Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #660244
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? |
| Date | 2025-01-11 12:37 -0800 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <6782D67C.425C@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (16 earlier) <vlsbn1$9hji$1@dont-email.me> <59e8de9a-c817-4b3f-a14e-0773267cfeca@gmail.com> <vltbf1$h8ou$1@dont-email.me> <vltbie$h8ou$2@dont-email.me> <6bea0dc3-c92f-4bcc-ba77-69d4b570275d@gmail.com> |
George Hammond wrote: > > On 1/11/2025 3:53 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > > On 1/11/2025 12:51 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > >>>> > >>> Â > [George Hammond] MS Physics > >>> . > >>> WRONG - - - > >>> Â Â Â I am telling you that IF the "CZAR BOMBA" the Russian's biggest > >>> nuclear bomb in the world (50 megatons) went off while "DUCT TAPED" > >>> to your head - - - you could still: - - - GO TO HEAVEN FOR 10 YEARS ! > >> > >> Why not 11? > > > > Lets say you are wrong, and its 12.666 years, then what? Then just, > > kaput after that? > > > > > [George Hammond] MS Physics, Cape Cod USA > . > Look Chris - - - it is known that the theoretical lifespan of a > human being is somewhere around "80 years", more or less ! > . > Furthermore, it is known that the world average adult is only > about "85% fully grown" (WHO, UNESCO, data) > . > And since 100% - 85% = 15%, and since (.15) (80yrs)=12 years > we see that the "AVERAGE AFTERLIFE" is around 12 years > since the Afterlife represents the amount of time we were > "short changed" in actual life ! > Whether it is 10, 11, 12.666 .. years, etc. doesn't make any > difference for this discussion !. > . > BUT THE REAL BONER YOU HAVE MADE .... Is the assumption > that after the Afterlife, "life is KAPUT"... > . > This is a stupid presumption, made by people who DON'T KNOW > that : - - - > . > ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ > E T E R N A L ----- L I F E- > . > I S A T I M E (D- I -L -A -T -I- O- N) > . > N O T A T I M E (D- U- R- A- T -I -O -N) > ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ > . > Of course people cannot LIVE FOREVER --- DON'T BE STUPID > ---- how could there be progressive evolution of the human body > if people lived forever ===== DON'T BE RIDICULOUS !!! > . > ETERNAL LIFE refers to "reaching 100% full growth" in which case > we see "true 100% time, and true 100% speed" because there is no > "mental time dilation" in our brains due to less than "full growth" ! > . > ETERNAL LIFE refers to living life at "full biological speed", > meaning "full biological growth"... Which the human race has yet > to achieve ! > . > George Hammond MS Physics Cape Cod MA USA 1/11/25 > . Coming from a guy who graduated from Physics skool and automaticall got a ten year degree in...homeleness! a lot of good your phd did... it is the road of all physics phds. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 21:28 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 21:31 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 02:24 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 13:09 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 20:57 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 20:52 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 15:49 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 02:40 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 00:51 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 00:53 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 13:51 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 12:37 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 05:21 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-15 10:02 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 17:37 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:29 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 16:37 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:34 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:41 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:46 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:51 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-16 10:56 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? x <x@x.org> - 2025-01-16 14:40 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 17:05 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 14:17 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-17 22:44 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 13:55 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 18:19 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 18:23 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:21 -0600
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 17:28 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 18:51 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 16:14 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 00:58 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 17:06 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:15 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 14:42 -0600
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 16:19 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 18:57 -0600
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:07 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:45 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 22:46 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 15:58 -0600
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-21 11:55 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-21 12:48 -0600
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 19:01 -0600
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 19:03 -0600
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:05 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:15 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:02 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 21:18 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 04:50 -0500
csiph-web