Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #659329

Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC?

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC?
Date 2024-12-04 09:12 -0800
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <67508D65.4CDD@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <49KcnWM7FaqorNH6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> <674CF27F.3140@ix.netcom.com> <674D42FE.6C4@ix.netcom.com> <f486b8cd-bea0-4bfd-b94b-71582d0839b9@gmail.com> <674EA881.4E95@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> George Hammond wrote:
> >
> > On 12/2/2024 12:17 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > > Like everyone else you need proof...
> > >
> > > "the microtubule system produces a dream"
> > >
> > > "and it is the microtubule system which watches the dream"
> > >
> > >
> > December 2, 2024
> > Geo. Hammond MS physics
> > Hyannis, Cape Cod MA USA
> > ghamamond928@gmail.com
> >
> > LOOK;    [S T A R M A K E R]:--
> >
> > There are 3 KINDS OF PEOPLE
> >
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > 1.  People who KNOW what God is,
> > but can't SEE God  (e.g. Churchgoers)
> >
> > 2.  People who SEE what God is but don't
> > REALIZE  that it is God (Agnostic geniuses
> > such as you etc. )
> >
> > 3.  People who both KNOW what God is and
> > can SEE what God is (generally old people, or
> > historical prodigal geniuses such as Newton,
> > Einstein,  Roosevelt etc.)
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> >
> > YOU are in category 2, -- you learned to see
> > what God is at an early age, but you're only
> > beginning to recognize that it is the phenomena
> > called "God" !
> >
> > Chris M Thomasson, the 3rd poster to this
> > thread---  clearly appears to be in category 1,
> > although he is apparently approaching category
> > 3 due to advancing age?
> >
> > I myself, am now in category 3, since I'm
> > 82 years old and have been studying the
> > subject for decades  !
> >
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> >
> > [George Hammond]
> > OKAY [S T A R M A K E R],  YOU SAID
> > IN YOUR LASF POST:--
> >
> > "Like everyone else you need proof..."
> >
> > And then you quoted my 2 statements:--
> >
> > "the microtubule system produces a dream"
> >
> > "and it is the microtubule system which
> > watches the dream"
> >
> > OKAY here I am trying to explain how a 5 µs
> > ultraviolet (UV) light flash in the water filled
> > microtubules of the brain can produce a
> > 5- YEAR AFTERLIFE for the entire human body !
> >
> > So let me give you a CLEARER DEMONSTRATION
> > of how the brain does this !
> >
> > Suppose you have a COMPUTER which you can
> > DIVIDE into 2 halves.  In the first half you play a
> > five-year movie. While you use the 2nd half of the
> > computer as an "OBSERVER" of the movie.
> >     Now suppose you speed up the computer by a
> > factor of 10-trillion !  And you do the same thing
> > again.
> >     I am simply pointing out that the "observing half"
> > of the computer will still see a five-year movie
> > irregardless of how fast the computer is running !
> > THE SPEED OF THE COMPUTER IS IRRELEVANT
> > if both the movie projector and the movie observer
> > are running at the same speed  !!
> >
> > THE POINT OF THIS is to explain HOW the brain can
> > produce a 5-YEAR AFTERLIFE of human consciousness
> > when in fact the human brain was being vaporized in
> > 5 microseconds (like those sidewalk A-bomb
> > human shadows in Hiroshima) !
> >
> > AND THE ANSWER IS-- that the microtubule system
> > in which this occurs-- routinely runs 10 TRILLION times
> > faster than the ordinary neuronal system of the brain
> > (e.g. at the frequency of ultraviolet light 10^15 hertz)  !!
> >
> > Hope this clarifies how Life after Death so called,
> > actually works !
> >
> > Geo Hammond  MS physics Hyannis 12/2/24
> > .
> 
> I don't think you understand...
> 
> there is no God.
> 
> You're just an ant
> crawling on the surface
> of the earth..
> searching for food.
> 

...and if you look
down..
all the way down...
it's ants
all the way down.

And one ant..
an Atom Ant...
in the center
of the Atom
is 
another ant.










-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-11-30 20:23 -0500
  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 04:49 -0500
    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-01 15:34 -0800
      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 23:35 -0500
      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-01 21:17 -0800
        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 23:48 -0500
          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-02 22:43 -0800
            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? x <x@x.org> - 2024-12-03 19:31 -0800
            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-04 09:12 -0800
              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2024-12-04 18:50 +0000
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 09:23 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 08:43 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 09:18 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? x <x@x.org> - 2024-12-05 16:04 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 16:34 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 19:40 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 19:55 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-07 09:56 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 16:33 -0800
  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 21:12 -0800
    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-03 08:52 -0500
      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-03 17:37 -0800
        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 17:52 -0800
          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 06:54 -0500
            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 13:12 -0800
              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 19:12 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 21:17 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 21:38 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 18:53 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 01:53 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 02:01 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 01:14 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-13 09:28 +0100
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 12:34 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 11:45 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-14 15:18 +0100
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-14 21:04 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-12-15 05:23 +0000
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 09:56 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-16 17:54 +0100
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 13:28 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Python <jpierre.messager@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 22:45 +0000
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 22:10 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 13:03 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Python <coin@python.invalid> - 2024-12-17 18:06 +0000
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 12:47 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2024-12-17 19:04 +0000
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 15:49 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-20 09:21 -0800

csiph-web