Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #657985
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI |
| Date | Sun, 13 Oct 2024 14:15:41 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Lines | 39 |
| Message-ID | <670C387D.400E@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <092811508d125e2f370c13560eae1630@www.novabbs.com> <670604F7.49AB@ix.netcom.com> <6707F0C7.2200@ix.netcom.com> <29e11f28-1661-a1cf-f61a-92ea9d2e7816@ichigo.kinoko.kuri> <0304990b90ab98c7a34160dd2d5a935e@www.novabbs.com> <7c66510a-4c1d-b47d-adf6-437bab958182@ichigo.kinoko.kuri> <0e49e32633d279ad270abf3e5e6ae6dc@www.novabbs.com> <55ac82a1-6767-1f41-f2c2-a4b9ecb979a7@ichigo.kinoko.kuri> <222975cc46993f87d73ec6826058db55@www.novabbs.com> <670B5D9B.51AA@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Sun, 13 Oct 2024 23:15:33 +0200 (CEST) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="9c519665e9e1f7833efacf54c39c29e3"; logging-data="882490"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+nB2RM3G5O0ge9XIYc3z/I82r6YdpPWjo=" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:i33bs26nO3oRsho6u13x4Tee2gI= |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| X-Antivirus | Avast (VPS 241013-4, 10/13/2024), Outbound message |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:657985 sci.physics:889614 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
The Starmaker wrote: > > Bertietaylor wrote: > > > > So facts are that EVs are flammable and rockets pollute the upper > > atmosphere causing greenhouse effects. And Musk is behind both these > > pollutions. > > are you tryin to say > Musk > that is just a > chemical, a > collection of molecues > on the surface of the earth > > is the cause of...global warming???? > > is the cause of the > magentic north pole movement away > from the north pole? > > Musk is making bees fly west? > How about...atomic bombs? Does dat make holes on the upper atmosphere causing greenhouse effects? (nevermind wat it does to people...kill those chinks) -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2024-10-09 03:25 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-08 21:22 -0700
Fahrenheit 451 (Was: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-10-09 08:40 +0200
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-10 08:20 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-10 08:25 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-11 09:52 +0200
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-11 12:30 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-11 08:46 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-11 11:20 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-11 10:05 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 06:52 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 09:47 +0200
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 09:27 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-12 13:45 +0200
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Bertietaylor @novabbs.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-12 08:09 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 09:27 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-12 11:38 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 11:59 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-12 20:43 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI kazu <f00@0f0.00f> - 2024-10-12 21:35 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-13 00:35 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-12 17:58 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-13 01:25 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2024-10-12 19:34 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-13 08:20 +0200
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-13 07:07 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-13 08:20 +0200
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-12 22:41 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-13 14:15 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-09 17:18 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) - 2024-10-11 09:37 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Bertietaylor @novabbs.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-11 10:55 +0000
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-11 09:37 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-12 09:02 +0200
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-17 11:26 -0700
Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI Aether Regained <AetherRegaind@somewhere.in.the.aether> - 2024-10-11 12:17 +0000
csiph-web