 12:48 +0000
          Re: SpaceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-02 16:47 +0200
            Re: SpaceTime hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-06-02 16:57 +0000
              Re: SpaceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-02 19:07 +0200
              Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 10:13 -0700
                Re: SpaceTime hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-06-02 17:48 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 11:07 -0700
                Re: SpaceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-06-03 09:00 +0200
                Re: SpaceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-03 09:57 +0200
                Re: SpaceTime Dmitriy Makricosta <ymt@yyiiciy.gr> - 2024-06-02 20:30 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime Richard Hachel <richard.hachel@invalid.fr> - 2024-06-02 21:34 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-06-02 23:22 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime Richard Hachel <richard.hachel@invalid.fr> - 2024-06-03 00:04 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-06-03 01:36 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 19:35 -0700
                Re: SpaceTime Richard Hachel <richard.hachel@invalid.fr> - 2024-06-03 00:17 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 18:14 -0700
                Re: SpaceTime hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-06-03 01:52 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-03 05:20 +0200
                Re: SpaceTime Hank Bogdán <dnkao@nonkn.hu> - 2024-06-03 19:57 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 17:31 -0700
                Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 17:59 -0700
                Re: SpaceTime hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-06-03 02:12 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 19:35 -0700
                Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 20:06 -0700
                Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 20:10 -0700
                Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 20:31 -0700
                Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 20:55 -0700
                Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-04 17:13 -0700
                Re: SpaceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-03 05:23 +0200
                Re: SpaceTime Richard Hachel <richard.hachel@invalid.fr> - 2024-06-04 14:51 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime Python <python@org.invalid> - 2024-06-04 19:26 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime Richard Hachel <richard.hachel@invalid.fr> - 2024-06-04 23:19 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-06-05 04:11 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-05 07:04 +0200
                Re: SpaceTime hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-06-05 11:55 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-05 14:39 +0200
                Re: SpaceTime Richard Hachel <richard.hachel@invalid.fr> - 2024-06-05 10:46 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime Richard Hachel <richard.hachel@invalid.fr> - 2024-06-05 11:00 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-06-05 12:05 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-05 14:40 +0200
                Re: SpaceTime hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-06-05 20:20 +0000
                Re: SpaceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-06 07:28 +0200
                Re: SpaceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-05 07:02 +0200
                Re: SpaceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-02 20:17 +0200
                Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 11:54 -0700
                Re: SpaceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-02 21:01 +0200
                Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 12:09 -0700
          Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 08:57 -0700
    Re: SpaceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-01 19:48 +0200
      Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-01 12:53 -0700
        Re: SpaceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-01 22:37 +0200
          Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-01 13:46 -0700
            Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-01 17:15 -0700
            Re: SpaceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-06-02 08:18 +0200
              Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 08:51 -0700
                Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 09:22 -0700
                Re: SpaceTime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 09:28 -0700

csiph-web