Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #596351
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: SR without panties |
| Date | 2022-11-28 00:54 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <juj493FagnlU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <f91ae15e-ba64-4b08-8557-a7216e3f8152n@googlegroups.com> <tm1ke8$1u00g$1@dont-email.me> |
On 11/28/2022 12:28 AM, Volney wrote: > On 11/27/2022 6:43 PM, beda pietanza wrote: >> I will here construct the Doppler effect as it take place in the reality: >> A source A at speed v1 is relatively moving versus a receiver B at >> speed v2: >> either the A and B have their clock rate of 1 Hz in their own >> reference frame. > > Hold on, if A is moving relative to B at v1, then B is moving relative > to A at -v1. You wrote v2. Or did you mean A moves relative to (some > unmentioned) C, perhaps an observer, at v1, and B moves relative to C or > the observer at v2? If you use the term "relative to" then there is no + or -. As a simple "difference" the number is absolute. There are workarounds that can get you to arithmetic differences. I realize this is a sort of nitpick, but I think it is an important one. > <snip rest as ambiguous until this is cleared up>
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
SR without panties beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-27 15:43 -0800
Re: SR without panties rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-11-27 17:38 -0800
Re: SR without panties rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2022-11-27 17:42 -0800
Re: SR without panties beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-28 01:43 -0800
Re: SR without panties Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-28 01:53 -0800
Re: SR without panties Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-28 01:28 -0500
Re: SR without panties whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-28 00:54 -0600
Re: SR without panties Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-11-29 08:36 +0100
Re: SR without panties beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 02:33 -0800
Re: SR without panties whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-29 12:46 -0600
Re: SR without panties Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-11-30 09:01 +0100
Re: SR without panties whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-11-30 11:43 -0600
Re: SR without panties Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-01 10:33 +0100
Re: SR without panties Mitch Leoni <nien@iltcntco.ws> - 2022-12-01 16:15 +0000
Re: SR without panties Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-02 08:04 +0100
Re: SR without panties Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-27 23:09 -0800
Re: SR without panties beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 02:23 -0800
Re: SR without panties Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-11-29 21:52 -0500
Re: SR without panties Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-11-29 22:40 -0800
Re: SR without panties beda pietanza <bedapietanza@gmail.com> - 2022-11-30 03:47 -0800
csiph-web