Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #582536

Re: Annotated version of SRT

From	Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Annotated version of SRT
Date	2022-04-11 07:42 +0200
Message-ID	<jbhtemFpi0U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(19 earlier) <jbcm7iFr8jU1@mid.individual.net> <t2sbk2$ka$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jbfeeoFgs4lU1@mid.individual.net> <t30c1k$10rb$1@gioia.aioe.org> <acdebdda-e439-4528-9961-3df7ea1a8714n@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Am 11.04.2022 um 06:52 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
> On Monday, 11 April 2022 at 06:49:59 UTC+2, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
>> I think Einstein's target audience understands the relationship between
>> force and acceleration.
>
> A pity it was too dumb to stick consistently
> to its own definitions.
>

Einstein wrote almost no definitions, because he assumed, the 'intended 
audience' would know the meaning of his symbols anyhow.

But that was certainly not the case and most physicists would have 
regarded Einstein's text as obscure crap, which they didn't find useful 
to deal with.

So, Einstein's text remained within the continuous stream of nonsense, 
we are permanently exposed to and which we usually simply ignore.

This did change later, when a collosal hype was created, with which the 
text of Einstein should be lifted to devine status.

Then a number of physicists opposed, but it was already too late.

For the intended audience of professional physicists it was strictly 
forbidden to criticise Einstein in any way. If anyone dared to do that, 
he was expelled from the 'community'.

Many dared, anyhow, but were expelled and regared as 'crackpots', 
'Nazi', 'insane', 'antisemitic' or similar.

That is for all practical purposes the case untill today, as I can tell 
from my experience of decades of following this usenet group and of my 
own experience as critic of Einstein's text.

I have decided not argue against relativity itself (which I think is 
correct), but concentrate on 'technical' issues alone, because the text 
contains so many errors, that it is hard to believe, that anybody will 
dare to defend it in the future.

This seems to work quite fine, because even people without any knowledge 
in physics can see the amount of errors with one single view at the huge 
number of yellow stripes in my text and can imagine, those would be red 
and mean corrections by their teatcher.

The details, like wrong or inconsistent variable names or wrong 
equations, can be left to the specialists in the field, because anybody 
with eyes can see the number of issues.

In case someone missed it, here is the link again:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dlajModzLK4wgScoOLEMmzpzS2JTUft6/view?usp=sharing 

The file needs to be downloaded, because google does not show 
annotations in the online version.

TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-07 01:06 -0700
  Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-08 08:40 +0200
    Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-07 23:56 -0700
      Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-08 20:50 +0200
        Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-08 19:05 -0400
          Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-09 08:08 +0200
            Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-08 23:51 -0700
            Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-09 13:02 +0000
              Re: Annotated version of SRT Coke Hishikawa <uhva@blseummh.nm> - 2022-04-09 13:21 +0000
            Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-09 12:18 -0400
              Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-10 09:14 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-04-10 11:29 +0300
                Re: Annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-10 12:28 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-04-10 16:54 +0300
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-11 00:50 -0400
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-10 21:52 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-11 07:42 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 11:01 +0000
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-04-11 05:50 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-11 18:20 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 09:48 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-04-11 09:54 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 12:32 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-11 18:39 -0400
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 21:28 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-12 06:36 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 21:38 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-12 06:47 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 21:58 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-12 11:14 +0000
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-12 11:10 +0000
                Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 12:38 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-12 18:48 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 11:37 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-13 02:37 -0400
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-14 08:36 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 23:44 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-14 04:16 -0400
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 01:34 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 12:47 +0000
            Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-10 13:06 +0200
        Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-09 07:48 +0200
    Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-09 14:36 +0200
      Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-09 06:18 -0700
      Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-10 08:49 +0200
        Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-09 23:52 -0700
          Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-10 12:54 +0200
        Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-10 12:51 +0200
          Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-10 05:02 -0700
          Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-10 21:04 +0200
            Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-10 22:08 +0200
              Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-10 21:20 -0700
              Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-11 07:48 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2022-04-11 08:43 +0000
                Re: Annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-11 13:55 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-11 21:09 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2022-04-12 02:52 +0000
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-13 07:49 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2022-04-13 07:41 +0000
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-14 08:21 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-14 14:38 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 07:47 -0700
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2022-04-14 15:26 +0000
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 15:42 +0000
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-15 18:29 +0200
                Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-15 17:00 +0000
                Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-15 15:46 -0700

csiph-web