Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #660389

Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC?

Message-ID <6718dc2a-fd56-4c66-b693-cfb2cbcbe30e@gmail.com> (permalink)
Date 2025-01-15 04:50 -0500
Subject Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC?
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
References (17 earlier) <59e8de9a-c817-4b3f-a14e-0773267cfeca@gmail.com> <vltbf1$h8ou$1@dont-email.me> <vltbie$h8ou$2@dont-email.me> <6bea0dc3-c92f-4bcc-ba77-69d4b570275d@gmail.com> <vlvjau$11gmb$1@dont-email.me>
From George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 1/12/2025 12:18 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 1/11/2025 10:51 AM, George Hammond wrote:
> [...]
> 
> relax?
> 

T H E    B I O L O G I C A L    C A U S E

       O F    T H E    A F T E R L I F E


George Hammond MS Physics      Jan 2025

    I think it's logically apparent that the reason that
nocturnal dreaming exists,  is the fact that no
human being is "fully grown" – – – in fact we can
point out that the average world adult is apparently
only around 85% fully grown (WHO, UNESCO etc.).
    I presume, that a fully grown human being, if such
a thing existed, would NOT dream at night.
    45 centuries ago the Egyptians believed that
Dreaming was evidence of Life After Death.
    I therefore conclude that the REASON for
Life After Death is likewise, the fact that no one is
fully grown !
    If this is true, we see that Life After Death
is simply the last and final stage of the
lifelong human growth process, and that
the Life After Death mechanism is simply the
"Final Stage of Growth" of the human body !!
    100% of "Full Consciousness" apparently is
sufficient for the body to assume that it has
finally reached "Full Grown" !

Note:  this theory presumes that the microtubule
system contains a "complete map" of the body
whereas the neuronal system does not !

That this is possible is demonstrated by the fact
that the "genetic" mechanism that begins the body
is essentially 100% complete – – whereas as the
growth mechanism becomes higher and more
sophisticated – – shortfalls in the completeness
of the mechanism begin to show up – it is merely
assumed here that the microtubule system is
capable of completing the full growth of
consciousness, while the neuronal system alone
would not be able to.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-11-30 20:23 -0500
  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 04:49 -0500
    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-01 15:34 -0800
      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 23:35 -0500
      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-01 21:17 -0800
        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 23:48 -0500
          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-02 22:43 -0800
            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? x <x@x.org> - 2024-12-03 19:31 -0800
            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-04 09:12 -0800
              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2024-12-04 18:50 +0000
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 09:23 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 08:43 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 09:18 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? x <x@x.org> - 2024-12-05 16:04 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 16:34 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 19:40 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 19:55 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-07 09:56 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 16:33 -0800
  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 21:12 -0800
    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-03 08:52 -0500
      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-03 17:37 -0800
        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 17:52 -0800
          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 06:54 -0500
            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 13:12 -0800
              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 19:12 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 21:17 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 21:38 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 18:53 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 01:53 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 02:01 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 01:14 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-13 09:28 +0100
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 12:34 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 11:45 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-14 15:18 +0100
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-14 21:04 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-12-15 05:23 +0000
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 09:56 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-16 17:54 +0100
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 13:28 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Python <jpierre.messager@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 22:45 +0000
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 22:10 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 13:03 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Python <coin@python.invalid> - 2024-12-17 18:06 +0000
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 21:28 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 21:31 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 02:24 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 13:09 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 20:57 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 20:52 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 15:49 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 02:40 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 00:51 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 00:53 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 13:51 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 12:37 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 05:21 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-15 10:02 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 17:37 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:29 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 16:37 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:34 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:41 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:46 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:51 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-16 10:56 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? x <x@x.org> - 2025-01-16 14:40 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 17:05 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 14:17 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-17 22:44 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 13:55 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 18:19 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 18:23 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:21 -0600
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 17:28 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 18:51 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 16:14 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 00:58 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 17:06 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:15 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 14:42 -0600
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 16:19 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 18:57 -0600
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:07 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:45 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 22:46 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 15:58 -0600
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-21 11:55 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-21 12:48 -0600
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 19:01 -0600
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 19:03 -0600
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:05 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:15 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:02 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 21:18 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 04:50 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 12:47 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2024-12-17 19:04 +0000
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 15:49 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-20 09:21 -0800

csiph-web