Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #596433

Re: SR without panties

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: SR without panties
Date	Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:46:06 -0600
Lines	36
Message-ID	<jun2bhFt378U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<f91ae15e-ba64-4b08-8557-a7216e3f8152n@googlegroups.com> <tm1ke8$1u00g$1@dont-email.me> <juj493FagnlU1@mid.individual.net> <julr4fFn8gjU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	individual.net vUSb/o0LlqzeVVoJdRz4igEI962uvXiM7E5s0RaVuhxY+d9Ogq
Cancel-Lock	sha1:bwoihe+lzS9w1loOr+SD+8+sRR8=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0
Content-Language	en-US
In-Reply-To	<julr4fFn8gjU1@mid.individual.net>
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:596433

Show key headers only | View raw

On 11/29/2022 1:36 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
> Am 28.11.2022 um 07:54 schrieb whodat:
> 
>>> Hold on, if A is moving relative to B at v1, then B is moving relative
>>> to A at -v1. You wrote v2.  Or did you mean A moves relative to (some
>>> unmentioned) C, perhaps an observer, at v1, and B moves relative to C
>>> or the observer at v2?
>>
>> If you use the term "relative to" then there is no + or -. As a
>> simple "difference" the number is absolute. There are workarounds
>> that can get you to arithmetic differences. I realize this is a
>> sort of nitpick, but I think it is an important one.
> ???
> 
> To me this sounds like nonsense!


Of course it does, but then you lack the basic essential skills
essential to understanding such elementary things. Please find
pastimes better suited to your abilities. Thanks.


> It makes a difference if you write 10-1 or 1-10!
> 
> You cannot declare negative values positive and ommit the sign, if you 
> don't have very good reasons.
> 
> Especially in relativity it makes a difference, if an object approaches 
> or receedes.
> 
> Approach would cause blue-shift and receeding red-shift, which is not 
> the same phenomenon.
> 
> 
> TH

Thread

SR without panties beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-27 15:43 -0800
  Re: SR without panties rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-11-27 17:38 -0800
  Re: SR without panties rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-11-27 17:42 -0800
    Re: SR without panties beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-28 01:43 -0800
    Re: SR without panties Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-28 01:53 -0800
  Re: SR without panties Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-28 01:28 -0500
    Re: SR without panties whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-28 00:54 -0600
      Re: SR without panties Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-11-29 08:36 +0100
        Re: SR without panties beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 02:33 -0800
        Re: SR without panties whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-29 12:46 -0600
          Re: SR without panties Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-11-30 09:01 +0100
            Re: SR without panties whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-30 11:43 -0600
              Re: SR without panties Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-01 10:33 +0100
                Re: SR without panties Mitch Leoni <nien@iltcntco.ws> - 2022-12-01 16:15 +0000
                Re: SR without panties Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-02 08:04 +0100
    Re: SR without panties Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-27 23:09 -0800
    Re: SR without panties beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 02:23 -0800
      Re: SR without panties Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-29 21:52 -0500
        Re: SR without panties Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 22:40 -0800
        Re: SR without panties beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 03:47 -0800

csiph-web